Perspectives from two UK institutions Stephen Town University of York, UK LibQUAL+ Exchange Florence, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LibQUAL+ ® : The UK and Irish Experience Selena Killick Library Quality Officer, Cranfield University J. Stephen Town Director of Information, The University.
Advertisements

LibQUAL+ in the local context: results, action and evaluation Selena Lock & Stephen Town Cranfield University 6th Northumbria International Conference.
The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
1 What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Years of CUL LibQUAL Data Liane O’Brien, Linda Miller, Xin Li May 21, 2008.
Reading Rodski: User Surveys Revisited The 25 th IATUL Annual Conference Krakow 2004 Dr. Grace Saw University of Queensland Cybrary Brisbane, Australia.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Bound for Disappointment Faculty and Journals at Research Institutions Jim Self University of Virginia Library USA 7 th Northumbria Conference Spier, South.
Library Service Quality Survey Results Yeo Pin Pin Li Ka Shing Library April 2013.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
Origins SERVQUAL IS SERVQUAL LibQual+. Theoretical Model Define services from the end user point of view Understand that end user expectations are shifting.
California State University Northridge Oviatt Library Service Assessment, Spring 2007 Summary Results Kathy Dabbour September 27, 2007.
Presentation to Council 28 th November Summary Personal introduction Evidence and context The Library & Archives vision & strategy Progress and.
1 Wymagania informacyjne uzytkownikow bibliotek akademickich 21 wieku Maria Anna Jankowska University of Idaho Library Biblioteki XXI wieku. Czy przetrwamy?
TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.
Library User Studies Hsin-liang Chen SLIS, Indiana University.
LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively 23 rd June 2008 Dr Darien Rossiter.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
LibQUAL Tales from Past Participants Vanderbilt University Library Flo Wilson, Deputy University Librarian
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Selena Killick ARL/SCONUL LibQUAL+ Administrator Cranfield University Introduction to LibQUAL+
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2008 LIBQUAL RESULTS. Number of Respondents UAAAPU Undergraduate1,388 Graduate267 Faculty233 Library Staff33 Staff157 Total2,078.
The votes are in! What next? Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
WVU Libraries LibQual Surveys 2003, 2005, 2007 “ The WVU library system is outstanding. I honestly cannot think of anything that needs improvement within.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
LibQUAL+ at Cranfield University Selena Lock LibQUAL+ International Results Meeting 17 th July 2006.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results American Library Association (ALA) Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 14, 2008 Martha Kyrillidou, Director Statistics.
Testing the LibQUAL+ Survey Instrument James Shedlock, AMLS, Dir. Linda Walton, MLS, Assoc. Dir. Galter Health Sciences Library Northwestern University.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
LIBQUAL+ and Library Summit: The Clemson Experience.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2011 LIBQUAL RESULTS APU Faculty Assembly – February 15, 2012.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
ARL and SCONUL Assessment Initiatives: Synergies and Opportunities Stephen Town University of York, UK LibQUAL+ Exchange Florence, 2009.
After the Academy Selena Lock LibQUAL+ Results Meeting 22nd August 2005.
Effectively utilising LibQUAL+ data J. Stephen Town.
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library ALA Conference Washington DC June 25, 2007.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
June 25, 2007 ALA Washington, DC Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College Using Your LibQUAL+ Results Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
Joined up Thinking: Integrating eLearning with QA and Enhancement Emma Rose: Teaching and Learning Office Linda Irish: eLearning Team Cath Dyson : eLearning.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
Columbia University. Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions.
Texas State University LibQUAL Survey 2015 Core Survey Section IC 1-8 Information Control Ray Uzwyshyn Director, Collections and Digital Services Texas.
Library Satisfaction Survey Results Spring 2008 LibQUAL Survey Analysis User Focus Team (Sharon, Mickey, Joyce, Joan C., Paula, Edith, Mark) Sidney Silverman.
LibQual at UAB Lister Hill Library Pat Higginbottom Associate Director for Public Services
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
LibQUAL 2005 at London South Bank and a Lincolnshire man in Chicago.
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Leeds University Library LibQUAL+ at Leeds - one year on Pippa Jones Head of Customer Services, Leeds University Library.
TM Project web site Presented by Colleen Cook June 26, 2004 Orlando, FL ALA.
Focus on SCONUL Institutions: Cranfield University – DCMT Campus Stephen Town.
LibQUAL + ™ 2004 Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2004 survey with comparisons to past surveys.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics and Service Quality Programs Association of Research.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
How to participate LibQUAL+
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
International Results Meeting LibQUAL+TM
LibQUAL+® 2008 A summary of results from the Consortium of Church Libraries and Archives.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
Reading Radar Charts.
Using LibQUAL+® as a Foundation for the Library’s Support of
LibQUAL+® Survey Results
Presentation transcript:

Perspectives from two UK institutions Stephen Town University of York, UK LibQUAL+ Exchange Florence, 2009

Outline LibQUAL+ and culture LibQUAL+ at Cranfield LibQUAL+ at York

Key issues for engagement & action Basic assumptions –Don’t ask questions you don’t want to know the answer to –Don’t waste time seeking data on things you aren’t going to fix Minimum cultural requirements –Willingness to listen –Ability to understand the data –Permission to act –Structure for action –Methodology for action

Cranfield University

Context and culture DCMT Library part of a contract for education between University & UK MoD Quality paramount Management & leadership education Formal quality initiative since 1993 Performance culture (and skills) Supportive leadership and culture

Further analysis conducted at Cranfield Campus library results –Results notebook recreated for each campus library Results by discipline Comparisons between PhD and Masters students Exploring specific issues Detailed analysis of comments (time consuming++) Longitudinal analysis Internal benchmarking External benchmarking –SCONUL & ARL average –Peer-to-peer

Overall CU Results 2007

Two Campus Results from CU, 2007

DCMT Results 2007 IDQuestion Text Superiority Mean Desired Rank IC-1Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office IC-4The electronic information resources I need IC-2A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own IC-8Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work IC-6Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own IC-3The printed library materials I need for my work LP-1Library space that inspires study and learning LP-2Quiet space for individual work IC-5Modern equipment that lets me easily access needed information LP-4A haven for study, learning, or research IC-7Making information easily accessible for independent use AS-5Library staff who have the knowledge to answer user questions AS-9Dependability in handling users' service problems

DCMT Results 2007 IDQuestion Text Superiority Mean Desired Rank LP-3A comfortable and inviting location AS-1Library staff who instill confidence in users LP-5Space for group learning and group study AS-7Library staff who understand the needs of their users AS-4Readiness to respond to users' enquiries AS-8Willingness to help users AS-6Library staff who deal with users in a caring fashion AS-3Library staff who are consistently courteous AS-2Giving users individual attention

Computer Science Business & Management

Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office

Comments Comments received overall Results grouped by topic Topics standardised year-on-year Catalogued by: –Dimension –Discipline –User group (Undergrad / Postgrad etc.) –Sex –Age

Comment Analysis

Highlighting Issues The only element that needs some work is the ability to interrogate library resources from remote desktops. Postgraduate Computing & Information Technology DCMT Library Male Full-time The new web page of the library (electronic access to various journals) is not as good or as easy to use as before. Academic Staff Electrical Engineering DCMT Library Male Does not apply / NA

Year-on-Year Change

Changes over the years

Internal Benchmarking

External Benchmarking

Peer-to-Peer Benchmarking

Actions: Electronic Developments Information skills training Information Literacy outcomes received the lowest score in the 2003 survey Action: New Information Literacy project to provide software based tutorial to help students with IL, specifically to aid our distance learners Access to electronic resources Our Web site and providing electronic access to resources were seen as major opportunities for improvement Action: Developing a new library Web site, replacing 6 static html pages with a portal.

New Web Site From:To:

Results of Actions – Information Literacy QuestionMean+/ The library helps me stay abreast of developments in my field(s) of interest The library aids my advancement in my academic discipline The library enables me to be more efficient in my academic pursuits The library helps me distinguish between trustworthy and untrustworthy information The library provides me with the information skills I need in my work or study

Results of Actions – Access to electronic resources QuestionSuperiority+/ Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own

University of York

Context and culture Large traditional Library Broad and flat University structure Progressive and excellent institution, but cautious SCONUL survey every two years Strong project management, but bureaucratic, hierarchic style with concerns about change

Summary of results 990 responses (20% response rate) 560 = UG 253 = PG 110 = academic staff Largest % from History, English, Language and Linguistics and Politics.

Radar Graph: University of York

Zones of Tolerance

Benchmarking York is generally lowest or 2 nd lowest across all aspects against seven chosen comparators (3 UK; 4 US) Lowest in the group on information literacy Results for academic staff are the worst in the group

Comparisons with 2004 results Most significant improvements on: –Space for group study and group learning –Readiness to respond to user enquiries –Giving users individual attention Most significant decline on: –Quiet space –Haven for study and learning –Printed library materials Slight improvements on information literacy outcomes and general satisfaction

Undergraduate radar graph

Postgraduate radar graph

Academic radar graph

Comparison across user groups

Electronics – radar graph

Electronics – zones of tolerance

History – radar graph

History – zones of tolerance

Politics – radar graph

Politics – zones of tolerance

Comments on Information Control “The libcat website is difficult to find usable information. Frequently it returns results that are blatantly incorrect, and others that don't match the title I'm searching for.” (Computer Science) “Access to online journals is difficult, needing to go through Athens and various portals to gain access, and not all journal resources are available. Making this available to off-campus users would be beneficial. (Considering my course length is 5 years, and I only have easy access to the library in my first year being on campus. While I've been off-campus for the majority of my course it makes using the library difficult. Most journals require access from the campus network, and this is problematic).” (Computer Science)

Comments on Library as Place “It’s often noisy and its an uninspiring location that doesn’t make me want to remain in the Library to study” (Medieval Studies) “There are areas of the library that are far too noisy. Often, it is only a few selfish students that cause the problem. Generally the RBL is reasonable. However there is a problem when groups of students work together on one table. I am aware that there are facilities for group study. However this seems to be ignored by students” (Law)

Overview – all users Areas of greatest weakness: –Printed library materials –Electronic information resources –Print and/or electronic journals –Library space that inspires study and learning –Quiet space –Haven for study, learning or research Areas of greatest strength: –Courteous staff –Readiness to respond to user enquiries. Undergraduates are generally happier with the service than postgraduates and academics.

Action plan Information content provision –Information Needs capital: key texts, backfiles –DLPs, academic liaison & marketing of resources –Process review –Opening hours –Web site & virtual library Library as Place –Open zone & zoning –Longer term: refurbishment & CS building Service –Greater consistency –Culture development –Leadership and management training & development

University of York LibQUAL to 2009 trends Superiority mean scores improved across all but one of the 22 core and 5 local questions The other item remained constant Discipline adequacy scores improved in all but six cases Information control overall adequacy score moved from negative to positive Substantial improvements in convenient service hours and online course support items (the latter also out of the red)

Engaging stakeholders

Conclusions Communication Comprehensive approach to stakeholder interests –engage all levels and external agents in actions Competent programme, project and change management methods Cultural development mechanisms –Measures & direction –Values coherence –Boundary reduction

J. Stephen Town Director of Information & University Librarian University of York, UK