Monica L. Heller & Jerrell C. Cassady Ball State University, Muncie, IN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Student Progression Study 2002 Update: Floridas Public High School Graduates Seven Years Later.
Advertisements

Mobility, Time to Degree, and Institutional Practices: Towards a New Conceptual Model of Undergraduate Retention for Underrepresented Students Lucy Arellano,
The First Generation Student: Barriers and Strategies for Success
RETENTION(N): DOING THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND EXPECTING DIFFERENT RESULTS (INSANITY)
A Helpseeking Profile of International Students. Elizabeth A. Klingaman Cristina M. Risco William E. Sedlacek The University of Maryland
Vinetta C. Jones, Ph.D. Howard University QEM—Baltimore, Maryland September 20, 2013.
Academic Success Center (313) Self-Regulated Learning and Its Role in Tutoring Jan Collins Eaglin and Laura Woodward Tutoring Institute Academic.
Neag School of Education Using Social Cognitive Theory to Predict Students’ Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Online Courses Anthony R. Artino,
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. 1 CHAPTER 5 Sociocultural Diversity.
1 Examining the role of Self-Regulated Learning on Introductory Programming Performance Susan Bergin, Ronan Reilly and Des Traynor Department of Computer.
First Generation College Students Dr. Stephanie Reyes-Tuccio Director, Center for Educational Partnerships.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
WSU Tutor Institute 4/13/06 Promoting Academic Achievement: The Will and Skill of College Success Stuart A. Karabenick University of Michigan Combined.
Neag School of Education Task Value, Self-Efficacy, and Experience: Predicting Military Students’ Attitudes Toward Self-Paced, Online Learning Anthony.
Alcohol Consumption Past 90-day drinking was assessed with self-report items measuring typical quantity of alcohol consumption, drinking frequency, and.
Giovanni Sosa, Ph.D. Chaffey College RP Conference 2013.
ENGAGE Your Students! ENGAGE Your Students! April Hansen ACT Client Relations In College and Career Readiness.
The Targeted Reading Intervention: How Early Reading Intervention for Rural Kindergarten and First-Grade Students Affects Teachers’ Ratings of Students’
Elizabeth C. Rodriguez Jessica Pettyjohn Chapter 11 Week 10.
1 MSP-Motivation Assessment Program (MSP-MAP) Tools for the Evaluation of Motivation-Related Outcomes of Math and Science Instruction Martin Maehr
Hardiness and Psychological Well-Being in College Students
A comparison of barriers to physical activity faced by older and younger adults with mobility impairments Vijay Vasudevan,
KBauer IFST 689 Students in American Higher Education Karen Bauer IFST 689.
Think. Learn. Succeed. Self-Regulation and Academic Achievement Among Employed College Students: Does Cutting Back on Number of Work Hours Help? Faye Huie,
Motivation and Among Working Faye George Mason. Self-Regulation College Students Huie University.
Exploring the Relationships Among College Students’ Goal Orientations, Perfectionism, and Academic Self-Efficacy Hannah Geis and Brittany Weber, Faculty.
Profile of an Engineering Education and Professions Introduction to Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas-Pan American College of Science and.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Jennifer P. Hodges, Ph.D. Bucking the Trend: Balancing Work, Family, Commuting, and Academics.
TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE Achieving the Dream Fall 2009 Student Focus Groups © 2010 Tulsa Community College Data Team.
Students with Learning Disabilities Adolescents and Adults with Learning Disabilities.
Tracking Pathways to Success Identifying Learning Success Factors Across Course Delivery Formats Peter Usinger, State Assessment Meeting 2013.
Achievement Gap and Mindset in United States Justin Zhang 张熹 12 哲学
1 Learning Processes Task Group Miami Meeting Progress Report June 6, 2007.
GARNET: Geoscience Affective Research Network WHAT MOTIVATIONS AND LEARNING STRATEGIES DO STUDENTS BRING TO INTRODUCTORY GEOLOGY? GARNET PART 2, STUDENTS.
Evaluation of the Pedagogical Aspects of the Project.
David A. McConnell Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University Laura Katherine John This material is based upon work supported.
Applying Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in a Web-Based Instruction-An Investigation of Motivation Perception 指導教授: Chen, Ming-puu 報 告 者: Chen, Wan-Yi.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
Adviser: Ming-Puu Chen Presenter: Pei-Chi Lu van den Boom, G., Pass, F., van Merrienbore, J.J.G., & van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Medical Education Unit Leeds Institute of Medical Education will skill Workshop: Pause2Learn: developing the will.
Culture and Socio-economic status. Cultural Practices & Beliefs Individualism/Collectivism Behavior toward Authority figures Cognitive Tools Valued activities.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.
“Tell me and I forget, teach me and I remember, involve me and I learn-” Benjamin Franklin.
Implications of Holland’s Theory in College Career Counseling: A Socio-Cultural Perspective Yas Djadali Career Counselor University of California, Irvine.
1 Self-Regulation and Ability Predictors of Academic Success during College Anastasia Kitsantas, Faye Huie, and Adam Winsler George Mason University.
Training Future Scientists: Factors Predicting Underrepresented Minority Student Participation in Undergraduate Research Sylvia Hurtado, M. Kevin Eagan,
Final Report for East Carolina University
Turning the Revolving Door into the Staircase of Academic Success for Basic Skills Students NACADA October 5, 2011 Presented by:  Marti Demarest Assistant.
Social Cognitive Theory
Predicting Individual Student Attrition and Fashioning Interventions to Enhance Student Persistence and Success Dr. Thomas E. Miller University of South.
Joan M. T. Walker Long Island University and
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
CONTINUOUS ENROLLMENT BY THE NUMBERS. A 4-year Data Profile THE STUDENTS ENROLLMENT STATUS PERFORMANCE RESULTS BEST PRACTICES ENGAGEMENT.
Chapter Nine Social Cognitive Theory. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 9-2 Overview The Triadic Reciprocal Causation Model Self-Control,
Investigate the present status of Self-regulated Learning skills of University students studying in the Open & Distance Learning Environment. Vajira De.
Gabriela Garcia John Briggs. Explore whether using an assessment instrument which measures non-cognitive attributes is a predictor of student success.
The Academic Library Experiences & Information Seeking Behavior of Undergraduates Ethelene Whitmire Assistant Professor University of California – Los.
The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: Jun.
Ann BYKERK-KAUFFMAN, Ronald K. MATHENEY, Matthew NYMAN, David McCONNELL, Matthew NYMAN, David McCONNELL, Jennifer A. STEMPIEN, David A. BUDD, Lisa GILBERT,
St. Philip’s College. 17% Full-Time, 83% Part-Time 56% Female, 44% Male Ethnicity 52% Hispanic 12% African-American 30% White 34% Economically Disadvantaged.
LRC Lab’s Target Population The Underprepared Student.
Direct Practice in Social Work, 2e Scott W. Boyle Grafton H. Hull, Jr. Jannah Hurn Mather Larry Lorenzo Smith O. William Farley University of Utah, College.
Assessing Student Engagement at the Course Level Rick D. Axelson, PhD, Univ. of Iowa, Off. Consult & Research in Medical Educ. Arend Flick, PhD, Norco.
Assessing Student Engagement in the Classroom Rick D. Axelson, PhD Assistant Professor, University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine Arend Flick, PhD.
Results Reliability Consistency and stability of cluster solution across different samples In both years, three distinct cluster groups identified thus.
Investigate the present status of Self-regulated Learning skills of University students studying in the Open & Distance Learning Environment. Vajira De.
Academic Self-Regulation
Learning online: Motivated to Self-Regulate?
Presentation transcript:

Monica L. Heller & Jerrell C. Cassady Ball State University, Muncie, IN

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011  Attrition Rates in U.S. Higher Education after 1 st year: ▪ 4 -year public institutions: 35% ▪ 2 -year public institutions: 45%  Graduation Rates in U.S. Higher Education*: 4 -year public institutions: 36 % 2 -year public institutions: 23 % *5 years for 4-year degree; 3 years for 2-year degree (ACT, 2013)

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011 ACHIEVEMENT

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011 ▫ Environmental Factors ▫ Environmental Factors: ▫ SES of student, parental-education level ▫ School type ( 2 -year vs. 4 -year) ▫ SES at the school level ▫ Social and institutional engagement, available resources ▫ Social Barriers (e.g., transportation, employment, family responsibilities)

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011 ▫ Personal Factors: ▫ Motivation ▫ Intrinsic ▫ Extrinsic ▫ Value-beliefs toward tasks ▫ Self-Efficacy ▫ Academic-Related Anxieties ▫ Test Anxiety ▫ General forms of Academic Anxiety

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011 ▫ Behavioral Factors ▫ Cognitive/Metacognitive Learning Strategies ▫ Rehearsal ▫ Elaboration ▫ Critical Thinking ▫ Organization ▫ Self-Regulation ▫ Resource Management Learning Strategies ▫ Management of time & study environment ▫ Effort Regulation ▫ Seeking help from and interacting with others

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011  Low income / SES  First- Generation  Ethnic Minority  Non-traditional  Part-time status  Employed full-time  Reside off campus  Academically less prepared  Reduced self-regulation skills  Less efficient study skills  Greater social barriers  Fewer resources for successful navigation of college  Lower Graduation/Persistence (American Association of Community Colleges, 2014; Community College Research Center; Wyner, 2012; Scherer & Anson, 2014)

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon What are the observed differences between community college and 4 -year university students among these factors? - Environmental Factor - Behavioral Factors - Personal Factors - Achievement outcomes 2. What are the influences of the environmental, behavioral and personal factors on achievement (i.e., GPA) in community college and 4 -year university students?

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011  728 students from 2 public, U.S. Midwestern institutions  4 -year: 317 ; 2 -year: 411 Demographics 4 -Year Institution  82 % Female  Age Range: ; M= 19.7  Ethnicity :  90% White  4 % Black  2 % Hispanic  2 % Multi-ethnic 2 -Year Institution  66 % Female  Age Range: ; M= 19.7  Ethnicity :  87% White  5 % Black  3 % Hispanic  4 % Multi-ethnic

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011  Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (Pintrich, Smith, Garcia, & McKeachie, 1991)  81 self-report items ( 15 subscales) on student motivation, anxiety & learning strategies toward their academic work  Reliability estimates for all subscales: α ≥. 70  Academic Anxiety Scale: (Cassady, 2010)  11 -item scale measuring anxiety experienced in response to academic environment & demands  Reliability estimate: α =. 87  Achievement  outcome variable :  Cumulative GPA (on 4.0 scale)

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011  Environmental Factor:  School Type (Community College, 4 -Year University)  Behavioral Factors:  Resource Management Strategies (MSLQ)  Cognitive-Metacognitive Strategies (MSLQ)  Personal Factors:  Internal Goal Orientation (motivation; MSLQ)  External Goal Orientation (motivation; MSLQ)  Control over Learning Beliefs (motivation; MSLQ)  Self-Efficacy (motivation; MSLQ)  Task Value (motivation; MSLQ)  Test Anxiety (MSLQ)  Academic Anxiety (Academic Anxiety scale)

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011  MANOVA revealed:  Multivariate effect of School Type  F (1, 717) = 30.34, p =.000, η 2 =.30  Discriminant Analysis revealed:  λ =.703, p =.000  Of the 17 variables, 3 contributed to group differences ▪ Cumulative GPA (r =.70) ▪ External Goal Orientation (motivation) (r = -.44) ▪ Academic Anxiety (r =.20)

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011  2-Year Students  4-Year Students

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011  Block 1 : School Type R 2 =.17 **  School Type (β =.41**)  Block 2 : Behavioral R 2 =.18 *  School Type (β =.43**)  Resource Management (β =.10*)  Block 3 : Personal (Motivation) R 2 =.18  School Type (β =.42**)  Resource Management (β =.10*)  Block 4 : Personal (Anxiety) R 2 =.19  School Type (β =.41**)  Resource Management (β =.11*)  Test Anxiety (β =.09*)

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011 Regression Model Regression Model2-Year (n=411) 4-Year (n=317) Block 1: Behavioral Factors R 2 =.01 Resource Management β =.13 β =.12 Cognitive Metacognitive SR β = -.03 β = -.05

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011 Regression Model Regression Model2-Year (n=411) 4-Year (n=317) Block 2: Personal Factors (Motivation) R 2 =.02 R 2 =.09** Resource Management β =.12 β =.06 Cognitive Metacognitive SR β = -.07 β =.05 Control over Learning Beliefs β =.06 β = -.04 External Goal Orientation β =.03 β = -.21** Internal Goal Orientation β = -.01 β = -.02 Self-Efficacy β = -.05 β =.34** Task Value β =.06 β = -.18*

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011 Regression Model Regression Model2-Year (n=411) 4-Year (n=317) Block 3: Personal Factors (Anxiety) R 2 =.04 R 2 =.13** Resource Management β =.18 ** β =.00 Cognitive Metacognitive SR β = -.11 β =.09 Control over Learning Beliefs β =.03 β = -.04 External Goal Orientation β = -.05 β = -.14* Internal Goal Orientation β = -.01 β =.01 Self-Efficacy β =.08 β =.22* Task Value β =.04 β = -.18* Academic Anxiety β =.09 β = -.24** Test Anxiety β =.11 β = -.00

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011  “One Size Fits All” approach not appropriate  Targeted approaches for orientation, freshman success courses, advising, and interventions  Social context & barriers; Institutional resources  Study & learning strategies  Motivation  Academic-related anxieties

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011 ACHIEVEMENT

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011  “One Size Fits All” approach not appropriate  Targeted approaches for orientation, freshman success courses, advising, and interventions  Social context & barriers; Institutional resources  Study & learning strategies  Motivation  Academic-related anxieties

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2011 Monica L. Heller: Jerrell C. Cassady: Center for Technology in Education Research Design Studio