Panel Discussion Electronic Exchange of Student Transcripts (Session T 4.8) SACRAO 66 th Annual Meeting Tuesday, February 5, 2013 3:00 pm – 4:00 pm.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SBR in SuperStream John McAlister Standard Business Reporting March 2011.
Advertisements

EDI – an overview Linda SatherCheryl Kolbe Oregon State UniversityConsultant Office of the Registrar.
Preferred by Students ►24/7 online access ►Easy ordering and tracking ► delivery confirmation Online Ordering and Delivery Service.
XML Format for the High School Transcript NCES Data Conference July 26, 2006 Washington, DC John “Tom” Stewart Former College Registrar Bruce Marton University.
OPI’s K20 Data Project Montana Electronic Transcript Initiative Available Spring 2015 Free Certified Transcripts!
E T SMU’S PARTNERSHIP WITH NSC FOR ELECTRONIC TRANSCRIPTS JOHN HALL UNIVERSITY REGISTRAR & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF ENROLLMENT SERVICES Southern Methodist.
CANHEIT 2012 Introducing PESC – Postsecondary Electronic Standards Council Building the Digital University Brian Patton – Manager, Application Systems.
University of Colorado Boulder The Game of Operations.
The Latest in the Exchange of PDF Transcripts Presented by: Bobby (Butch) Stokes, University Registrar Mississippi State University Tuesday, February 14,
Importing Transfer Equivalencies: How to Maximize Efficiency How Columbia College Office of Registrar improved productivity through third party solutions.
$how Me the Money Cost Benefits of Electronic Exchange of Student Transcripts SACRAO Conference 2015 American Association of Collegiate Registrars and.
A Standards Based Data Exchange Network Jeff Alderson, Director of Pre-Sales Solutions April 8, 2009.
Asper School of Business University of Manitoba Systems Analysis & Design Instructor: Bob Travica System interfaces Updated: November 2014.
Philips Research France Delivery Context in MPEG-21 Sylvain Devillers Philips Research France Anthony Vetro Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories.
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)
1 The Functional to Technical Overview of Implementing Electronic Data Exchange Date: Tuesday July 16, :15 am - 10:30 pm Salon 1 Session ID: 1556.
Iowa Transcript Center File Format Validation Process.
DIY eTranscripts: A Guide to Building your own Electronic Transcript and Certified Document Solution Kristin Schuette Associate Registrar for Technology.
Proprietary and Confidential Preferred by Students ►24/7 online access ►Easy ordering and tracking ► delivery confirmation Online Ordering and Delivery.
Proprietary and Confidential 1. College Registration 2. College as Receiver 3. College as Sender Postsecondary Demonstrations.
1 Panel on State K-16 and P-20 Initiatives Indiana eTranscript Initiative SHEEO Professional Development Conference August 15, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts.
Tools to Successfully Implement Electronic Transcript Exchange American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers Monday February 2.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 4.1.
1 The Functional to Technical Overview of Implementing Electronic Data Exchange Date: Sunday, February 1, :00-3:00 pm 201D Session ID: S1.05 Jerald.
2 Session # 50 Presented by: Russell Judd Chief Industry and Government Relations Officer Great Lakes Educational Loan Services Michael Sessa Executive.
1 DC eTranscripts software overview and intended use.
1 The Functional to Technical Overview of Implementing Electronic Data Exchange Date: Thursday, July 17, :00-11:00 am Parlor GH Session 4F Jerald.
XML Working Group Joan Ugljesa NDIA PMSC April,
1 CommonLine and the Common Record: The Building of Convergence Kim Shiflette, USA Funds Bob King, Citibank Student Loans Session 34.
XML High School Transcript 3 rd Annual Conference on Technology and Standards May Washington DC Bruce Marton University of Texas at Austin.
PDF Transcripts What does “PDF Transcript” mean? Portable Document Format - Originally developed by Adobe Systems, PDF is a file format that preserves.
Articulation and Transfer Clearinghouse Update December 5, 2006.
FERPA Concerns for Sending and Honoring Electronic Requests for Student Transcripts SACRAO 2012 Tuesday, February 14 Covington, Kentucky SPEEDE – A Professional.
XML & EDI - What’s the Difference? Postsecondary Electronic Standards Council Alexandria, VA May 8, 2003 Tom Stewart Miami-Dade Community College (FL)
2012 MIS Conference. The Butterfly Effect and the Iowa Transcript Center Jay Pennington Carla Schimelfenig Iowa Department of Education Jessica Bleak.
John O’Connell SVP, Business Development Company Overview & Service Offerings.
1. Initiative Overview Parchment Overview Parchment Send Benefits Student Request Process Parchment Send Process Steps to Getting Your School Live Contact.
Digitally Signed Transcripts Department of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin – Eau Claire Student Researcher: Kevin M. Spinar
EDI communication system
MED INF HIT Integration, Interoperability & Standards ASTM E-31 January 14, 2010 By Imran Khan.
Proprietary and Confidential 1. College Registration 2. College as Receiver 3. College as Sender.
XML in Higher Education Bruce Marton, The University of Texas at Austin Student Information Systems.
Mapping Your Future ® : Supporting Standards Presented by: Al Walser Senior Programmer Analyst.
PESC Annual Conference, May, 2003 XML Postsecondary Transcript Bruce Marton, The University of Texas at Austin Student Information Systems.
Common Record Update Holly A. Hyland, FSA Kim Shiflette, NCHELP.
INTERNET EDI SERVER Bruce Marton Sr. Systems Analyst The University of Texas at Austin.
More from the SPEEDE Committee Clare Smith-Larson, Chair AACRAO SPEEDE Committee.
AUSTIN INTERNET SERVER Bruce Marton Sr. Systems Analyst The University of Texas at Austin.
Put Some Wind in Your Sails: Tools to Successfully Implement Electronic Transcript Exchange AACRAO Technology Conference 2012 American Association of Collegiate.
CommonRecord: CommonLine Implementation Gary Allen David Steiner.
NASFAA 2003: Reconnecting With Students!. 2 The Common Record - COD An Update on COD and XML.
Common Record Paving the Way for Electronic Standards in Higher Education Common Record – COD Common Record – CommonLine Common Record – ISIR Collaboration.
Making the Case for eTranscript California Benefits & Savings of Electronic Transcripts Sponsored by the CCC Technology Center and eTranscript California.
Postage Statement Wizard Mail.dat Web Services Presented by: (insert name here) The 1, 2, 3 of Electronic Postage Documentation.
CCCTran Technical Implementation for IT CCCApply / CCCTran User Workshops March/April, 2008 Skyline and Pasadena Colleges Richard Oberlin IT Project Leader.
CCCTran Electronic Transcripts for California HECCC Meeting Oct 8, 2007 Tim Calhoon Lenny Robison Terry Cataline.
Presented by: Shadd Schutte, WISE Project Manager, Wyoming Department of Education And Alex Jackl, Chief Architect, ESP Solutions Group 1+1=3 How Wyoming.
‘CCCTran’ Electronic Transcripts for California’s Students CISOA Conference 2007 March 27, 2007.
Texas Education Agency ApplyTexas/SPEEDE Conference June 2016.
Chapter 8 Environments, Alternatives, and Decisions.
A project of the PESC Common Data Services (CDS) Task Force
Tuan Anh Do San Francisco State University Jeff Elliott
Presented By: Prof. D.W.Chadwick Other Author: D.Mundy
Date: Tuesday, July 11, :00 – 9:00 am Bayside A Session ID: 6630
PDF Transcripts Recommendations & Best Practices
PDF Transcripts Recommendations & Best Practices
Academic Achievement Record
Mapping Your Future®: Supporting Standards
EDI – an overview Linda Sather Cheryl Kolbe
Immediate Past Chair, SPEEDE Committee
Presentation transcript:

Panel Discussion Electronic Exchange of Student Transcripts (Session T 4.8) SACRAO 66 th Annual Meeting Tuesday, February 5, :00 pm – 4:00 pm

Richard D. Skeel, Kuali Student, Honorary SACRAO Member. David H. Stones, Retired University Registrar, Honorary SACRAO Member, Slides prepared by J. Tom Stewart, Retired Miami-Dade Registrar, Honorary SACRAO Member,

Agenda A brief history and considerations of various methods of electronic transcript exchange to include: EDI Transcripts XML Transcripts PDF Transcripts Q & Q

EDI History The AACRAO Standardization of Postsecondary Education Electronic Data Exchange (SPEEDE) Committee began developing the national standard for a College Transcript in 1989 US Department of Education’s National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) began developing a national standard for a High School Transcript during same timeframe Both groups worked with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Accredited Standards Committee (ASC) X12 to develop standard formats ANSI ASC X12 Transaction Set 130 for the Student Educational Record (Transcript) approved in early ’90’s Goal to transmit data with the least amount of characters necessary

Sample SES (Session), SUM (Sem Summary), 2 CRS (Course) segments SES|201008|||2|Fall 2010|D8| |D8| |21|73|249999|Concurre nt/Not Designated|B27~ SUM|S|U|N|6.0000|6.0000|6.0000|0.00|4.00|3.50|N||||||| ~ CRS|R|S|3.0000|3.0000|025|A||U|||| ||ENG|131|Rh etoric & Composition~ RAP|9TX|TXCORECURR|010Communication I|A|Y~ CRS|R|S|3.0000|3.0000|025|B||U|||| ||HIS|134|U.S. History, 1877-Present~ RAP|9TX|TXCORECURR|060History|A|Y~

EDI Process Benefits Standards are consistent Resources are available Processes can be batched and automated Large volume of current institutions using standard State and district initiatives Sender and receiver are identified Automated acknowledgments of both delivery and receipt possible Transmission through SPEEDE Server benefits trading partners Costs decrease SPEEDE delivery

EDI Institutional Considerations Capabilities of the organization IT resources available Interest level of senior management Compatibility with SIS Cost/benefit analysis In house vs. vendor sponsored solution Efficiency gains Strategic goals Preferred trading partner methodologies

EDI Process Considerations Technical complexity limits some institutions Need for translation software or SIS compatibility to recognize full benefits Data mapping can be cumbersome Perception of complexity or lack of IT resources ANSI ASC X12A Education sub-committee inactive since 2005 Devil is in the details, but it’s only done once

EDI Numbers UT Server, December transactions (minus 2416 XML). 104,145 transcripts UT Server, January, ,293 transactions 137,108 transcripts, 148,171 acknowledgments, 9121 test score reports, transcr. Requests, adm apps, SACRAO States Send Jan ‘13: AL(5),AR(lots),FL(lots), NC (acks), SC(800+), TN, TX(lots), VA (2300, 3 sch) Since 1984: 9,800,000 transcripts, 35,000,000 transactions – delivered at no cost to senders, recips

More Research EDI Primer – Published by AACRAO SPEEDE RIPS Document – Recommended Impl.Practices for SPEEDE. On AACRAO SPEEDE page. Implementation Guides – PESC and AACRAO/SPEEDE AACRAO Technology Conf, July 2013 TX SPEEDE UG June 17, 2013.

What is XML ? XML stands for Extensible Markup Language XML is a markup language much like HTML XML was designed to carry data, not to display data XML is designed to be self-descriptive

XML High School Transcript Schema

XML Example Kristen Young - Female

Key Benefits of XML Content identification Enforced structure International standard Industry standardization

Additional XML Benefits It supports Unicode, allowing almost any information in any written human language to be communicatedUnicode Format uses English and less abbreviations making it less technical to read than EDI format It can be updated incrementally It is platform-independent, thus relatively immune to changes in technology Forward and backward compatibility are relatively easy to maintain despite changes in Schema Compatible with SEVIS, IPEDS and NCATE (for teachers) XML preferred by IT because it is a format they are familiar with

XML Considerations XML syntax is large relative to EDI (binary) representations of similar data This results in higher storage, transmission and processing costs Example 2K EDI = 30K XML (compression available in MS Office) XML syntax is verbose, especially for human readers, relative to other alternative 'text-based' data Number of tags = more to sift through to determine what you need for your SIS as a receiver

XML Numbers UT Server, December transcripts. AZ: Pima CC  UA 464 NM: Central NM CC  > UNM 622 TN: 12 senders 301 UT Server, January 2013, 2416 transcripts. AZ: Pima  UA 1406 IA: UIowa  National Transcript Center 47 MO: Missouri Western State  Metrop CC 22 NM: CNM  > UNM 792 TN: 10 senders, 149 TX: National Transcript Center  UIowa 25

PDF History Portable Document Format (PDF) Created by Adobe Systems 15+ years ago Electronic image vs. electronic data Secure PDF signed and certified as authentic Extract a dataset from sending institution and spool to PDF document Encryption/Decryption sender and receiver keys Sign/Verify relies on digital certificates of authenticity

PDF Transcripts Benefits Can be sent to any computer anywhere; not just to another school Far more secure than mail Less opportunity for fraud Faster delivery and easy for human to print or view Low cost Fast implementation Easier batching abilities Considerations Upload of data to SIS more difficult Out of Network delivery possible – no prior commucation required. Really just a picture – not data. Longevity Different philosophies on appropriateness of expiration Multiple transmission methodologies Vendor differences Varying cost models for senders/receivers Closed networks

AACRAO White Paper Committee Report on Electronic Transcripts, Past Present and Future. College & University, Vol. 87, No. 2, Fall 2011 Available at EDI/XML and pdf have different niches Some combination may be best. EDI/XML for high volume with one or more schools Pdf for delivery of small n to broad range of recipients, or to student.

PDF Vendors at SACRAO Credentials Scrip-Safe National Student Clearinghouse Parchment (formerly Avow + Docufide + ?) Others?CollegeNet?

Questions Additional Resources AACRAO/committees/speede.aspx# pesc.org

This presentation was brought to you by the AACRAO SPEEDE Committee aacrao.org/speede SPEEDE – A Professional Development Committee of AACRAO American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers