Gretchen Everhart School School Improvement Plan Public Hearing Public Hearing September 13, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Individual Professional Development Planning for Teachers
Advertisements

Question 8 Virginia Department of Education 8. Does the IEP consider the strengths, interests, preferences, and needs of the student? (34 C.F.R §300.43(a)(2)
A Study of State and Local Implementation and Impact The Study of State and Local Implementation and Impact of the Individuals with Disabilities Education.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Stuart Kerachsky Acting Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics October 14, 2009 EMBARGOED until October 14, :00 a.m. E.D.T.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
1 Citrus County 21 st CCLC Progress Report Larry Parman External Evaluator.
Data Analysis Training PDP Goals & Strategies September, 2012.
Gretchen Everhart School School Improvement Plan Public Hearing September 10, 2007.
Gretchen Everhart School School Improvement Plan Public Hearing Public Hearing September 11, 2012.
Gretchen Everhart School School Improvement Plan Public Hearing Public Hearing September 19, 2013.
SBA to GLE: The Road Les Morse, Director Assessment & Accountability Alaska Department of Education & Early Development No Child Left Behind Winter Conference.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
You will need some paper!
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
0 - 0.
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY Title I For additional information contact the school at
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
ZMQS ZMQS
1 FAA Florida Alternate Assessment Karen Schafer Office of Testing and Accountability Brevard Public Schools.
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
1 SESSION 5- RECORDING AND REPORTING IN GRADES R-12 Computer Applications Technology Information Technology.
Special Education Survey Barnstable Public Schools September 17 – October 2, 2012.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
Changes in Student Assessment and School Accountability A-1.
ABC Technology Project
2 |SharePoint Saturday New York City
VOORBLAD.
Middle School 8 period day. Rationale Low performing academic scores on Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) - specifically in mathematics.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Making Data Work for Kids: EVAAS Teacher Reports October 2012 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
High School School Performance Framework (SPF)
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
District Advisory Council (DAC) 1 October 22, 2012 Westlawn Elementary School.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Jasper City Schools: A Look at the Numbers Dr. Martha LaCroix Jasper City Schools Administrative Retreat –
SY PIMS/Educator Effectiveness/PVAAS Teacher Specific Reporting Mini PPT for LEA Admin Use Provided by: PVAAS Statewide Team.
Timeline/Issues January to July 2012 FEPA Mid Year Work Session 2012.
1 First EMRAS II Technical Meeting IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 19–23 January 2009.
Event 4: Mental Math 7th/8th grade Math Meet ‘11.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Deana Holinka, MA, CRC, Administrative Coordinator,
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Florida School Accountability Dr. Karen Schafer Accountability and Testing Adapted from Presentation June, 2014 by Ed Croft Bureau Chief, Accountability.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.
Weekly Attendance by Class w/e 6 th September 2013.
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
Compass: Module 3 Student Growth.
School Grades Model and Historical Background
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education June 17, 2013 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator Leslie Titler, Title One Teacher.
Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Created from “Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Online at:
School Improvement Plan Guidance Presented by the School Improvement And Educational Data Warehouse.
Administrator Update January Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997 –Students with disabilities must participate in statewide assessment.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Presentation transcript:

Gretchen Everhart School School Improvement Plan Public Hearing Public Hearing September 13, 2011

School Improvement Plan Look what we have accomplished! and what we hope to accomplish!

Our SIP for The SIP is in the Differentiated School Accountability Format as mandated by the State of Florida Uses goals in: »Reading »Writing »Math »Science »Attendance »Parent Involvement and aims for improvements over last years scores

Changes in how scores were reported Students scores are in one of three levels/categories: –Emergent (1-3) –Achieved (4-6) –Commended (7-9) Most of our students are Emergent

Reading End of Year Results: 14% of Everhart students assessed in reading by the Florida Alternate Assessment (grades 3 – 10) achieved a level 4 or higher in order to attain adequate yearly progress. 80% of the students in the school made gains in reading as assessed on school wide reading assessments Next Years goal utilizing Safe Harbor 23% of Everhart students assessed in Reading by the Florida Alternate Assessment (grades 3 – 10) will achieve a level 4 or higher.

Writing End of Year Results: 4% of Everhart students assessed in writing by the Florida Alternate Assessment (grades 4, 8 & 10) achieved a level 4 or higher. 50% achieved a level 3 or higher! Next Years goal: 14% of Everhart students assessed in writing by the Florida Alternate Assessment (grades 4, 8 & 10) will achieve a level 4 or higher as evidenced by the Florida Alternate Assessment Report results.

Math End of Year Objective: 7% of Everhart students assessed in mathematics by the Florida Alternate Assessment (grades 3 – 10) achieved a level 4 or higher in order to attain adequate yearly progress. Next years goal utilizing Safe Harbor: 17% of the students tested on the FAA (grades 3-10) will achieve a level 4 or higher.

Science End of Year Results: 9% of Everhart students assessed in science by the Florida Alternate Assessment (grades 5, 8 & 10) achieved a level 4 or higher. Next years goal: 18% of Everhart students assessed in science by the Florida Alternate Assessment (grades 5, 8 & 10) will achieve a level 4 or higher as evidenced by the Florida Alternate Assessment Report results.

Florida Alternate Assessment: Takes into consideration the 3 access point levels –Participatory Level –Supported Level –Independent Level Performance Task Approach Allows students to work across levels to their fullest potential

Grades tested same as FCAT 3 rd ReadingMath th ReadingMathWriting th ReadingMath Science 6 th ReadingMath th ReadingMath th ReadingMathWritingScience 9 th ReadingMath th ReadingMathWriting th Science

When? F.A.A. Test Administration window is from: January 9 th – Feb. 24 th FCAT is: Feb. - Writing March - Reading / Math and Science

Attendance Goals Average daily attendance of students at Everhart is 88.32% –Next year: 90% or more 56% were absent for 10 days or more –Next year: 50% or less 18 students wil excessive unexcused tardies –Nest year: 15 students or less

Parent Involvement 75% of the parents will be in attendance at their childs IEP meeting Attendance at school sponsored activities will have at least 10 parents or more.

We are a part of Leon County Schools Accreditation Process Self studies involved in the process help us better determine the direction of our school and ultimately will impact our School Improvement Plan which is a critical component of continuous improvement

Vision Statement in a few words Striving for quality of life... one student... one success at a time

Comments / Ideas? Stay tuned…….. the School Advisory Council will meet: Tuesday, September 20 th 6:00 – 7:00 to approve the Plan for the year

Recruiting S.A.C. Members If you would like to serve on the School Advisory Council for Everhart We could use you! Please let one of us know! We need people to represent our diverse school population! We also need D.A.C. Representatives (District Advisory Council)

Thank You! Thank you for participating in the Public Hearing of the Gretchen Everhart School School Improvement Plan for