 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Factors affecting milk ELISA scores of cows tested for Johne’s disease H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, and T. M. Byrem 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
Advertisements

Importance of Genetic Evaluation for Structure in the US Dairy Industry October 10, 2012 Sam Comstock, Ph.D.
Linear Ben Krahn Oregon State University Dairy Research Center.
2002 Paul M. VanRaden and Ashley H. Sanders Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
John B. Cole* and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
2003 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Dairy Goat.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
2012 ADSA-AMPA-ASAS-CSAS-WSASAS joint annual meeting (1)Norman Comparison of daughter performance of New Zealand and North American sires in US herds H.D.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.
Dairy Breeds and Selection
Dairy Industry: Selection OBJECTIVES By: Mr. Weaver Identify specific traits associated with making a decision regarding dairy cattle selection. Evaluate.
G. R. Wiggans*, L. L. M. Thornton*,1, R. R. Neitzel †, and N. Gengler ‡ * Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD †
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
John B. Cole* and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
2003 G.R. Wiggans,* P.M. VanRaden, and J.L. Edwards Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
REGRESSION MODEL y ijklm = BD i + b j A j + HYS k + b dstate D l + b sstate S l + b sd (S×SD m ) + b dherd F m + b sherd G m + e ijklm, y = ME milk yield,
2007 Paul VanRaden, Mel Tooker, Jan Wright, Chuanyu Sun, and Jana Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD National Association of Animal.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Missouri Dairy Summit.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansInner.
2002 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Dairy Goat.
John B. Cole, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA The U.S. genetic.
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Overview.
Genetic correlations between first and later parity calving ease in a sire-maternal grandsire model G. R. Wiggans*, C. P. Van Tassell, J. B. Cole, and.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Selection for.
Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.
Adjustment of selection index coefficients and polygenic variance to improve regressions and reliability of genomic evaluations P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright*,
Synchronization Effects on Parameters for Days Open M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and R. H. Miller* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
Genetic interactions for heat stress and herd yield level: predicting foreign genetic merit from domestic data J. R. Wright*, P. M. VanRaden Animal Genomics.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Best prediction.
G.R. Wiggans* and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
2003 P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluations.
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
2006 H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, and C. M. B. Dematawewa 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
7 th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod Selection of dairy cattle for lifetime profit Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory.
J. B. Cole *, G. R. Wiggans, P. M. VanRaden, and R. H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
1 Dairy Cattle Production (95313, 95314) Topic 3: Characteristics of dairy cattle and dairy type traits.
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
WiggansARS Big Data Computing Workshop (1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
Dairy Cattle Selection. Dairy Cattle Selection Overview Dairy Terms and Definitions Parts of a Dairy Cow Dairy Traits and Selection.
2007 John B. Cole USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 Data Collection Ratings and Best Prediction.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
ADSA 2002 (RHM-P1) 2002 R.H. Miller, ,1 H.D. Norman, 1 and J.S. Clay 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Multibreed Genomic Evaluation Using Purebred Dairy Cattle K. M. Olson* 1 and P. M. VanRaden 2 1 Department of Dairy Science Virginia Polytechnic and State.
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
2006 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Genetic.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2001 ASAS/ADSA 2001 Conference (1) Simultaneous accounting for heterogeneity of (co)variance components in genetic evaluation of type traits N. Gengler.
2006 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (1) Trait Selection When Culling U.S. Holsteins H.D. Norman, J.L. Hutchison, J.R. Wright,
USDA Dairy Goat Genetic Evaluation Program
Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity
Improving production efficiency through genetic selection
Update on Structure EPD Development R. L. Weaber, J. Bormann, N
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Genetic Evaluation of Milking Speed for Brown Swiss Dairy Cattle
3Canadian Dairy Network, Guelph, ON Canada
Relationship of gestation length to stillbirth
Presentation transcript:

 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and net merit. Phenotypic and genetic correlation of mobility with 16 linear type traits and final score Genetic evaluation of mobility for Brown Swiss dairy cattle G. R. Wiggans 1, J. R. Wright* 1, C. J. Muenzenberger 2, and R. R. Neitzel 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Brown Swiss Cattle Breeders Association of the USA, Beloit, WI, USA Abstr. T43 INTRODUCTION  Ability of a cow to easily move about is a vital aspect to her health and production  Brown Swiss Cattle Breeders Association (BSCBA) began scoring mobility in June 2007 as a potential addition / correction to foot and leg composite  Defined as a global measure indicating the ease of movement and comfort while standing  Evaluated while the cow is walking, when possible  Scored on a scale from 50 to 99 by BSCBA appraisers  Estimate genetic parameters for mobility  Determine the relationship between mobility and linear type traits  Calculate genetic evaluations for mobility CONCLUSIONS & APPLICATIONS  Use of mobility trait evaluations may increase the accuracy of predictions of productive life by increasing the accuracy of the foot and leg composite (FLC).  PTA mobility seems to more accurately reflect ideal body structure than the current FLC since it accounts for ease of movement, flex to hock, rear leg rear view, and correct thurl placement.  Field observations of sire daughters’ feet and leg traits seem to be more consistent with PTA mobility than with FLC.  BSCBA will replace FLC with PTA mobility in the calculation of their breed index ranking (Progressive Performance Ranking; PPR) beginning August  A study conducted with 6,152 Milking Shorthorn records from 4,213 cows yielded similar results, including a h 2 of OBJECTIVES DATA & METHODS EDITS:  Appraisal scores from June 2007 to June 2011  Cow must be < 69 month old and have been scored in first or second lactation  No missing scores for final score, 16 linear traits, and mobility (variance estimation only)  After edits, 32,710 records of 19,472 cows in 819 herds VARIANCE COMPONENT MODEL:  Multi-trait analysis using canonical transformation, multiple diagonalization, and a decelerated expectation-maximation REML algorithm  Fixed effects for: herd – appraisal date (2,109 groups) appraisal age within parity (46 groups) lactation stage within parity (21 groups)  Random effects for: animal, permanent environment, residual GENETIC EVALUATION MODEL:  Multi-trait animal model with same effects as variance component estimation plus addition of herd-sire interaction effect RESULTS (cont.)RESULTSRESULTS (cont.) Distribution of mobility scores (2007 to 2011) Distribution of PTA mobility for 840 bulls with at least 1 daughter scored Mobility scor e Thousands of records M ean=83.7 Std dev=4.3 Phenotypic correlation Genetic correlation Final score Stature Strength Dairy Form Foot angle Rear leg (side view)-0.10 Body depth Rump angle Thurl width Fore udder attachment Rear udder height Rear udder width Udder depth Udder cleft Front teat placement Teat length Rear legs (rear view) M ean=0.0 Std dev=0.5 Number of bulls Milk0.41Final score0.69 Fat0.36Stature0.48 Protein0.40Strength0.24 Productive life0.31Dairy Form0.54 Somatic cell score-0.07Foot angle0.41 Protein percent-0.12Rear leg (side view)-0.13 Fat percent-0.17Body depth0.33 Net merit0.39Rump angle-0.12 Thurl width0.32 Composites:Fore udder attachment0.53 Feet / legs0.35Rear udder height0.59 Udder0.51Rear udder width0.55 Size0.43Udder depth0.37 Udder cleft0.36 Milking speed0.29Front teat placement0.43 Teat length-0.29 Rear legs (rear view)0.50 ● Correlation of PTA mobility with PTA of other traits 2012 ● Phenotypic estimated standard deviation (SD), repeatability (R) and heritability (h 2 ) for mobility, final score, and 16 linear type traits SDRh2h2 Final score Stature Strength Dairy Form Foot angle Rear leg (side view) Body depth Rump angle Thurl width Fore udder attachment Rear udder height Rear udder width Udder depth Udder cleft Front teat placement Teat length Rear legs (rear view) Mobility  Heritabilities ranged from 0.06 (rear legs rear view) to 0.37 (stature) and were similar to the values used in the present Brown Swiss type evaluation system.  Heritability of mobility was moderate (0.21), as was the repeatability (0.46).  Phenotypic SD was somewhat lower in final score and mobility than in the linear traits, likely due to difference in scoring method.  Less than 5% of mobility scores were below 75 or above 90.  Evaluated bulls with ≥1 daughter differed by as much as 3.4 points.  PTA mobility of Active AI bulls ranged from -0.7 to+1.2 (not shown).  Traits most highly correlated with mobility were final score, rear legs rear view, rear udder height and rear udder width. PTA mobility