LIGO-G040336-00-Z Detector Characterization Summary - 2004.8.19K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO-G Z Beating the spin-down limit on gravitational wave emission from the Crab pulsar Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LIGO.
Advertisements

LIGO-G W Lessons Learned From E7 at LIGO Hanford Observatory Fred Raab Daniel Sigg.
LIGO-G Z Camp orientation / overview K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction and Overview Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO Reduced Data Sets E7 standard reduced data set RDS generation for future runs decimation examples LIGO-G Z Isabel Leonor (w/ Robert Schofield)
LIGO Data Quality Monitoring Keith Riles University of Michigan.
LIGO-G Z Camp orientation / overview K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Orientation and Overview Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
Glitch Group S5 Activities LSC LSU, Baton Rouge August 15, 2006 G Z L. Blackburn, L. Cadonati, S. Chatterji, J. Dalrymple, S. Desai,
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Activities Keith.
LIGO-G Z NSF Review LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan 1 LSC Participation in Initial LIGO Detector Characterization.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization NeedsK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Needs Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 Welcome to the L-V Meeting Status of the LSC Dave Reitze University of Florida.
LIGO Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration -- UWM 1 LSC Data Analysis Alan G. Wiseman (LSC Software Coordinator) LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LSC at LHO LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 Data Analysis Summary Alan Wiseman G040xxxx-zz.
Data Quality Vetoes in LIGO S5 Searches for Gravitational Wave Transients Laura Cadonati (MIT) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
Glitch Group S5 Activities Laura Cadonati for the Glitch Working Group LSC meeting, Hanford March 21, 2006 G Z.
LIGO-G Z Detchar Introduction (8/16/06)K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 StrainBandsMon and SixtyHertzMon Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
1 Proposed Control Room Figures of Merit for Pulsar Sensitivity Keith Riles (University of Michigan) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Livingston.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Software Tools K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Status Report on CW Discriminator Work Keith.
LIGO-G Z LIGO at the start of continuous observation Prospects and Challenges Albert Lazzarini LIGO Scientific Collaboration Presentation at NSF.
LIGO-G D LSC Meeting Nov An Early Glimpse at the S3 Run Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Status of MNFTmon Soma Mukherjee +, Roberto Grosso* + University of Texas at Brownsville * University of Nuernberg, Germany LSC Detector.
S5 BNS Inspiral Update Duncan Brown Caltech LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
Jan 12, 2009LIGO-G Z1 DMT and NDS2 John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Ligo PAC, Caltech, Jan 12, 2009.
LIGO-G Z S2 and S3 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the Calibration team Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins.
LIGO-G Z Instrum. Lines and Blind CW Search K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Status Report on Instrumental Line Catalog and Blind.
1 Planning notes from August 2005 Burst Group Face-to-Face Meeting LHO, August 18, 2005 Peter Shawhan, scribe LIGO-G Z.
LSC Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 LSC Software and Other Things Alan Wiseman University of Wisconsin.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
GEO Online Detector Characterization System R. Balasubramanian Cardiff University LSC March 2003 LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z Detchar Introduction (8/16/06)K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 SixtyHertzMon Update Junyi Zhang & Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G Z DMT Status for UL Analysis K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 DMT Monitors -- Status Update for Upper Limits Analysis.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Issues K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Issues -- S2 Analysis & S3 Planning.
S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
LIGO-G Z Data Quality Segments Repository K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Data Quality Segments Repository Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Issues K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G ZRai Weiss LSC Session on Scientific Monitoring March 21, 2006 Committee formed by Peter Saulson to: Consider the value and effectiveness.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Software Tools K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to Detector Characterization Sessions.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z Introd. to Detect. Charact. Sessions K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Introduction to the Detector Characterization.
LSC at LLO LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 Report from Executive Committee Meeting Alan Wiseman G Z.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 Welcome to the Hannover L-V Meeting Status of the LSC Dave Reitze University of Florida.
S.Klimenko, LSC, Marcht 2005, G Z BurstMon diagnostic of detector noise during S4 run S.Klimenko University of Florida l burstMon FOMs l S4 run.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith.
LIGO-G Z Report on the S2 RunK. Riles / S. Whitcomb 1 Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan) Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech)
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z 1 “Welcome to the LSC meeting” Peter Saulson.
LSC Z000.0 LSC at LLO LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 LSC Software Coordinator Report Alan Wiseman University.
1 InspiralMon Duncan Brown California Institute of Technology LIGO-G Z.
All The future of DC work. GEO DC workshop June Restructuring of DC and Detector Work for many reasons the DC work was not very efficient in the.
LIGO-G05????-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
S3 Glitch Updates Laura Cadonati
WaveMon and Burst FOMs WaveMon WaveMon FOMs Summary & plans
Report on the S2 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
Planning for the S4 Run Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
Burst Figure of Merit Julien Sylvestre LSC Meeting, March 2004
Summary of LSC Data Analysis Activities: Alan Wiseman
S3 Performance of the LIGO Interferometers as Measured by SenseMonitor
LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Michigan
Booksy University Migration.
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of the Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University of Michigan) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford Observatory August 16-19, 2004

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 2 Presentations in DC Sessions Can’t do justice to all of these in this brief summary Will just try to hit the highlights Agenda Lots of interesting talks!

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 3 S4 Planning Pre-S4 engineering runs approaching fast New DMT monitors should be ready for 24/7 running at observatories in Mid-September: More reliable shakedown of monitors More guidance to commissioners on astrophysical issues (e.g, if IFO’s unacceptably glitchy, need time to find sources)  Time is running out!

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 4 Looking ahead to S4 - Scimons Making scimons more effective – discussions underway Longer shift blocks with fewer different scimons (more cost-effective for groups, allows better training; longer-term goal: more LSC students/postdocs at sites) More focus on astrophysical figures of merit More focus on data quality flagging in the control room Groups should make requests for special consideration early – to avoid later use of scimon-swaps

LIGO-G Z S4 Planning Looking ahead to S4 Analysis Feedback First line of defense against astrophysically crappy data: SenseMonitor & other monitors of “expected” sensitivities Next line of defense: DataQual, glitchmon, & other generic glitch finders Next line of defense: BurstMon (& other monitors of realistic astrophysical sensitivity) Last line of defense Quasi-online analysis jobs using actual inspiral template banks, burst ETG’s, etc.  DASWG purview [ volunteers welcome! see Patrick Brady ]

LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization Summary K. Riles - University of Michigan 6 More on DMT issues Glad to see new astrophysical FOM and other DMT monitors  THANKS! But we need more monitors of known artifacts (see Fred’s list) Embarrassing that we STILL don’t have an airplane monitor! (effects first seen in E1(!) engineering run – April 2000) Upcoming detector investigation camp will have sessions on DMT monitors, including how to write them, with template examplesdetector investigation camp