LHCC - May 2000 1 THE CMS ALIGNMENT SYSTEM Alignment scheme Task of the align. system Monitor the position of the  -chambers and the CT detectors with.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. Lee CMS EMU Alignment: 28 Feb, COCOA Simulation and Study of the EMU Alignment System Robert Lee CMS Endcap Alignment Muon EDR 28 February 2002.
Advertisements

Assisi – 23 June 2005 Tito Bellunato 1 Status of the LHCb RICH detector and the HPD Beauty 2005 Assisi – 23 June 2005 Tito Bellunato – Università degli.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
Kaori Maeshima (FNAL), Muon Alignment EDR: FEB. 28, Endcap Alignment EMU Alignment DAQ Muon Alignment EDR Feb. 28, 2002 Outline: 1.Components to.
Chamber Calibration Bench Status Barrel Muon Alignment Group 9 April 2003, J MocholíWorkshop on "LHC Physics with High-Pt Muons in CMS'‘, Bologna, Italy.
MUON Alignment DAQ (Overview), EDR Feb Kaori Maeshima MUON Alignment DAQ (overview) Often a question is asked: Do we have a single DAQ program.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, Endcap Alignment Dick Loveless DOE/NSF Review 9 May 2001.
MUON_EDR-06 (Alignment) Enrique Calvo Alamillo February 28-March 1, 2002 Link Mechanics: Status.
The barrel reference system1 THE BARREL REFERENCE SYSTEM C.Guyot (Saclay) Goal: Provide a geometrical survey of the whole barrel muon spectrometer.
GE alignment- status, proposal N. Béni, Z.Szillási (ATOMKI, Debrecen, HU) G. Bencze, G. Endrőczi (Wigner RCP, Budapest, HU) GMM meeting 1.
The RASNIK Alignment System. Particle Physics CERN, Geneva, Swiss.
DCS TCSG November 10th 1999, H.J.Burckhart1 Status of the general purpose I/O system LMB u DCS Architecture u LMB u Local Monitor Box (LMB) u Concept u.
SITRA Test beams Simulations Zdeněk Doležal Charles University Prague Annual EUDET meeting Munich October 2006.
Pixel hybrid status & issues Outline Pixel hybrid overview ALICE1 readout chip Readout options at PHENIX Other issues Plans and activities K. Tanida (RIKEN)
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Roger Rusack The University of Minnesota On behalf of the CMS ECAL collaboration.
Freiburg 7/07/20001 laser beam lens CCD (long arm) screen + grid CCD (short arm) glass plates at  45° STAMP : Saclay Telescope for the Alignment of Many.
Goal : Setup and monitor “chambers” with resolution of  < 200  m Demonstrate System Redundancy Test Setup : 1 SLM Line (2 Laser Redundancy) 1 Transfer.
First Reconstruction Results on the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment at CERN S. Guragain, G. Baksay, M. Hohlmann Florida Tech 74.
CSC ME1/1 Upgrade Status of Electronics Design Mikhail Matveev Rice University March 28, 2012.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
Novel Semi-Transparent Optical Position Sensors for high-precision alignment monitoring applications Sandra Horvat, F.Bauer, V.Danielyan, H.Kroha Max-Planck-Institute.
Alignment Software from the ME perspective Marcus Hohlmann Florida Tech Muon Alignment meeting during CMS week - CERN, March 15, 2005.
ATLAS micromegas activities (MAMMA)
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
Kaori Maeshima (FNAL), Alignment Workshop at CERN: May 17-18, Endcap Alignment Status of Offline Software Alignment CERN 17, 18 May 2001.
Towards a 7-module Micromegas Large TPC prototype 1 D. Attié, P. Baron, D. Calvet, P. Colas, C. Coquelet, E. Delagnes, M. Dixit, A. Le Coguie, R. Joannes,
DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS May 21-23, 2003 CSC Mechanics and Electronics Paul O’Connor Tom Muller BNL May 22, 2003.
CMS pixel telescope at MTEST 1 A. Kumar, S. Kwan, A. Prosser, R. Rivera, M. Turqueti, L. Uplegger.
November 11 SESAPS 2006 Samir Guragain 1 Calibration, Installation & Commissioning of Sensors for the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment.
Status of the PSD upgrade - Problems with PSD in Be runs - Modification of cooling system - New temperature control - Upgrade of HV control system - MAPD.
1 03/21/2006 GLAST CU Beam Test Workshop Scanning Table.
Chamber Alignment Pins Δy = y PG – y nom. vs. Δx = x PG – x nom. M. Hohlmann 1, G. Baksay 1, S. Guragain 1, J. Bellinger 2, D. Carlsmith 2, F. Feyzi 2,
Alignment Meeting, CERN, Sept 19, 2006O.Prokofiev 1 EMU Alignment System Analog Data Analysis for ME+1yME+4 Stations Run: Aug 25-28, 2006 Magnetic field.
Calibration and production of PRAXIAL (*) sensors for the ATLAS muon spectrometer Optical Metrology - SPIE Optical Measurement Systems for Industrial Inspection.
August DESY-HH VFCAL Report W. Lohmann, DESY Infrastructure for sensor diagnostics FE Electronics Development Sensor test facilities Laser Alignment.
Status of the PSD upgrade - Status of the PSD cooling and temperature stabilization system - MAPD gain monitoring system - PSD readout upgrade F.Guber,
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
EMU Meeting, CERN, Sept 18-19, 2006O.Prokofiev 1 EMU Alignment System Analog Data Analysis for ME+1yME+4 Stations Run: Aug 25-28, 2006 Magnetic field up.
THE H8 TEST STAND Conceptual Design Mechanical supports Status of preparation Project schedule 1 (Brandeis, CERN, MPI, Seattle - presented by Sandro Palestini)
1 ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Alignment LHC Days in Split, 5-9 Oct J.Krstic, M.Milosavljevic Institute of Physics, Belgrade D.Fassouliotis,C.Kourkoumelis,
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 15-March-2009 Hardware Alignment.
ATLAS DCS Workshop on PLCs and Fieldbusses, November 26th 1999, H.J.Burckhart1 CAN and LMB in ATLAS u Controls in ATLAS u CAN u Local Monitor Box u Concept.
B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde PHENIX Silicon Endcap  Mini-strips (50um*2mm – 50um*11mm)  Will not use ALICE chip  Instead custom design based on.
Fork Calibration Barrel Muon Alignment 9 April 2003, Z. Szillási Workshop on "LHC Physics with High-Pt Muons in CMS'‘, Bologna, Italy Page 1 Calibration.
RD42 Status Report W. Trischuk for the RD42 Collaboration LHCC Meeting – June 12, 2013 Development of CVD Diamond Tracking Detectors for Experiments at.
Zheng Li, 96th LHCC open session, 19th November 2008, CERN RD39 Status Report 2008 Zheng Li and Jaakko Härkönen Full author list available at
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker final integration and commissioning Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Université de Genève on behalf of the Atlas SCT collaboration.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
Project status, Apr 2003 Barrel Muon Alignment 9 April 2003, G. Bencze Workshop on "LHC Physics with High-Pt Muons in CMS'‘, Bologna, Italy Page 1 General.
James Bellinger, December CMS Week Muon Alignment James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin at Madison 5-December-2006 DCOPS Data from MTCC2.
SVD FADC SVD-PXD Göttingen, 25 September 2012
Detector building Notes of our discussion
Markus Friedl (HEPHY Vienna)
Pressure monitoring system for the CMS muon chambers
SCADA for Remote Industrial Plant
CMS WEEK Sept. 24 Opening session CMS MUONS: Barrel Drift Tubes
Large Area Endplate Prototype for the LC TPC
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
LumiCal mechanical design, integration with LDC and laser alignment
Vertex Detector Mechanical R&D Design Questions and Issues
EMU Alignment DAQ Endcap Alignment Muon Alignment EDR Feb. 28, 2002
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Transfer Line and CSC Rφ Reconstruction
University of Wisconsin-Madison
(On Behalf of CMS Muon Group)
Pierluigi Paolucci & Giovanni Polese
CMS Week Muon Alignment
Plans for the 2004 CSC Beam Test
Presentation transcript:

LHCC - May THE CMS ALIGNMENT SYSTEM Alignment scheme Task of the align. system Monitor the position of the  -chambers and the CT detectors with respect to each other. Building blocks: 4 subsystems - Internal tracker align. - Internal muon : barrel and endcap - The link tracker  muons (3 alignment planes) Basic components Mechanical structures (rigid, stable) Light sources (LED, laser beams) Light detectors (DPSD) Tilt, proximity and temp. sensors System requirements Physics requirements Position accuracy in r  (referred to the tracker detector) for muons up to 2 TeV : - track reconstruction: ~500  m - for p t measurement: ~150(350)  m at MB1(MB4) ~150  m at ME1 layer Operational constraints Detector hermeticity Large dynamic range (few cm) Radiation tolerance and insensitivity to  B of the components

LHCC - May THE CMS ALIGNMENT SYSTEM Alignment scheme

LHCC - May THE CMS ALIGNMENT SYSTEM Alignment scheme

LHCC - May MUON ALIGNMENT SYSTEM ORGANIZATION AND PARTICIPANTS Internal BarrelInternal Endcap Link system CERN (CMT) USA: SPAIN: Hungary (Debrecen) :FERMILABCIEMAT (Madrid) Kossuth L. Univ.North-Eastern Univ.IFCA (Santander) ATOMKI Austria (Vienna) : HEPHY Inst. Fur H. der OAW Pakistan (Islamabad) : Optics Labs.

LHCC - May Link Tracker - Muons Working principle  Translates Tracker co-ordinates (points,  angles) to the ´linking points´ in the external MABs –The tracker co-ords are defined by the internal tracker alignment at the TK ends (TK alignment wheels) –The MAB ´linking points´ serve for Barrel and Endcap connection to the Tracker –Each 1/4  plane is generated independently. The whole system is constrained at the TK volume –Points (3D co-ords) are measured with laser beams + semitransparent sensors for the co-ords perpendicular to the beams, and by mechanical tubes and proximity sensors for the co-ords along the beams –The  angle is measured at each structure (TK wheel and MABs) by Laser Level units ØMeasures directly ME1/2 chambers (CSCs crossed by a secondary link line) and the ME1/1 CSC disk (using a ME1/1 transfer platform to bend by 90° the laser beam)

LHCC - May Barrel muon alignment Working principle 36 rigid mechanical structures called MABs are holding TV-cameras (typically 10 cameras/MAB). These cameras are observing LEDs mounted on both sides of the barrel muon chambers ( 40/chamber) and on the so called Z-bars (the reference in Z-direction). A high level of redundancy is achieved by multiple observations and loops which make the system robust and reliable. The barrel system is connected to the TK via linking lines.

LHCC - May Endcap muon alignment Connect Endcap CSCs to Tracker Tracker co-ordinates (points,  angles) from the MAB modules (via link system) 6 axial lines (transfer lines) pass through the MABs and run outside each CSC station Connection between axial lines and SLMs on transfer plates. Z distance measured by mechanical tubes and optical gap sensors Radial measurements from transfer plates to CSCs by potentiometers CSCs alignment design 3 laser lines per CSC station (SLM) are linked to the axial transfer lines: –SLM measures location of CSCs (on 1/6) –SLMs are 60 degrees apart, mount on CSCs at same point on each chamber –Precise location of sensors on CSCs using internal calibration and photogrammetry –Precise relationship of strips, alignment pins, and sensors on CSCs

LHCC - May Endcap muon alignment: Transfer lines and Z measurements Fig 2. EMU Transfer-line Schematics

LHCC - May Endcap muon alignment: SLMs CSC LHC Beam M 1 P 1 M 2 P 2    MAB EMU Transfer line CSC SLM-line SLM sensor Transfer Sensor Transfer Plate ALIGNMENT SCHEMATICS SLM Laser 2-D sensor Transfer Plate Transfer Laser Alignment Schematics. Only one transfer laser is shown, at the top-left corner, defining the EMU transfer line. Similarly for the SLM line, only one laser beam, coming from the top is shown. The other laser beams coming from the opposite directions have been omitted for clarity.

LHCC - May Barrel alignment status wMechanics: MABs and LED holders wMinimal system test wReadout electronics

LHCC - May MAB Modules (External MABs) Barrel cameras Link sensors Endcap transfer sensors

LHCC - May MAB development wAluminum prototype used for first tests. wNew prototype under construction (Portugal) Glass fiber 1.5  1 m 2 Study deformations at the junctions (data by June)  define final geometry and materials w3D design of the different MAB structures: most of integration problems (inside the Mu-detector and at boundary region) have been identified.

LHCC - May LED holders in the MB chambers - Four forks /chamber - Each fork instrumented with 10 LED (4/6) - LED positions within the holder: 16  m (x,y), 60  m (z) Total number of LED ~ Mounting of precalibrated forks and LED driver electronics during chamber assembly at the production sites. - Calibration of each chamber at Cern before installation in the detector Estimated calibration precision:  m (x,y) 470  m (z)

LHCC - May LED Holder mechanical repeatability Deviation wrt to a mean of a series of position-reposition tests

LHCC - May BARREL alignment stand (CERN ISR I4-hall) Layout of the Minimal test of the barrel alignment: disposition of alignment components as for the central muon barrel wheels

LHCC - May Minimal barrel test results: Accurate reconstruction of LED positions with a floating calibrated MAB referenced by external system  (D5) = 18  m  (D4) = 38  m  (M5) = 11  m  (M4) = 25  m  (G5) = 20  m  (G4) = 52  m

LHCC - May Readout electronics Bla bla... MAB Cameras (16 to 24) Temperature Sensors (4 to 16) Board computer Ethernet Control room Slow control MAB - LEDs (0 to 20) Z bar - LEDs (0 to 4) Barrel muon chamber slow control unit Slow control for barrel muon chambers CAN 4 LED holders (<20 LED-s/holder) Chamber I2C AMPRO Littleboard P5i (PC104 type) 146x203x30 mm 3 100/166 MHz Pentium* processor PC/AT compatible system on a single board Up to 128M bytes onboard DRAM PC/104 with PCI extension Floppy, IDE, EPP, Parallel, 4 Serial ports PCI UltraSCSI PCI Super VGA LCD/CRT local bus controller with GUI accelerator High speed Ethernet LAN interface Extensive embedded feature set: ruggedized BIOS, bootable solid state disk, watchdog timer, powerfail NMI, locking I/O connectors, Advanced Power Management Small size +5V only operation, low power requirement, extended temperature operation

LHCC - May Minimal barrel test results: Accurate reconstruction of LED positions with a floating calibrated MAB referenced by external system  (D5) = 18  m  (D4) = 38  m  (M5) = 11  m  (M4) = 25  m  (G5) = 20  m  (G4) = 52  m

LHCC - May Readout electronics Bla bla... MAB Cameras (16 to 24) Temperature Sensors (4 to 16) Board computer Ethernet Control room Slow control MAB - LEDs (0 to 20) Z bar - LEDs (0 to 4) Barrel muon chamber slow control unit Slow control for barrel muon chambers CAN 4 LED holders (<20 LED-s/holder) Chamber I2C AMPRO Littleboard P5i (PC104 type) 146x203x30 mm 3 100/166 MHz Pentium* processor PC/AT compatible system on a single board Up to 128M bytes onboard DRAM PC/104 with PCI extension Floppy, IDE, EPP, Parallel, 4 Serial ports PCI UltraSCSI PCI Super VGA LCD/CRT local bus controller with GUI accelerator High speed Ethernet LAN interface Extensive embedded feature set: ruggedized BIOS, bootable solid state disk, watchdog timer, powerfail NMI, locking I/O connectors, Advanced Power Management Small size +5V only operation, low power requirement, extended temperature operation

LHCC - May Barrel alignment: summary wPrototypes of components exist: wMechanical design of LED holders and video cameras is ok wFinal MAB design under development  Neutron irradiation of the opto-electronic components up to highest barrel doses (fluences = 2.6  n/cm 2 ): ok wMagnetic field tests (up to 1T) of cameras, LED, and board computer prototype: ok wReadout electronics (prod. version) under development wDAQ + Software test version ready wFirst test of the system concept ok: consistent with expectations wFull simulation of system performance (as for the TDR)

LHCC - May Endcap alignment status wMechanical progress wSensor developments wDAQ and software

LHCC - May Mechanical progress and Sensor technology Layout Most conflicts resolved: –Required some changes to the disk and cart designs –SLM lines change z position due to RPC chambers layout Mount positions on CSCs defined: Prototype mount plates and towers constructed for ME23/2 chamber Roughly 50% of transfer plate production drawings finished Sensor development The SLM design requires up to 10 sensors in line: –ALMY: Semitransparent a-Si sensors (see later) –DCOPS: Digital CCD optical position sensor 4 linear CCDs mounted in a window frame + cross-hair laser beam Readout with DSP processor and serial I/O Good test results on resolution & stability Radiation test: Test CCDs in 4 MeV proton beam (neutron fluences of 1.3  n/cm 2  Present version of the CCD and readout are acceptable (safety factor ~3)

LHCC - May DCOPS sensor board

LHCC - May DCOPS neutron irradiation

LHCC - May CCDs neutron irradiation

LHCC - May DCOPS neutron irradiation bbb

LHCC - May Endcap DAQ and Software wDAQ system (C++ in window98 env.) has two branches: DCOPS readout chain: Line of DCOPS boards read out through serial interface 1 serial processor / disk (Note that the read-out DAQ will be very much the same for DCOPS and ALMY) HP readout chain: HP readout unit contains all multiplexers, switches and signal conditioning hardware 1 HP readout unit /disk wTwo steps offline analysis: FLAP (First Level Analysis Program, C++, OO design on UNIX platform ): Takes raw data from DAQ as input and fits data to find centroid in CCD pixel numbers. Convers HP DC voltage read out appropiate position and temperature units SLAP (Second Level Analysis Program): Takes FLAP output as input and converts the CCD centroid pixel numbers to the real space positions using the position calibration constants.... Design in progress

LHCC - May Link system status wMechanical progress wSensor developments (ALMYs and Laser Level) wDAC system and Software

LHCC - May Mechanical progress Layout Mechanical drawings in the endcap/barrel region (MAB and ME1/2) ready ME1/1 transfer and mounts on ME1/1 CSCs prototype drawings exits Re-design of the  = 3 region in accordance with the EE calorimeter support TK region in standby... (position and size of passage re-defined for new geometry) Complete prototypes for the ISR tests (tests of mechanical behaoivor): Laser box, Laser Level, distance meas (mechanical tube + optical and potentiometers), periscope -short size, ~40 cm-, DPSDs mounts, re-positionings platforms.

LHCC - May Sensors develpoment (1) wALMY: Semitransparent a-Si sensors Performance: Linearity and resolution: 5  m Sensor fiducilization: ~1  m (2D configuration) Radiation hardness: -  (CIEMAT) up to 10 Mrad: ok - n (ATOMKI) total fluence n/cm 2 : ok - p (24 GeV/c PS CERN) total fluence n/cm 2 : sensors still cooling down... Optical properties: >75 % transmission Serial readout electronics New prototypes development: Stuttgart: succeeded to produce test structures with dark currents as low as required. They proceed now with the fabrication of the first set of complete test sensors with final layout and bonding pads until beginning of July. This effort is carried out -within CMS- by Spain. It is done in collaboration with the MPI (Munich), institute involved in the alignment of the muon chambers of the ATLAS experiment. Minnesota: produced (by Feb 2000) two complete prototypes (with identical geometry as the old EG&G sensors). Their optical and electrical properties have been studied at CIEMAT-Madrid. The electrical test was not satisfactory: the sensors did not show the typical diode curve. Instead, they yield IV curves rather symmetric with respect to the (0,0) point which correspond to two mutually inverted Schottky barriers. This behavior was understood given the high symmetry of the structure (ITO/intrinsic a-Si/ITO) of the prototypes. Two lines of actions have been identified for the new prototypes to be built. The optical test was instead rather satisfactory. The measured transmission for both devices was over 75% and quite flat over the whole working region (wavelength nm). New prototypes ( 8 units) will be ready by summer. We will be testing mainly the electrical properties of the junction and charge division between strips, given that the optics is already properly understood. This effort was supported -within CMS- by US and Spain until beginning of It will continue mainly by Spanish institutes.

LHCC - May Semitransparent aSi:H sensors (ALMY) Thickness aSi  1  m Thickness electrodes  100 nm Thickness glass substrate 500  m Number of electrodes 64 horizontal, 64 vertical Active area 20 mm  20 mm Strip pitch312  m Low Hall mobility  B field insensitive Amorphous Si  Rad. hardness Glass substrate  Multi-point meas. 19 mm dia.

LHCC - May Sensors develpoment (2) wLaser Level units Consist of: A laser source + a tiltmeter (AGI and AOSI) one or two dimensional Performance: Linearity and resolution: ~10  rad (independent tilt calibration) Stability of the assembly: <5  rad Radiation hardness and insesitivity to B: to be tested - From manufacters (AGI): ok up to 10 Mrad  doses insensitive to uniform fields, and ok up to 80 gauss/mm

LHCC - May Tiltmeter (AGI-756) calibration: linearity, resolution and stability V(mV) = mV/mrad  (mrad) mV After stabilization  = 0.6  rad TOTAL: 6.7 days After stabilization  = 1.9  rad TOTAL: 6.7 days

LHCC - May Laser level: calibration and mechanical stability  _Y_position = 5.6  rad  _AGI1= 5.4  rad  _Y_position = 4.4  rad  _AGI1= 4.1  rad

LHCC - May DAQ and Control system + Software DAC configuration: Level 1: includes sensors and local electronics boards(LEB) –LEB: microcontroler with flash program memory and data memory + CAN controler chip –The microcontroler is equiped with: ADC convertors to handle the signal coming from the diferent sensors used (temperatutre, DPSD, tiltmeters,..), a serial port, timers for signal generation and several digital I/O ports to control the 2D position sensors. It will perform basic treatment of the signals (center of gravity, gaussian fits..) –At the moment each LEB handles up to 4? sensors (any type) sitting at < xx m from the actual devices. Level 2: comunication via CAN bus between L1 and industrial PC –Each LEB comunicates via CAN bus protocol with the PC using a Main Controler Interface (a CAN controler board with two ports) placed in the PC –PC for data storage and processing Level 3: comunication via Ethernet between align. PC and Detector Control System (DCS) Software: Level 1: LabView (programming graphic platform) for data acquisition and control. Fully developed for system tests Level 2: CMS OO code for optical alignment (COCOA). Simulation and reconstruction package.(ISR version available)

LHCC - May Planned activities (Y2000) wComplete test with Link system, Barrel and Endcap alignment (ISR-I4) ØThe installation of components and DAQ started last week (May 10th) Ø~ 5 weeks for individual calibration of parts ØFirst common data taking by ~ 20 June. ØThe full setup will stay in place up to end of the year wEDR foreseen for October ØEndorse the general scheme ØLED holders for the DT chambers first to go into production

LHCC - May