Alaska School Leadership Institute Session for New Participants May 27, 2014 Anchorage, Alaska Facilitated By Al Bertani, Senior Design Consultant; Lexie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Look at Module 4 and an Alpha FAL Network Meeting, September 5, 2012 Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative Exploring MAP Offerings.
Advertisements

Principals Session: Introduction to NTI Goals and Session Framework for Principals EngageNY.org.
Alaska School Leadership Institute Rural Alaska Principal Preparation Project Session for New Participants May 31, 2011 Anchorage, Alaska Facilitated By.
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction: Small Group Time
Welcome to Day 3 Please be seated in groups of 4.  Like grade bands  Mixed schools  New faces Introduce yourself to your table members.
Multiple Purposes of Data Collection William T Grant i3 Learning Community October 14-15, 2012 Elma Ruiz and Alison Boardman.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Winter, 2014 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
Welcome Back Review of Day 1 Feedback Agenda Review for Day 2.
New Teacher Development Program Tamika Estwick-Sen. Program Manager Elizabeth Kurkjian Henry- New Teacher Developer Alexis Harewood- Year II Teacher.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Middle School Leadership Teams February 6, 2014.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
 1. Look at the questions you’ve developed for your role model pick the top 8 questions that you want to practice. (If you are not prepared, use this.
Session 7: Using the Tuning Protocol to Adapt Modules
EngageNY.org Meeting the Needs of Challenged Students Session 3, May 2014 NTI.
Collaborative Data Teams
Key Leaders Network “Making Connections” October, 2012 Alabama Best Practices Center.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Colorado Families as Faculty Project Families as Faculty: Improving Home-School Communication Beth Schaffner.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Enhancing Formative Assessment, Increasing Student Responsibility: Focus on Collaborative Learning Elementary Powerful Conversations Network January 19,
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 1 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Thursday February 3 rd, 2011.
Preparing to Teach a Module Session 2 August 2014 NTI.
Parkway School District Summer, Outcomes Why Mentor? Phases of New Teacher Development Roles of the Mentor Teacher Responsibilities and Expectations.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Why Collaborate?. “Why do we have to collaborate? I know my job. If I do my job and everybody else does his, we will be fine. The teachers I work with.
Alaska School Leadership Institute Rural Alaska Principal Preparation Project Opening Session May 29, 2012 Anchorage, Alaska Facilitated By Kelly Tonsmiere,
EngageNY.org Session 1: Building a Change-Focused Culture November, 2013 Network Teams Institute.
Assistant/Associate Principals and Deans Statewide Mentoring Meeting Tuesday, January 20, 2015.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
Regional Training Sessions The Arts, Grades 9-12 Day One John Phillips Education Officer, The Arts Ontario Ministry of Education November, 2009.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
ISLLC Standard #4 Collaborating with Families (and Stakeholders) Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #3 Planning for School – wide Behavior Management
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
Welcome! March 2013 ELA Network
Alaska School Leadership Institute 2011 Rural Alaska Principal Preparation Project June 2, 2011 – Ensuring Implementation Anchorage, Alaska Facilitated.
Superintendents’ Statewide Mentoring Meeting Thursday, September 24, 2015.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Urban Mathematics Education Leadership Academy Session 2 May , 2009 Irving, TX.
Alaska School Leadership Institute 2012 Rural Alaska Principal Preparation Project May 30, 2012 – Creating a Vision Captain Cook Hotel Anchorage, Alaska.
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
Academic Language and Standards-Based Instruction Session 4 1/28/16.
+ What Should I Expect to See During Mathematics Instruction? Helping Elementary Principals Recognize and Support Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning.
1 Los Angeles New Administrators Leadership Program Unit of Study 9 Conversations with Educators March 17, 2016.
Iowa Leadership Academy: “Superintendent Network” Heartland AEA 11 Pilot Network Facilitators Denny Wulf Sharon Kurns Dave Stickrod.
District Literacy Leaders Network Meeting March 24, :00am-12:00pm Dr. LaWonda Smith Manager, English Language Arts Dr. Argentina Back Manager, Multilingual.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
LW Version 1.0 August Supporting Schools and District Improvement in Massachusetts Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instruction.
ISLLC Standard #3 Implementing Effective Meetings Name Workshop Facilitator.
Overview of Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects The Common Core State Standards.
Learning Management System
Superintendents’ Network Welcome! Apprentice Facilitators And Coaches.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Assessment for Learning
GPAEA Coaches’ Network
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Supporting Ambitious Instruction
Supporting Ambitious Instruction
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Alaska School Leadership Institute 2011
Conscious Competence Ladder: Debrief
Conscious Competence Ladder: Debrief
Tier 3 – Our Students are Counting on US
Presentation transcript:

Alaska School Leadership Institute Session for New Participants May 27, 2014 Anchorage, Alaska Facilitated By Al Bertani, Senior Design Consultant; Lexie Domaradzki, RAPPS Consultant; Sue Johnson, RAPPS Consultant; Shelby Skaanes, RAPPS Consultant

RAPPS DISTRICTS SERVED 17 rural school districts 141 schools All districts are high poverty 30 schools are at NCLB levels 2, 3 or 4 49 schools are in corrective action/res

Principal Preparation Induction Coaching Collaboration with AK EED Professional Learning

Alaska Staff Development Network University of Alaska Anchorage - Educational Leadership Program Alaska Administrator Coaching Project Alaska Department of Education and Early Development (EED) Alaska Comprehensive Center Funded by a School Leadership Program Grant from the U.S. Department of Education PROJECT PARTNERS

Al Bertani RAPPS Senior Design Consultant Shelby Skaanes RAPPS Consultant Lexie Domaradzki RAPPS Consultant Sue Johnson RAPPS Consultant Kris Smith RAPPS Program Evaluator Kelly Tonsmiere, Director Alaska Staff Development Network – RAPPS Director Kathy Blanc, Program Manager Alaska Staff Development Network

 Build Our Community  Purposes and Agenda Preview  Notebook Review  Norms and Processes  Role-Alike Critical Friends Conversations

In order to build our community across participants new to ASLI 2014, we invite each of you to prepare a Two Minute Story. You’ll use your story to help introduce yourself to other members of the group. Your story should include: Your Name Number of Years in Education Your Current Role Your Story…(About a student, family, colleague, leader who influenced you, or goals in your role)

My name is… I’ve been in education for… My current role is… My story is about…

Institute Content Themes for ASLI 2014  Leading the Implementation of the New Alaska Mathematics Standards  Leading the Implementation of the new Alaska English/Language Arts Standards  Building a High Quality System for Evaluating Educator Effectiveness

► Program Coherence and Scope ► Home Group Structure ► Learning Group Structure ► Pairings, Small, and Mixed Groups ► Critical Friends Conversations ► District Team Time – Daily ► ASLI 2014 Evaluation Design

7:00-8:00 a.m. Morning Breakfast and Collegial Conversation Aleutian Room 8:00-9:00 a.m. Opening Plenary Sessions Aleutian Room > Content Focus and Overview > Critical Friends Conversations 9:00-10:30 a.m. Break-Out Groups A, B, and C 10:30-10:45 a.m. Break Time 10:45-12:00 p.m. Break-Out Groups A, B, and C 12:00-1:00 p.m. Lunch 1:00 – 3:00 p.m. Break-Out Groups A, B, and C 3:00-4:00 p.m. District Team Planning Time Aleutian Room

Ensuring Fidelity in Evaluation System Implementation Module 1 Selecting and Training Evaluators Module 2 Using Teacher Evaluation Results Module 3 EVALUATING EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS Al Bertani, RAPPS Senior Design Consultant

Integration of Mathematics Standards and Practices into Classroom Instruction What Does the Integration Look, Sound, and Feel Like? What Are the Attributes of Exemplary Performance Tasks in Mathematics? Lexie Domaradzki RAPPS Consultant and Sue Johnson RAPPS Consultant

Implementation of Alaska’s ELA Standards Integration of Writing Standards into Classroom Instruction Integration of Speaking and Listening Standards into Classroom Instruction Shelby Skaanes, RAPPS Consultant

SESSION NORMS 1.The LEARNING belongs to you, and it rests largely with you. 2.Enter into the discussions ENTHUSIASTICALLY!!! 3.Give FREELY of your experience, but don’t dominate the discussion. 4.CONFINE your discussions to the task assigned. 5.Say what you THINK… be honest! 6.Only ONE PERSON should talk at a time… avoid private conversations while someone else is talking… 7.Listen ATTENTIVELY to the presentations and discussions. 8.Be PROMPT and REGULAR in attendance. 9.Follow the HAND SIGNAL from the session leader and MONITOR discussion time by watching the TIMER on the screen. 10.Place your cell phone on SILENT or VIBRATE to limit distractions.

What We Believe About Learning Consider this: We Learn About... 10% of what we READ 20% of what we HEAR 30% of what we SEE 50% of what we both SEE & HEAR 70% of what we DISCUSS with others 80% of what we EXPERIENCE personally 95% of what we TEACH to someone else Adapted from Eldon Ekwall, 1974

Attributes of a Professional Learning Community Professional  Decision Making  Refined Distinction Making  Precise Professional Vocabulary Learning  How Do We Get Better – Challenge One Another  De-Privatization of Practice (Transparency)  Growing Our Capacity Community  Genuine Care about Each Other  Openness to Each Other and New Ideas  Welcome and Socialize New Members Bertani and Bocchino The College Board

CRITICAL FRIENDS CONVERSATIONS Each day begins with a critical friends conversation (Begin Wednesday Morning) Table groups divide into quartets – mix returning and new Facilitators will help organize and serve as time keepers Use The Consultancy Protocol for conversations Each member will have an opportunity to discuss a specific challenge one day during the week Members serve as Critical Friends for one another

THE CONSULTANCY PROTOCOL Step 1Description of Challenge, Problem, Dilemma (3 minutes) Step 2Clarifying Questions (2 minutes) Step 3Discuss and Recommend (10 minutes) Step 4Presenter Reflection (5 minutes) The Facilitator’s Book of Questions; Allen and Blythe; Teachers College Press; 2004

THE CONSULTANCY PROTOCOL Step 1Description of Challenge (3 minutes)  Overview of Challenge  Frames a Question for the Group to Consider  Presents Evidence as Appropriate Step 2Clarifying Questions (3 minutes)  Group Asks Questions for Clarification Purposes  Questions that Have Brief, Factual Answers  Presenter Responds with Brief, Factual Answers The Facilitator’s Book of Questions; Allen and Blythe; Teachers College Press; 2004

THE CONSULTANCY PROTOCOL Step 3Discuss and Recommend (10 minutes)  Group Members Talk to One Another about the Challenge Described  Potential Questions What did we hear? What didn’t we hear that we think might be relevant? What assumptions seem to be operating? What questions does the challenge raise for us? What do we think about the challenge? What might we do or try if faced with a similar challenge? What would we recommend?  Group Members Make Suggestions serving as Critical Friends  Presenter Doesn’t Speak – Only Listens and Takes Notes The Facilitator’s Book of Questions; Allen and Blythe; Teachers College Press; 2004

THE CONSULTANCY PROTOCOL Step 4Presenter Reflection (5 minutes)  Challenge Presenter Reflects on What He/She Heard  Challenge Presenter Shares What He/She Is Now Thinking  Challenge Presenter Highlights Specific Ideas/Comments that Resonated The Facilitator’s Book of Questions; Allen and Blythe; Teachers College Press; 2004

THE CONSULTANCY PROTOCOL Step 1Description of Challenge (3 minutes) Step 2Clarifying Questions (2 minutes) Step 3Discuss and Recommend (10 minutes) Step 4Presenter Reflection (5 minutes) The Facilitator’s Book of Questions; Allen and Blythe; Teachers College Press; 2004

Our Orientation Session… … In Review Build Our Community Institute Purposes and Agenda Preview Notebook Review Norms and Processes Critical Friends Conversations