Evaluations of CDCR Substance Abuse Programs: Lessons Learned Michael L. Prendergast, Ph.D. Criminal Justice Research Group UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javier Leung and Kassy Tyler University of West Florida Educational Statistics III Dr. Carla Thompson.
Advertisements

MISSION: To protect the public and reduce crime by and reduce crime by holding youth offenders accountable and holding youth offenders accountable and.
Amity In-Prison Therapeutic Community: Preliminary Five-Year Outcomes
Ex-Offenders and Housing
Effectively Responding to the Rising Challenge of Mental Health & Addictions in Corrections How to Effectively & Efficiently Treat These Issues to Reduce.
Treatment of Substance Involved Offenders in Criminal Justice Settings – Challenges & Outcomes Igor Koutsenok, MD, MS Assistant Professor of Psychiatry,
Issues Faced by Juveniles Leaving Custody: Breaking Down the Barriers University of Oregon April 6, 2007 Pat Arthur, National Center for Youth Law.
Abstract People who enter substance abuse treatment under various degrees of legal pressure do at least as well at the end of treatment or at follow-up.
A housing first program operated by St. Vincent de Paul of Baltimore
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Strategies for Drug-Abusing.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
Police chiefs | formerly incarcerated people | pretrial service administrators | probation officials | state legislators | substance abuse treatment providers.
Women and Corrections: A Model Program By Vanessa Alleyne,PhD.
Harri-Ann Ellis April 28 th, 2011 Meth and More Conference.
PROJECT FUNDING PROVIDED BY R e-entering O ffenders A chieving R ecovery ROAR offers reintegration and recovery services to male adult offenders transitioning.
Substance Abuse Treatment and Corrections
Recovery Management With Offender Populations S. Doug Lemon, Psy.D. Licensed Clinical Psychologist Chief Psychologist United States Penitentiary, McCreary.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
1 Mental Health and Co- Occurring Treatment Needs of Individuals in the Criminal Justice System American Psychiatric Association 2007 Annual Meeting May.
Criminal Justice Mental Health and Substance Abuse Reinvestment Grant Housing Strategies Ellen Piekalkiewicz Department of Children and Families Florida.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
Evaluating Prison-Based Therapeutic Community Substance Abuse Programs: The California Initiative William M. Burdon, Ph.D. David Farabee, Ph.D. Michael.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
UCLA Drug Abuse Research CenterForever Free Evaluation Forever Free Substance Abuse Treatment Program Outcomes Study Michael Prendergast, Ph.D., Principal.
Kriminaalihuollon tukisäätiö KRITS Probation Foundation.
The Source for Housing Solutions Returning Home Ohio Permanent Supportive Housing for Ex-Offenders October 10, 2013 OJACC Annual Conference.
Chapter 8 Residential Intermediate Sanctions. Introduction Intermediate Sanctions are sentencing options between prison and probation that provide punishment.
Chapter 40 Rehabilitation. Objectives Identify the major factors that affect criminal behavior Explain the role of correctional treatment programs in.
1 Ed Monahan Public Advocate Substance Abuse: Senate Bill 4 (2009) Treatment options expanded Ernie Lewis KY Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers June.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Presentation Outline Why we need a prisoner reentry program What is happening with MPRI statewide What is happening locally How you can help Questions.
Criminal Justice Reform in California Challenges and Opportunities Mia Bird Northern California Grantmakers Annual Conference – From Ideas to Action May.
ON THE MOVE Department of Corrections GEORGIA Presented by: Rachael G. Hopkins, LPC, CPCS, CCAADC, CCDP-D, CCS Substance Abuse Unit Risk Reduction Services.
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:  LO1 Define community corrections and discuss its role in the criminal justice system  LO2 Describe.
Housing: A Significant Reentry Barrier Nicole E. Sullivan NC Department of Correction Office of Research and Planning.
Introduction The United States has one of the largest criminal justice populations in the world with over 6.94 million people under the supervision of.
The Coalition of Community Corrections Providers of New Jersey A Partnership Responding to Prisoner Re-entry.
1 Strategies for Serving the Chronically Homeless …
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
1 Therapeutic Community Treatment in Correctional Settings The Call for An Integrated System George De Leon, Ph.D. Center for Therapeutic Community Research.
History and Background Formed in 2006 as a joint collaboration of San Mateo County Courts, Probation Department, District Attorney Office, Sheriff’s Office,
LJIC Intercept Filter 2 October 1, 2007 Brenda Desmond Leslie Halligan Dr. Laura Wendlandt.
HIGH POINT TREATMENT CENTER High Point Treatment Center’s (H.P.T.C.) mission is to prevent and treat chemical dependency and provide therapeutic services.
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: Results of Two Interim Evaluations in Texas College on Problems of Drug College on Problems of Drug Dependence.
Skagit County Criminal Justice Master Plan Conclusions and Recommendations.
Psychosocial Changes Among Special Populations in a Prison-based Therapeutic Community David Farabee, Michael Prendergast, & Jerome Cartier University.
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Amity In-Prison Therapeutic Community: Five-Year Outcomes Association of Criminal Justice Research (CA) Sacramento,
Assessing Housing Barriers Donna Harrison Community Placement Coordinator Virginia Department of Corrections Welcome Home: Addressing Today’s Challenges.
Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007 (AB 900) Implementation and Impact on County Mental Health Robin Dezember Chief Deputy Secretary.
Introduction Results Treatment Needs and Treatment Completion as Predictors of Return-to-Prison Following Community Treatment for Substance-Abusing Female.
Ready (or not) to graduate: Mental and physical health characteristics associated with completing public housing-based, substance abuse treatment in Key.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of Research 1.
Research Issues on Treating Substance-Abusing Offenders Michael L. Prendergast, Ph.D. William M. Burdon, Ph.D. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs.
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse ProgramsForever Free Evaluation Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Programs for Women Laurie Bright, National Institute.
First Steps System of Care Family Systems Collaborations Systems to Systems Nancy Gottlieb, MFT.
Michigan Prisoner ReEntry Initiative (MPRI) Creating safer neighborhoods and better citizens.
Legislative Enhancements to Behavioral Health. Recent Legislation Behavioral Health Enhancements HB 7019/SB 7068 (2015) SB 12/HB 7097 (2016) Housing Assistance.
Byrne Grant Reentry Enhancement Coordination Program State of Oregon Prison Reentry Multnomah County, Oregon.
A web presentation for RSAT - T&TA by Deana Evens, MA Corrections Transitions Programs Administrator Gender-Responsiveness in the Correctional Setting.
International Legislators Forum: Minnesota Criminal Justice Issues
Summit County Probation Services
Coming Soon! Manual on promising practices for the Role of the Corrections Officer in RSAP Programs.
California State Association of Counties
Kristin Stainbrook, PhD
Kristin Stainbrook, PhD
Addressing dual diagnosis within a residential treatment programme serving women with complex needs Anita Harris.
The Success of IPS in Oklahoma
Presentation transcript:

Evaluations of CDCR Substance Abuse Programs: Lessons Learned Michael L. Prendergast, Ph.D. Criminal Justice Research Group UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Presented at the First Annual National Therapeutic Community Conference Denver, CO October 5-9, 2008

Characteristics of CDCR TC Programs TC model adapted to prison setting Voluntary participation is encouraged, but most admissions are mandated Treatment occurs in the last 6 to 24 months of incarceration; 4 hours a day, plus optional activities Treatment services are provided by agencies under contract to CDCR Treatment clients are housed apart from the general population Graduates can participate in community treatment

Continuing Care  Community treatment provided for six or more months to SAP graduates  Participation in community treatment is voluntary  Treatment modalities: Residential, Outpatient, Sober Living  Substance Abuse Services Coordinating Agencies (SASCAs) contract for community services and provide case management to clients  SASCAs provide transportation for many parolees to treatment programs

Evaluations Amity Forever Free Substance Abuse Treatment Facility Expansion Programs (16) Female Offender Treatment and Employment Program Valley State Prison for Women (Gender Responsive) Database on ~28,000 treatment participants

Prison treatment improves prison management. Lesson 1

SATF: Drug Use

SATF: Disciplinary Actions

Absenteeism among SATF and Non- Treatment Correctional Staff

Clients need to participate in prison treatment and in community treatment (90+ days) for reductions in recidivism and drug use to occur. Lesson 2

Amity Program: 12-Month Return to Prison % Returned

SATF: 12-Month Return to Prison

SATF: 12-Month Return to Prison by Aftercare Participation

Recidivism Among 2000 SATF Release Cohort by Aftercare Participation

Percent Positive Study Groups Control (n=59)61.0 Intent-to-treat (n=170)52.9 Treatment Groups*** Prison TC Drops (n=25)76.0 Prison TC Completers (n=66)63.6 Aftercare Drops (n=13)53.8 Aftercare Completers (n=66)33.3 *** p <.0001, likelihood ratio chi square Amity: Positive Drug Tests at 12-Months

SATF: Aftercare Participation by Release Cohort (N=8,037)

SAP graduates face various barriers to enrollment in community treatment. Lesson 3

SATF: Perceptions about Aftercare No interest in changing criminal lifestyle – found in younger prisoners Denial of drug problem Having a home and family to return to, so don’t need additional treatment or support Can do it by myself (no need for additional help) Having a home and family to return to, but worried about returning to prison

SATF: Barriers to Entering Aftercare Lack of information about the programs in a prisoner’s county of commitment Perception that family needs outweigh their need for additional treatment Family financial strain Few program choices in their county Seeing aftercare as continued incarceration Desire to start working and be productive right away Belief that they can make it with 12-step support only

Correctional treatment needs to be responsive to the needs of different subpopulations. Lesson 4

Life Histories of Women Offenders Compared with men offenders, women offenders: Have more severe substance abuse histories Have more severe histories of sexual/physical abuse Have more severe psychological problems Have less education Have less employment experience and opportunities Have less severe criminal histories Are more likely to have custody of children

Forever Free Program: 12-Month Parole Performance *** 1 *** p< p=.07

Standard Prison TC Gender-Specific TC (n=29)(n=34) In aftercare at 6 months 4%25% Reincarcerated at 6 months 48%29% Valley State Prison for Women: Gender-Responsive Study (Preliminary Findings)

Psychological Symptoms at Admission by Mental Health Status (N= 8,093) * *Bivariate Comparisons significant at p<.001.

12-Month Return to Prison by Mental Health Status (N=4,408)

Organizational factors heavily influence successful program performance. Lesson 5

Organizational Factors Screening and assessment Staffing Institutional support Lockdowns Mission conflict Treatment maturity

SATF: 12-Month Return to Prison by Amount of Aftercare and Release Cohort

Expansion Programs: 12-Month Return to Prison by Release Cohort

1.Prison treatment improves prison management. 2.Clients need to participate in prison treatment and in community treatment (90+ days) for reductions in recidivism and drug use to occur. 3.SAP graduates face personal and institutional barriers to enrollment in community treatment. 4.Correctional treatment needs to be responsive to the needs of different subpopulations [women, co- disordered]. 5.Organizational factors heavily influence successful program performance [include maturity]. Lessons

Thank you Questions? > Presentations Supported by: CDCR Contracts C94.217, C97.243, C97.355, C98.346, C02.017, C06.229,C NIDA Grants R01DA11483, R21DA NIJ Grants 97-RT-VX-K003, 1999-RT-VX-K003