Defining a Career Skills Building Student Cohort & Outcome.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LACCD Strategic Plan Internal Scan A. Enrollment Trends and Student Characteristics.
Advertisements

Student Persistence and Completion Strategy Twenty-seven Best Practices Milestones and Momentum Points Win/Win Grant Reverse Transfer First-Term to First-Year.
Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
Perhaps it is time for a change in defining educational goal Student Pathways.
Office of Institutional Research Career Technical Education (CTE) Completion Rates Follow-up data presented to the CTE Committee September 30, 2014 Hannah.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Scorecard: How to Improve your CDCP Outcomes Rate Association for Community and Continuing Education 2014 Annual Conference Beverly Heasley Mt. San Antonio.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation presented by presented by David Torres, Dean Institutional.
CTE Outcomes Survey KC Greaney, Santa Rosa Junior College VERATAC September CAIR Conference, Nov. 20, 2013.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Colleges can provide all Washingtonians access to 2-year post secondary education Measures: Enrollments in community and technical colleges Rate of participation.
Development of a Measure of Career Skills-Building Students KC Greaney, Santa Rosa Junior College Alice van Ommeren, California Community Colleges Chancellor’s.
Defining a Career Skills Building Student Cohort & Outcome.
Scorecard Update Salary Surfer/Wage Tracker Alice van Ommeren Ryan Fuller Research, Analysis and Accountability.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
November 13, 2013 Contra Costa Community College District Board Review Achievement Gap Report & College Scorecards.
Student Success Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges September 2011.
Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
ARCC Accountability Report for the Community Colleges Focus on Quality.
Student Performance Profile Study: An Examination of Success and Equity Matt Wetstein, Interim Vice President of Instruction Office of Planning, Research,
Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC) 2007 Report for Cerritos College Bill Farmer and Nathan Durdella.
Aggregated Core Indicator Data TOPs Code 12 – Performance Of All Voc Ed & Special Populations Students.
Cuesta College ARCC Data Report to the San Luis Obispo Community College District Board of Trustees May 5, 2010.
REPORT TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 7, 2012 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL.
1. ACCJC INSTITUTION-SET STANDARDS DISCUSSION 2 A “standard” is the level of performance set by the institution to meet educational quality and institutional.
2014 Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation May 7, 2014 E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC)
Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation April 17, 2013 FOOTHILL COLLEGE E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
 Purpose:  Identify skills builder students & determine their course taking patterns  Background:  Student course taking patterns is current method.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Hawaii Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
2010 ARCC Overview Michael Orkin, Ph.D. Associate Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs Peralta Community College District.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Mallory Newell Office of Institutional Research and Planning
Student Pathways as defined exclusively by Units Earned Units Earned in Following Spring Term Units Earned in Next Fall Term Units Earned in First Fall.
Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
Understanding the National Reporting System Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability NRS.
Documenting California Program and Learner Outcomes to Federal and State Policymakers for the ACSA presentation on September 25, 2003 and for the California.
1 A ccountability R eporting for the C ommunity C olleges (ARCC) 2008 Presentation to Peralta Community College Board of Trustees Merritt College Office.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2009 Data Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning December 21, 2009.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees Meeting November 2, 2016
Student Success Scorecard: 2016 Report
OAEP Conference – Prepared for Success Component Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability May 8, 2017.
DJJ Accountability Rating System
Student Success Scorecard 2017
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees October 1, 2014
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 19, 2012
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Program Review Presentation April 29th, 2015
Contra Costa Community College District
Indicators Four areas of institutional effectiveness
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Board of Trustees Review
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
WIOA Accountability Ben Konruff
Scorecard Future File Data
IPRE Retreat Transfer & Employment Natalia Córdoba- Velasquez
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees
Student Success Metrics
Career Technical Education (CTE) Completion Rates
Student Success Scorecard
Course selection and class description overview
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees October 7, 2014
CTE Transitions Formerly Tech Prep.
2010 ARCC Report Findings May 3, 2010
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants January 17, 2012
Presentation transcript:

Defining a Career Skills Building Student Cohort & Outcome

VERTAC Skills Builder cohort definition options #1 Reported student goal #2 Student course taking pattern #3 Combination of student course taking pattern & reported student goal

#1 Reported student Goal Had reported student goal of ‘G’ (Prepare for new career), ‘H’ (Advance in current job/career) or ‘I’ (Maintain certificate or license) in a given year – Could be informed or uninformed goal No longer enrolled after 1 year Did subsequently not earn an award or transfer to a four-year institution

#2 Student Course Taking Pattern Students attempts or completes between.5 and 18 units in a given year Some number of these units must be a SAM A, B, or C course (designated as vocational) No longer enrolled after 1 year Did subsequently not earn an award or transfer to a four-year institution

#3 Combination of student goal & course taking pattern. Student would be included in cohort if characteristics of ‘reported student goal’ option or ‘student course taking pattern’ option were met

Scorecard & Course Behavior Scorecard cohorts based solely on past course behavior. Look back to determine inclusion into cohort (example: completion cohort, look back 6 years, determine who had at least 6 units and attempted any Math or English). Those meeting criteria would then be included in cohort. How many completed outcome definition in some time period?

Cohort Sizes ( ) Reported student goal N=132,270 – 5% of total enrollment Student course taking pattern N=203,555 – 8% of total enrollment Combination of student course taking pattern & reported student goal N=252,244 – 10% of total enrollment

Cohort overlap Reported Goal Cohort = 132,270 Course Taking Cohort = 203,555 Overlap = 48,046

Cohort Descriptives Median Age – Reported Goal: 34 – Course Pattern: 30 – Combination: 30 Median units earned (11-12 year) – Reported Goal: 3 – Course Pattern: 4 – Combination:4

Cohort Descriptives Gender – Reported Goal: 41% female/57% male – Course Pattern: 41% female/57% male – Combination: 41% female/57% male

Course Taking Patterns % SAM A, B, C courses taken – Goal cohort: 50% – Course pattern cohort: 63% – Combination cohort: 56% % Vocational courses taken – Goal cohort: 60% – Course pattern cohort: 69% – Combination cohort: 63%

Cohort Outcome Options #1 Course success rate #2 Percentage wage gain over x number of years (those already employed) #3 Earnings that meet some benchmark (possibly living wages or entry level earnings in some field)

#1 Course Success Rates Reported Goal: 71% Course Pattern: 69% Combination: 67% Success rates vary significantly by Top Code Ranges from 99% Petroleum Technology to 24% Secondary Education & GED

#2 Wage Gain Median Wages 1 year before ( ) compared to wages 1 year after ( ) Match Rates: reported goal (21%), course pattern (18%), combination (18%) Pre Post Reported Goal: $47,900 to $49,600 (3.5%) Course Pattern: $42,300 to $43,000 (1.7%) Combination: $40,300 to $41,300 (2.5%)

#3 Compare to Benchmark California living wage for one person= $23,295 (Poverty in America Living Wage Calculator % with post enrollment wages above ‘living wage’ benchmark – Reported Goal: 64% – Course Pattern: 60% – Combination: 59%