Practical Considerations for supporting Emergency Calls Brian Rosen Emergicom.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Number Portability Administration Center Change Orders NANC 399 & NANC 400 NANC Meeting March 15, 2005 Tom McGarry NeuStar, Inc.
Advertisements

DNS Proxy Bypass by Recursive DNS Discovery and LOCAL.ARPA draft-ietf-dns-recursive-discovery Ray Bellis IETF76 DNSOP WG Hiroshima, 11 th November 2009.
Next Generation Emergency Services Christian Militeau Intrado,Inc. March 21, 2006.
Telecommunication Relay Service (TRS) Emergency Call Handling Federal Communications Commission Emergency Access Advisory Committee January 14, 2011.
What’s Next for i3? Dan Mongrain, Senior Solutions Consultant Bell Canada Terry Reese NENA NG9-1-1 Architecture Evolution Subcommittee Chair Senior Consultant,
Vodacom Microsoft Hosted Lync
Voice over IP Fundamentals
Security in VoIP Networks Juan C Pelaez Florida Atlantic University Security in VoIP Networks Juan C Pelaez Florida Atlantic University.
1 © 2004 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Making NATs work for Online Gaming and VoIP Dr. Cullen Jennings
Improving Connections for the Mobile Worker Theron Dodson Ascendent Systems August 9.
DISPATCH Call-Info purpose for TRS (draft-kyzivat-dispatch-trs-call-info-purpose-02) IETF 92, March 23, 2015 Author: Paul Kyzivat Presenting: Brian Rosen.
Origins of ECRIT IETF has been working on location since 2000 –Spatial BoF, eventually GEOPRIV chartered in 2001 GEOPRIV provides location information.
NENA’s 11 th Annual Technical Development Conference A proposal to support E911 calls on Voice over IP Networks Martin Dawson – Nortel Networks.
VoIP Technology Developments and Trends Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University.
Long Term Definition Because the VoIP world is SO different from the current environment, we have to go back to basic requirements: –Identify a call as.
North American Emergency Services Brian Rosen Emergicom.
Von 2004 Will SIP Win? Brad Templeton Chairman of the Board Electronic Frontier Foundation
When Networking meets Wireless When Networking meets Wireless.
Published Summary WiFi VoIP: From Installation to Implementation (W-02) Thursday - 01/26/06, 12:30-1:15pm In this session, users can expect to learn about.
An SAIC Company Telcordia View of NENA Progress on VoIP Migration Plan Telcordia Contacts: Nadine Abbott (732) An SAIC Company.
Location Hiding: Problem Statement, Requirements, (and Solutions?) Richard Barnes IETF 71, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Remote Workers Without the Hassle
North American Emergency Services Brian Rosen Emergicom.
January 24-27, 2006 Ft. Lauderdale, FL E9-1-1 Technical Solutions Timothy Lorello SVP, Chief Marketing Officer TeleCommunication Systems.
SIP Explained Gary Audin Delphi, Inc. Sponsored by
© 2008 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. 1 Video Relay Service and Assignment.
Methods of communication
NG911 technology Henning Schulzrinne
ESW – May 2010 UK Architecture for VoIP 999/112s John Medland – BT 999/112 Policy Manager.
Critical Issues Forum i3 – The future and beyond Brian Rosen Emergicom.
February 25, Infrastructure-ENUM Secure, Private, Next Generation Addressing Infrastructure Douglas J. Ranalli Founder, Chief Strategy Officer NetNumber,
Conxxus, LLC HIGH-SPEED BROADBAND Power By WE ARE BRINGING HIGH SPEED TO OUR ENTIRE COOPERATIVE SERVICE AREA.
NENA Next Generation Architecture
Packetizer ® Copyright © 2008 H.325 Beyond Today’s Second Generation Systems Paul E. Jones Rapporteur, ITU-T Q12/16 1.
RTCWEB Signaling Matthew Kaufman. Scope Web Server Browser.
-framework Brian Rosen. -11 version deals with IESG comments All comment resolved one way or another One open issue – spec(t)
RIPE64 Enum Working Group DE-CIX NGN Services.
MAEDS 45 th Annual Conference October , 2009.
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 7: Transport Layer Introduction to Networking.
Problems with the “Inbox Everything” Approach Sometimes completing the task is easier than reading the Sometimes something is important.
Architectural Considerations for GEOPRIV/ECRIT Presentation given by Hannes Tschofenig.
Applied Communications Technology Voice Over IP (VOIP) nas1, April 2012 How does VOIP work? Why are we interested? What components does it have? What standards.
Quintum Confidential and Proprietary 1 Quintum Technologies, Inc. Session Border Controller and VoIP Devices Behind Firewalls Tim Thornton, CTO.
Emerging Technologies. Emerging Technology Overview  Emerging technologies are those which are just beginning to be adopted or are at the initial acceptance.
DNS based IP NetLocation Service China Telecom Guangzhou Institute
NETWORKING COMPONENTS AN OVERVIEW OF COMMONLY USED HARDWARE Christopher Johnson LTEC 4550.
IEEE “Green Book” This set of slides is a collection of presentations, motions and other material that has come before the Working Group.
Draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency- framework-00 Brian Rosen NeuStar CPa
GEOPRIV Layer 7 Location Configuration Protocol; Problem Statement and Requirements draft-tschofenig-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps-00.txt Hannes Tschofenig, Henning.
Peering Considerations for Directory Assistance and Operator Services - John Haluska Telcordia SPEERMINT, IETF 68 Prague, Czech Republic 20 March 2007.
The State of VoIP Peering Charles Studt Director of Product Management, VoEX.
Next Generation Standards, Transitions and Challenges Brian Rosen Senior Director, Neustar Chair, Long Term Definition WG, NENA.
Interdomain IPv6 multicast Stig Venaas UNINETT. PIM-SM and Rendezvous Points Interdomain multicast routing is usually done with a protocol called PIM-SM.
The State of SIP Application Development Brian Schwarz VP – Engineering RedSky Technologies, Inc.
Draft-newton-speermint-itsp- problem-statement Andrew Newton 19 - September SPEERMINT WG Interim Meeting Philadelphia, PA, US.
GIS and Next Generation Public Safety
Peering: A Minimalist Approach Rohan Mahy IETF 66 — Speermint WG.
SIP Interconnect Guidelines draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-01 David Hancock, Daryl Malas.
California Public Utilities Commission MLTS E9-1-1 Caller Location Information Proceeding (R ) Public Workshop California Office July 27,
Core VoIP and 911 issues and alternatives Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University August 2003.
ECRIT Basic Reqs draft-stastny-ecrit-requirements Richard Stastny Brian Rosen IETF62 Minneapolis.
Figure 11-1 A residential AP (Access Point) WAN4 Switch ports DC Power.
Draft-bryan-sipping-p2p-usecases-00 David A. Bryan Eunsoo Shim Bruce B. Lowekamp.
Presentation Material ● PAR ● 5 Criteria ● ✔ Problem tutorial ● ✔ Why VoIP doesn't work today ● ✔ What is needed to fix it ● ✔ Working with ECRIT should.
How GIS will support Ng911 in Indiana
IP Telephony (VoIP).
THIS IS THE WAY ENUM Variants Jim McEachern
Step-by-step explanation what happens if a L3 device is connected via a L2 vPC: Packet arrives at R R does lookup in routing table and sees 2 equal paths.
SIX MONTHS INDUSTRIAL TRAINING REPORT
Open Forum th November 2016.
Presentation transcript:

Practical Considerations for supporting Emergency Calls Brian Rosen Emergicom

Emergency calls are fundamental to deploying VoIP Doesn’t matter if you are a service provider or an enterprise, you must have provisions for emergency calls There is significant liability if you don’t do something appropriate – At least after there are defined standards – As of the end of this year, in North America, there will be The more flexibility you offer your customers/employees, the harder it is

The “Sierra Leone” problem Patron at a Starbucks café has a laptop with WiFi connection to Internet VPN Tunnel exists to Patron’s employer Softclient on laptop connected to employer’s VoIP PBX An accident happens, and the patron dials for help

Sierra Leone cont. – So What? The Starbucks is in Chicago The employer is Sierra Leone Trading Intl It’s VSP is Sierra Leone VoIP Services Pty It’s ISP is Cable and Wireless Starbucks uses T-Mobile to supply the hotspot There are no contractual relationships except that between S.L. Trading and S.L. VoIP There is clearly no contractual, legal or other relationship between the Chicago PSAP and any entity in Sierra Leone

How this will work (at least at i3) The phone learns its location from the LOCAL environment – DHCP supplies location when the laptop gets it’s IP address – This is the right location, before the VPN tunnel is established Location is carried in the signaling, with the call There is an available routing database so that anyone, worldwide, can route the call to the correct PSAP

Routing is non trivial, especially in North America There are approximately 6,134 PSAPs in North America Each has a service boundary They are NOT necessarily aligned to any political (state/county/city) boundary Call must be routed to the correct PSAP There are databases that exist for civic and geo locations that tell you where to route the calls But currently, access to them is restricted, and has cost associated with it Other areas are easier (one PSAP for a country) others are harder (no existing database)

Location In Enterprises Getting to the right “address” is not enough – Think of this as the “yelling” test All enterprises who have large facilities will need to provide more specific location information We’re going to make this as easy as possible, but it’s still going to be some level of burden on enterprise

Making Location work in Enterprise VoIP Same basic idea – phone learns location from its local environment – Could be proprietary to your VoIP vendor – Standards based approaches are feasible now – RFC3046 describes a mechanism to determine the switch port a packet arrived on This gives you the basis to use a (manually maintained) wiremap database (room number to switch port) to determine location – and that is where the cost is DHCP can be used to supply this location to endpoints Location to building/suite/floor/room can be specified

Location for Residential VoIP Voice Service Providers don’t have much of a role because they don’t know where the customer is AND THEY DON’T HAVE A RELATIONSHIP WITH ANYONE WHO DOES The ISP may or may not know, but if they don’t they have a relationship with someone who does The Access Infrastructure Provider knows where the customer is

Access Infrastructure Providers “First Mile” infrastructure owner, wireline or wireless Wireline AIPs already have a notion of a Service Address, and a wiremap (or equivalent) database I believe ALL AIPs, regardless of technology, and regardless of whether they offer voice/video/text services, must supply location It’s likely that regulation will be required, and it’s likely to happen Fixed wireless (e.g. WiMax) vendors; plan on GPS receivers or triangulation mechanisms You heard it here first

ISPs If you are the AIP, you supply location to endpoints If you aren’t, contract with the AIP to get it If there is a system spec on all infrastructure including all end points, you can use any mechanism you like to get location to the endpoint If you don’t have such control, support at least DHCP

Cascaded Location Applicable to things like WiFi “AP” gets location from its environment, and relays it to its endpoints If possible, supply more specific location – The “yell test” again Works for things like café hotspots

Next Up = SIP Phone Vendors You have to get location from the environment as described If you do digit analysis in the phone, you have to learn the local emergency call number for the environment the phone is in – We are working on standards for this When you detect an emergency call, or the downstream proxy tells you its an emergency call, you must supply location

SIP Phone Vendors, cont. Because location is sensitive, IETF standards REQUIRE sips (TLS) for emergency calls PLEASE implement this now, pretty please Supply a good callback in Contact – Good as in, “reachable from the PSAP” Implement blind and supervised transfer (REFER/Replaces) 3 rd Party Call Control (for conferencing)

SIP Proxy Vendors – Your turn For i3, you need to implement routing based on location – This is the charter of the new IETF working group – The DNS based approach will work, others may or may not, we’ll see You have to implement TLS too Allow callback from the PSAP – Probably more a configuration thing

What if you don’t support SIP? The standard interface to PSAPs, at least in North America, will be SIP Other vendors will have to gateway to SIP to send emergency calls Most vendors already support SIP, because most inter-enterprise/inter-carrier peering is SIP Must include location, as per SIP standards on the call

Voice Service Providers For i2, you contract with a “VPC” operator and an “ESGW” vendor (could be the same entity) Three different ways to hand off calls – Unconditional SIP handoff – Query VPC, choose ESGW – SIP Handoff, with redirect back to you to select ESGW

That i2 picture again

More VSP Responsibilities Deploy TLS – So, beat up your (SBC) vendors. It’s the Right Thing To Do For i3, much simpler routing decision – Look up location in a database (DNS for example) – Forward call to where it says to – No 3 rd parties Allow callbacks to Contact header May need identity assertions

Other communications service providers have a role too Video telephony/conferencing vendors, i3 PSAPs will take the calls – Also applies to camera phones IM vendors, i3 PSAPs will take the calls And for everyone, there will be a new generation of “TDD” devices based on SIP and interactive text streams. Please plan on supporting them

Summary Emergency Calls are important, and not some one else’s problem Voluntary compliance forestalls heavy regulation Participate in the standards work if you are interested Plan for deployments NEXT YEAR