Leon County Schools’ K-12 Comprehensive Research-Based Reading Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
To create a fail-safe system of literacy so that all students have equal access to a standards based curriculum. Result: Joyful, independent readers,
Data Analysis Training PDP Goals & Strategies September, 2012.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
High School Reading Project Implementation Plan Final Proposal: Key Points The primary goal of the proposed plan is to increase the number of students.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
School Improvement Process Mt. Pleasant School Nashua School District Bruce Geer, Principal.
Implementing a Diagnostic Reading Assessment Grades 4-8
The Florida Reading Initiative (FRI) is a research-based school wide reform effort committed to providing the professional development and follow up support.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Roles and Responsibilities of the Instructional Coach
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Lee County’s Just Read, Florida! District Plan K-12 Comprehensive Research-Based Plan Dianne Johnson, Ali Conant C. Keith Woodfin, John Scheller.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
Secondary Intensive Reading Block Evan Lefsky, Ph.D. Reading Specialist, 6-12.
Keystone State Reading Conference October 29, 2012 Dr. Deb Carr, King’s College.
Literacy Collaborative Achievement for Every Student.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Using a Comprehensive Assessment Plan to Meet All Students’ Instructional Needs Leadership Conference 2005 Orlando, Florida Pat Howard and Randee Winterbottom.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
Instructional Coaches in Sheldon ISD
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Reading First Site Visits Jane Granger Meadows, M.S. Lisa A. Slover, M.S. Mary Raiford Mickey McKinnes 2006 Just Read, Florida! Leadership Conference.
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
Portage North Middle School Principal: Dr. Celeste Harris Assistant Principal: Mr. Craig Medd “Where Failure is not an Option!”
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
RESULTS FOR ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOLS 2013 Statewide Test Data.
STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES The “Tween” Years — Increasing Academic Rigor Administrators’ Management Meeting for Exceptional Education and Student Services.
CMC South Conference November 1, 2013 Sacramento City Unified School District Iris Taylor Mikila Fetzer Suzie Craig.
Leadership Team July 24, Learning Targets 1. Familiarize and use The Framework of Teaching in the areas of engagement and questioning to observe.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Curriculum & Instructional Projects at the Florida Center for Reading Research Research Symposium November 6, 2006 FCRR.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
A Mission of Restoration
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Artifact 12 A PowerPoint on Understanding by Design. This artifact was developed during my graduate class School Curriculum: Elementary EDE 6205 Fall 2006.
Literacy Plan Kara Klokis and Carol Pippen Longwood University.
School Improvement Plan Central Elementary Vanessa S. McAllister, Principal Margaret Lewis, Assistant Principal RaeAnn Whiteside, Literacy Coach.
Dr. Vashti K. Washington Superintendent of Schools Presented by Dr. A. Lee Holmes Chief Officer of Academics and Human Resources September 9, Presented.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Creating a School-Wide Literacy Plan Richmond Public Schools Assistant Principals Meeting September 28, 2011.
Garrett Elementary Accountability Report Kids are our Business! October 14,
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Kentucky Core Academic Standards Pike County Schools.
What is Learning-Focused?
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
MASTERING READING INSTRUCTION A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR FIRST GRADE PROFESSIONALS.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Diocese of Baton Rouge Catholic Schools
Presentation transcript:

Leon County Schools’ K-12 Comprehensive Research-Based Reading Plan Adapted from 2005 Administrators’ Meeting August 3, 2005

Closing the Achievement Gap “No significant learning occurs without a significant relationship of mutual respect.” Dr. James Comer “Active participation by ALL students.” Brian M. Pete and Robin J. Fogarty

K-12 Comprehensive Research-Based Reading Plan Leadership & Monitoring Professional Development Elementary Student Achievement and Instruction Middle School Student Achievement and Instruction High School Student Achievement and Instruction

District Leadership and Monitoring

Leadership & Monitoring District Reading Leadership Team Iris Wilson Margo Hall Bev Owens DJ Wright Merry Ortega Marsha Glover Eydie Sands Reading First Project Manager

Expectations of the Reading District Leadership Team Monitor Reading Plans Monitor Reading Coaches Visit Schools Conferencing Resources

Chiles High School Reading Leadership Team 8 - 12 Members Educational Leaders (Principal and APs) Reading Coach: Kathy Corder Content Area/Grade Level Teachers (“The A Team”) Reading Specialists: Linda Heller & Debbie McKinnon Media Specialist Parents Students Community Member

Responsibilities of the School Reading Leadership Team Gather information about literacy and resources Facilitate workshops Organize study groups Initiate action research Support peer coaching Participate in demonstration lessons Examine student artifacts Investigate areas of concern and develop an action plan

What is a Reading Coach? A reading coach is a professional development liaison within the school that provides support, models lessons, and continuously assists in improving instructional programs in reading to assure reading improvement for ALL students.

What a Reading Coach is NOT!! A Reading Resource teacher A substitute teacher An evaluator/administrator An enforcer/dictator Negative

How Administrator Supports the Reading Coach… Ensures that the reading coaches attend required professional development, such as Reading Coach Conferences and monthly District Coaches meetings, reading instructional practices workshops, etc. Provides time for reading professional development for the staff Encourages teachers to use the coach and provides specific feedback to teachers

Monitoring…. Classroom Walk-Throughs (District & School) Informal and Formal Visits to school during the first 3 months of school to ensure plan has been implemented (State, District and School) Additional monthly fidelity checks will be conducted Formally report all findings to the District Assistant Superintendent of Management and Curriculum Services (State, District and School) Based upon monitoring results, additional support may be provided

Professional Development

Professional Development Everyone will participate in some type of professional development (Faculty Meeting In-Service & Book Study Groups) Administrators will attend Just Read, Florida! K-12 Leadership Conference (Dr. Cox attended) Monthly Principal and Assistant Principals meetings will have reading as an agenda item Reading Coaches will provide professional development Professional development should support district reading plan and School Improvement Plan Model Classrooms will be utilized to model the 5 components of reading

High School Student Achievement and Instruction First Step is to identify students and students needs: FCAT - determines most needy SNAPSHOT online database of student test records Level I and Level ll students

Requirements for Level 1 Students In addition to the minimum 50 minute intensive reading class, the student will be provided extended reading instruction in a content area class with a teacher who has the reading endorsement, is working on the reading endorsement or has K-12 Reading Certification If a Level 1 student is receiving a minimum 90 minutes of intensive reading instruction, then an additional core content area class with a reading endorsed teacher is optional. By the school year 2006-07, the students with the greatest reading deficiencies will receive a continuous 90 minute reading block of instruction. The teacher will have the K-12 reading endorsement, will be working towards the reading endorsement or will have reading certification.

Requirements for Level 2 students Students scoring a scale score below 280 on the Reading FCAT SSS with a NRT score below the 50% percentile, will receive a minimum of 50 minutes in a daily intensive reading class with a teacher who has reading endorsement, who is working on reading endorsement or who has reading certification. Students scoring a scale score at or above 280 on the FCAT-SSS Reading and have a NRT score at or above the 50%tile, will receive intensive reading strategies instruction (i.e., differentiated instruction, leveled text, etc.) in a content area class with a teacher who has reading endorsement, is working on reading endorsement or who has reading certification. Students receiving reading instruction will be screened using data from Reading FCAT-SSS, fluency probes, diagnostic test, and vocabulary checks.

High Quality Instruction Goal: Proficient Grade Level Students Provide Print-rich Environment Integrate Authentic Literature into Content Area Classes Incorporate Reading into Subject Areas with the utilization of leveled texts Incorporate Writing in the Subject Areas Offer Before and After School Activities

K-12 Reading and Language Arts Developers Marsha Glover gloverm@mail.leon.k12.fl.us Eydie Sands sandse@mail.leon.k12.fl.us Phone Number: 487-7893

2005-2006 LCHS Reading Plan Goal: Continuous Reading Achievement Faculty Meeting In-service (all faculty) “The A Team” (9th & 10th content area teachers focus on Systematic Vocabulary Instruction--SVI) with monthly trainings Learning Communities—Book Study Groups: Classroom Instruction that Works by Robert Marzano A+ Learning Systems—Computer Lab Reading Coach

Snapshot Data Based decisions FCAT performance Statistics about Chiles High that are helpful to understanding student achievement Focus on reading skills of bottom 30% to increase overall reading comprehension content knowledge http://www.chiles.leon.k12.fl.us/

Assessments What is on the FCAT? Item Specifications (list of content areas--informational text) Test Questions—Sample: Read “King of Fibers” and respond to questions #7-14 now. Content vocabulary-SSS and FCAT Explorer Standards based curriculum

Asking the tough questions???? Whose job is it to teach reading? What are YOU doing to improve reading in your classroom? What are you willing to do each day in your class to enhance reading skills? Are you covering the content and reading standards in your lessons? REFLECTION: PAIR AND SHARE

Faculty Feedback Written response: What are your concerns? How do you plan to contribute to our school goal of continuous improvement in reading? What kind of support, resources or training do you need to meet your goal?