Role of University Rankings in Kazakhstan Prof. Sholpan Kalanova BRATISLAVA 2011.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Republic of Macedonia Ministry of Education and Science Borcho Aleksov, Deputy Head Higher Education Sector Ministry of Education and Science Republic.

Advertisements

Public Accreditation Agency for Higher Education, PAAHE

Education and global cities, St. Petersburg, March 2014 Quality of rankings in the spotlight Education and global cities, St. Petersburg, March 2014 Waldemar.

«Bologna Structural Reforms: History, Problems and Perspectives» INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Astana February 13-14, 2014.

An Overview of Quality Assurance in the EHEA by Prof. Andreas G. Orphanides President of EURASHE, Rector of European University Cyprus, and Ex-President.

CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Internal Evaluation Procedures at CUT Quality Assurance Seminar Organised by the Ministry of Education and Culture and.

The Role of the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation (NAQAAE) in Egyptian Education The National Authority for Quality Assurance.

Learning outcomes in the context of the Bologna reforms Сейдахметова Римма Ганиевна Bologna Process and Academic Mobility Center Ministry of Education.

Prof. dr. Bozin Donevski University “St. Kliment Ohridski” 7000 Bitola, Macedonia EVALUATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.

1 Roundtable Meeting of Quality Assurance Agencies of the Organisation of Islamic Conference Member Countries Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia November 2009.

College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European

The role of European standards and guidelines for the development of the national system of independent assessment of the quality of higher education Seidakhmetova.

Russian State University of Tourism and Service Dean of faculty of tourism and hospitality Elena Sakharchuk, Phd, Prof. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE.

National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.

Developments in the University of Latvia governance – past, present and future Juris Krumins – Vice rector, University of Latvia Juris Puce – Head of Strategy.

The evaluation of research units at HCERES

Quality Assurance at the University St. Kliment Ohridski Elizabeta Bahtovska National Bologna promoter TEMPUS SCM C-032B06 West Balkan Bologna Promoters.

Globalization of Higher Education

PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.

LOGO Internal Quality Assurance Model: Evidence from Vietnamese Higher Education Tang Thi Thuy, Department of International and Comparative Education,

LOGO Kazakh Ablai khan University of International Relations and World Languages Tempus Project TEMPUS IT-SMGR - DOQUP Documentation for.

MAIN CHALLENGES AND TRENDS IN QUALITY ASSURANCE IN CENTRAL ASIA: THE EXAMPLE OF KAZAKHSTAN (Implementing Quality Assurance within Higher Education Institutions)

Presentation of the Montenegrin Higher Education System Regional Cooperation in Higher Education: Hungary and the Western Balkans University of Szeged,

Rogaška Slatina 30. november- 1. december 2007 ESTABLISHING EXTERNAL QA SYSTEM IN SLOVENIA Franci Čuš Marinka Drobnič Košorok.

Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.

Implementation of DOQUP Project at L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND RESEARCH.

The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.

Quality Assurance in the European HEA Enrique Lopez-Veloso University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain Agustin Merino National Team of Bologna Experts.

TEMPUS DOQUP in Kazakhstan: Strategic Impact on the National Level Saule Aidarova, Project Coordinator Kazakhstan.

University of Warsaw The Office for Quality of Education 11th of December th of December 2008.

The Bologna process and postgraduate education in Belarus (on the example of the Grodno State Medical University) Head of the Department of General Hygiene.

1. Pre-school education 2. School education (11 years) 3. Vocational education (2-3 years) 4. Higher education: One step program (5 years, specialist.

Gero Federkeil Expert Seminar „Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Lifelong Learning“, Berlin, February 2011 Rankings and Quality Assurance.

MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SPs ■ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ■ Faculty of Civil Engineering.

RECOMMENDATIONS Strand B: Validation of non-formal and informal learning.

AMU DoQuP FINAL REPORT MD, PhD, Associate Professor G.Ahmadov Azerbaijan Medical University Bishkek, April 22, 2015.

Natalya Kryvulina, Andrey Kashyn June, 2009 Astana, Kazakhstan.

Quality Assurance at the University of Arts in Belgrade Novi Pazar, 14 th February 2011 Olga Stanković General Secretary.

Loughborough London School of Sport & Exercise Sciences Evaluating the Competencies of Sports Managers in Taiwan: A Delphi Approach Ling-Mei Ko Professor.

Legal framework for student participatiing in decison making process in Serbia V. Dondur University of Belgrade-Faculty of physical chemistry CAQA, HERE.

Quality Assurance Agency in the Republic of Moldova PhD Nadejda Velico, Head for higher education department, Ministry of Education Ministry of Education,

1 FIRST STAGE OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM IN CROATIA – TASKS OF AUTHORISED BODIES.

NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN AZERBAIJAN Prof. Dr. Natig YUSIFOV Azerbaijan University.

1 European Union cooperation in quality assurance in higher education By Enrique Aguado Asenjo Sector manager Education, Employment, Social Issues, Science.

Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durman /27 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY.

1 Higher Education Funding in the Czech Republic Higher Education Department Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy.

Bologna Process in Croatia Melita Kovačević University of Zagreb Consortia Meeting of the Tempus Project UM-JEP Moving Ahead with the Bologna Process.

1 University of Mostar Prof. Ivo Čolak, Ph.D. Vice Rector.

International Cooperation Leading to Improvement of High Education Quality Mirjana Ivanović, Živana Komlenov, Zoran Putnik Department of Mathematics and.

Dr. Salwa B. El-Magoli 16/1/2007Dr.Salwa B. El-magoli Cairo: 16/1/2007 Quality Assurance and Accreditation (The Egyptian Experience) Dr. Salwa B. El-Magoli.

1 EAN CONFERENCE June 30 – July 2, 2008, Berlin. 2 „Challenges for Europe: European Higher Education in a Global Setting“ Barbara Weitgruber Austrian.

ESG 2015: Linking external and internal QA Involving stakeholders Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.

Assoc. Prof. Piniti Ratananuku, Ph.D. Assoc. Prof. Piniti Ratananuku, Ph.D. Inspector General Office of Permanent Secretary Ministry of education.

University of Warsaw. The quality of education assurance and enhancement system at the University of Warsaw.

Dr. Ahmed Dezaye The President of Salahaddin University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq “ICTHE-2015, 5 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON TRENDS IN HIGHER EDUCATION,

QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CULTURE IN ROMANIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Regional Conference „From Quality Assurance to Quality Culture” Sarajevo, 5-6 december.

Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.

Higher Education in the UAE

Joint Framework Concept

Quality Assurance in Egypt and the European Standards and Guidelines

DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO

Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra Associate Prof. Hanan Eltobgy

Project KA2-CBHE School-to-Work Transition for Higher education students with disabilities in Serbia, Bosnia & Herzegovina and Montenegro (Trans2Work)

The Role of Students in the QA System in Kazakhstan: IAAR Experience

Quality Assurances System. Where we came from and where we are now

PROGRESS AND CHANGES IN

Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA

Introduction to the training

Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics (KhNUE)

Presentation transcript:

Role of University Rankings in Kazakhstan Prof. Sholpan Kalanova BRATISLAVA 2011

Kazakhstan’s Higher Education System 2010 – Joining the Bologna Process State SectorPrivate Sector Total HEI’sStudentsHEI’sStudents HEI’sStudents Source: Agency of Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan’s Higher Education System New Classification of HEI’s in the Updated Education Law: National Research Universities National Universities (Arts, etc.) Research Universities Universities Academies Institutes

Milestones of the Ranking History in Kazakhstan  2006: National Accreditation Center developed and conducted Kazakhstan’s first institutional rankings of universities  2008: Independent Kazakhstan Quality Assurance Agency for Education (IQAA) developed and conducted first independent institutional rankings of universities  2009: IREG-4 Conference in Astana, Kazakhstan

Why We Conduct Rankings  To improve the quality of Kazakhstan’s Higher Education  To help prospective students and their families to make a right choice  To promote and speed up competition among Kazakhstan’s universities  To provide necessary and timely information for employers, government, social funds and international educational organizations

IQAA Ranking Methodology BASIS 1.Berlin Principles of Ranking Higher Education Institutions 2.Scientific Approach 3.International Experience

Three independent sources of information are used to conduct the rankings:  Form #1 is based on quantitative information submitted by HEI’s, additional sources of information are received from the Ministry of Education & Science and independent sources.  Form #2 is based on sociological research and consists of questionnaires for experts in the field of higher education.  Form #3 is based on sociological research and consists of questionnaires for employers. IQAA Ranking Methodology

1. Academic Resources – 60%  Quantitative (Informational-Statistical) Data Presented by HEI’s  6 Indicators and 39 Criteria

IQAA’s Ranking Methodology, 2011 # Indicators% of the Total Score 1 Student Body8 2 Student Academic Achievements and # of Educational Programs in HEI’s 10 3 Faculty9 4 Research and Innovation15 5 Internationalization 11 6 Informational Support 7 1. Academic Resources

IQAA Ranking Methodology 2. Expert Survey – 10%  Consists of Questionnaires for Experts  More than 200 experts participate nationwide.  Experts: Rectors, Vice-Rectors, Heads of Departments, Professors and Researchers

IQAA Ranking Methodology 3. Employer Survey – 30%  Employers assess the level of training and qualification of graduates working at the surveyed companies.  More 1000 respondents participate nationwide.  Surveys are conducted by mail and .  Surveyed employers consist of ministries, regional governorships, leading national business companies, NGO’s and others.  National Economic Chamber “Atameken” publishes the questionnaire for employers on their website during the ranking.

IQAA 2011 Ranking Results  62 HEI’s were ranked, while 135 had participated.  All the results were summed up and the integral sums determined, according to which the ranking positions of universities were defined.  If the results of ranking were within 3% range, the HEI’s were assigned the same place.

IQAA Ranking Results  Supervisory Council at IQAA considers and approves ranking results. It’s members are: Management of the National Economic Chamber “Atameken” MP’s of the Parliament of Kazakhstan Representatives of the Ministry of Education and Science  F rom June to September, as the ranking results are published, the number of daily visits on the IQAA website triples.

 The government has outlined the target for 2 or more universities to enter the top global rankings by  Heightened Interest to Quality of Universities in Society  More Competition and Improvement among HEI’s The Impact of Rankings on HE Sphere in Kazakhstan

 Enhancing Internationalization and Promoting Academic Mobility in HEI’s  Websites of universities have been significantly improving and much more information is now provided.  Ranking results are used by Academic Councils of universities to shape their strategy and improve their positions.

Conclusion: Rankings in Kazakhstan  Rankings should be one of evaluation and QA tools, not the solution to all issues. However, they are still an important instrument and they add new dimensions to quality assessment.  Rankings play an important role in information dissemination about relative positions of universities to broader public and stakeholders.  Rankings should be careful about not being too one- dimensional and limited and strive to assess all sides of university activity.  University rankings are popular and have positive opportunities for further development in Kazakhstan.

Thank you very much!