Keeping up with the Joneses, reference dependence, and equilibrium indeterminacy FUR XII conference, LUISS, Roma, 23 June 2006 Livio Stracca European Central.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
XII. Monopoly pricing and limited needs
Advertisements

The Solow Model When 1st introduced, it was treated as more than a good attempt to have a model that allowed the K/Y=θ to vary as thus avoid the linear.
Ch. 16: Output and the Exchange Rate in the Short Run.
Advanced Macroeconomics:
Discussion of Aguiar Amador, Farhi and Gopinath Coordination and Crisis in Monetary Unions.
Designing Taxes for Raising Revenue Efficiently and Equitably By James A Mirrlees.
Lecture 5: Externalities (chapter 9) Relation to lectures 1-4 Negative externalities Positive externalities: public goods and empathy Efficiency wage relation.
1 MACROECONOMICS AND THE GLOBAL BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Consumption and Saving 2 nd edition.
Notes: Use this cover page for internal presentations The Behavioural Components Of Risk Aversion Greg B Davies University College.
1 CHAPTER 16: DETERMINANTS OF THE MS. 2 In Ch 15, we developed a simple model of multiple deposit creation which showed that the Fed can influence the.
The Association of Public Economic Theory (APET), and the University of Exeter Business School Workshop in honour of Cuong LE VAN University of Exeter,
Contemporary Models of Development and Underdevelopment
Economics 2301 Lecture 24 Concavity.
Behavioral Finance and Asset Pricing What effect does psychological bias (irrationality) have on asset demands and asset prices?
Neoclassical Growth Theory
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005 Advanced Macroeconomics Chapter 16 CONSUMPTION, INCOME AND WEALTH.
‘’Deep Habits’’ by Morten Ravn, Stephanie Schmitt Grohe and Martin Uribe Ester Faia, Universitat Pompeu Fabra IMOP/ ECB Dynamic Macroeconomic Conference,
Productivity, Output, and Employment
Chapter 7 General Equilibrium and Market Efficiency
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Principles of Macroeconomics 9e by Case, Fair and Oster 12 PART III THE CORE OF MACROECONOMIC.
Aging and the Welfare State: A Political Economy Model Assaf Razin, Efraim Sadka and Edith Sand October 2005.
Investment Planning Costs and the effects of Fiscal and Monetary Policy Susanto Basu and Miles S. Kimball Frontiers of Macroeconomics Conference, June.
Aggregate Demand and Supply
Robinson Crusoe model 1 consumer & 1 producer & 2 goods & 1 factor: –two price-taking economic agents –two goods: the labor (or leisure x 1 ) of the consumer.
The Theory of Aggregate Supply Chapter 4. 2 The Theory of Production Representative Agent Economy: all output is produced from labor and capital and in.
LOGO. Microeconomics is the study of how households and firms make decisions and how these decision makers interact in the broader marketplace. In microeconomics,
Aggregate Demand and Supply. Aggregate Demand (AD)
The Economics of Smoking. One of the potential problems (from an economic perspective) with smoking is that there may be an externality in consumption,
Copyright © 2001 by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 1 Economics THIRD EDITION By John B. Taylor Stanford University.
Ch. 17: Economic Growth: Resources, Technology, and Ideas Del Mar College John Daly ©2003 South-Western Publishing, A Division of Thomson Learning.
Chapter 20 Tax Inefficiencies and Their Implications for Optimal Taxation Social efficiency is maximized at the competitive equilibrium (in the absence.
Modelling the labour market Labour supply decisions The effect of a minimum wage.
Course: Microeconomics Text: Varian’s Intermediate Microeconomics.
MICROECONOMICS TOPIC 2 Economics DEMAND.
PROSPECT THEORY AND ASSET PRICES Nicholas Barberis Ming Huang Tano Santos Course: Financial Economics, Ales Marsal, Presentation of the paper:
Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Competitive markets (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013.
© 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
+ Equity Audit & Root Cause Analysis University of Mount Union.
Chapter 16 Income Taxation

WEEK IX Economic Growth Model. W EEK IX Economic growth Improvement of standard of living of society due to increase in income therefore the society is.
Aim: What can the government do to bring stability to the economy?
Income and Spending Chapter #10 (DFS)
In his classic "The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money" Keynes telling about two important things: If you find your income going up,
Monetary Theory and Business Cycles. From the very beginning of the option theory, it was considered as a part of much larger foundation. I like the beauty.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Economic Growth: Solow Model.
Chapter 12SectionMain Menu What Is Gross Domestic Product? Economists monitor the macroeconomy using national income accounting, a system that collects.
LECTURER: JACK WU The Theory of Property Tax. Outline Topic I: What Are Property Taxes? Topic II: Property Tax Incidence Topic III: Property Tax Capitalization.
1 Jesus Ferreiro & Felipe Serrano Department of Applied Economics V University of the Basque Country Conference Economic Policies of the New Thinking in.
MICROECONOMIC THEORY 1 COURSE OVERVIEW AND INTRODUCTION WEEK 1.
QR 24 Economics Review Session 12/3/2009. Agenda Demand curves Supply curves Equilibrium Market failures – Moral hazard – Adverse selection Net Present.
Studying Optimal Paternalism, illustrated by a Model of Sin Taxes Ted O’Donogue and Matthew Rabin Presented by Julia Sonina & Liliana Perez December 2011.
The Measurement of Nonmarket Sector Outputs and Inputs Using Cost Weights 2008 World Congress on National Accounts and Economic Performance Measures for.
MODEL FOR DEALING WITH DUAL-ROLE FACTORS IN DEA: EXTENSIONS GONGBING BI,JINGJING DING,LIANG LIANG,JIE WU Presenter : Gongbing Bi School of Management University.
Bringing in the Supply Side: Unemployment and Inflation? 10.
Introduction Many organizations use decision rules to alleviate incentive problems as opposed to incentive contracts The principal typically retains some.
Topic 3: Fiscal Policy Circular Flow Investment Taxes and Government Spending 1.
Externalities >> chapter: 17 Krugman/Wells Economics ©2009  Worth Publishers 1 of 32.
Chapter 2: The Role of Economics
AGGREGATE DEMAND, AGGREGATE SUPPLY, AND INFLATION Chapter 25 1.
Equilibrium Risk Premia for Risk Seekers Douglas W. Blackburn Andrey D. Ukhov Indiana University.
Maximizing Wealth Means Maximizing What Others See as our Wealth. Wealth is what we value and we assume in macroeconomics that if everyone is at least.
Fun Facts- The Lion King  Simba means “lion”  Mufasa means “King”  Scar’s original name is Taka which means “trash”- he changed his name after getting.
The political economy of government debt Advanced Political Economics Fall 2011 Riccardo Puglisi.
By Audrey Hu and Liang Zou University of Amsterdam
Exchange Chapter 31 Niklas Jakobsson Click to add notes.
Efficiency and Equity in a Competitive Market
AQA 1.2: Individual Economic Decision Making
GDP and the Price Level in the Long Run Chapter 19
Presentation transcript:

Keeping up with the Joneses, reference dependence, and equilibrium indeterminacy FUR XII conference, LUISS, Roma, 23 June 2006 Livio Stracca European Central Bank

Literature background Growing recognition in the economics literature of the role of positional concerns in consumption (Easterlin 1995; Clark and Oswald 1996; Layard 2003) … … though the idea goes back at least to Duesenberry (1949) Research findings show that positional concerns have important effects on income and consumption comparison, but little impact on leisure comparison (Layard 2003) … … which entails the risk of overconsumption at an aggregate level Consumption externalities may call for government policy aimed at undoing the effect of the positional concerns and restoring the efficient level of consumption (Ljungqvist and Uhlig 2000)

The keeping up with the Joneses (KUJ) model Introduced by Gali (1994) Concept: the marginal utility of consumption for each individual is higher, the higher aggregate consumption Standard assumptions: Positional concerns:

Equilibrium in the KUJ model

The KUJ model can lead to equilibrium indeterminacy! This may happen if a sunspot change in aggregate consumption prompts a proportional (or more than proportional) rise in individual consumption) … … which makes the initial change in aggregate consumption self- fulfilling So, the general KUJ model has the potential to create self- fulfilling fluctuations in consumption However, this possibility has not been seriously considered thus far in the literature … … which in our view might be a mistake

Reference dependence and positional concerns Positional concerns imply that agents evaluate their consumption level relative to a reference point Reference dependence is a concept traditionally associated with the preference to maintain the status quo (endowment effect) However, reference dependence is in fact a much broader concept (Tversky and Kahneman 1991) Tversky and Kahneman (1991): “… although the reference state usually corresponds to the decision maker’s current position, it can also be influenced by aspirations, expectations, norms, and social comparisons”. What does reference dependence typically do to the functional form of the utility function?

The utility function under reference dependence

Implications for the modelling of positional concerns In short, the key point is that reference dependence implies a comparison with a given standard of value That standard of value may well be given by social comparison We conjecture that a plausible specification of the KUJ model should take reference dependence into account … … which implies that the utility function for the individual is S- shaped, convex below the reference point and concave above it As long as the marginal dis-utility of work is constant or not strongly increasing, agents will want to consume up to at least the reference level c-C becomes a “supernumary” consumption (consistent with lack of link between rising income and reported happiness; see Esterlin 1995)

The model Utility from consumption is In addition to the usual assumptions, we postulate that reference dependence holds The utility function is strictly concave for gains … … and strictly convex for losses Loss aversion

The main result of the paper (homogeneous population)

The main messages of Proposition 3 There is no determinate solution to the consumption decision problem This is due to the convex shape of the utility function below the reference point This result has a lot in common with the idea of endogenous business cycles introduced by Benhabib and Farmer (1994) There, self-fulfilling fluctuations are driven by increasing returns to scale in production, while in our work they are determined by consumers’ concern for relative status Of course assumption of homogeneous population highly unrealistic, but main result extends to at least one simple form of heterogeneity, i.e. rich and poor (shown in the paper)

What can fiscal policy do? Ljungqvist and Uhlig (2000) show that in the context of the KUJ model the the government can restore the first best level of consumption by using tax policy to undo the effect of positional concerns The effect of the tax is to reduce the marginal utility of consumption by an amount exactly equal to the importance attributed to positional concerns, with the result that the effect of positional concerns is fully corrected for In our model, the task of leading to a determinate solution can be accomplished by a progressive tax schedule. This is the same found in the context of endogenous business cycles driven by increasing returns in production (see Guo and Lansing 1998; Christiano and Harrison 1999).

The optimal tax schedule

Conclusions The main result of this paper is that aggregate consumption may be subject to multiple equilibria and be driven by sunspot fluctuations … … although it is reasonable to expect that such fluctuations would happen within certain limits, i.e. at not too high levels of work effort where the marginal disutility of work is likely to be strongly increasing This might make the case for public intervention in dampening the effect of this type of negative externalities even more compelling than typically recognized Our results might also shed a new light on the effects that factors like advertising and, more generally, social norms have on the actual aggregate level of consumption