Running at Low  * and High Lumi Test insertion on 13 October 2011:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collimation with retracted TCSGs R. Bruce, R. Kwee, S. Redaelli.
Advertisements

LHC/HERA workshop, WG 4 (17. Jan. 2005)
● Morning: – Squeeze and collide. – Smooth, orbit rather well under control (max. excursion ~ 0.2 mm at TCT, roughly sigma). Orbit evolution at the.
Wednesday 12 th September Pumping, removal of vacuum equipment from tunnel in the morning TOTEM & ALFA, RP movement tests: OK 11:50 pre-cycle started,
M. Gallinaro - "Physics with the CT-PPS project" - LHC Forward - Sep. 23, Michele Gallinaro LIP Lisbon (on behalf of the CMS and TOTEM collaborations)
LHC progress with beam & plans. Of note since last time Transverse damper Beta beating in the ramp Collimation set-up at 450 GeV & validation LBDS – systematic.
The First 1 ½ Years of TOTEM Roman Pot Operation at the LHC M. Deile, G. Antchev, I. Atanassov, V. Avati, J. Baechler, K. Eggert, J. Kašpar, F. Lucas Rodriguez,
External Review on LHC Machine Protection, CERN, Collimation of encountered losses D. Wollmann, R.W. Assmann, F. Burkart, R. Bruce, M. Cauchi,
● 08:30 Loaded by mistake squeeze function to 2 m  Dumped beams ● 10:30-13:00 Test of new algorithm for long. Emittance blow-up to minimize oscillations.
P. 1Mario Deile – Summary of Likely Running Scenarios ScenarioInelastic PileupLuminosity [cm  s  ]  * = 90 m with crossing angle  < – 10.
Plan for start-up with beam Friday  19:00 Machine closed. Ramp for powering tests & pre-cycle  22:00 Pilots through nominal cycle up to collisions. Measure.
LHC Studies Working Group – 03 July 2012 Beam Scraping and Diffusion + Asynchronous Dump MD G. Valentino, R. W. Assmann, F. Burkart, L. Lari, S. Redaelli,
:00: Prepared new fill B1: Q X =0.293, Q Y =0.269; lifetime = 25h ✔ B2: Q X =0.297, Q Y =0.267; lifetime = 5h ✗ Strong 50Hz and 100hz lines.
May 12, 2009Włodek Guryn1 Physic Program with Tagged Forward Protons at STAR Single Diffraction Dissociation (inclusive SDD cross section, leading  0.
Improvements of the ALFA and TOTEM Roman Pot Movement System in TS1 Mario Deile with input from P. Fassnacht, S. Jakobsen, J. Kaspar, S. Ravat for the.
Evian 2014 historical perspective run 1: 2010: L peak >10 32 cm -2 s -1  2x10 32 cm -2 s : produce >1 fb -1  delivered.
Saturday 7ish – refill for RP set-up 9:15 Going for Roman pot alignment. Stefano is coming. 12:10 TOTEM: Alignment of horizontal RPs B2 finished, short.
P. 1Mario Deile – Meeting on Experiment Protection from Beam Failures Protecting TOTEM Mario Deile PH-TOT
Low Luminosity Opportunities Andrew Brandt, U. Texas at Arlington DØ ADM November 18, 2005 “easy” “really hard”
LHC Crystal MD 22/09/2015 – LSWG #7 R. Rossi for the LHC Collimation team and the UA9 Collaboration.
P. 1K. Eggert – Early TOTEM Running with the  * =90m Optics Karsten Eggert on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration Politecnico di Bari and Sezione INFN Bari,
:00 meetingEBH 1  8:40 – 9:30 access for MKB (dilution kicker) LBDS B2 – PLC exchange  Pre-cycle  11:17 – 12:50 RF problem with ion injection.
ATLAS-ALFA as a beam instrument Sune Jakobsen (BE-BI-PM and PH-ADO) on behave of the ATLAS-ALFA community LS1 LBOC meeting
LHC Collimation Working Group – 02 April 2012 Results from Beam-Based Collimator Alignment G. Valentino, R. W. Assmann, R. Bruce, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi,
Status of the TOTEM Experiment and Latest Results
FP420 Backgrounds Marta Ruspa, Univ. Piemonte Orientale & INFN-Torino, Italy Andrew Brandt (UT-Arlington) Much of what is known about pileup background.
Collimator settings for 2012 R. Bruce, R. Assmann for the collimation team
Β*-dependence on collimation R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann C. Alabau Pons, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, M. Giovannozzi, W. Herr, L. Lari, G. Muller, S. Redaelli,
Cryo back at 17:30 Beam back at 19:00 IR2 aperture until ~03:00 Since then no beam from the SPS:  Connector problem on MKD  Connector eroded, needs to.
LHC Machine Operational Status and Plans LHCC, 22nd September 2010 Steve Myers (On behalf of the LHC team and international collaborators)
D.Macina TS/LEATOTEM Meeting25/02/2004 Roman Pot test at the SPS Test of the Roman Pot prototype in the SPS proposed in December 2003 (CERN/LHCC ):
Kreuth, 2015/10/5-9 Csörgő, T. Evidence for non-exponential pp d/dt at low t and √s = 8 TeV by TOTEM T. Csörgő for the TOTEM Collaboration.
How low can we go? Getting below β*=3.5m R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann Acknowledgment: T. Baer, W. Bartmann, C. Bracco, S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, B. Goddard,W.
C. Bracco, R. Bruce, B. Goddard, C. Wiesner, A. Lechner, M. Frankl
Ion Commissioning: Thursday & Friday
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
-9:00: Test IP transverse adjustment (CMS) and optics verification.
MD2036: UFO dynamics studies and UFO fast detection
Recent Results from TOTEM
Measurements of Proton-Proton Elastic Scattering and Total Cross-Section at the LHC by TOTEM Diffraction 2012 Lanzarote, 15 September Mario Deile on.
Fast losses at collimators during 16L2 dumps
Β*-reach in 2017 R. Bruce, S. Redaelli, R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi, A. Mereghetti, D. Mirarchi Acknowledgement: collimation and optics teams, BE/ABP,
Saturday 30th June - Sunday: Rocky !
Saturday 09:40 Stable beams #1369 (56 bunch scheme)
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Monday – recovery from MKI flashover
LHC commissioning Week 38
LHC Injection and Dump Protection
Summary of Week 16 G. Arduini, J. Wenninger
Trigger  Detectors at 420m can be included in the HLT
Saturday 2/4/ :00-09:00 Problems with SPS:
On behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration:
Summary of Week 26 Main aims: G. Arduini, B. Holzer, M. Lamont
Friday morning 10:30 Optics measurements and corrections.
Wednesday 9:08 Fill 3214 dumped by OP after 5:26 hours in stable beams
Saturday 7th May Sat – Sun night
Summary Thursday h21: Stable beams fill #1303.
90m "proper" VdM scans in the 90m/10m optics
Wednesday 13th 9:30 Stable Beams… with 1 pilot and 2 nominals
Monday morning 09:40 Dump fill 2838, integrated ~130 pb-1.
Friday 14th September 03:15 Beta* at 1 km. Optics measurements, see yesterday. 07:00 Dump. 08:00 Refill with 3 nominal bunches for high beta. 11:15 Beams.
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
Thursday 22nd March 00:20 – 02:40 on longer squeeze function, orbit and chroma correction at 4 TeV 2:40 – 5:30 second cycle with long squeeze 5:46 – 7:00.
Double Pomeron Exchange (DPE)
Fri :52 Stable beams fill #2536
Tuesday – Morning and Evening
Another Immortal Fill….
Tuesday 24/5 Fill # :00 Stable beam fill # bunches
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Results, Status and Perspectives for 2011
Presentation transcript:

Running at Low  * and High Lumi Test insertion on 13 October 2011:

Overview of the Insertions H T B BLM (UFO) 15 h

Zoom 6 MHz 4 MHz 2 MHz 0 Expected rate in H from SD: L = 1.5 x Hz/cm 2  SD ~ 10 mb / side  min ~ 3 mm / 7 cm ~ 5 %  SD (visible) ~  SD x (1 decade / 6.5 decades) ~ 1.5 mb Rate ~ 2 MHz  correct order of magnitude

Scenario for  * = 0.7 m Minimum RP approach compatible with BLMs : V : 14  H : somewhere between 21  (would dump) and 28  (ok)  conservatively assume 28  Aim at a faster RP beam-based alignment: right after the collimator setup: 4  drive RPs quickly to 6  (except RP 220 H)   if the beam edge is not hit, the alignment is known within ± 2  Physics: - large |t| elastic scattering (vertical pots with SD region cut away) : 3.5 GeV 2 < |t| < ~ 6.5 GeV 2 - hard diffraction with CMS: RP 220: D = 83 mm, x min ~ 28  ~ 2.7 mm   min = 3 % RP 147: D = 70 mm, x min ~ 28  ~ 14 mm   min = 20 % (Is this useful ? Don’t align ?) Trigger: RPs (double arm) x CMS dijet: above 100 GeV:  min = 200 GeV / 8 TeV = 2.5 % diff. dijet cross-section: ~ 1 nb  rate ~ 1 L = cm -2 s -1  (V) [mm]  (H) [mm](for  n = 2.5  m rad) RP no reference from 2011 but large beam  big tolerance RP very small  (H)  need to align with small steps

Dijet Cross-Section 1nb 1b1b

Scenario for  * = 90 m  (V) [mm]  (H) [mm](for  n = 2.5  m rad) RP no reference from 2011 RP use 2011 alignment as first guess Two runs: 1. Alignment and minimum bias physics bunches: 2 coll. + 1 non-coll., with 6 x p/b  n = 2  m rad Option (a): Full scraping exercise for 24 pots (up to 12 hours)  operation with Vertical 5  = TCP mm) Horizontal 10  (protected by 6  and 8  ) Option (b): Faster alignment (without touching the beam) (difficult for RP 147: where to start ?)  operation with retraction by additional 2  4 hours data taking: - 2 hours: min. bias with CMS, trigger on T2 + RP(single arm) with 1 bunch - 2 hours: RP trigger alone (single or double arm) with 2 bunches At the end: loss map for qualification for more bunches L = 7.6 x cm -2 s -1 / b,  = 0.05

Scenario for  * = 90 m 2. Diffractive dijets (DPE) with CMS 156 bunches with 6 x p/b  n = 2  m rad Collimation hierarchy: Vertical: 4.5 , 6 – 6.5 , 8 – 8.5  Horizontal: in addition 8 , 10  Alignment already done  fast approach (~ 1 h) Trigger: (RP double arm) x dijet (> 20 GeV): diff. dijet : ~ 0.5  b 3 h data taking ~ 10 nb -1 L = 1.2 x cm -2 s -1 / b,  = 0.05

Scenario for  * = 500 m Aim at physics near the end of the running season, but optics development earlier in MDs. Technical problem (mitigation possibilities currently being investigated) : Anti-collision switch limits relative Top – Bottom pot distance. Best case for RP 220: T – B > 2 x 7    m Worst case for RP 220: T – B > 2 x    m If no mechanical solution for this year: take data for both diagonals separately