Session I – Session I – Strengths and Weaknesses of the EDSP Screening Assays Moderator: Angelina J. Duggan Exponent Health Group September 9, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Abt Associates Inc. In collaboration with: I Aga Khan Foundation I BearingPoint I Bitrán y Asociados I BRAC University I Broad Branch Associates I Forum.
Advertisements

Abt Associates Inc. In collaboration with: I Aga Khan Foundation I Bitrán y Asociados I BRAC University I Broad Branch Associates I Deloitte Consulting,
Calista AVCP Regional Energy Plan. Preliminary Planning and Stakeholder Involvement Resource Inventory and Data Analysis Develop and Review Draft Energy.
Perspectives from EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
UNEP Advisory Group Meeting Geneva, Switzerland December 12, 2014
Session III: Assessing Cumulative Effects of Endocrine Active Substances 9:15 - 9:30 Introduction” Rick Becker (Session Chair and Panel Moderator) 9:30.
Priority-setting for the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: Pesticide Active Ingredients Penelope A. Fenner-Crisp Office of Pesticide Programs U.S.
External Peer Review of the FDA Office of Regulatory Affairs Pesticide Program FDA Science Board Advisory Committee Meeting Nov. 4, 2005.
1. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Presentation to RCC Stakeholders - Webinar Session January 14 th, 2014.
ISRTP Endocrine 2010 Exhibitors.  ABC Laboratories  Battelle  BioQual  Harlan  RTI  Steptoe & Johnson, LLP  Wildlife International  WIL Research.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Sue Sheridan, Acting Director, Patient.
Outcome of Federal Actions on WA Water Quality Standards.
The Challenge The retailing and shopping center sector is experiencing one of the most profound and thoroughgoing transformations in its 60-year history.
EDSP Validation Gary E.Timm Senior Technical Advisor Office of Science Coordination and Policy U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
BILC Standardization Initiatives and Conference Objectives
In Vitro Aromatase Assay: Prevalidation Studies
Criteria for Screens— Review of the EDSTAC Recommendations Presentation to the EDMVS July 23, 2002.
1 Theme-based Research Scheme Briefing Session 12 April 2010.
Canada vs. USA Environmental Regulation (Why Canadians are better known for hockey) Georgia Basin-Puget Sound International Airshed Strategy Meeting September.
Quill Law Group LLC1 EDSP Implementation Business and Legal Considerations Terry F. Quill Quill Law Group LLC 1667 K St, NW Washington, DC
Quill Law Group LLC1 EDSP Compliance EDSP Phase 2 Policies and Procedures Terry F. Quill Quill Law Group LLC 1667 K St, NW Washington, DC
September 16, SWANA 2005 COLORADO CHARLES JOHNSON SOLID WASTE UNIT LEADER.
Step 6: Implementing Change. Implementing Change Our Roadmap.
Status of the U.S. Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Status of the U.S. Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) September
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
Environmental • failure analysis & prevention • health • technology development A leading engineering & scientific consulting firm dedicated to helping.
Present Development of a Regional Guidance Document for Dredged Material Evaluation Christopher McArthur, P.E. (US Environmental.
EDSP’s Approach to Test Protocol Validation Office of Science Coordination and Policy U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Quill Law Group LLC1 EDSP Compliance Timing, Procedural and Legal Issues Terry F. Quill Quill Law Group LLC 1667 K St, NW Washington, DC
Slide 1 of 24 EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Use of Exposure Data in Priority Setting Bill Wooge Office of Science Coordination and.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Forming. Context 113 Catholic elementary and secondary schools in 19 counties of southwest Ohio Demographic, financial, programming, and enrollment challenges.
Beyond and Decisions: From Problem Formulation to Dose- Response.
Wildlife Screens What Do They Tell Us? Dr. Pat Guiney Manager Global Safety, Regulatory & Environmental Assessment S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. Racine, WI.
Green Chemistry & Commerce Council (GC3) A project of the Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, University of Massachusetts Lowell.
International Society of Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2009 Endocrine Workshop The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: What Can Screening Results.
Communications and the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program ISRTP Workshop December 13, 2010.
Quill Law Group LLC1 EDSP Implementation Business and Legal Considerations Terry F. Quill Quill Law Group LLC 1667 K St, NW Washington, DC
Federal Aviation Administration NextGen Environmental Management System (EMS)
1 Revising the Content Standards for K-12 Social Sciences A Progress Report State Board of Education December 3, 2009.
Introduction to Session II: Incorporating Existing Data into the EDSP Erik R. Janus Director, Human Health Policy CropLife America.
© 2007 SRI International CPATH Principal Investigators Meeting: Program Evaluation Update March 26, 2010 By the Center for Education Policy Dr. Raymond.
Global Assessment Report and need for Regional Assessment Report Meeting of the ISDR Asia Partnership, September September 2011 Pattaya, Thailand.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
MDIC 1 George Serafin Deloitte & Touche LLP MDIC Open Forum Quality System Maturity Model Update.
75 years of excellence 16 June 2011 – Washington DC 16 th Trilateral Working Group Meetings Agenda Item #12 Battery Summit 16 th Trilateral Working Group.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Clinical Forum: Risk Where are we now? Lindsay Thomson Medical Director, Forensic Network.
EDSP Implementation: Concerns for the Pesticide Industry ISRTP 2009 Endocrine Workshop: The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: What Can Screening Results.
EPA’s White Paper and Workshop on Background Ozone NASA AQAST 10 th Semiannual Meeting – 1/6/16.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 2 Diploma of Project Management.
Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing: An Industry Update
Data Analysis in the Water Industry: A Good-Practice Guide
U.S. FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health Update
Discussion of CRVS strategies
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
Suggestion for next steps for PGA for REDD+ in Vietnam
FSTF Strategic planning update
Organizational Consulting
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
Developing a Plan for Identifying Local Needs and Resources
Standard Operating Procedures and Termination Procedures
Beyond Science and Decisions: Problem Formulation to Dose Response
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
Developing a Plan for Identifying Local Needs and Resources
Towards a sustainability process for GEOSS Essential Variables
Palais des Nations, Geneva, Switzerland
Presentation transcript:

Session I – Session I – Strengths and Weaknesses of the EDSP Screening Assays Moderator: Angelina J. Duggan Exponent Health Group September 9, 2009

Session I Objectives EPA EDSP update EPA EDSP update Provide forum to discuss stakeholder’s EDSP perspectives, interpretations and recommendations Provide forum to discuss stakeholder’s EDSP perspectives, interpretations and recommendations

EDSP Tier 1 Development More than 10 years since August 2008 EDSTAC Final Report More than 10 years since August 2008 EDSTAC Final Report Validation was a global effort Validation was a global effort –EPA and international regulators –Academic, industry, government and CRO scientists –Stakeholders recommendations Implementation and interpretation of Phase 1 EDSP screening will present new challenges and expectations for EPA, stakeholders, industry and NGOs Implementation and interpretation of Phase 1 EDSP screening will present new challenges and expectations for EPA, stakeholders, industry and NGOs

Challenges and Expectations Individual and collective interpretation of Tier 1 Phase 1 screening results Individual and collective interpretation of Tier 1 Phase 1 screening results Provide guidance to implement mid-course correctionsProvide guidance to implement mid-course corrections Provide guidance on weight-of-evidence to proceed to Tier 2 testing (EDTP)Provide guidance on weight-of-evidence to proceed to Tier 2 testing (EDTP) Tier 1 lessons learned and expert recommendations (ILSI, NAS) should be applied in Tier 2 testing validation Tier 1 lessons learned and expert recommendations (ILSI, NAS) should be applied in Tier 2 testing validation Can the EDSP accommodate and compliment new technologies Can the EDSP accommodate and compliment new technologies Genomic technologiesGenomic technologies Alternative screening programs (e.g., ToxCast)Alternative screening programs (e.g., ToxCast) NanotechnologyNanotechnology

EPA EDSP Update Gary Timm, EPA OCSP: “ An Update on the Implementation of the EPA’s Endocrine Disruption Screening Program” Gary Timm, EPA OCSP: “ An Update on the Implementation of the EPA’s Endocrine Disruption Screening Program” EDSP background and path forward EDSP background and path forward – ESTAC’s recommendation – Validation criteria – Timelines to implement test orders and Tier 2 testing validation

EDSP Stakeholder Expert Panel CRO perspective CRO perspective –Shelley Tyl, RTI, “Challenges in Conducting and Interpreting Tier 1 EDSP Screening Assays: CRO Perspective ” Registrant /industry assessments Registrant /industry assessments –Sue Marty, Dow Chemical Corp., “Mammalian Tier 1 EDSP Screening Assays: What do they tell us?” –Pat Guiney, SC Johnson, “Wildlife Tier 1 EDSP screening assays: What do they tell us?” –Christopher Borgert, Applied Pharmacology and Toxicology Inc., “Staging Screening and Testing”

Thank You