Mn/DOT Combined Smoothness Specification Operator Certification Training Workshop July 12, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background images courtesy of abc.com 1,000, , , ,000 64,000 32,000 16,000 8,000 4,000 2,000 1,
Advertisements

Volvo Construction Equipment Road Institute Paving Principles.
General Ledger Operations AgVantage ® Software National Conference June 22-24, 2010 Rick Prinsen.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Slicer Tutorial Module: Segmentation May 26, 2005.
1 Phase II Secondary Schools Teacher Assistant Mark Entry Student Information Services Section August 2007.
Executive Session Office of Asset Management
Minnesota Department of Transportation Mn/DOTs Gradual Shift from Profile Index to IRI.
Signing Plan Design - At Grade Intersections TEM Chapter Application Guidelines - Regulatory Signs.
Why is ride important?. Our customers - the driving public values pavement smoothness very high.
Ride Specification – IRI Update Prepared by Joe Thomas, P.E. 11/1/06 MAAPT 53 rd Annual Asphalt Conference December 6, 2006.
Stewardship Oversight Committee Project Delivery Design & Construction Performance Measures May 2012.
Editing Instructions Simply add a question and 4 possible answers by overtyping the white text. The green box on the next slide shows which answer should.
Welcome to... Everything you always wanted to know about New Growth... But... were afraid to ASK !
HST Toolpaths.
CRCT Review. The weight of a new truck is 1,500 kg What is the weight of the truck in grams? A.) 150 B.) 15,000 C.) 1,500,000 D.) 150,000,000.
Payment & Remittance Processes
Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez Stephen Henry
ASPHALT PRICE ADJUSTMENT PRICE ESCALATION IN THE 21 ST CENTURY.
How fast is the butterfly moving? What direction is it moving?
Office of International Student Services Tax Seminar
This PP is annotated (with a pointer) and narrated (using PP versions 2007 and later). The speaker icon on each slide indicates this capability. The narration.
Partial Products. Category 1 1 x 3-digit problems.
3D Analysis with AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating
Welcome to a tour of Limb Volumes Professional 6.0 LVP6.0 is the latest version of the world famous and widely used lymphedema tracking and reporting software.
A Connected Vehicle-Based Application to Estimate Road Roughness Transportation agencies devote significant resources towards collection of highly detailed.
IRI Smoothness Testing for Quality Assurance and Warranty Construction Alberta Transportation CUPGA November 15 th, 2009 Moncton, NB.
Proposal Note 555 Surface Smoothness for Bridges and Approaches
LLP HMA Pavements Inertial Profiler Prebid Meeting Solano A0104 Oakland, CA September 14, 2012 Peter Vacura Chief, Office of Asphalt Pavement.
Joe White (608) Wayne Chase (608) WisDOT Materials Management Section 1.
Airfield Pavement Roughness -Gaps in the Industry-
Welcome to the YPQA Scores Reporter On Line Tutorial! This technology, available to network and program site leaders using the YPQA as part of quality.
1 PAVEMENT DATA ITEMS. 2 Climate_Shapes (4 LTPP zones) Soil_Shapes Metadata Estimates Section level data HPMS Pavement Data Summary level data.
History Dynatest was founded in 1976 in Denmark by a group of engineers and technicians who combined  science  technology and  business into the development.
International Roughness Index (IRI) for Construction Acceptance Technical Standards Branch Knowledge Presentations to the CEA February 13 th, 2014 Jim.
Guide to using the myNATE website
PILOT CAR ESCORT CERTIFICATION JEOPARDY GAME Defensive Driving Breakdowns and Emergency Highway Operations Functions and Duties GA.
Pavement Ride Quality Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation.
Data Collection for Determining Pavement Condition
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES. n Historic development of pavement condition indices n The basic functions of condition indices in PMS n Different types of.
Welcome to the Eastern Region Laboratory Procedures Manual ERLPM
2002 FDOT/FTBA Construction Conference
 Quality Management Program (QMP) Review  HTCP Program  IRI News.
MoDOT’s Inventory Systems and Measures for Pavement Marking and Roadway Signing Jim Carney State Maintenance Engineer October 2004.
I. Advantages of Smooth Pavements: Longer Life Public Opinion Save Fuel Less Surface Maintenance II. Ways to Ensure Smooth Pavements Subgrade and Subbase.
Presented by: Ken Skorseth, Program Manager
0 Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) Department of Defense Government Training.
Moving to International Roughness Index Measured By Inertial Profilers for Acceptance of New Asphalt Construction in Ontario By John A. Blair, Bituminous.
Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Identifying High Collision Concentration Locations Raghavan Srinivasan 1 Craig Lyon 2 Bhagwant Persaud 2 Carol Martell.
Pavement Thickness Evaluation Using Ground Penetrating Radar Dwayne Harris Dwayne Harris Presented for Final Exam.
Comparison of Inertial Profiler Measurements with Leveling and 3D Laser Scanning Abby Chin and Michael J. Olsen Oregon State University Road Profile Users.
ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA PERSPECTIVE Airfield Pavement Roughness Presentation to: ASTM E17 Committee.
Addressing Localized Roughness at the Project Level by Gary Higgins.
Using LTPP Data in Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pavement Smoothness.
4/25/2017 9:25 AM Inertial Profiler Forum Intro to the Inertial Profiler Implementation September 28, 2015 © 2015 California Department of Transportation.
Motion. Objectives Define motion. Calculate the speed of a moving object. Distinguish between velocity and acceleration.
MnDOT Pavement Surface Smoothness Specification 23 rd Annual RPUG Meeting September 29, 2011.
Estimating Crop ET from Satellite Section 2. Calculate ET from Satellite Data-V1.
Pavement Profile Viewing and Analysis Presented by ProVAL Support Team.
By Terry Treutel Ride Quality Consultant Former WisDOT Ride Spec Coordinator.
IRI T ESTING IN N ORTH C AROLINA Presented by Christopher Bacchi, PE Vice President, Trimat Materials Testing, Inc. Raleigh, NC.
Office of Highway Safety Sight Distance and Roadway Condition Dan Walsh, P.E.
1 Berger Jean-Baptiste
CPNZ STATISTICS A guide to completing and entering Patrol Statistics.
NCDOT – “Final Surface Testing” CAPA / NCDOT Asphalt Training Workshop February 21-22, 2012 Raleigh, NC IRI Standard Specification Article
National Highway Institute 4-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 PROFILE INDICES BLOCK 4.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
Statistical Analysis with Excel
Transitioning to IRI for Pavement Smoothness
Welcome to a tour of Limb Volumes Professional 6.0
Presentation transcript:

Mn/DOT Combined Smoothness Specification Operator Certification Training Workshop July 12, 2010

Combined Smoothness Spec. Whats Different? 1.Smoothness evaluation 2.Areas of localized roughness (ALR) 3.Profile Viewing and Analysis (ProVAL) software 4.Profile Summary worksheets 5.Operator certification

1. Smoothness Evaluation Both the right and left wheel paths must be profiled with a certified Inertial Profiler. After corrective work, an IRI value will be computed for each wheel path, for each 528- foot segment, and then averaged. This average IRI value will used to calculate the segment pay adjustment. IRI values will be determined with ProVALs Ride Quality: Fixed Interval. Exclusion: paving with posted speeds < 45 mph

2. Areas of Localized Roughness Will replace bumps/dips 25-foot continuous IRI that exceeds inches/mile Will be analyzed in the right wheel path only ALR and grinding locations will be determined by ProVALs Smoothness Assurance.

2. Areas of Localized Roughness ALR that exist after paving will require corrective work. ALR that remain after corrective work will be assessed a deduction of either $5.00 per linear foot or $10.00 per linear foot, depending on the magnitude of roughness. Exclusion: paving with posted speeds < 30 mph

Required Data by Posted Speed 1. Posted Speed 45 mph Smoothness (both wheel paths) ALR (right wheel path only) 10-foot straightedge mph Posted Speed < 45 mph ALR (right wheel path only) 10-foot straightedge 3. Posted Speed < 30 mph 10-foot straightedge

ALR > Bumps/Dips Areas of localized roughness are generated from IRI, an index that measures what passengers actually feel. Accurate identification of bumps/dips is hindered by the design of the California Profilograph. The California Profilograph ignores or minimizes some bumps/dips, while exaggerating or manufacturing others.

Design Limitations of Profilograph Because its front and rear wheels are in contact with the pavement surface, the profilograph cannot accurately measure the pavement profile.

Do These Bumps Really Exist? Actual Profile Profilograph Trace Phantom Bumps Dip

Sample Profile

Applying a 25-foot Moving Average 25-foot sliding window

Continuous IRI: 25-foot Intervals 54 in/mi 125 feet

Areas of Localized Roughness 125 in/mi Areas of Localized Roughness

3. ProVAL Developed by the Transtec Group for the U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Long Term Pavement Performance Program (LTPP) Free to download at Contractor ERD values will be imported into ProVAL to calculate 528-foot IRI values, areas of localized roughness, and recommended grinding locations.

Getting Started

Add Files

Viewer

Analysis

Ride Quality

ALR

Ride Quality 528 IRI Values

Smoothness Assurance

Smoothness Assurance Grinding ALR

Smoothness Assurance Grinding

Exercise #1 Lets practice creating the first set of ProVAL reports that must be submitted to the Project Engineer: 1.Ride Statistics at Intervals (within 5 days of paving placement) 2.Smoothness Assurance Grinding (prior to corrective work) Open ProVAL and load Exercise1.erd.

Smoothness Assurance Histograms ALR

Smoothness Assurance Histograms

Enter this value into Profile Summarys 125 ALR < 150 box

Smoothness Assurance Histograms

Enter this value into Profile Summarys 150 ALR < 250 box

Exercise #2 Lets practice creating the final set of ProVAL reports that must be submitted to the Project Engineer: 1.Ride Statistics at Intervals (within 5 days of corrective work) 2.Smoothness Assurance ALR Histograms (within 5 days of corrective work) Open ProVAL and load Exercise2.erd.

Editor

Enter this value into Profile Summarys 150 ALR < 250 box

Editor

Exercise #3 Lets practice using ProVALs Editor to create two subsections: 1.1,000 feet to 3,000 feet 2.3,500 feet to 5,500 feet After creating the new sections, lets compare their respective IRI values. Open ProVAL and load Exercise3.erd.

4. Profile Summary Worksheets All green cells are to be filled in by contractor. 528-foot IRI values must be entered for each wheel path. The average IRI will be calculated automatically by the worksheet. ALR data should be entered only on the first Profile Summary for an ERD file.

New Profile Summary Worksheets

Profile Summary Worksheet ProVAL Ride Quality Fixed Interval ProVAL Smoothness Assurance Histograms ProVAL Ride Quality Fixed Interval

ALR Deduction Calculation -$ , Total Length x (125ALR<150)/100 x $5.00 Total Length x (150ALR<250)/100 x $

ALR Data Entry Instructions If this is the first Profile Summary for an ERD file, enter the percent of pavement with ALR and < (after corrective work) for the entire files Right Wheel Path. If this is NOT the first Profile Summary for an ERD file, enter 0. If this is the first Profile Summary for an ERD file, enter the length of pavement for the entire files Right Wheel Path. If this is NOT the first Profile Summary for an ERD file, enter 0.

Exercise #4 Lets practice filling out the Profile Summary worksheet that needs to be submitted to the Project Engineer within 5 days of the completion of corrective work. Open HMA_ABC_2010.xls. Open ProVAL and load Exercise4.ppf.

5. Operator Certification All contractors who operate an Inertial Profiler (IP) on a Mn/DOT project: must be trained in the operation of the IP and be knowledgeable in the use of ProVAL must pass a written certification examination should operate that particular IP during Mn/DOTs annual Inertial Profiler Certification Program

Exam Information For Question 13 on the exam, you will need to create and print a Corrective Work plan and a Final ProVAL report. In order to do so, you will need to open the following three ERD files: SampleProfile-Right.erd SampleProfile-Right-AfterGrinding.erd SampleProfile-Left-AfterGrinding.erd You also will use these files to complete a Profile Summary worksheet.