Actuarial Communication is not an Oxymoron Philadelphia Actuarial Club November 11, 2009 Alan D. Ford, Actuarial Standards Board.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TAC Position Paper Process Mark Melanson 5 August 2009 Tom Duerr Karen Harwell Mark Melanson Jim Neidhoefer.
Advertisements

Course on Professionalism ASOP 43 – Property / Casualty Unpaid Claim Estimates.
Page 1 Conflicts of Interest Peter Hughes IESBA December 2012 New York, USA.
1 Code of Professional Conduct Darrell Knapp Kansas City Actuaries Club Seminar June 24, 2009.
Organising seminars and conferences. Types of meetings 1. Organization meetings (board of directors’ meet, youth clubs). 2. Planning meetings (village.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley The CPA Profession Chapter 2.
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
Office of the Auditor General of Canada CANADA’S ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON AUDITING 20 FACTS PREPARERS of FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SHOULD KNOW.
Breach of a Requirement of the Code Marisa Orbea New York 19 June 2012.
Foster & Foster 0 SEPTEMBER 7, 2014 LOUISIANA ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Actuarial Standards and Required Disclosure Shelley R. Johnson,
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Business and Administrative Communication SIXTH EDITION.
Time for a new standard - AS General Conditions of Contract
IMS Systems Analysis and Design Communication and Documentation: Additional Notes on Written Reports.
Current Developments at the PCAOB Ensuring Integrity: 3 rd Annual Auditing Conference at Baruch College December 4, 2008.
9.401 Auditing Chapter 1 Introduction. Definition of Auditing The accumulation and evaluation The accumulation and evaluation Of evidence about information.
CSE Information Systems 1 Communication and Documentation: Additional Notes on Written Reports.
COURSE ON PROFESSIONALISM ASOP #17 - Expert Testimony by Actuaries.
Copyright  2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia by Gay & Simnett Slides prepared by Roger Simnett.
Purpose of the Standards
Current CAS Issues and Directions Joanne Spalla MAF Fall Meeting September 21, 2007.
Skit on Reserving Committee on Professionalism Education.
Auditing Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The CPA Profession Chapter 2 By Arens et. al. Learning Objective 1 Describe the nature of CPA firms, what they do, and their structure.
1 The Impact of SAS 112 on Governmental Financial Statement Audits GAQC Member Conference Call January 4, 2007 Presented by Chuck Landes, CPA.
1 Peer Review Casualty Actuaries of New England Spring Meeting April 2, 2008 Jeff Kucera.
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Minneapolis, Minnesota September 18 – 19, 2000 Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 36 Discussion of Implementation Considerations.
Professionalism: A Legal Perspective Lauren M. Bloom General Counsel American Academy of Actuaries.
The Actuarial Standards Board and Actuarial Standards of Practice Actuaries’ Club of Boston Annual Meeting September 16, 2010 Kathleen A. Riley, FSA, MAAA,
Compliance Audit related to the Audit of Financial Statements Seminar on Financial Audit Standards October 2008 Deputy Director General Kelly Ånerud, Technical.
Course on Professionalism ASOP 1 – Introductory Actuarial Standard of Practice (ASOP)
2008 Revised Qualification Standards Southwest Actuarial Forum Catherine Taylor, FCAS, MAAA June 2008.
Presentation Subject Header OVERVIEW OF THE ED - ISRS 4410 Presenter: Ashif Kassam Group Chief Executive, RSM Ashvir.
[Hayes, Dassen, Schilder and Wallage, Principles of Auditing An Introduction to ISAs, edition 2.1] © Pearson Education Limited 2007 Slide 4.1 An Auditor’s.
Discussion of Unpaid Claim Estimate Standard  Raji Bhagavatula  Mary Frances Miller  Jason Russ November 13, 2006 CAS Annual Meeting San Francisco,
US Standard of Practice #43 Unpaid Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Estimates Mary Frances Miller Christopher Carlson Casualty Actuarial Society Quebec,
A.S. FlemingFall 2009 Acct 431 – Cost Management "Ethics in its broader sense, deals with human conduct in relation to what is morally good and bad, right.
Part Eleven Reporting on Financial Statements 1. 2 Structure of Seminar 1.Standards of Reporting 2.Types of Audit Opinions 3.Other Reporting Considerations.
BY: G.P. MBUGUA AG. DEPUTY REGISTRAR, R&T. MEETINGS Definition: A meeting may be defined as the coming together of at least two persons for any lawful.
COURSE ON PROFESSIONALISM ASOP #17 - Expert Testimony by Actuaries.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies 2010 Auditing Internal Control over Financial Reporting Chapter Seven.
Proposed ASB Actuarial Standard of Practice on Statements of Actuarial Opinion Regarding Property/Casualty Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves Status.
March 2010 – IAASB to consider issues paper and task force proposals June 2010 – IAASB first read of exposure draft (prior to next IESBA meeting) September.
2002 CLRS - Arlington, VA Reserve/Opinion Issues from a Regulatory Perspective Proposed Revision to the NAIC Annual Statement Instructions Richard Marcks,
Conflicts of Interest Peter Hughes IESBA June 2012 New York, USA.
Practice Standards. Topic 77: Practice Standards Learning Objectives Describe the Practice Standards employed during each step of the financial planning.
Page 1 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA Meeting New York, USA September 15-16, 2015.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2015 American of Academy of Actuaries. All Rights.
HHHR Objective Setting and Performance Appraisal Cycle for Supervisors.
Business Meetings Oral Communication. What is a Business Meeting A business meeting is any focused conversation that has a specific agenda; usually, but.
What is the court’s expectation of doctors? British Medical Association 17 November 2006.
Internal Audit Quality Assessment Guide
Materiality And Audit Reporting Audit Report Audit Opinion
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
Actuarial Credibility Task Force Report & The Potential Impact to ASOP 36 Chris Carlson, FCAS, MAAA Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Chair Casualty Committee.
Webinar on the Exposure Draft of CAS Continuing Education Policy
Safeguards- Feedback on Safeguards ED-2 and Task Force Proposals
PRESENTATION BY THE LOA TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON FINANCE
Structure of the Code – Phase 2 TF Comments and Proposals
Setting Actuarial Standards
Structure–Feedback on Structure ED-2 and Task Force Proposals
EER Assurance December 2018
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
Update on the Developments in Government Auditing Standards
Taking the STANDARDS Seriously
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
International Triathlon Union
IAASB – IESBA Coordination Fees Proposals by IESBA
Presentation transcript:

Actuarial Communication is not an Oxymoron Philadelphia Actuarial Club November 11, 2009 Alan D. Ford, Actuarial Standards Board

WHY? In New Jersey, we drive on the Parkway. And we park in our driveways. 2

A Few Oxymora Airline foodExact estimateNon-stop flight Authentic replica Harmless pornography Open secret Constant variableHell’s AngelsRequired donation Dry martiniMicrosoft WorksSanitary sewer Elevated subwayMilitary intelligenceYoung adult 3

Agenda for Today ASB and ASOPS Background on ASOP 41 First Exposure Draft of ASOP 41 Second Exposure Draft of ASOP 41 Practical communications 4 4

Disclaimer All statements are mine alone. Any statements, representations, and expressions of opinions or views are attributable only to me and should not be construed as representing the Actuarial Standards Board. 5 5

Acknowledgement This presentation is based on slides from the Valuation Actuary Symposium in September and the SOA Annual Meeting in October. Thanks to Tom Bakos, Mike Boot, Bill Cutlip, Godfrey Perrott and Joshua Weber who made prepared those presentations. 6

Three Pillars of Professionalism Code of Conduct Qualification Standards Standards of Practice 7

What is the ASB? The Actuarial Standards Board establishes and improves standards of actuarial practice. These Actuarial Standards of Practice (ASOPs) identify what the actuary should consider and disclose when performing an actuarial assignment. The ASB’s goal is to set standards for appropriate practice for the U.S. 8

Composition of the ASB Nine members 3-year terms, no more than 2 consecutive. Broadly representative of all areas of actuarial practice. Meets quarterly. 9 9

Actuarial Standards of Practice ASOPs provide – guidance to US actuaries when performing work, and – Documentation of then current practice in the event of a later dispute Purpose of guidance is to give the intended users of the actuarial work product assurance as to its quality and suitability “Intended users” are an important part of our audience 10

ASOP Drafting The ASB drafts ASOPs to provide guidance. Stress principles rather than prescriptions. Process – observe and catalog generally accepted practice – determine whether that practice is appropriate or whether higher standard is needed. The ASB generally avoids endorsing one method (or approach) unless there exists a wide consensus that the one method is superior to the others and is the only appropriate method. 11

Process to develop a new ASOP Anyone may submit a proposal Proposal to ASB describes why a new ASOP is needed and what it would cover ASB may approve and refer to a Standing Committee (or a Task Force) ASB may decline to approve and return it to proposer 12

Process to develop a new ASOP Exposure Draft reviewed by ASB Exposure Draft distributed to profession and other interested parties for comment Comments are posted on ASB website Standing Committee and/or Task Force reviews comments and makes appropriate modifications ASB reviews and edits revised ASOP 13

Process to develop a new ASOP ASB decides to adopt or re-expose depending on the materiality of the changes from the Exposure Draft ASOP becomes effective several months after adoption by the ASB Similar process for repeal of ASOP (except repeal is immediate) Communication process now electronic for speed and efficiency 14

Independence of ASB The ASB is independent (of other actuarial bodies, employers, regulators, etc.) in creating, revising and repealing ASOPs. The ASB is responsive to the actuarial community through the proposal process, exposure process and periodic hearings. The ASB works with CUSP to recognize the actuarial profession's objectives 15

Issues facing ASB “Appropriate Practice” versus “Best Practice” Emerging/changing professional approaches Compliance with legal requirements that conflict with ASOPs ASB relationship with actuarial organizations Including non-actuaries in standards process - CRUSAP recommendation Globalization 16

History of ASOP 41 ASOP 41 was adopted in 2002 It addressed communication – What an actuary should communicate – When an actuary should communicate – What an actuary should disclose 17

Existing ASOP 41 The 2002 ASOP is still in effect It did not address deviation How to deviate from the guidance of an ASOP, while still complying with ASOP The organization of content is somewhat muddled in the existing ASOP 18

ASOP 41 Revision: First Exposure Draft Major changes from existing ASOP – Actuary is responsible for assumptions etc unless the actuary explicitly disclaims responsibility – Attempted to clarify (without success) when an “actuarial report” should be issued – Moved the required disclosure in the case of a deviation into ASOP 41 (from most other ASOPs) A deviation is deviating from the guidance of an ASOP while still complying with the ASOP 19

20 ASOP 41 Revision: First Exposure Draft Principle identify the methods, procedures, assumptions, and data used by the actuary with sufficient clarity that another actuary qualified in the same practice area could make an objective appraisal of the reasonableness of the actuary’s work User is entitled to peer review, and peer reviewer should not need to go back to author 20

ASOP 41 Revision: First Exposure Draft Requirements for Disclosures Within an Actuarial Communication (section 3) Identification of Responsible Actuary – clearly identified in actuarial communication Conflict of Interest – disclose if not financially, organizationally, or otherwise independent (also see Precept 7) 21

22 ASOP 41 Revision: First Exposure Draft Requirements for Disclosures Within an Actuarial Communication (cont’d) Reliance on Other Sources for Data and Other Information – make use of assumptions without assuming responsibility Responsibility for Assumptions and Methods – assumes actuary selects and endorses them unless otherwise disclosed 22

23 ASOP 41 Revision: First Exposure Draft Disclosures (section 4) – Identify Principal – Scope and Intended Purpose – Limitations or Constraints – Responsible Actuary – Actual or Apparent conflict of interest – Information that has a material impact 23

24 ASOP 41 Revision: First Exposure Draft Assumptions, Methods, etc. (section 4) – If prescribed by law - disclose – If selected by legally empowered other party – disclose – If selected by other party who is not legally empowered, disclose and disclaim unless accepting responsibility 24

25 ASOP 41 Revision: First Exposure Draft Deviation From the Guidance of an ASOP (section 4) – If an actuary deviates materially from the guidance in an ASOP under any other circumstances, s/he can still comply with the ASOP by disclosing the nature, rationale, and effect of such deviation – May require a with and without calculation (if practical) 25

26 ASOP 41 Revision: First Exposure Draft – Responses due in ASB office by December 31, 2008 – 23 responses received – Now on to the Second Exposure Draft 26

ASOP 41 Revision: First Exposure Draft – Asked four questions Is it appropriate to require the actuary to be responsible for assumptions and methods used within an actuarial communication unless otherwise disclosed? This ASOP is titled “Actuarial Communications” even though it also addresses documentation. Does this create any confusion? Does this draft make it sufficiently clear when the actuary should issue an actuarial report disclosing methods, procedures, assumptions, and? Are the added disclosure requirements in cases involving deviation clear and appropriate? 27

ASOP 41 Revision: First Exposure Draft – Asked four questions Is it appropriate to require the actuary to be responsible for assumptions and methods used within an actuarial communication unless otherwise disclosed? Fine This ASOP is titled “Actuarial Communications” even though it also addresses documentation. Does this create any confusion? No Does this draft make it sufficiently clear when the actuary should issue an actuarial report disclosing methods, procedures, assumptions? No Are the added disclosure requirements in cases involving deviation clear and appropriate? Yes 28

ASOP 41 Revision: First Exposure Draft Comments received on First Exposure Draft – Confusion over “Actuarial Report” and when required – Confusion over handling of oral only communication – Otherwise positive and supportive 29

ASOP 41 Revision Currently being worked on by the ASB General Committee Comments here are my opinion and may not appear in the second exposure draft 30

ASOP 41 Revision Changed ASOP now applies to oral communication (as well as written communication) Oral communication must follow the code of conduct The content needs to recognize the forum and audience If you send an to document an oral communication, that is itself a document that is subject to ASOP 41 31

ASOP 41 Revision – Actuarial report significantly changed: set of all communications (other than oral) on a topic available to an intended user; may comprise several documents (memos, , web site, etc.) should have a primary document indexing all other documents may be different for different intended users should enable peer review without needing any other non-public document 32

ASOP 41 Revision Assumptions, Methods, etc. (section 4) – If prescribed by law - disclose – If selected by any other party – disclose and opine – If opining is impractical (e.g. additional cost) - disclose 33

Schedule for Second Exposure Draft The ASB expects to issue a second exposure draft in January 2010 General Committee is now busily drafting Expect to present a draft to the ASB in December Expect to release a second exposure draft in January 34

Actuarial Communications – Practical Considerations Written: – Attention to detail reflects upon your work! – Documents that have errors or are poorly written can completely negate the impact of excellent work – Pretty is important, even if we would prefer that our work speak for itself 35

Actuarial Communications – Practical Considerations Oral: – Phone calls can make it difficult to gauge the level of audience understanding – Usually best to follow up oral advice in writing May clarify something that wasn’t understood Helps you to document what was said in case you need to refer back to it in the future 36

Actuarial Communications – Practical Considerations Electronic: – s can be too easy to send Make sure you adhere to actuarial communications standards even in simple s Always review an before you hit the send button s are frequently SAOs – Assume everything you put in an will be seen beyond the Principal – Beware the “Reply to all” button! 37

Actuarial Communications Things to think about Clear: – Know your audience (the Principal) – Do not underestimate the power of charts and tables – Consider whether bullets vs. prose might help with clarity – Seek peer review 38

Actuarial Communications Things to think about Appropriate – Is the form of communication appropriate for the content? More substantial and material findings may indicate more formal communication When in doubt, put it in writing – Again, know your audience 39

Actuarial Communications Things to think about Actuarial reports – general rule – Disclose methods, procedures, assumptions and data with sufficient clarity that another qualified actuary could make an objective appraisal of the reasonableness of the work 40

Actuarial Communications Things to think about Take a positive approach Think of your audience’s perspective Pay attention to tone Watch acronyms 41

Actuarial Communications Things to think about Use executive summary Use appendices Disclose and then Disclose…AND then Disclose 42