SAS PROC IRT July 20, 2015 RCMAR/EXPORT Methods Seminar 3-4pm Acknowledgements: - Karen L. Spritzer - NCI (1U2-CCA186878-01)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Item Response Theory in Health Measurement
Advertisements

How does PROMIS compare to other HRQOL measures? Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA, Los Angeles, CA Symposium 1077: Measurement Tools to Enhance Health- Related.
PROMIS DEVELOPMENT METHODS, ANALYSES AND APPLICATIONS Presented at the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): A Resource for.
Remaining Challenges and What to Do Next: Undiscovered Areas Ron D. Hays UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research
Models for Measuring. What do the models have in common? They are all cases of a general model. How are people responding? What are your intentions in.
15-minute Introduction to PROMIS Ron D. Hays, Ph.D UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research Roundtable Meeting on Measuring.
Why Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Important: Growing Implications and Applications for Rheumatologists Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine RAND.
Some Terms Y =  o +  1 X Regression of Y on X Regress Y on X X called independent variable or predictor variable or covariate or factor Which factors.
© UCLES 2013 Assessing the Fit of IRT Models in Language Testing Muhammad Naveed Khalid Ardeshir Geranpayeh.
Item Analysis: Classical and Beyond SCROLLA Symposium Measurement Theory and Item Analysis Modified for EPE/EDP 711 by Kelly Bradley on January 8, 2013.
Primer on Evaluating Reliability and Validity of Multi-Item Scales Questionnaire Design and Testing Workshop October 25, 2013, 3:30-5:00pm Wilshire.
Rare Diseases and PROMIS : Opportunities Natcher Conference Center March 1, 2013 James Witter MD, PhD FACR CSO PROMIS Medical Officer: Rheumatic Diseases.
The emotional distress of children with cancer in China: An Item Response Analysis of C-Ped-PROMIS Anxiety and Depression Short Forms Yanyan Liu 1, Changrong.
The Life Story of Ron Hays UCLA GIM/HSR Introduction to Fellows August 7, 2009 ~ 12:42 pm.
By Hui Bian Office for Faculty Excellence 1. K-group between-subjects MANOVA with SPSS Factorial between-subjects MANOVA with SPSS How to interpret SPSS.
Introduction Neuropsychological Symptoms Scale The Neuropsychological Symptoms Scale (NSS; Dean, 2010) was designed for use in the clinical interview to.
Ron D. Hays August 7, 2015 (12:24-12:32pm) Powerpoint file posted at: Health Services Research.
Use of Health-Related Quality of Life Measures to Assess Individual Patients July 24, 2014 (1:00 – 2:00 PDT) Kaiser Permanente Methods Webinar Series Ron.
1 Assessing the Minimally Important Difference in Health-Related Quality of Life Scores Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine October 25, 2006,
April 6 Logistic Regression –Estimating probability based on logistic model –Testing differences among multiple groups –Assumptions for model.
Another Perspective on PRO Content in Clinical Practice Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. University of California, Los Angeles June 25, 2007.
Development of Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores from PROMIS Global Items Ron D. Hays ( ) UCLA Department of Medicine
Are Positive Experiences with Health Care Bad for Health? June 14, 2015 (AcademyHealth) Minneapolis Convention Center 1301 S. 2nd Avenue, Minneapolis,
1 11/17/2015 Psychometric Modeling and Calibration Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. September 11, 2006 PROMIS development process session 10:45am-12:30 pm.
Chapter 13 Multiple Regression
1 Differential Item Functioning in Mplus Summer School Week 2.
Presented By Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. April 8, 2010 (MNRS Pre-Conference Workshop) Domains of PROMIS and how they were developed Dynamic Tools to Measure Health.
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. November 15, 2010, 15:01-15:59pm UCLA RCMAR/EXPORT Seminar Series.
Item Response Theory (IRT) Models for Questionnaire Evaluation: Response to Reeve Ron D. Hays October 22, 2009, ~3:45-4:05pm
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part I Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Questionnaire Design and Testing.
Item Factor Analysis Item Response Theory Beaujean Chapter 6.
Psychometric Evaluation of Questionnaire Design and Testing Workshop December , 10:00-11:30 am Wilshire Suite 710 DATA.
Item Response Theory in Health Measurement
Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Joshua S. Malett, Sarah Gaillot, and Marc N. Elliott Physical Functioning Among Medicare Beneficiaries International Society for Quality.
Item Analysis: Classical and Beyond SCROLLA Symposium Measurement Theory and Item Analysis Heriot Watt University 12th February 2003.
Overlap between Subjective Well-being and Health-related Quality of Life. 3 Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. (Alina Palimaru) November 18, 2015 (11:30-12:00 noon) Geriatric.
Can patients be satisfied to death? What was Joshua J. Fenton thinking? Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. July 21, 2015 UCLA Center for Maximizing Outcomes and Research.
Measurement of Outcomes Ron D. Hays Accelerating eXcellence In translational Science (AXIS) January 17, 2013 (2:00-3:00 pm) 1720 E. 120 th Street, L.A.,
Using PARSCALE via Stata and Dan’s spreadsheet Laura Gibbons, PhD.
Item Response Theory Dan Mungas, Ph.D. Department of Neurology
Considerations in Comparing Groups of People with PROs Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine May 6, 2008, 3:45-5:00pm ISPOR, Toronto, Canada.
Item Response Theory Dan Mungas, Ph.D. Department of Neurology University of California, Davis.
Patient-Reported Physical Functioning Ron D. Hays November 27, 2012 (11:15-11:30) UCLA Department of Medicine MCID for Orthopaedic Devices Silver Springs,
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part I Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Questionnaire.
Overview of Item Response Theory Ron D. Hays November 14, 2012 (8:10-8:30am) Geriatrics Society of America (GSA) Pre-Conference Workshop on Patient- Reported.
Estimating Minimally Important Differences on PROMIS Domain Scores Ron D. Hays UCLA Department of Medicine/Division of General Internal Medicine & Health.
Health-Related Quality of Life in Outcome Studies Ron D. Hays, Ph.D UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research GCRC Summer Session.
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Assessment in Outcome Studies Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA/RAND GCRC Summer Course “The.
Evaluating Patient-Reports about Health
Ron D. Hays September 12, 2006 Network Testing ~ 5 or 6pm
Psychometric Evaluation of Items Ron D. Hays
A Different Way to Think About Measurement Development:
UCLA Department of Medicine
Evaluating Patient-Reports about Health
UCLA Department of Medicine
Evaluating Multi-Item Scales
Classical Test Theory Margaret Wu.
Item Analysis: Classical and Beyond
Evaluating IRT Assumptions
Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment in Outcome Studies
Item Analysis: Classical and Beyond
Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of Multi-Item Scales
Evaluating Multi-item Scales
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part I
Item Analysis: Classical and Beyond
Estimating Minimally Important Differences (MIDs)
Evaluating the Significance of Individual Change
GIM & HSR Research Seminar: October 5, 2018
Patient-reported Outcome Measures
Examples of item response theory item characteristics curves.
Presentation transcript:

SAS PROC IRT July 20, 2015 RCMAR/EXPORT Methods Seminar 3-4pm Acknowledgements: - Karen L. Spritzer - NCI (1U2-CCA ) 1 Ron D.Hays, Ph.D.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Reduce response burden. Improve measurement precision. Compare or combine results from multiple studies. Use computer-based administration, scoring, and reporting. 2

3

4 The PROMIS Global Health item pool/scale assesses health in general (i.e. overall health). The global health items include global ratings of the five primary PROMIS domains (physical function, fatigue, pain, emotional distress, social health) as well as perceptions of general health that cut across domains. Global items allow respondents to weigh together different aspects of health to arrive at a “bottom-line” indicator of their health. Similar global health items have been found predictive of future health care utilization and mortality. The PROMIS Global Health items include the most widely used single self-rated health item (“In general, would you say your health is...”). Previous research has shown that this item taps physical and mental health about equally but reflects physical health more than mental health among respondents at lower income levels. PROMIS Global Health items include specific ratings of physical health and mental health, as well as a rating of overall quality of life. The remaining items provide global ratings of physical function, fatigue, pain, emotional distress, and social health. The PROMIS Global Health items can be administered as individual items or combined to produce separate physical and mental health summary scores (see Hays, Bjorner, Revicki, Spritzer, & Cella, 2009).Global Health

PROMIS Global Physical Health (alpha = 0.81) In general, how would you rate your physical health? (Global03) To what extent are you able to carry out your everyday physical activities such as walking, climbing stairs, carrying groceries, or moving a chair? (Global06) How would you rate your pain on average? (Global07) How would you rate your fatigue on average? (Global08) 5

Graded Response Model  Item “difficulty” and “discrimination” parameters  Probability of item responses modeled as: e D*a (theta – b) 1/(e -D*a (theta – b) ) e D*a (theta – b) 6 e = D = scaling constant, 1.7 = normal ogive a = discrimination b = difficulty

Global Physical Health Item Parameters 3. In general, how would you rate your physical health? 6. To what extent are you able to carry out your everyday physical activities such as walking, climbing stairs, carrying groceries or moving a chair? 7.How would you rate your pain on average? 8.How would you rate your fatigue on average? 3: Poor; Fair: Good; Very Good: Excellent 6: Not at all,; A Little; Moderately; Mostly; Completely 7: Worse pain imaginable (10) - No pain (0) 8: Very Severe; Severe; Moderate; Mild; None 7 ItemAB1B2B3B4 Global Global Global Global

IRT Software IRTPRO 2.1 for Windows –Li Cai, David Thissen & Stephen du Toit – –MULTILOG was predecessor WINSTEPS – – STATA 14 – SAS Version 9.4 (TS1M2) 8

PROC IRT Polychoric correlations between ordinal variables (Underlying normally distributed continuous latent variables) Eigenvalues and scree plots IRT model fit statistics IRT model parameter estimates Item characteristic and information curves Test (scale) information curve An, X., & Yung, Y-F. (2014). Item response theory: What it is and how you can use the IRT procedure to apply it. Paper SAS

PROC IRT Code DATA PROMIS; INFILE "C:\PCAR\gh_orig_all.dat"; INPUT CASEID GLOBAL03 GLOBAL06 R_GLOBAL07 R_GLOBAL08; RUN; ******************************************; TITLE "PROC IRT EXAMPLE USING PROMIS GLOBAL PHYSICAL HEALTH SCALE"; PROC IRT DATA=PROMIS POLYCHORIC PLOTS=(ALL); VAR GLOBAL03 GLOBAL06 R_GLOBAL07 R_GLOBAL08; RUN; 10

11

PROC IRT Output 12

13

14 Poor Excellent Very Good Fair

15

16 Rel = (Info – 1) / Info

Some PROC IRT Options RESFUNC = RASCH EQUALITY GLOBAL03 GLOBAL06 R_GLOBAL07 R_GLOBAL08/parm=[slopes]; LINK = PROBIT –LOGISTIC / 1.7 –Camilli, G. (1994). Origin of the scaling constant d = 1.7 in item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 19,

Global Physical Health Five items –RMSEA = r = 0.29 between two items: –In general, how would you rate your health (1) –In general, how would you rate your physical health? (3) –RMSEA = Dropped general health item (1) 18

Local Independence Assumption Itemsaa* Global Global Global Global Global03: In general, how would you rate your physical health? * Item discrimination parameters when also including “In general, would you say your health is:” item.

20 In general, how would you rate your health? Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor

21

22 In general, how would you rate your health? 62 = Excellent 54 = Very Good 47 = Good 38 = Fair 29 = Poor Reliability = 0.52 (compared to 0.81 for 4-item scale).

Suggested Readings Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J., Revicki, D. A., Spritzer, K., & Cella, D. (2009). Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global items. Quality of Life Research, 18, Hays, R. D., Morales, L. S., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory and Health Outcomes Measurement in the 21 st Century. Medical Care, 38 (Suppl.), II-28-II-42. Hays, R. D., Spritzer, K. L., Thompson, W. W., & Cella, D. (2015 epub). U.S. general population estimate for “excellent” to “poor” self-rated health item. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 23

24 Thank (twitter) Powerpoint file at: