Innovative Contracting / Highways for Life Tom Ravn, Acting State Construction Engineer TH 36 Through North St. Paul 12 th Annual Minnesota Pavement Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2006 San Diego Gas and Electric. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. How to fund your Virtualization Project SDG&E 2007 Energy Efficiency Program.
Advertisements

Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
1 Work Zone Crash Analysis & Traffic Management in Work Zones –The ODOT MOT Process Presented by:David Holstein, P.E., Administrator Office of Traffic.
TAX BENEFITS FOR THE GO ZONE Richard S. Goldstein IPED March 29, 2007 St. Petersburg, Florida.
1 Fairfax County Base Realignment and Closure Mark Canale Fairfax County BRAC Coordinator October 5, 2010.
Figure 1. There Are 13.3 Million Uninsured Young Adults Ages 19–29, 30 Percent of the Nonelderly Uninsured, 2005 Source: Analysis of the March 2006 Current.
September 18, 2008 I-35 South Environmental Assessment North End of I-35 SH 9W Interchange Ramps North to ½ Mile North of Main Street in Norman Public.
State Aid Programs An Introduction to: Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement.
0 Data Through 2008 Report for Statewide Transportation Plan and Business Plan Performance Measures October 2009 Report to District Engineers Safety 2009.
CM/CG Contracting Tom Ravn, Mn/DOT Director, Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting.
State Aid Programs Legislative Issues - Bonding Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement Township Sign Replacement Program.
2007 PAVEMENT MARKING ACTIVITIES AND PERFORMANCE
ACEC Conference March 5, 2012 Trudy Elsner P.E., Metro Maintenance, Engineering Services Sheila Johnson P.E., Metro Maintenance, Traffic Services.
Work Zone Impact Strategies Module 6. TMP Overview3 Identification of TMP Strategies Should be based on: type of work zone traffic conditions anticipated.
Bob Grubbs Lead Bridge Engineer ODOT Region 3, Tech Center Lessons Learned FAST 14, Boston MA FHWA Highways for Life Showcase.
Projects in the Forest Grove area Presented by: David Kim, ODOT Metro West Area Manager August 13, 2012.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt Time Money AdditionSubtraction.
1 MAXIMIZING PUBLIC INVESTMENT Ohio Department of Transportation Highway Funding Overview Julie Ray, Deputy Director Division of Finance & Forecasting.
B. Progress Schedule Schedule Costs –2002 C&MS … the cost of preparing and updating the schedule is incidental to all contract items. –2005 C&MS.
£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
Construction Engineering 221
From I-24 (MP 44) to I-64 (MP 92) is 48 miles ADT 2009 ADT = 30,000 vehicles per 2.2% growth rate 2030 ADT = 48,000 vpd 2009 Average Daily Truck.
Innovative Contracting
ORDER OF OPERATIONS Parentheses 2. Exponents 3. Multiplication or division (in order from left to right) 4. Addition or subtraction (in order.
$100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400.
Traffic Analysis Toolbox & Highway Capacity Manual Transition
City of Fargo Mickelson Field Area Flood Risk Management – Project 5902 Public Information Meeting November 19, 2012.
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT JOB ORDER CONTRACTING Copyright © 2004 The Gordian Group, Inc. all rights reserved.
Requirements for Federal Aid Project Contracts Kenneth Spear, Contracts & Estimates Engineer.
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT Tender and Construction Phase
Spring 2008, King Saud University Cash Flow Analysis Dr. Khalid Al-Gahtani 1 Payment schedule Materials Mobilization Monthly payments Final Payment Contract.
Design-Build Procurement Overview
Work Zone Safety Using Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) Rukhsana Lindsey, UDOT Presented by Jim McMinimee Principal Engineer, Applied Research Associates.
ACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION (ABC): THE KEYS TO SUCCESS FROM AN OWNERS PERSPECTIVE Presented by James McMinimee, P.E., P.S.E. UDOT Chief Engineer, Director.
Town of Mount Airy Main Street Construction Update Community Forum #5 and #6.
1 UPCOMING OPPORTUNITIES – Contractors Caissons Contractor(s) to perform installation of caissons to include purchase of all required materials. u Low/High.
UCRs 007 UCR Schedule Transition when Phase or Sub-phase begins on or after March 1, 2007 Eliminated codes for M0008 Technician I & M0013 Draftsman Professional.
Great Western Corridor Feasibility Study
Highway 13 & Highway 101 Interchange Construction SP Savage, Scott County Municipal Consent Public Hearing December 7, 2009.
Signing Performance Measures Report April 25, 2008 District Engineer Presentation 2 Signing Policy, Measures & Target Policy Replace signs near.
The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 I-280 Trench Project Public Meeting Monday, October 20, 2008 Ted Strickland, Ohio Governor James Beasley, P.E./P.S.
Project, Cost Schedule, and Work Limits Roadway Character Design Criteria for Bridges Maintenance of Traffic Right-of-Way & Utility Involvement General.
CMGC Contracting at UDOT Program, Projects & Lessons Learned
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
$1 Million $500,000 $250,000 $125,000 $64,000 $32,000 $16,000 $8,000 $4,000 $2,000 $1,000 $500 $300 $200 $100 Welcome.
HB 1048 / SB 518 Adjustments for Local Programs May 13, 2014 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
Joe Nestler, P.E. Bureau of State Highway Programs Division of Transportation Investment Management WTBA / WisDOT Contractor Engineer Conference January.
Innovative Contracting Techniques that Consider Driver Impacts Use of A+B Bidding Presented by: David L. Kent P.E. New York State Department of Transportation.
Contract Law 2014 NCHCA Education Series- January 23, 2014 Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa and Ron Price, Rasmussen Starr Ruddy LLP.
10 miles on I-80 from Robb Dr. to Vista Blvd. Reconstruction through congested downtown Installation of new 10-mile ITS system Preserved Operational Capacity.
Innovative Contracting Techniques “Partnering with Industry to Create a Better Roadway” Presented by Doyt Bolling Director Utah Technology Transfer Center.
Alternative Contracting Techniques for Urban and Rural Applications Chad M. Casey ISE 8105.
ABC/PBES COSTS by Mary Lou Ralls, P.E., Principal Ralls Newman, LLC (formerly Texas State Bridge Engineer)
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 6 Specifications and Special Provisions Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
Determining Innovative Contracting Methods to Reduce User Costs Stuart Thompson Utah Technology Transfer Center.
Route CC bridge replacement over Caulk’s Creek. What is the problem? Large debris consistently collects on the upstream end of the bridge. This causes.
AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CALIFORNIA OAKS ROAD AT I-15 INTERCHANGE CIP NO City Council Meeting January 18, 2011.
1 MnDOT Metro District Proposed Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Amendment Metropolitan Council January 17, 2007.
VT 100 over the Mad River Bridge Replacement July 13, 2015.
Asphalt Pavement Association of Indiana Annual Winter Conference Michael B. Cline Commissioner, INDOT December 14, 2010.
Design-Build in Minnesota Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Grand Valley Metropolitan Council March 3, 2016 Erick Kind Region Engineer MDOT-Grand Region.
Regina Bypass Project Information Session. Saskatchewan.ca Outline Background –The need for a bypass –Selecting the route –P3 delivery and procurement.
Innovative Contracting and Trns*Port
Guidance on Assessment of Liquidated Damages
Presentation transcript:

Innovative Contracting / Highways for Life Tom Ravn, Acting State Construction Engineer TH 36 Through North St. Paul 12 th Annual Minnesota Pavement Conference Thursday, February 14 th, 2008

Presentation Overview Constructability Review Constructability Review A+B Bidding A+B Bidding Lane Rental Lane Rental Locked Incentive Date Locked Incentive Date

Constructability Review One-on-One Meetings One-on-One Meetings Worked with AGC to identify list of contractorsWorked with AGC to identify list of contractors Open to other contractorsOpen to other contractors Informal information sharing meetings Informal information sharing meetings Industry input on: Industry input on: How Fast Can You Build It?How Fast Can You Build It? How Should Construction be Staged?How Should Construction be Staged? What are the cost impacts with acceleration?What are the cost impacts with acceleration?

Acceleration Techniques A+B Bidding A+B Bidding Factors Cost (A) + Time (B) into the bid Factors Cost (A) + Time (B) into the bid Lane Rental Lane Rental Minimizes disruptions to trafficMinimizes disruptions to traffic Effective scheduling of resourcesEffective scheduling of resources Incentives Incentives Monetary Incentives for Early CompletionMonetary Incentives for Early Completion

A+B Bidding Lowest Combination of Cost + Time Lowest Combination of Cost + Time A = Cost of the Project A = Cost of the Project B = Time Component B = Time Component Days of Construction * Road User CostDays of Construction * Road User Cost History with A+B Bidding History with A+B Bidding 15% Time Savings at Bidding15% Time Savings at Bidding 35% Time Savings with Incentive Clauses35% Time Savings with Incentive Clauses

TH 36 A+B Bidding Time Factors Time Factors Road User Cost (RUC) = $15,000 per DayRoad User Cost (RUC) = $15,000 per Day Allowable Times = 145 to 210 DaysAllowable Times = 145 to 210 Days Bid Results – Cost Bid Results – Cost 6 Bidders6 Bidders $27.6 to $32.7 Million$27.6 to $32.7 Million Bid Result - Time Bid Result - Time Time Ranged from 145 Days to 195 DaysTime Ranged from 145 Days to 195 Days

Innovative Strategies A+B BiddingA+B Bidding 145 Max 145 Max 100 Bid 100 Bid 104 Actual 104 Actual Lane RentalsLane Rentals Minimized Impacts on I-494 Minimized Impacts on I-494 IncentivesIncentives $100,000 Max $100,000 Max Valley Creek Road Interchange

Other A + B Projects TH 10 at Hanson Road Bid #1Bid #1 A = $16.95 million A = $16.95 million B = 135 Days B = 135 Days Bid #2Bid #2 A = $16.98 million A = $16.98 million B = 100 Days B = 100 Days TH 10 in Detroit Lakes Allowable Bid Range (534 to 869 Days)Allowable Bid Range (534 to 869 Days) 3 Bids Near Minimum3 Bids Near Minimum 3 Bids Near Maximum3 Bids Near Maximum Winning Bid – Lowest A and Lowest BWinning Bid – Lowest A and Lowest B

Lane Rental How Does It Work? How Does It Work? Hourly Charge to Temporary Lane Closures ($400 per hour)Hourly Charge to Temporary Lane Closures ($400 per hour) Hourly Charge for Ramp Closures ($300 per hour)Hourly Charge for Ramp Closures ($300 per hour) Bidding Lane Rental Bidding Lane Rental Contractors Bid Estimated Number of Hours for ClosureContractors Bid Estimated Number of Hours for Closure Lane Rental Working Fund Lane Rental Working Fund Dollars subtracted from Lane Rental Working FundDollars subtracted from Lane Rental Working Fund Excess $ at end = Incentive ($30,000 max) Excess $ at end = Incentive ($30,000 max) Overrun = Disincentive Overrun = Disincentive

Lane Rental Why Lane Rental? Why Lane Rental? Minimize Traffic Impacts Prior to Full ClosureMinimize Traffic Impacts Prior to Full Closure Minimize Traffic Impacts After Full ClosureMinimize Traffic Impacts After Full Closure Public PerceptionPublic Perception Why is there a lane closure up, but nothing is happening Why is there a lane closure up, but nothing is happening Better Subcontractor CoordinationBetter Subcontractor Coordination

Lane Rental Projects 2006 Projects Valley Creek RoadValley Creek Road Metro Pavement MarkingMetro Pavement Marking I-35 District 1I-35 District Projects TH 10 Detroit Lakes (Detour Method)TH 10 Detroit Lakes (Detour Method) TH 36 (Full Closure)TH 36 (Full Closure) I-394 / I-94 Bridge RehabilitationI-394 / I-94 Bridge Rehabilitation

Locked Incentive Dates a.k.a No Excuse Bonus How is it Different? Time extensions allow normal incentives to be paid past the anticipated date Time extensions allow normal incentives to be paid past the anticipated date LID – If you want the incentive, you must meet the date. LID – If you want the incentive, you must meet the date. LID – Waive all claims LID – Waive all claims

Locked Incentive Date TH 36 – Metro 145 Day Closure 145 Day Closure $350,0000 for completing work within 145 Days $350,0000 for completing work within 145 Days Additional $75,000 for every 5 days early Additional $75,000 for every 5 days early $650,000 max $650,000 max TH 10 – D4 Obligation - Open TH 59 by June 29, 2008 Obligation - Open TH 59 by June 29, 2008 LID - $300,000 if work is completed on or before December 1, LID - $300,000 if work is completed on or before December 1, I-35W Bridge, Metro A+B - $7,000,000 lump sum A+B - $7,000,000 lump sum Additional $2M for every 10 days early Additional $2M for every 10 days early $27,000,000 max (100 days) $27,000,000 max (100 days)

Questions? Thank You