William Lohr, P.E Federal Highway Administration Minnesota Division Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CM/CG Contracting Tom Ravn, Mn/DOT Director, Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting.
Advertisements

ODOT-OES Environmental Update Meeting September 16, 2010.
ODOT’s Public Involvement Process PI and the Project Development Process Minimum PI Requirements.
Project Delivery Approaches for Wastewater Utilities in Minnesota June 24, 2008 Metropolitan Council Environment Committee.
Raising the Standard for Improved Flood Risk Management in the Midwest Raising the Standard for Improved Flood Risk Management in the Midwest Interagency.
Planning for Innovative Technology. Every Day Counts Rapid changes face the highway community in the 21st century Adapting to those changes must be a.
CMGC Contracting at UDOT Program, Projects & Lessons Learned
EESE O&E Committee Update & Next Steps May 14, 2010.
EDC Summit Technology & Innovation Plenary 1. The Innovations Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) Precast Bridge Elements Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Safety Edge.
Planning for Success: Applying Systems Engineering to ASCT Implementation TRANSPO 2012 October 29, 2012 Eddie Curtis, PE FHWA Office of Operations / Resource.
Regional Asphalt Seminars Pavement Wedge Guidelines and Specifications EMMETT R. HELTZEL, P.E. STATE MAINTENANCE ENGINEER.
Utah’s Use of CMGC & Project Delivery
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) – ROW Impacts Dianna Nausley, HQ RES Assistant Program Administrator Washington State Department.
Research Advisory Committee Annual Meeting FHWA Briefing Michael Trentacoste Associated Administrator Research, Development, & Technology Director, Turner.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
1. George Washington Lead Change December 25, 1776, Trenton, New Jersey 2.
THANK YOU  John Horsley and the entire leadership of AASHTO  AGC of America and ARTBA (American Road and Transportation Builders Association)  NACE,
Irene Rico Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century ~ MAP-21.
Certification/Qualification Program. Certification Program What is it? Who is involved? What should be considered? Where can a Certification Program work.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 5 1 Module 5: CSS and Livability in Project Development.
Wisconsin DOT EDC Initiatives Rory Rhinesmith, P.E. Deputy Administrator – DTSD Bureaus.
Determining Innovative Contracting Methods to Reduce User Costs Stuart Thompson Utah Technology Transfer Center.
AASHTO Subcommittee on Rail Transportation Sept. 18, 2012 Kevin Chesnik.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION BORDER WAIT TIME WORKING GROUP.
Presentation to the Central Lane MPO Policy Committee March 08, 2012 Oregon Sustainable Transportation Initiative Statewide Transportation Strategy Statewide.
Overview of SAFETEA-LU Sections 6001, 6002, 3005, and 3006 TRB January 13, 2008 Shari Schaftlein FHWA Project Development & Environmental Review Washington,
TRIBAL INVOLVEMENT IN EVERY DAY COUNTS IVAN MARRERO, P.E. ASSISTANT DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR FHWA-OKLAHOMA DIVISION.
ABC POLICY DEVELOPMENT IOWA DOT Norman McDonald, PE Iowa Department of Transportation Office of Bridges and Structures MID-CONTINENT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH.
FHWA Update Butch Wlaschin, P.E. Director, Office of Asset Management AASHTO Highway Subcommittee on Construction 2010 Annual Meeting Burlington, Vermont.
Highway Location Study CE 453 Lecture 4 See also lab 2 and lab 4 instructions, and EIS lecture notes See also 04 DOT development process.doc Refs:
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
Efficiency through technology and collaboration SHRP2 and Every Day Counts Products September 9, 2015 David Otte - KYTC Jason J. Siwula, PE – KYTC.
FHWA Update AASHTO Subcommittee on Design July 26, 2010 Columbia, South Carolina Jon Obenberger, Ph.D., P.E. Preconstruction Team Leader Infrastructure.
Engaging State DOT’s Engaging State DOT’s 2008 ITS America State Chapters Council Annual Meeting and State Chapters Strengthening Workshop Bernie Arseneau,
What’s New with County Road Construction Bruce G. Stelzner Bruce G. Stelzner Chippewa County Highway Commissioner Chippewa County Highway Commissioner.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
Community Context Audits And Public Involvement Plans Rickie Clark, INDOT Joyce Newland, FHWA Presenter Title, INDOT Event Date.
AASHTO Research Advisory Committee ~ July 28, 2010 TERRA Transportation Engineering and Road Research Alliance Presented by: André Clover, P. E. Bureau.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
AASHTO Standing Committee on Research July 26, 2011 Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity Update.
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
What is a Link? Planning and Environmental Linkages for 2014 and Beyond Carmen M. Stemen, MUP Planning & Environment Specialist FHWA Ohio Division
Presented By: Jeffrey T. Folden, P.E. Assistant Chief, Innovative Contracting Division.
1 Transportation Systems Management & Operations A New Paradigm for the 21 st Century Transportation Department Group 3 3 Notches Above the Rest.
Contractor Alternate Design Serving the Public’s Best Interest.
IFTA Annual Business Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 17, 2011 Federal Highway Administration.
Adaptive Signal Control Initiatives and Validation Program Presenters Edward Fok, FHWA Resource Center Transportation Technology Specialist Dr. Douglas.
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
SHRP2 Reliability Implementation | February 2013 When Research Meets the Road Reliability Focus Area February 7, 2013.
FHWA’s Current Activities Related to Climate Change Southeastern Natural Resource Leadership Group Regional Climate Change Meeting Charleston, SC May 27,
Traditional Project Development Process ConstructionPlanningNEPA Design ROW CE, EIS, EA Location and Design Concept approval.
NTOC National Summit November 7, 2011 Washington, DC Aliyah Horton Douglas E. Noble, P.E., PTOE Aliyah Horton Douglas E. Noble, P.E., PTOE Operations:
Transportation Systems Management and Operations: Why It Matters Presenter Name Date AGENCY LOGO Photo: © Shutterstock.com/iofoto ( )
SHRP2 Capacity Implementation | February 2013 When Research Meets the Road Capacity Focus Area February 4, 2013.
Planning & Environment Linkages (PEL) July 20, 2011 PEL 101: The Tools for Adopting and Implementing a PEL Approach.
Project Delivery Performance Improvement Report to the Oregon Transportation Commission Hal Gard, Technical Services, Geo-Environmental Dee Jones, Technical.
1 NTOC Talking Operations – Road Weather Management – September 30, 2008 VII & Road Weather Pat Kennedy, Transportation Specialist FHWA/Office of Operations,
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
Connecting South Dakota and the Nation Access Management Training Brooke White, Access Management Engineer.
UW - Madison Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) David L. Kopacz, P.E. Wisconsin Division Office February 20, 2015.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
Virginia House Bill 2 – Funding the Right Projects Intelligent Transportation System Activities May 19, 2016.
Purdue Road School March 8, EDC Pillars Shortening Project Delivery Accelerating Technology and Innovation Deployment.
2013 Nevada Transportation Conference
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Overcoming Barriers to Implement Research Projects
Laurie Leffler, Division Administrator
Presentation transcript:

William Lohr, P.E Federal Highway Administration Minnesota Division Office

Every Day Counts A Toolkit for Shortening Project Delivery The toolkit is developed to guide and support State and local agencies in the use of underutilized flexibilities in the law Aids in development of processes and agreements that minimize duplication of effort and reduce delays in project implementation

Project Delivery Opportunities for EDC Planning NEPA Right of Way (ROW) & Utilities Design Construction

Planning & Environmental Linkages (PEL) Planning NEPAROW / UtilitiesDesign / Construction PEL provides transportation agencies with tools and resources that introduce environmental considerations early in planning and support carrying planning analyses and decisions into the NEPA process. Benefits: Seamless decision–making process Minimizes duplication of effort Promotes environmental stewardship Reduces delays in project implementation

Expanding Use of Programmatic Agreements Planning NEPA ROW / UtilitiesDesign / Construction Expansion of new and existing programmatic agreements to a regional or national level will establish a streamlined process for handling routine environmental requirements for commonly encountered project types. Benefits: Improved project decision-making Reduction in project delivery times (process streamlining). Mechanism to save and focus staff time.

In-Lieu Fees & Mitigation Banking Planning NEPA Increased usage of banking and in-lieu fee programs rather than project-by-project mitigation will expedite highway project delivery. Benefits: Creates a more streamlined and concurrent process Improves and expedites project delivery Reduce the need for piece-meal, project-by-project mitigation Expedited regulatory review and permit processing Design / ConstructionROW / Utilities

Enhanced Technical Assistance Planning NEPA FHWA will demonstrate the effectiveness of these key streamlining measures on a small number of select active EIS projects facing challenges with ongoing environmental issues and/or interagency coordination and other concerns that are effecting (or have the potential to effect) the timely completion of the project development process. Benefits: Identification and implementation of solutions to resolve reasons for delay. Facilitates interagency coordination and collaboration Design / ConstructionROW / Utilities

Flexibilities in Right of Way Evaluation, clarification and demonstration of the available flexibilities already existing in FHWAs current project delivery ROW processes and policies. Benefits: Improved project decision-making Reduction in project delivery times Cost containment PlanningNEPADesign / Construction ROW / Utilities

Flexibilities in Utility Relocation The initiative will spotlight existing flexibilities currently in place under Federal law and regulations and describe techniques that foster effective utility coordination during project development which warrant more widespread use. Benefits: Improved communication, coordination and cooperation; Collaborative decisions to accommodate or relocate utilities; Shared risk, gains and costs; Increased owner control; and Reductions in project development, construction time and project costs. PlanningNEPADesign / Construction ROW / Utilities

Construction Manager / General Contractor (CMGC) CM/GC occupies the middle ground between the traditional (DBB) and (DB). CM/GC provides for project acceleration by allowing the owner to contract with a construction manager early in the design process and agree to a negotiated price for construction later before the design is complete. Benefits: Reduces Costs No compromise on quality Enhances potential for creativity PlanningNEPA Design / Construction ROW / Utilities

Design Build With DB project delivery, the designer-builder assumes responsibility for the majority of the design work and all construction activities. This provides the designer-builder with increased flexibility to be innovative, along with greater responsibility and risk. Benefits: Considerable time savings over the traditional process of Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Allows design to be tailored to contractors resources Allows quality evaluation factors and best-value selection criteria when selecting contractors PlanningNEPA Design / Construction ROW / Utilities

Accelerating Technology and Innovation Every Day Counts is not about inventing the next "big thing It's about taking effective, proven and market-ready technologies and getting them into widespread use By advancing 21 st century solutions, we can improve safety, reduce congestion and keep America moving

Warm Mix Asphalt Allows a reduction in asphalt mixture production & placement temperatures Benefits: Provides better compaction Provides better compaction Improves pavement performance Improves pavement performance Reduce worker fatigue Reduce worker fatigue Reduces fossil fuel consumption Reduces fossil fuel consumption Reduces CO 2 e & other emissions Reduces CO 2 e & other emissions Extend paving season Extend paving season Allows for longer hauling distances Allows for longer hauling distances

Prefabricated Bridge Elements & Systems Prefabricated bridge elements and systems manufactured on-site or off-site, under controlled conditions, and brought to the job location ready to install Benefits: Reduces onsite construction time Minimizes traffic disruption – months to days Improves construction zone safety Improved product quality – controlled environment, cure times, easier access, etc. constructability of bridge designs Reduces environmental impact

Fast, cost-effective bridge support method using alternating layers of compacted fill and layers of geosynthetic reinforcement to provide bridge support. Lots of Benefits: Eliminates approach slab or construction joint at the bridge-to-road interface Reduced construction time (Complete in days!) Less dependent on weather conditions Flexible design – easily modified for unforeseen site conditions Built with common equipment and materials Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil

Sloped pavement edge at a 30º angle which allows drivers a more controlled re-entry back onto the roadway after tire drop-off Benefits: Reduces crashes due to edge drop-off and uncontrolled recovery Minimal cost (less than 1% on 2-lane highway) Consolidated edge reduces edge raveling, increases durability Safety Edge

ACS measures traffic flow and adjusts signal timing to promote smooth flow of traffic along arterial streets Benefits: ACS improves travel time reliability, reduces congestion, and smoothes traffic flow Increases long-term viability of traffic signal operations Widely deployable & uses existing control equipment Adaptive Signal Control

THANK YOU!