WORLD HISTORY Mental Map

Draw a map of the “world”. Draw/Label the following: Draw/Label the following: 5 physical features (think rivers, mountains, etc…) 5 physical features (think rivers, mountains, etc…) 5 political features (cities, countries, etc..) 5 political features (cities, countries, etc..) 5 economic features (resources, goods) 5 economic features (resources, goods) 5 scientific/technological features (inventions, ideas) 5 scientific/technological features (inventions, ideas)

Continued…. 5 cultural features (works of arts, literature, music, religion) 5 cultural features (works of arts, literature, music, religion) 5 world historical features (events, peoples, processes) 5 world historical features (events, peoples, processes) 5 arrows to show movement across space (plague, trade routes, migrations) 5 arrows to show movement across space (plague, trade routes, migrations)

QUESTIONS What does the way you drew your map say about how you view the world? What does the way you drew your map say about how you view the world? Where are the “blank features”? Where are the “blank features”? How does your map reveal “bias” and “worldview”? How does your map reveal “bias” and “worldview”?

Map Projections & Their Effects on Perceptions in the Study of World History

Medieval European T-O Map. In medieval Europe one of the most common forms of rendering the earth was the mappae mundi of which more than a thousand have survived. The T-O map is one kind of mappae mundi. The T-O image reproduced here comes from the encyclopedia of knowledge produced by Isidore, Bishop of Seville, in 630 A.D., and was printed in Augsburg in 1472.

The Maya Cosmos. Adopted with modifications from Linda Schele and David Freidel, A Forest of Kings: The Untold Story of the Ancient Maya (N.Y.: William Morrow, 1990), p. 67, fig. 2:1. Drawing by Linda Schele, courtesy Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc. (permissions Nov. 7, 2002).

An ancient map that strongly suggests Chinese sailors were first to round the world. It seems more likely that the world and all its continents were discovered by a Chinese admiral named Zheng He, whose fleets roamed the oceans between 1405 and His exploits, which are well documented in Chinese historical records, were written about in a book which appeared in China around 1418 called "The Marvellous Visions of the Star Raft". One of Zheng He's fleet's adventures, blown off course to the east to the New World, provides a fascinating thread in Neil Stephenson's fabulous fiction, Cryptonomicon. It is a copy, made inCryptonomicon 1763, of a map, dated 1418, which contains notes that substantially match the descriptions in the book. Each fleet would have at least one "Treasure ship", used by the commander of the fleet and his deputies (nine-masted, about 120 meters (400 ft) long and 50 m (160 ft) wide).

The greatest "inventor" of sixteenth century Europe was map maker Gerhardus Mercator whose 1569 summary map, publicized by the learned Richard Hakluyt in his Principal Navigations, Voyages and Discoveries of the English Nation (London: 1589), liberated cartography from dependence on Ptolemy, and included a projection that allowed navigators to understand the coasts of the New World. These maps silently promoted a Eurocentric view that privileged the Western image. Generations of European and American students have been indoctrinated with the glories of nationalism and colonialism through this map.

Seventeenth Century Atlantic Basin. Lines indicate direction of movement of goods from Europe and Africa to the Americas and from the Americas to Asia. Europe was the source of financial and commercial activity, while Africa was primarily important for the slave trade—so that the main cultural impacts were those of Europe upon Africa, and Africa upon America. This was the transoceanic arena in which an Atlantic World emerged in the Age of Empire, and the geographical stage for cross-cultural encounters, Spanish treasure fleets, a transatlantic slave trade, and the movement of European peoples. Lines indicate direction of movement of goods from Europe and Africa to the Americas and from the Americas to Asia. Europe was the source of financial and commercial activity, while Africa was primarily important for the slave trade—so that the main cultural impacts were those of Europe upon Africa, and Africa upon America. This was the transoceanic arena in which an Atlantic World emerged in the Age of Empire, and the geographical stage for cross-cultural encounters, Spanish treasure fleets, a transatlantic slave trade, and the movement of European peoples. Adopted with permission from D.W. Meining, The Shaping of America: A Geographical Perspective on 500 Years of History. Volume 1, Atlantic America, 1492–1800 (Yale University Press, 1986), p. 56

North America appears to be more involved in the Pacific Basin than South America (its eastward location pulling it toward the Atlantic). Finally, this map reveals a major truth about the earth, and that is that the earth is mostly water not land, the Pacific Ocean amounting to 64,000,000 square miles (over twice the size of the Atlantic Ocean).

Miller World Map Centered on 180 Meridian: The Pacific Perspective. South is at top of map. After 1850, a Pacific perspective must be added. With the United States acquiring Alaska, the Aleutian Islands, and Hawaii (and taking possession of the Philippines), followed by Pearl Harbor and the Pacific theater of World War II, the strategic importance of the Pacific for the United States becomes obvious. With China emerging as a major power, the twenty-first century may become the Pacific century.

Robinson Projection This projection was presented by Arthur H. Robinson in 1963, and is also called the Orthophanic projection, which means right appearing. This projection was presented by Arthur H. Robinson in 1963, and is also called the Orthophanic projection, which means right appearing. Scale is true along the 38º parallels and is constant along any parallel or between any pair of parallels equidistant from the Equator. It is not free of distortion at any point, but distortion is very low within about 45º of the center and along the Equator. Scale is true along the 38º parallels and is constant along any parallel or between any pair of parallels equidistant from the Equator. It is not free of distortion at any point, but distortion is very low within about 45º of the center and along the Equator. This projection is not equal-area, conformal, or equidistant; however, it is considered to look right for world maps, and hence is widely used by Rand McNally, the National Geographic Society, and others. This feature is achieved through the use of tabular coordinates rather than mathematical formulae for the graticules. This projection is not equal-area, conformal, or equidistant; however, it is considered to look right for world maps, and hence is widely used by Rand McNally, the National Geographic Society, and others. This feature is achieved through the use of tabular coordinates rather than mathematical formulae for the graticules.

The Peters Projection Map from Two Perspectives: In 1974, as an effort to reduce the political bias of conventional maps, Arno Peters created the 'Peters Projection' of the world so that one square inch anywhere on the map represents an equal number of square miles of the earth's surface.

Comparing Projections

"Political" Map

The Myth of Continents The current sevenfold categorization of the earth into the continents (that is, continuous, discrete masses of land) of Asia, Europe, Africa, North America, South America, Oceania (Australia and New Zealand), and Antarctica, is a recent convention beginning with the threefold system of the Ancient Greeks and modified over time into today's system. The problem with this kind of classification is that most people consider "continents" to be "real" geographical realities "discovered" through scientific inquiry, instead of what they are—the product of creative imagination and metageography. The current sevenfold categorization of the earth into the continents (that is, continuous, discrete masses of land) of Asia, Europe, Africa, North America, South America, Oceania (Australia and New Zealand), and Antarctica, is a recent convention beginning with the threefold system of the Ancient Greeks and modified over time into today's system. The problem with this kind of classification is that most people consider "continents" to be "real" geographical realities "discovered" through scientific inquiry, instead of what they are—the product of creative imagination and metageography. Continents not only supposedly reflect physical reality, but natural and human features as well. In the field of geology, tectonic plates do not respect the geographer's continental system, with Europe and Asia sharing the same plate for more than thirty-five million years, and India being tectonically linked, not to Asia, but to distant Australia! Continents not only supposedly reflect physical reality, but natural and human features as well. In the field of geology, tectonic plates do not respect the geographer's continental system, with Europe and Asia sharing the same plate for more than thirty-five million years, and India being tectonically linked, not to Asia, but to distant Australia! While it is ridiculous to conceive of Europe as a continent and India a subcontinent, the continental status of Europe (which shares a land mass with Asia), serves to reassure Europeans that their sense of western superiority and false dichotomies (Europe equals West; Asia equals East) will go unchallenged. While it is ridiculous to conceive of Europe as a continent and India a subcontinent, the continental status of Europe (which shares a land mass with Asia), serves to reassure Europeans that their sense of western superiority and false dichotomies (Europe equals West; Asia equals East) will go unchallenged.

The Myth of Continents The traditional notion of continents can be abandoned (or at least modified). The idea of a North American continent, separate from South America, encourages false dichotomies that do not reflect actual biological, geological, and cultural realities, and that overlooks many themes that parallel the history of both regions (from cowboy culture to urbanization). The traditional notion of continents can be abandoned (or at least modified). The idea of a North American continent, separate from South America, encourages false dichotomies that do not reflect actual biological, geological, and cultural realities, and that overlooks many themes that parallel the history of both regions (from cowboy culture to urbanization). By substituting a world regionalism scheme for the continental one, today's students will be using a regional classification that better fits the realities of ethnicity, culture, and history. This, then, would be the beginning of an attempt to look at the New Old World in a new way. By substituting a world regionalism scheme for the continental one, today's students will be using a regional classification that better fits the realities of ethnicity, culture, and history. This, then, would be the beginning of an attempt to look at the New Old World in a new way.

Regional World Map

Which map projection does the College Board use in their WHAP materials?