Conducting Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts in Your Community: Count Manager Training MnDot Bicycle and Pedestrian Counting Initiative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
York Viva Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Concept image along Davis Drive.
Advertisements

1 Update on Bicyclist & Pedestrian Data Collection and Modeling Efforts Transportation Research Board January 2010 Charlie Denney, Associate Michael Jones,
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
January 23, 2006 FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT.
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Conducting Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts: Volunteer Training MnDot Bicycle and Pedestrian Counting Initiative.
1 Innovative Tools October 27, 2011 Chi Mai. 2 Presentation Overview VISSIM Corridors VISSIM Protocol Hours of Congestion.
1 ODOTs Complete Streets Initiative. 2 Tipping Point for Complete Streets.
Webinar: June 6, :00am – 11:30am EDT The Community Eligibility Option.
Site Safety Plans PFN ME 35B.
1 Incorporating Extreme Weather Risks in Asset Management Planning Lynn Clarkowski.
SMG FUN RUN SATURDAY April 26 TH 2014 The SMG Fun Run/Walk 5K and 1 Mile: Running for Fitness, Faith, and Fun Benefiting Physical Education Programs and.
Transition from the Long Shutdown to Hot Checkout: Pre-Hot Checkout Steve Suhring Operability Manager 6/6/13.
Public Consultation Session 7:00 pm, Tuesday March 28, /2007 Shared Transportation Plans for St.Teresas ES, Westmount PS, St.Catherine ES, Keith.
Traffic Analysis Toolbox & Highway Capacity Manual Transition
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
Eric Graves, P.E. City Traffic Engineer Alpharetta, Georgia
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
City of Oakland: Road Diet Experience
1 Preparing for Smallpox: Post-event Smallpox Response.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Complete Streets: Moving from introduction to local policy
Southeastern Association of Educational Opportunity Program Personnel 38 th Annual Conference January 30 – February 3, 2010 Upward Bound Internal & External.
Riding a Bike for Transport 2011 Survey Findings.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Applicants Videoconference January 17,  MnDOT funding began in 2005 with federal transportation bill (SAFETEA-LU)  This solictation uses remaining.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
CITY OF MIAMI CITY OF MIAMI. Health District Traffic Study July 21, 2008 Miami Partnership.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Urban Transportation Council Green Guide for Roads Task Force TAC 2009 Annual Conference and Exhibition Vancouver.
Louisiana Safe Routes To School Program
Political Support Needed to Improve Transportation 06 | 25 | 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SFMTA | Municipal Transportation Agency Image: Market and Geary.
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
Introducing Bicycle/Pedestrian Planning & School Travel Plans Presentation prepared for the 2010 Active Transportation Conference Jim Fisher, PhD, AICP.
Efficiency through technology and collaboration Road Diet (Roadway Reconfiguration) Every Day Counts 3 Innovative Safety Initiative.
Conducting Counts & Surveys. Why? Better understand needs Understand what influences biking and walking Secure grant funding Support Bicycle and Pedestrian.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
Safe Routes to School in the ATP Jeanie Ward-Waller Senior California Policy Manager Active Transportation Program Cycle 2 Caltrans District Workshops.
Bike/Walk Twin Cities Conducting bicycle & pedestrian counts.
History of US Bicycle Routes In 1970’s interest in long distance bicycle travel proliferates.
Counting Bikes in Madison, WI 2013 Fall Count Procedure Madison, WI Sept
Regional Active Living Vision Statement The Arrowhead is a vibrant and healthy region where well-designed communities embrace and encourage physical activity.
School-based projects from a Transportation Act program.
New Visions Bicycle & Pedestrian Action Plan Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation – Bicycle and pedestrian travel is vital to the region’s public health,
Lompoc Community Assessments “What We Learned” Presented by Judy Taggart MS, CHES March 25, 2010.
Minnesota Guidestar Evaluation of Non-Intrusive Technologies for Traffic Detection Farideh Amiri Minnesota Department of.
Roosevelt Road: State to Columbus Public Meeting September 22, 2015.
Instructions  Check in with Andrew Bomberger at TCRPC to let him know what muni you will be visiting so he can give you any specific info for that muni.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Rural Transportation Planning Eunice Fitzpatrick Transportation Planner Kentucky River ADD Hazard, KY.
City Leadership & Bike Edina Task Force Annual Work Session February 16 th, 2010.
Best Practices for Collecting Counts and Risk Evaluation for Bicyclists and Pedestrians Krista Nordback, P.E., Ph.D., PSU Taylor Phillips, PSU Mike Sellinger,
Counting that Counts: Bike and Pedestrian Documentation.
Minnesota State Planning Conference September 28, 2011.
East-West Corridor Connectivity Study – Study Recommendations November 17, 2009.
Using Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts
Complete Streets Award Program
Project Management Team Meeting #3
Neighborhood Pedestrian Fatality Risk
FHWA Bicycle and Pedestrian Program
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
Developing a Pedestrian -Bicycle Safety Action Plan
Emily Guenther Zach Olson Laura Scott Cameron Wein
MPO Board Presentation
Safe Routes to School John Schaefer State Coordinator.
Presentation transcript:

Conducting Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts in Your Community: Count Manager Training MnDot Bicycle and Pedestrian Counting Initiative

MnDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Counting Initiative The MnDOT Research Some reasons for counting

The MnDOT Bike and Ped Counting Research Project New initiative to encourage communities to count non-motorized traffic - bicyclists and pedestrians Information, training, and technical support for new local counting bike and ped programs –Guidance for annual field counts –Support for pilot automated counting projects Central repository for count data

Bike & Ped Counts Needed to Achieve MnDOT Priorities 2050 Vision – Minnesota Go : to support multi-modal systems Complete Streets : to understand vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian interactions Toward Zero Deaths : to assess exposure and effectiveness of safety programs Performance measures : to assess progress towards states transportation goals

MnDOT Bike & Ped Initiative Based on Other Successful Programs Designed to integrate with MnDOT motor vehicle count program Builds on experience of Minnesota communities, DOT initiatives in CO & WA, and the National Bicycle and Pedestrian Demonstration Project Consistent with FHWA protocols in new Traffic Monitoring Guide

MnDOT reasons for counting … Bicycling and walking are important modes of transportation Few bike and ped traffic counts available Traffic counts needed to –Plan complete transportation systems –Invest resources in facilities and maintenance operations more efficiently –Assess effectiveness of safety interventions

MDH reasons for counting Aligns with health improvement efforts Provides SHIP grantees with TA Establishes baseline for community evaluation efforts Leverages resources and partnerships

Counting Basics Motor Vehicle Traffic Local Collaboration Types of Counts Manual vs. Automatic How local counts feed into the Statewide project

Modeled on MnDOT Motor Vehicle Count Program FHWA guidelines, MnDOT management and protocols, and local cooperation Network of 1,000+ permanent, continuous counters and 30,000+ locations for short duration (48 hour) counts Used to report Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) and measure Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)

Local Collaboration Key to Success Minnesota local governments and nonprofit organizations have pioneered local counting programs Local governments are mostly responsible for roads with most bike and ped traffic No federal or state financial support for bike and ped counting programs

Some Counting Basics All counts are estimates Main purposes for counting – Measure volumes (AADT, VMT)* –Measure turning movements –Understand behaviors Types of counts – Screenline counts (volumes, behaviors)* –Intersection counts (turning movements, safety/crash studies) Approaches to counting – Manual, field observations (short duration)* –Automated counts (continuous) *Focus of this presentation

Types of counts

Screenline counts: Imaginary line perpendicular to street Count all persons on bike or feet who cross screenline within street right-of-way Count both directions Use consistent location for observation Screenline Counts

Manual vs. Automated Counts Manual counts –Good for short periods at multiple locations –Snapshots do not reveal traffic patterns and are hard to extrapolate Automated counts –Provide continuous counts at limited number of locations –Needed to develop adjustment factors for extrapolating short term counts

Replicate what was done in Twin Cities around the state Short duration counts help make the models more accurate for different types of facilities and size communities How local counts fit into the statewide project

Non-motorized traffic counts Minneapolis, MN Count Description Method of observation Manual Traffic observed Cyclist - separate Pedestrian - separate Locations in Minneapolis On /off-street bike facilities and no bike facilities (n=259) Period of observation Number of observations 436 Length of observations 12-hour (n=43) 2-hour peak period (n=352) Other LimitationsHuman error

Counts by road/facility type Type of Street / Facility Daily Auto Traffic Volume % all count locations % of count location type with bike facilities Principal Arterial15, ,0001%0% Minor Arterial5, ,00042%25% Collector1, ,00018%20% Local< 1,00024%18% Off-street trail015%100%

Daily patterns in non-motorized traffic (n=43)

Scaling factors for daily traffic BicyclePedestrian Time period Percent of 12-hour count Scale factor R2R2 Percent of 12-hour count Scale factor R2R2 7-8am7.5% % am9.3% % am7.8% % am6.4% % noon5.9% % noon-1pm5.2% % pm7.2% % pm7.5% % pm9.3% % pm12.0% % pm12.6% % Example: Multiplying 4-5 pm traffic by 8.4 yields 12-hour traffic volume.

Conducting Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts: Volunteer Training MnDot Bicycle and Pedestrian Counting Initiative

Volunteer Training Dates for counting Using the forms Defining Bicyclist and Pedestrians

Dates for the first MnDOT Counts September 11, 12, 13, 2012 (Tu, Wed, TH) –Peak hour: 4:00 p.m. – 6:00 or 7:00 p.m. –12-hour day: 7:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. September 15 (Sat) –Peak hours: 10:00 a.m. – noon or 2:00 p.m. –12 hour day: 7:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. Rain dates: Sept. 18, 19, 20, 22

Complete all of the fields on both sides of this form. Count all bicyclists and pedestrians crossing your screen line under the appropriate categories. Make only one tally mark for each person. Count for two hours in 15 minute increments. Count bicyclists who ride on the sidewalk. Count the number of people on the bicycle (i.e., bicyclists), not the number of bicycles. Pedestrians include all people not on bicycles. Record pedestrians in wheelchairs, on skates, on scooters, etc. in Pedestrians Assisted columns. Do your best when traffic volumes are high or people talk to you; it is easy to lost count. Do your best, but note if you lose track. If traffic volumes are high count bicycle and pedestrian totals and disregard other attributes. How to Use MnDOT Counting Form

Two-hour counts (4:00 -6:00 pm) Start on time (arrive early!) Include name, date & Location with ID See instructions on form *Make a note of any unusual thing that impacted the count at the bottom of the sheet or in space on back. Conducting the count

Every person (bicyclist or pedestrian) is always counted. Other attributes also may be tallied, including gender, direction of travel, or use of helmet, depending on purpose. Recording Bikes and Peds

Bicycles – all pedal powered vehicles: tandems, recumbents, 3 wheelers, tag-alongs, trailers Walkers – people on foot or assisted: joggers, skaters, segways, wheel chairs, strollers, crutches, scooters, children being carried, person walking a bicycle Defining bikes and walkers

Example of Count Tallies

One male bicyclist Example 1

Two female pedestrians One using assistive device (wheelcha ir) Image from PBIC Image Library Example 2 II

One male bicyclist Example 3 I

Four pedestrians: Three female; One male Two children Two Assist Image from PBIC Image Library Example 4 III I

Two cyclists: One male; One female Also a child Image from Alta Planning National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project Examples courtesy of Alta Planning National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project Example 5 II

Two female bicyclists; Four pedestrians One male; Three female One child Image from PBIC Image Library Example 6 I I I III

Two bicyclists: One male; One female 5 male pedestrians; Two on assistive devices (in-line skates) Image from PBIC Image Library Example 7 I III II I

Count each person not each bike! Five bicyclists: Three male; Two female; Three - children Image from Alta Planning National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project Examples courtesy of Alta Planning National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project Example 8 II I II

What to Take on Day of Count Instructions Location maps Count forms Clipboards Pens, pencils, and spares Watch, phone, or timepiece Public information sheet Safety vest (may be available from MnDOT) Optional: hat, sunscreen, jacket, folding chair …

How to Interact with Public Counter must –Maintain focus on counting –Explain politely what he or she is doing and reasons for count –Note if count interrupted –Provide person interrupting with print information about count (see example)

Work Zone Safety Considerations Your counting locations represents a transportation work zone Safety is your primary concern; do not take risks Wear safety vest or high visibility colors Do not interfere with traffic flow Contact count manager if questions arise

Thank You Your contact info here

Managing a Count Program Count Manager Role Selecting Count locations Recruit, Train and Schedule volunteers Conduct Counts Report Counts

Steps in Starting a Counting Program 1.Consider the 5 Ws and an H* 2.Consult stakeholders and determine purpose 3.Confirm partnerships 4.Select locations, and create maps 5.Recruit and train counters* 6.Conduct counts 7.Report results to MnDOT 8.Evaluate experience and plan next count *Focus of presentation

Timeline 2012 MnDOT Bike and Ped Counts Steps in Starting a Bike & Ped Counting ProgramJulyAugSeptOct 1. Consider the 5 Ws and an HX 2. Consult stakeholders and determine purposeXX 3. Confirm partnershipsX 4. Select locations and create maps 5. Recruit and train volunteersXX 6. Conduct countsX 7. Report results to MnDOTXX 8. Evaluate experience and plan next countX

Consider the 5 Ws and an H A.Why count in my community? B.Who will do the counts? C.Where will the counts be taken? D.What information will be collected? E.When will the counts be taken? F.How will the counts be taken?

A. Why count in my community? –Document bike and ped traffic on particular streets –Evaluate use of bicycle lanes, sidewalks, trails, and other facilities –Assess programs like Safe Routes to Schools –Implement Complete Streets policies –Evaluate State Health Improvement Plan strategies –Other - consult stakeholders

B. Who will perform the counts? Local Count Manager will lead count Employees or volunteers will perform counts People and partners depend on purpose –Public works for traffic signaling –Planning department for evidence for plans –Parks & recreation for measuring trail use –Public Health for active living evaluations –Nonprofits and advocates for documenting need

C. Where will the counts be taken? Locations where you need information –Arterials, collector, or local streets (mid-block) –Sidewalks (mid-block) –Bicycle or pedestrian facilities such as multi-use trails (shared-use paths) –Intersections (more complex) –Downtown near businesses –Near schools, parks, and other important destinations

Factors in Choice of Count Locations Counts taken at location previously Existing or proposed bike or ped facilities Number of accidents or collisions Presence of transit options Stakeholder interest in location Land use mix Accessibility and safety for counters

Goal is to Count at Multiple Locations Many counts needed to understand variation in traffic over space and time Resource limitations prevent random or representative samples of entire community Strive for many locations (> 3 initially) Examples –Met Council counts trail users at > 500 sites –Minneapolis DPW & Transit for Livable Communities count annually at > 250 locations

Examples Bridge or other pinch point Trail Bike Lane Destination

Count location details Count location form GPS coordinates Create map for volunteer Test conducting a count

How to Use MnDOT Counting Form

Trail U of M Transitway, east of 29 th Ave SE Counter location Screen line N NOTES: Screenline revised for 2011 moved from 25 th, as 29 th is now the bike route from 27 th Ave. Count bicycles as riding on the transitway or on the sidepath (sidewalk riding)

Location 9: Hennepin Ave bridge Counter location Screen line N NOTES: Screen line is south of the stairway to W River Pkwy at the foot of the bridge

Location 15: 26 th Ave N, east of Penn - Bike Boulevard Counter location Screen line N NOTES: Screen line has been revised to be consistent with 2009 and 2010 counts just east of gas station driveway.

Location 6: Riverside Ave, over I-94 - Bridge Counter location Screen line N NOTES: Observation from mound on NE side of the intersection, screen line is the bridge. CLOSED 2011

Location 26: Franklin Ave Bridge Counter location Screen line N NOTES:

Location 39: Cedar Lake Trail, west of Kenilworth Trail (w of I-394) Counter location Screen line N NOTES: Observe from north of RR tracks – DO NOT COUNT KENILWORTH TRAIL Coordinate with other Cedar Lake Trail counts Loc 40, 43 and 70

Location 149: Bryant Ave, north of Lake Street - Bike Boulevard Counter location Screen line N NOTES: Not Annual Benchmark – Monthly count location only

Location 541: Summit Ave, east of Western Ave - Bike Lane Counter location Screen line N NOTES:

D. What information will be collected? Required data (screenline counts) –Number of bicyclists past point –Number of pedestrians past point Optional data: attributes, behaviors, based on goals –Direction –Gender –Relative age –Use of helmet

E. Dates for the first MnDOT Counts September 11, 12, 13, 2012 (Tu, Wed, TH) –Peak hour: 4:00 p.m. – 6:00 or 7:00 p.m. –12-hour day: 7:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. September 15 (Sat) –Peak hours: 10:00 a.m. – noon or 2:00 p.m. –12 hour day: 7:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. Rain dates: Sept. 18, 19, 20, 22

E. Other dates Peak periods and hours for biking or walking –Spring or fall; school in session –Both weekdays and weekends Good weather conditions At least annually, over many years

E. When will the counts be taken? Weekdays (essential) –Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays (consistent patterns) –Peak hours (varies by mode; essential) Bikes: 4:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. or 7:00 p.m. Peds: Noon – 1:00 p.m.; 4:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. or 7:00 p.m. –12 hour days (7:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m.) Weekend days –10:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m, depending on location –12 hour days (7:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m.)

F. How will the counts be taken? Count managers will train staff and volunteers Staff and volunteers will record bicycle and pedestrian traffic in field on MnDOT standard counting forms Count managers will collect, record, and report counts to MnDOT MnDOT and research team will report results

What to do if bad weather or emergency If bad weather – hard rain, thunderstorms and lightning, or tornado warnings or watches – stop count, note time on form, and go to safe place; report to manager as soon as possible. If emergency, call 911 as appropriate, and contact count manager as soon as possible. Document emergency on forms.

How to Report Results Counter –Give completed forms with tallies to count manager Count manager –Collect completed forms from each counter –Record tallies on spreadsheet ; check totals twice –Send spread and copies of tally sheets or pdf to Lisa Austin, MnDOT

Totals Bicycles Pedestrians Hourly Total

Check list of Count Manager Tasks Coordinate with local partners and MnDOT Choose and inspect counting locations Determine where counter will be located Determine number of volunteer counters needed Determine counting schedule Create packet of information for counters Train counters Provide and collect essential forms Notify public safety officials and responsible agencies Check weather and traffic conditions Ensure counts done correctly Share data with local partners and MnDOT

Example Counting Program

An Example: Anytown, Minnesota Anytown Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and SHIP Program proposes to count bikes and peds to see if people are using new bike lanes Counting plan –5 locations, two 12-hour reference sites –Wed, Sat counts Labor requirements –Count manager –Counters for 30 hours (15 people for 2-hour blocks)

Anytown Counting Schedule Wed Sat Site 1 (reference)Site 2Site 3Site 4Site 5 (reference) 7:00 a.m.XX 8:00 a.m.XX 9:00 a.m.XX 10:00 a.m.XX 11:00 a.m.XX 12:00 noonXX 1:00 p.m.XX 2:00 p.m.XX 3:00 p.m.XX 4:00 p.m.XX 5:00 p.m.XXXXX 6:00 p.m.XXXXX

Anytown Potential Counting Partners Complete Streets Committee members Municipal Depts. & employees (Public Works; Parks & Recreation, Planning, Public Health) Bike or outdoor club members College or high school classes Boy and Girls Scouts Local service clubs

Training Anytowns Counters How to count bicyclists and pedestrians How to use MnDOT standard counting form How to interact with public What to take on day of count What to do if counting in a work zone What to do in case of bad weather or emergencies How to report results

What to Take on Day of Count Instructions Location maps Count forms Clipboards Pens, pencils, and spares Watch, phone, or timepiece Public information sheet Safety vest (may be available from MnDOT) Optional: hat, sunscreen, jacket, folding chair …

Public Information Sheet for Counters MnDOT Bicyclist and Pedestrian Counting Program We are participating in a research project with MnDOT to study bicyclist and pedestrian traffic volumes. For more information, you may contact Lisa Austin, MnDOT Transportation Planner, , I will be happy to answer your questions if possible, but I must keep focused on counting to ensure our counts are as accurate as possible. Thank you for your interest in our

Next Steps Permanent-continuous counts and automated counts short duration counts Extrapolate with factors and models

Test Automated Equipment Permanent Continuous Automated Portable

Extrapolating Short Counts Engineers use short counts to estimate traffic volumes for longer periods of time –Peak hour counts are extrapolated to daily counts –Daily counts are aggregated to monthly counts –Monthly counts are aggregated to annual volumes Full day counts are best for developing adjustment factors used to extrapolate Extrapolating involves error but error is acceptable given goals and resource limitations

Extrapolating Peak Hour Counts: An Example Non-motorized Volume or Factor Peak Hour Volume (September weekday)25 Peak Hour % of Daily Traffic14% Weekday volume179 Weekend/weekday ratio1.4 Weekend daily volume250 Monthly volume5,929 September % of annual volume12% Annual volume 49,405

Bike & Ped Traffic Counting: Some Minnesota Examples Agency / OrganizationCounting Method BikesPedsMixed Mode Infrastructure type Minneapolis DPWManualYes Streets, sidewalks, trails Loop detector YesTrail Transit for Livable Communities ManualYes Streets, sidewalks, trails InfraredYes Sidewalks, trails Three Rivers Park Dist.InfraredYesTrails MankatoMethodYesBridge

Tradeoffs in Counting Approaches FactorManualAutomated - Infrared Automated – Loop Detector Automated - Video Data collected Volume, mode, behavior, turning movement Volume only (not mode) Bike volume onlyVolume, mode, behavior, turning DurationShort duration24-hour Accuracy of counts High, but errors with higher volumes and turning movements Systematic undercounts (grouping) Depends on technologies Potentially higher than in field counts Technical issues Need to train staff or volunteers Need to calibrate Need to train counters CostExpensive or time- consuming Less expensive Expensive for manual coding

Questions? For more information contact: Lisa Austin ABC Ramps Coordinator / Bicycle and Pedestrian Planner MnDot Office of Transit, Mail Stop 315, 395 John Ireland Boulevard St. Paul, MN Office: Acknowledgements: Transit for Livable Communities; Bike Walk Twin Cities