Page 1 Schedule Experimental Energy Reduction (EER) updated 2005 Note: This program is available to qualified participants within the EntergyArkansas,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

Summary of Proposed Market Rules For Transition Period Price-Responsive Demand and Active Demand Resources in the Forward Capacity Market Henry Yoshimura,
The Power to Make a Difference PPL Electric Utilities April 2010.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com Winter 2014 Overview & Recent and Upcoming Market Rule Changes Adam Keech Director, Market Operations.
Solar Energy in Washington State and Executive Order All Stakeholder Workgroup Jake Fey Director, WSU Energy Program December 8, 2014.
Low Load Process David L. Plant March Objectives Describe the three stages of the Low Load Process and their time requirements Describe the three.
Page 1 The Experimental Market Valued Energy Reduction Service (MVER) Rider for Arkansas and Louisiana 2005 update.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. COLD SNAP Overview of Proposed Options for Winter 2004/2005.
TIME OF USE RATES AT THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY Presented at: Connecticut’s Energy Future December 2, 2004 James D. Lundrigan Pricing Manager The.
PG&E’s General Market Virtual Net Metering Schedule NEMV
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen 1 © 2011 D. Kirschen and the University of Washington.
SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS Bob Goldberg 312/
1 Addendum Fall 2006 Limited-Term RFP Detailed Instructions for Bidder Registration and Proposal Submission ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. September 11, 2006.
David I. McGeown "Where's the value in on site generation? Can real time metering and dispatch make a difference?
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Restructuring BUSINESS PROCESSES IN MAINE. Business Transactions Contracts Metering Usage History Enrollments & Drops Billing, Collections & Payments.
®® QUESTAR GAS Transportation Balancing Susan Davis, Director, Account & Community Relations February 28, 2014 We develop, transport and deliver clean.
Strategic Pricing Plan Central District Power Accountants Association Franklin, Tn. March 19, 2015.
20 September 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Introduction of Gas Reserve Arrangements Mark Bailey Gaz de France ESS.
ERS Update for DSWG June 1, Agenda June – September 2012 Procurement XML Project Update Clearing Price discussion NPRR 451 Q & A.
What is Ubiquity™? ubiquity (noun): the state of being, or seeming to be, everywhere at once Ubiquity™ is a powerful building management system that.
Submitted to Southeast Symposium on Contemporary Engineering Topics (SSCET) New Orleans, LA - August 31.
1 of 19 Development of Industry Standards Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Ikechukwu N. Nwabueze, Ph.D. Director,
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
Demand Response Products. Discussion Points 1.Setting the scene….. 2.Virtual Power Station 3.Reserves deployment order 4.Demand Response Products.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Existing Demand Response Programs Kurt Castleberry Director, Operating Committee Support May 24, 2007.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
NATIONAL GRID Winter Peak Demand Reduction Scheme (WPDRS) Michael Walsh ESB National Grid Sustainable Energy Ireland – LIEN Workshop Kilkenny, 22 nd July.
Summer 2004 and Beyond Lon W. House, Ph.D ACWA/Edison Joint Presentation June 24, 2004.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Time of Use Base Interruptible Program (TOU-BIP) Aggregation June 2007.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
® ®® ® IRP Workshop Feb 9, ®  February 9, Workshop - Review of 2014 IRP Order - December 30 and 31 Weather Event - Demand Forecast and 65%
R OCKY M OUNTAIN P OWER C OMPANY DSM OPT-OUT PROPOSAL Utah Industrial Energy Consumers (UIEC) November 3, 2009.
E x p e r i e n c e C o m m i t m e n t SM ERCOT Nodal – Fuel Cost Analysis Verifiable Cost Working Group October 6, 2008.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Demand Side Products in PJM Joseph BowringCornell University January 17, 2011.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Southern California Edison Company’s Proposal to Participate in Convergence Bidding August 23, 2010.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
1 Tab X ERCOT Confidential Credit Impact of Increased Caps The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal.
The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal ERCOT model under four scenarios: 1.(Base Case) “Normal” summer.
Demand Response Programs: An Emerging Resource for Competitive Electricity Markets Charles Goldman (510) E. O. Lawrence Berkeley.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Developing Load Reduction Estimates Caused by Interrupting and/or Curtailing Large Customers By Carl L. Raish 2000 AEIC Load Research Conference.
WSPP Webinar Proposed Service Schedules Operating Reserve Service (D) Intra-Hour Supplemental Power (E) February 4, 2010.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
Demand Side Management Andy Pace 6 October | Energy Networks Association - DCMF.
Modification Proposal 0435: Arrangements to better secure firm gas supplies for GB customers Initial Workgroup discussion 1 November 2012.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.
Program Overview Solar resource will be built by j uwi, (pronounced “you-vee”), a developer based out of Boulder, Colorado. Solar farm will be located.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Matinee Pricing Opt-in Pilot Rate Proposal (R ) Commission Workshop February 24, 2016 Manager, Pricing Design.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
2015 SDG&E PTR/SCTD Evaluation DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impact Workshop George Jiang May 11 th, 2016 Customer Category Mean Active Participants Mean Reference.
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Flexible Forward Contracts for Renewable Energy Generators
Load Response Products from Constellation NewEnergy
ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. February 23, 2006
Market Pricing Initiatives Update September 9th, 2003
Presentation transcript:

Page 1 Schedule Experimental Energy Reduction (EER) updated 2005 Note: This program is available to qualified participants within the EntergyArkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States (LA) Inc., and Entergy Louisiana, Inc. jurisdictions ONLY

Page 2 The Experimental Energy Reduction Program (EER): What Is The EER Program, and Why Is Entergy Pursuing This? The EER Program is designed to enable the market mechanics necessary to permit a broader range of customers to participate in a curtailment program. The EER Program provides an economic incentive to qualified customers to release Entergy from its obligation to supply during periods of highly volatile market prices, or when supply is severely constrained (< 15 days). EER offers another layer of protection for Entergy’s customers against the risks of exposure to higher fuel costs. $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800 $2, Highest to Lowest Summer Weekday Day Ahead Energy ($/MWH) Note: This program is available to qualified participants within the Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States (LA) Inc., and Entergy Louisiana, Inc. jurisdictions ONLY

Page 3 The Experimental Energy Reduction Program (EER): Program Features The program hours are the 4 hour "super peak” in summer and winter 2PM - 6 PM CDT May – September 5 PM – 9 PM prevailing time January – April & October – December The Customer must participate all 4 hours and at the same pledged demand during each hour (minimum pledge is 150 kW). Entergy’s posted price will be the same for all 4 hours. Market Replacement Charges (penalties at a rate of 2 X posted prices) apply for each kW that is 90% below pledged demand, measured during each hourly interval. Entergy provides the opportunity for a waiver from Market Replacement Charges, through a “Relief From Operational Failure” provision (2 waivers per program period). The waiver applies to the entire four hour period, and if exercised the customer also forgoes the credit. There are Maximum Energy Reduction Payments of 130% of pledged demand. The customer receives no further credit after surpassing 130% of their pledged energy reduction, also measured during each hourly interval. Note: This program is available to qualified participants within the Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States (LA) Inc., and Entergy Louisiana, Inc. jurisdictions ONLY

Page 4 The Experimental Energy Reduction Program (EER): How the EER Program Operates Entergy implements EER by posting energy prices on a web page by 8:00 AM, day-ahead of the proposed curtailment. The customer is notified to review the offer via , phone call, or fax. The customer elects participation by pledging their demand reduction for all four hours using the web interface, and must make the commitment by 11:00 AM day-ahead. Entergy provides confirmation no later than 10:00 AM, day-of. The energy reduction is measured by comparing the previous normal business day interval metering data within the program hours with the day-of interval metering data for those same hours (2:00 PM - 6:00 PM or 5:00 PM – 9:00 PM). Entergy will calculate the energy reduction credit / debit and will post the net result on the customer’s bill, usually within the next available billing cycle. Note: This program is available to qualified participants within the Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States (LA) Inc., and Entergy Louisiana, Inc. jurisdictions ONLY

Page 5 EER Program Example Illustration Assumption: Customer Pledges 500 kW Reduction Variables Pledged orMinimum HourlyMaximum Hourly EMO posted priceCurtailable DemandEnergy Reduction $ %130% Results: hour 1hour 2hour 3hour 4 Prior Normal Business Day hourly kW Day Of hourly kW Net Hourly Energy Reduction Minimum Energy Reduction (90% of Curtailable Demand)450 Maximum Energy Payment (130% of Curtailable Demand)650 Calculation:Market ReplacementNet Credit CalculationCredit AmountsPenalty CalculationsChargeResults *hour 1350 kW X $.50$ kW X (2 X $.50)$100.00$75.00 hour 2550 kW X $.50$275.00none$0$ hour 3500 kW X $.50$250.00none$0$ **hour 4650 kW X $.50$325.00no credit > 130%$0$ Total Credit$ * Customer fails to meet the minimum hourly energy reduction of 450 kW (90% of Pledge) by 100 kW. Incurs a penalty. ** Customer exceeds the maximum hourly energy payment (130% of Pledge or 650 kW) by 75 kW, receives credit only for maximum allowable. The Experimental Energy Reduction Program (EER): Example - Market Replacement Charges and Maximum Payment Provisions Note: This program is available to qualified participants within the Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States (LA) Inc., and Entergy Louisiana, Inc. jurisdictions ONLY

Page 6 Customer Incurs penalty based on 100 kW shortfall Customer’s maximum payment is 130% of pledged demand, forgoes 75 kW The Experimental Energy Reduction Program (EER): Example - Market Replacement Charges and Maximum Payment Provisions Note: This program is available to qualified participants within the Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States (LA) Inc., and Entergy Louisiana, Inc. jurisdictions ONLY

Page 7 Customers wishing to participate must be willing to execute an Enabling Agreement with Entergy. Customers must have interval metering at their site, or be willing to pay to have interval metering installed. Customers will be asked to participate in a “fire drill” to determine the level of operational flexibility as needed to reduce electric loads by a minimum of 150 kW during all participating hours prior to an actual curtailment. Participating accounts must be firm (i.e., interruptible load is not eligible to participate in EER) The customer must have internet access, and be willing to pay any and all associated fees for this service. If back-up generation is to be used, the customer must comply with Entergy distribution standards for wiring configuration. The Experimental Energy Reduction Program (EER): Minimum Criteria To Participate Note: This program is available to qualified participants within the Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States (LA) Inc., and Entergy Louisiana, Inc. jurisdictions ONLY