, Running Start 2009 Ready to Teach on Day 1. Participating Districts North Cohort Box Elder Weber Ogden Davis Tooele Granite Salt Lake Murray Jordan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include: Report student progress toward.
Advertisements

Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
CTE Credential Program For IHE and District Representatives Meetings held March & April 2010.
Hank Fien, Carrie Thomas Beck, Nicole Sherman-Brewer Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Leadership Session: Fidelity of Implementation Observation.
Live Learn Lead.  What are the major reasons we use report cards and assign grades to students’ work?  Ideally, what purposes should report cards or.
Local Mentor Plan South Brunswick Schools September 2005 South Brunswick Schools September 2005.
Differentiated Supervision
Coaching Framework Improving Teaching and Learning Literacy District More than Literacy.
Formative Assessment in Idaho Idaho is committed to the idea that a system of assessment will yield far better information about teaching and learning.
PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
The Impact of Growth on Public Education Utah Intergovernmental Roundtable Annual Summit October 19, 2006 Dr. Ray Timothy Deputy State Superintendent.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
The Process of Effective Instruction Includes Planning for Assessment in What and How You Teach.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
RUNNING START: AN ONGOING COMPREHENSIVE INDUCTION PROGRAM FOR BRAND NEW UNLICENSED SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS AND THEIR INSTRUCTIONAL COACHES UTAH STATE.
UEA Evaluation Organizing Project August 8, 2013 Insert EOP logo.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Association for Behavior Analysis International 36 th Annual Convention Teacher Induction: Where the Rubber Meets the Road Randy Keyworth.
Monica Ballay Data Triangulation: Measuring Implementation of SPDG Focus Areas.
Basic Principles of Achievement Testing 4. Should be designed to fit the particular uses to be made of the results. Pretest Mastery test Diagnostic test.
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
Math In Focus Haverford’s New Math Program. Strategies of MIF The “why” as well as the “how” is taught with all math concepts. This allows teachers to.
Evaluation Tools & Approaches for Engaging Stakeholders: The AREA Approach Presentation at the Canadian Evaluation Society Dr. Mariam Manley, Principal.
Professional Development Plan: Instructional Strategies Jumoke Academy Honors Middle School PD Team: Maxx, Doreen, Dave, & Kate.
TAP TAP Basics (Preparing for Success in a TAP School) [PSTS]
UTIPS Update C-Forum October 5, 2007 Julie Quinn Computer-Based Assessments Specialist Assessment Section Utah State Office of Education.
SciencePLUS (Promoting Learning & Understanding for Students) Network A Federally Funded Project through the Math-Science Partnership and the Kentucky.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Blended Learning Design: Revised Recommendation
Training Program Proposal December  Review ~ of The Educational Technology Plan from Donegal’s Strategic Plan  Analysis ~ of Donegal’s School.
MSP Annual Performance Report: Online Instrument MSP Regional Conferences November, 2006 – February, 2007.
Research and Evaluation Team Lines of Work Andy Porter, Director Building a Partnership – Susan Millar District Case Studies – William Clune Targeted Studies.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
CaMSP Cohort 8 Orientation Cohort 8 State and Local Evaluation Overview, Reporting Requirements, and Attendance Database February 23, 2011 California Department.
Roles and Responsibilites of the Mentor Teacher Thank you for participating in our Mentor/Mentee Program! Parkway School District Summer 2010.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
CPD- Continuous Professional Development & GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CONTRACTUAL STAFF.
Evaluating Educational Technology Brian McNurlen & Chris Migotsky University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Chapter 6: High-Leverage Practice 1: Formative Evaluation.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
The purpose of evaluation is not to prove, but to improve.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
By William Gray Rinehart and Kristi Ley
University of Minnesota Minnesota Department of Human Services Minnesota Positive Behavior Support Initiative.
Utah’s Comprehensive K-12 Foundation Prevention Program.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Prevention Specialists December 13, 2013 Canyons School District.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Data and Assessment-Using the Right Data to Make Better Decisions September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Writing Workshops For more information
Writing Workshops For more information
Model Types Instructional Decisions Associated Lesson Plans
Basic FBA to BIP e-Learning Modules: Building Capacity for Tier 3 Support Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University
Using data for instructional decision-making
School Community Councils: Teachers Matter
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
LINKS Peer to Peer Support Program
Information July 15, 2015.
Presentation transcript:

, Running Start 2009 Ready to Teach on Day 1

Participating Districts North Cohort Box Elder Weber Ogden Davis Tooele Granite Salt Lake Murray Jordan Canyons Wasatch Odyssey Charter School South Cohort Alpine Provo Nebo

Planning Began September 2008 Weber, Ogden, Davis, Tooele, Salt Lake, Granite, Jordan, Canyons, Alpine, Provo, Washington, and Nebo School districts Monthly planning meetings Two day planning retreat mid-May Weekly meetings commencing June 2009

Content Vital Teaching Behaviors Lesson planning, effective instruction, behavior management Theory, modeling, guided practice, independent practice Vital Coaching behaviors Relationship building, modeling, feedback, data collection Coaches received coach-specific training for addition hour each day Coaches attended Running Start with their new teacher(s)

Formative Assessment of the Training BSN Teachers Very high ratings of both the content and conduct of the training. Demonstrable gains from pretest and post- test measures of content knowledge. Mastery achieved by 90% of all BSN teachers on follow-up post-test.

Monitoring Coach Behavior: The First 30 Days Project Coaches self-reported their coaching activities on a weekly basis using an online reporting system during August and September Findings Coaches met frequently/regularly with BSNs Provided emotional support Did not formally observe very much Did not model More light coaching than heavy coaching

Formative Assessment of Training BSN Coaches Very high ratings of conduct of training High ratings of content of the training Demonstrable gains on pretest and post-test measures of content knowledge.

Insert teacher observations

Insert coach observations

Additional Ongoing Evaluation Surveys of Running Start BSNs Linking RS BSN responses to surveys to intensity and quality of coaching behaviors Surveys of Running Start coaches Additional qualitative assessments of RS teachers and coaches (e.g., Success Case Method) Additional online monitoring of RS Coaches