Intravenous Calcium and Magnesium (CaMg) Reduces Chronic, But Not Acute Neurotoxicity Associated With Oxaliplatin – Results From a Placebo- controlled.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MOSAIC Stage ll+lll FOLFOX4 LV5FU2 Randomize. DFS DFS (months) Hazard ratio: 0.77 [0.65 – 0.92] p < 0.01 FOLFOX (n=1123) 77.9% LV5FU2 (n=1123) 72.8% FOLFOX.
Advertisements

A Phase III Trial Comparing FULV to FULV + Oxaliplatin in Stage II or III Carcinoma of the Colon: Results of NSABP-C-07 Norman Wolmark, MD Colorectal Cancer.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
A Meta Analysis of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Treated with Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Long term results.
CM A Comparison of Simple Single-Item Measures and the Common Toxicity Criteria in Detecting the Onset of Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.
Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Intravenous Calcium/Magnesium to Prevent Oxaliplatin- Induced Sensory Neurotoxicity, N08CB.
Taxane neuropathy: clinical features, mechanisms and methods of assessment.
Intravenous calcium and magnesium prevents oxaliplatin-induced sensory neurotoxicity in adjuvant colon cancer: Results of a phase III placebo-controlled,
Diabetes mellitus and the incidence and time to onset of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral sensory neuropathy in patients with colorectal cancer: A pooled.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Oxaliplatin/5FU/LV in adjuvant colon cancer: Updated efficacy results of the MOSAIC trial, including survival, with a median follow-up.
Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) upregulation Dose- and time-dependent upregulation of TP in human colon cancer xenografts PaclitaxelDocetaxel.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer 2005 Daniel G. Haller, M.D. Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
Intermittent oxaliplatin administration improves time-to-treatment failure in metastatic colorectal cancer: Final results of the phase III CONcePT trial.
Prevention of Pegfilgrastim-induced Bone Pain (PIP): A URCC CCOP Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of 510 Cancer Patients Jeffrey J. Kirshner,
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Greg Yothers, Stephanie R. Land, Clifford Y. Ko, D. Lawrence Wickerham, Louis Fehrenbacher, Jeffrey K. Giguere, Norman Wolmark, and Patricia A. Ganz.
Poster #382 XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line XELOX vs. FOLFOX-4 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Updated.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Treating and Supporting Patients with Advanced Cancer Neal J. Meropol, M.D. Fox Chase Cancer Center Philadelphia, PA June 1, 2009 Colorectal Cancer Poster.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
# 3564 Neurotoxicity with FULV versus FLOX in patients with stage II and III carcinoma of the colon: Results of NSABP Protocol C-07 S Land 1,2, J Kopec.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
Oral Colorectal Presentations: Discussion Abstracts # #4011 Cathy Eng, M.D. The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center May 31, 2008.
XELOX vs. FOLFOX4: survival and response results from XELOX-1 / NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line treatment for patients with metastatic.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
Locatelli F et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4378.
Sandra A. Mitchell, PhD, CRNP Outcomes Research Branch, DCCPS
Correlation of Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFS) with Treatment Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer (PC) Patients (pts) Treated with Gemcitabine/Capecitabine plus.
Maintenance Therapy with Bortezomib plus Thalidomide (VT) or Bortezomib plus Prednisone (VP) in Elderly Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM2005MAS65 Spanish.
Brentuximab Vedotin Administered Concurrently with Multi-Agent Chemotherapy as Frontline Treatment of ALCL and Other CD30-Positive Mature T-Cell and NK-Cell.
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients with.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Reviewer: Dr Scott Berry Date posted: June 21, 2007 CAPEOX vs. FOLFOX4 +/- Bevacizumab: survival results from NO16966, a randomized.
Phase III Study of First-Line XELOX Plus Bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 Cycles Followed by XELOX Plus BEV or Single Agent (s/a) BEV as Maintenance Therapy in.
Comparing and Validating Simple Measure of Patient-reported Peripheral Neuropathy for NCCTG Clinical Trials: a Pooled Analysis of 2440 Patients Heshan.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Acute Abnormalities of Sensory Nerve Function Associated With Oxaliplatin-Induced Neurotoxicity Susanna B. Park, David Goldstein, Cindy S.-Y. Lin, Arun.
Phase III Clinical Trial of FOLFOX with or without Cetuximab in Resected Stage 3 Colon Cancer: Cooperative Group Trial N0147 (NCCTG*,
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Methodological challenges of studying CIPN during chemotherapy
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Perez EA et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 80.
ESPAC-4: Adjuvant Gemcitabine/ Capecitabine Improves 5-Yr Survival vs Gemcitabine Alone in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma CCO Independent Conference.
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
TREATMENT ARM B: Cycles 1–3: Cycles 4+: 5-FU continuous infusion
for the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG)
Ospedale Misericordia, Grosseto
Short or long adjuvant treatment: can we use new trials to decide it?
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Gordon LI et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 415.
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
Forero-Torres A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 3711.
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
and the NSABP Investigators
Effect of intravenous calcium and magnesium versus placebo on response to FOLFOX+bevacizumab in the CONcePT trial Hochster HS,1 Grothey A,2 Shpilsky A3,
Presentation transcript:

Intravenous Calcium and Magnesium (CaMg) Reduces Chronic, But Not Acute Neurotoxicity Associated With Oxaliplatin – Results From a Placebo- controlled Phase III Trial A. Grothey 1, D. A. Nikcevich 2, J. A. Sloan 1, J. W. Kugler 3, P. T. Silberstein 4, T. Dentchev 5, D. B. Wender 6, H. E. Windschilt 7, X. Zhao 1, C. L. Loprinzi 1 For the North Central Cancer Treatment Group

Background Oxaliplatin exhibits a characteristic toxicity profile with a very common, reversible acute, mainly cold-triggered sNT, muscle cramps during or immediately after oxaliplatin infusion, commonly understood as a symptom of acute sNT, a chronic, cumulative peripheral sNT which is the dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin In a retrospective, non-randomized study, intravenous administration of calcium and magnesium (CaMg) was associated with reduced oxaliplatin-induced PSN (Gamelin 2004) N04C7 evaluated the activity of IV CaMg as a neuroprotectant against oxaliplatin-related sNT in a placebo-controlled phase III trial in adjuvant colon cancer Detailed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures were included to specifically analyze a potential protective effect of CaMg against acute and chronic sNT

N04C7 Cancer Control Phase III Trial – Study Design 1g Ca-gluconate and 1g Mg-sulfate in 100 mL D5W over 30 min immediately before and after oxaliplatin (placebo = 100 mL D5W) Neurotoxicity recorded in 3 different ways: NCI-CTC v3.0 (primary endpoint) Oxaliplatin-specific scale Patient questionnaires Pts to receive adj. FOLFOX IV CaMg % of Grade 2+ sNT R IV placebo

Key Inclusion Criteria Resected adenocarcinoma of the colon, stage II or III No evidence of residual disease Scheduled to receive 12 cycles of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy with 85 mg/m 2 oxaliplatin every 2 weeks (e.g. mFOLFOX6 or FOLFOX4) Age >18 years No pre-existing peripheral neuropathy of any grade No hypercalcemia No digitalis medication, no history of AV block

Statistics Primary endpoint Percentage of patients with Grade 2+ chronic PSN during or at end of therapy After discussions with NCI, CTC v3.0 “enhanced” by patient-reported outcomes (PRO) used With 150 patients per arm, 80% power to detect a 15% difference (25% vs 40%) in incidence of Grade 2+ PSN Stratification factors: Age ( 65), gender, regimen (FOLFOX4 vs mFOLFOX6)

Statistics Selected secondary endpoints Time-to-onset and duration of G2+ (and G3+) PSN Percentage of patients with acute neuropathic events Percentage of patients discontinuing adjuvant therapy Average cumulative oxaliplatin dose Duration of therapy Various QOL parameters (questionnaires) Pharmacogenomic analysis (e.g. GSTP1 polymorphism)

Neurotoxicity Evaluation GradeNCI-CTC 3.0 Oxaliplatin-specific scale I loss of deep tendon reflexes or paresthesia, including tingling, but not interfering with function sensory symptoms of short duration II objective sensory alteration or paresthesia, including tingling, interfering with function, but not interfering with activities of daily living sensory symptoms persisting between cycles III sensory alteration or paresthesia interfering with activities of daily living sensory symptoms causing functional impairment IV Permanent sensory losses that are disabling -

PRO-”Enhanced” NCI-CTC in N04C7 Do you have problems writing? Grade I “No, I might feel some tingling in my hands, but I have no problems writing” Grade II “It is a bit harder than before, but I can still write” Grade III“I have severe difficulties writing” or “I cannot write anymore” Grade IV“I haven’t been able to write for weeks”

Study Characteristics Study designed to randomize a total of 300 patients Accrual halted and study terminated prematurely in August 2007 when interim analysis of the palliative COncePT trial suggested that CaMg reduced activity of oxaliplatin-based therapy (Hochster et al. Letter to Editor, JCO 2007) At time of study closure, 104 patients randomized, 102 patients had started study medication (50 CaM, 52 PL) Presented analyses based on intention-to-treat analysis of these 102 patients Data cut-off after 127 days (4 months plus 1 week) due to premature study closure

Pertinent Patient characteristics % Patients CaMg (N=50) Placebo (N=52) Total (N=102) Age > Male Caucasian96 mFOLFOX

Adverse Events No difference between CaMg and Placebo in any recorded adverse events incl. Anemia Leuko-/neutropenia Thrombocytopenia Infection Diarrhea Dehydration Cardiac events Pain Myalgia Muscle weakness Hypersensitivity Taste abnormality Stomatitis Nausea/vomiting Hypercalcemia Incidence of any toxicity

Incidence of Grade 2+ sNT sNT Grade CaMg (N=50) Placebo (N=52) P NCI CTC scale Grade 0/178%59% Grade 2+22%41% Oxaliplatin scale Grade 0/172%49% Grade 2+28%51% Nikcevich et al. ASCO 2008, #4009

QOL Assessment At each visit, patients completed 3 questionnaires General QOL questionnaire Brief Fatigue Inventory Specific neurotoxicity evaluation form which tried to distinguish between acute vs chronic neuropathy “Symptoms immediately after last treatment” “Symptoms within last 2 week” Analysis of PRO-QOL items at distinct time points acute sNT Area between curves over sequential treatment cycles chronic sNT

Acute Symptoms on Day 2 of Cycle 1 Mean PRO-scores (SD) Symptom CaMg (N=45) Placebo (N=50) P Sensitivity to cold 17 (22)14 (21)0.41 Discomfort swallowing 13 (21)13 (23)0.81 Throat discomfort 5 (10)13 (27)0.19 Muscle cramps 2 (6)11 (23)0.002 Scale (0: no symptoms, 100: worst)

Chronic sNT (Examples) Numbness fingers/toesTingling fingers/toes p=0.02p=0.06 p-value for comparison of areas under the curves

Chronic sNT (Examples) Numbness fingers/toesTingling fingers/toes p=0.02p=0.06 p-value for comparison of areas under the curves Further significant effect of CaMg vs placebo on: impaired ability to button shirts (p=0.05), muscle cramps over the course of therapy (p=0.01)

Conclusions Analysis of specific PRO questionnaires in N04C7 demonstrated that CaMg was able to significantly reduce muscle cramps and chronic, cumulative sNT No effect was noted on phenomena associated with acute sNT. These data suggest that Acute sNT (mainly cold-triggered events) and muscle cramps have a different patho-physiologic origin Acute sNT and chronic, cumulative sNT are distinct neuropathologic phenomena CaMg can be recommended as neuroprotectant against oxaliplatin- related muscle cramps as well as chronic sNT, oxaliplatin's dose- limiting toxicity.