PPA 419 – Aging Services Administration Lecture 10c – Public Transportation and Aging.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Better Accessible Transport to Encourage Robust Intermodal Enterprise Work Package 6 Dr John Harrison.
Advertisements

West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Texas Coordination Institute August,  Schedule / Dispatch  Maintenance  Driver Training  Vehicle Sharing.
Government Owned Vehicles Westchester County. Westchester County Cars County cars are being underutilized. County officials can only use county cars.
ANYBODY CAN RIDE! Examples of successful rural transit programs and practices elsewhere in the United States.
Mobility Management Increasing Independence for Community Members.
Mid-State Regional Coordinating Council NH legislature passed RSA 239B establishing the Statewide Coordinating Council for Community Transportation.
WELCOME Panhandle Independent Living Center’s Travel Training Partnership.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act (SAFETEA-LU) enacted August 10, 2005 Required that projects be derived from a locally.
Washington County Transportation Authority. Mission Statement  The mission of the Washington County Transportation Authority (Washington Rides) is to.
Opportunities for Better Special Needs Transportation Coordination House Transportation Committee Work Session February 8, 2007 Paula Hammond WSDOT Mike.
Company confidential Prepared by HERE Transit Sr. Product Manager, HERE Transit Product Overview David Volpe.
Together We Ride - Mobility Management Center for Santa Clara County Mobility Management Center.
Transportation Development How do we get rubber on the road? …..and other burning questions.
GETTING THERE The Vehicle To Participation!!!!
PPA 419 – Aging Services Administration Lecture 10a – Aging and Mobility.
The Planning Perspective Presented by Joel Eisenfeld – KFH Group.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Service Recommendations September 9, 2014.
Experiences of Demand Responsive Transport System (DRTS) in Keski- Uusimaa/Finland.
“To link accessible responsive transportation with community needs” I&R In The World of Community-Based Transportation Cora Potter, Service Specialist.
Public Transportation & Persons With Special Transportation Needs House Transportation Committee February 12, 2013 Tom Hingson Transportation Services.
Jarrod McCarthy River Valley Regional Commission Mobility Manager.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services How will I get there? Transportation Resources in Massachusetts Presentation.
White House Conference on Aging Transportation Policy Committee Testimony January 8, 2005 Looking Forward… Growing Older Public Transportation: Providing.
Transportation & Aging Senior and Disabled Riders Transportation Summit December 6, 2013.
06/20/2007 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Update on FTA New Initiatives on Transportation Services.
HSTP PLAN DEVELOPMENT Skagit-Island Human Services Transportation Plan July 10, 2014.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #4 October 1, 2014.
Transportation for Individuals with Disabilities Marian Vessels Director Mid-Atlantic ADA Center voice and tty.
Keeping Harris County Moving.. Background Transit needs study in Commissioned by H-GAC and Harris County Transportation Coordinated Council.
Almada Final Conference 21 October 2011 FLIPPER FL exible transport services and I CT P latform for eco-mobility in urban and rural Euro PE an a R eas.
Enhancing the Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Access and Use of Targeted Transportation Funds August 17, 2015.
One Call Transportation Services One Call Transportation Services Building on a Network.
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Texas Transportation Works Summit Presenter: Maurice Pearl, Citibus, General Manager.
Introductions Introduction to TCAG Federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Responsible for long-term planning for all modes of surface transportation.
Sullivan County Coordinated Transportation Plan Proposed Coordinated Transportation Plan.
Innovations in Transit Planning and Financing Presentation to the 2003 MPO Conference, Muncie IN October 16, 2003.
Beyond Buses and Taxis Beyond Travel Training Beyond The ADA MOBILITY MANAGEMENT.
MyRideNorthTexas (VTCLI Grant) August 17, 2015 Marion Denney, Dallas Area Rapid Transit Mobility Management Services 1.
Counseling, Caregivers and Alternative Transportation Panel C 12/02/03.
ILO Management of Training Institutions Workshop Flexible Training Delivery Trevor Riordan ILO Senior Training Policy Specialist.
Region X Local Human Service Transit Coordination Plan Public Workshop RDC Title Date Location Insert transit photo from your community here.
00 Metropolitan Transit System Transit Serving Point Loma September 23, 2008.
MaineCare Transportation System Redesign Speaking Up for Us Annual Meeting October 11, All documents.
2008 National Rural Public and Intercity Bus Transportation Conference Nebraska Statewide Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan.
ADA COST SAVING PRACTICES OUTSIDE OF CALIFORNIA ELIGIBILITY CONTRACTING WITH TAXI RESPONSIBLE RIDER PREMIUM SERVICE WEB RESERVATION.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
Travel Ambassador Program A train the trainer workshop.
WHAT IS A MOBILITY MANAGEMENT CENTER? HOW WOULD IT FUNCTION?
10/5/05 Marcy Jaffe, Outreach Liaison Agency Council for Coordinated Transportation/WSDOT October 5, 2005 Working with Rural Areas: Bringing it all together.
Ride in Kane Paratransit Service Kane County. Ride in Kane was established in 2008 through the efforts of the Kane County Paratransit Coordinating Counsel.
Community Partnership Program Don Okazaki, Planner Accessible Services King County Metro.
Alternative Transportation and Accessibility White House Conference on Aging Listening Session January 8, 2004 Audrey Straight, AARP Public Policy Institute.
Transportation for Everyone Community Transportation for the Contoocook River Valley February 2007 Posted 2/14/07.
Riding While Blind Enhancing the Public Transportation Experience for Riders Who are Blind or Visually Impaired.
E XPANDING M OBILITY O PTIONS IN M ARIN Marin Transit’s Paratransit and Mobility Management Programs 1.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
WIS DOT MCLARY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT.
Transportation Fee MSFAC Meeting 12/06/ Transportation Summary Typical Service Day during Semester: Tech Trolley – 6,200 riders & 240 trips Red.
RideWise Travel Training
and Transportation Impacts
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
Promoting Shared Rides: Where do Transit Agencies Fit?
Where’s My Ride William Tsuei Director of IT.
INNOVATIVE SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS AND SERVICES
United We Ride United We Ride….
CUTRIC: Specialized and Conventional Transit Integration Project
CTSA’s Grow Healthy Communities.
FY 2018 Section 5310 Application Solicitation
Mobility Management in Sacramento:
Presentation transcript:

PPA 419 – Aging Services Administration Lecture 10c – Public Transportation and Aging.

Source  Sterns, R., Antenucci, V., Nelson, C., & Glasgow, N. (2003). Public transportation: Options to maintain mobility for life. Generations, 27 (Summer),

Introduction  Social service agencies, transportation service providers, and governmental entities are searching for ways to develop or improve transportation services to meet local travel needs of older people.  Services can be provided to: People of all ages; Age-segregated group; or Both older adults and people with disabilities.

Organization and Management  Transportation services may be organizaed within a single organizational entity acting alone or by two or more entities acting together through some informal or formalized arrangement.

Organization and Management  Organizational structures. Regional transportation authority (RTA).  The most familiar organizational model of public transportation services. Fixed route, fixed schedule, plus: Many new flexibilities. A unit of local government.  City, village, or county.

Organization and Management  Organizational structures (contd.). Social service agencies.  Transportation services to clients with agency-operated vans or buses. Private enterprises. Tribal governments.

Organization and Management  Coordination arrangements. Brokerage.  Identifying customer needs and matching them with available transportation services. Coordination.  The process of coordination consists of combining arrangements and agreements among transportation providers to pool physical and financial resources, combine transportation capabilities, and improve the capacity of services to meet travel needs.  Three stages – cooperation, development of joint-use arrangements, and consolidation. Mobility management.  Serving customers as opposed to running a bus.  Mobility manager carries out the coordination of transportation services.  Brokering, facilitating, encouraging, coordinating, and managing both traditional and non-traditional services to expand the array of transportation services to diverse consumer groups.

Framework for Service Delivery  The delivery of transportation services varies in flexibility, accommodation to people with different levels of functional capability, and cost, affecting how services are provided and how customers gain access to them.  The challenge is to determine the type and level of service that best meeting the needs of residents of the community and to develop appropriate services, given the resources available.

Framework for Service Delivery  Framework for service delivery. Fixed route, fixed schedule.  Traditional mode.  Dependable and reliable transportation for functionally capable older adults with least assistance. Fixed route, flexible schedule.  Generally designed to accommodate an area with recreational opportunities or points of interest along a fixed route.  Jitney, requires high level of functional capability.

Framework for Service Delivery  Framework for service delivery. Flexible route, fixed schedule.  This type of service requires additional time built into a fixed schedule to accommodate a stop that occurs off an established route.  Accommodates declining levels of functional capabilities. Flexible route, flexible schedule.  Demand-responsive or paratransit service.  Costs more, suitable for low level of functional capability.

Framework for Service Delivery  Framework for service delivery (contd.). No specific route or schedule.  Like a private taxi, virtually unlimited flexibility, especially when people are able to call and schedule rides for specific times.

Older Consumer Preferences for Transportation Services  Older adults choose specific forms of transportation for specific trips that meet their physical and emotional needs for specific situations.

Older Consumer Preferences for Transportation Services  Ideal services: Reliable. Provide travel door to door. Available within 30 minutes of a phone call for service. Provide travel to more than one destination during an outing. Allow flexibility in choosing destinations and times. Provide comfortable waiting areas.

Older Consumer Preferences for Transportation Services  Ideal services (contd.). Provide easily accessible vehicles. Travel during evening hours and weekends. Provide friendly, courteous, helpful drivers and information specialists. Provide easy-to-read and understandable timetables, maps, and other travel information materials. Provide training for travelers to help them use the services successfully.

Older Consumer Preferences for Transportation Services  Preferred service features offer the rider control, empowerment, and choice.

Bringing Improved Services to Your Community

Summary  Successful transportation service delivery to older adults as well as others in the community requires the organization and management of a brokerage and coordination or mobility management.  Efficient and effective services are those that combine demand response, fixed and flexible routes, and fixed and flexible schedules.

Summary  The challenge facing mobility managers and transportation planners is to find ways to deliver needed services efficiently in order to achieve the greatest public benefit for the public resources expended.