AQUIFER VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT: PROJECT REVIEW COLUMBIA COUNTY June 11, 2009 Columbia County, Florida Advanced GeoSpatial Inc. Alan Baker, P.G. James.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Advertisements

Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Sacramento Model Derivation of Initial Parameters.
DRASTIc Groundwater Vulnerability map of Tennessee
2 nd International Conference Graz, October 10 th, 2012 SHARP PP 2: Region of Western Macedonia Fig. 1: Vulnerability map for Florina Basin GIS-based Vulnerability.
Esri International User Conference | San Diego, CA Technical Workshops | An Overview of Solving Spatial Problems Using ArcGIS Linda Beale, Jian Lange July.
Aquifer Recharge, Lakes, and Springs
Simulating Future Suburban Development in Connecticut Jason Parent, Daniel Civco, and James Hurd Center for Land Use Education and.
Using ESRI ArcGIS 9.3 Arc ToolBox 3 (Spatial Analyst)
BASIC SPATIAL ANALYSIS TOOLS IN A GIS
The Calibration Process
Let’s pretty it up!. Border around project area Everything else is hardly noticeable… but it’s there Big circles… and semi- transparent Color distinction.
Spatial Analysis University of Maryland, College Park 2013.
Rebecca Boger Earth and Environmental Sciences Brooklyn College.
Density vs Hot Spot Analysis. Density Density analysis takes known quantities of some phenomenon and spreads them across the landscape based on the quantity.
Potentiometric Surface Map - September 2007 Sources of Nitrate and Estimated Groundwater Travel Times to Springs of the Santa Fe River Basin, AMEC.
Wellhead Protection Strategies: Keys to Success Prepared by: Mr. Brian Oram, PG, Licensed Driller, PASEO B.F Environmental Consultants and Wilkes University.
Arc Hydro groundwater data model: a data model for groundwater systems within ArcGIS ESRI user conference May 2004 Gil Strassberg and David Maidment, University.
Title: Spatial Data Mining in Geo-Business. Overview  Twisting the Perspective of Map Surfaces — describes the character of spatial distributions through.
GIS UPDATE!
Manager: John Daneri Analyst: Kathleen Callahan Assistant Manager: Jacob Powell Analyst: Leah Gibson.
Spatial Analyst Toolbox Lecture 17. Spatial Analyst Tool Sets  Conditional  Density  Distance  Generalization  Ground Water  Interpolation  Conditional.
ESRM 250 & CFR 520: Introduction to GIS © Phil Hurvitz, KEEP THIS TEXT BOX this slide includes some ESRI fonts. when you save this presentation,
1 of 35 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 4 - Specify Boundaries (30 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 4.
Time of Travel. American Water Charleston intake on the Elk River Charleston 1,000, ,984 = 1880 seconds or 31 minutes.
Chittenden County Land Use - Transportation Decision Support System November 19, 2003 Chittenden County Metropolitan.
Ground Water Conditions around the Lathers Property Town of Waukesha Douglas S. Cherkauer PhD, PG, PH November 15, 2007.
Application CPA (Large Scale Map and Text Amendment): A request initiated by Alachua County to amend Conservation and Open Space Element as follows:
Upper Colorado River Basin spatial analysis of water demand Olga Wilhelmi Kevin Sampson Jennifer Boehnert Kathleen Miller NCAR, Boulder.
Scale estimation and significance testing for three focused statistics Peter A. Rogerson Departments of Geography and Biostatistics University at Buffalo.
Karst Topography – Developing a Sinkhole Inventory to Protect Groundwater Quality Presenters: Stacey Jarboe and John-Paul Brashear Stantec Consulting Services.
Introduction A GENERAL MODEL OF SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION.
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
Calibration Guidelines 1. Start simple, add complexity carefully 2. Use a broad range of information 3. Be well-posed & be comprehensive 4. Include diverse.
Probability of Detecting Atrazine and Elevated Concentrations of Nitrate in Colorado’s Ground Water USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report
NR 143 Study Overview: part 1 By Austin Troy University of Vermont Using GIS-- Introduction to GIS.
Processing Elevation Data. Limitations of DEMs for hydro work Dates Static, does not evolve Matching to linear line work due to scale Processing errors.
1 Overview Importing data from generic raster files Creating surfaces from point samples Mapping contours Calculating summary attributes for polygon features.
So, what’s the “point” to all of this?….
BOT / GEOG / GEOL 4111 / Field data collection Visiting and characterizing representative sites Used for classification (training data), information.
Development of Spatial Probability Models to Estimate, Integrate, and Assess Ground- Water Vulnerability at Multiple Scales Earl A. Greene and Andrew E.
Debra Harrington and Haizhi Chen FDEP Groundwater Protection March, 2005 PROTOTYPE FOR SPRING SYSTEM ASSESSMENTS.
Phil Hurvitz Avian Conservation Lab Meeting 8. March. 2002
AN INTRODUCTION TO STORMWATER AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Eric H. Livingston Bureau of Watershed Management Florida Dept. of Env. Protection Tallahassee,
Definition of Spatial Analysis
Arc Hydro groundwater data model: a data model for groundwater systems within ArcGIS AWRA Specialty Conference Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and.
Board of County Commissioners October 14, 2008 Vinzant Landing Swallet Santa Fe River.
A Framework and Methods for Characterizing Uncertainty in Geologic Maps Donald A. Keefer Illinois State Geological Survey.
INTERPOLATION Procedure to predict values of attributes at unsampled points within the region sampled Why?Examples: -Can not measure all locations: - temperature.
WELLS AND TIME SERIES DATA. Framework Temporal Aquifers & Wells.
Ras Al Ein and Its Catchment Area Delineation Using Images ( Raster Maps) and GIS Techniques Refaat Bani-Khalaf.
An Integrated Approach for Subsidence Monitoring and Sinkhole Formation in the Karst Terrain of Dougherty County, Georgia Matthew Cahalan1 and Adam Milewski1.
Raster Analysis Ming-Chun Lee.
URBDP 422 Urban and Regional Geo-Spatial Analysis
Incorporating Ancillary Data for Classification
Florida and Reclaimed Water
Statistical surfaces: DEM’s
Lecture 6 Implementing Spatial Analysis
Review- vector analyses
Susceptibility Assessment for Public Water Supply sources
use of GIS to assess groundwater recharge in the Texas High Plains
Drinking Water Mapping Application:
The inventory of Finnish groundwater resources
Water Table: is the level at which the groundwater pressure is equal to atmospheric pressure. Aquitard: is a zone within the earth that restricts.
5. Zonal Analysis 5.1 Definition of a zone 5.2 Zonal statistics
GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISATION in England & Wales
Water Table: is the level at which the groundwater pressure is equal to atmospheric pressure. Aquitard: is a zone within the earth that restricts.
NJ-GeoWeb Interactive Basics Workshop
4. Focal Analysis 4.1 Definition of focal analysis
GIS Analysis in Land Management
Presentation transcript:

AQUIFER VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT: PROJECT REVIEW COLUMBIA COUNTY June 11, 2009 Columbia County, Florida Advanced GeoSpatial Inc. Alan Baker, P.G. James Cichon

Presentation Overview Conceptual Definition Conceptual Definition Model Results Model Results Implementing Model Results Implementing Model Results Generalization with examples Generalization with examples

Model Limitations Vulnerability is relative; all aquifers are vulnerable Vulnerability is relative; all aquifers are vulnerable Based on features of the natural system that have association with location aquifer vulnerability Based on features of the natural system that have association with location aquifer vulnerability Does not account for human activity Does not account for human activity Does not take account for contamination types Does not take account for contamination types Does not estimate ground-water flow paths Does not estimate ground-water flow paths Does not model fate/transport of chemical constituents Does not model fate/transport of chemical constituents Large surface water features omitted Large surface water features omitted

Study Area over which to search for a particular occurrence Study Area over which to search for a particular occurrence Usually a county or some political boundary Usually a county or some political boundary Can be aquifer or springshed specific Can be aquifer or springshed specific Conceptual Definition

Development of evidential layers used as predictors: Development of evidential layers used as predictors: Soil Properties Soil Properties Confinement or Overburden Thickness Confinement or Overburden Thickness Sinkhole Features or closed topographic depressions Sinkhole Features or closed topographic depressions Conceptual Definition

Training Sites Training Sites Dataset of occurrences in our case ground water wells Dataset of occurrences in our case ground water wells Maximize knowledge by locating as many as possible Maximize knowledge by locating as many as possible Evaluate water quality records to locate upper quartile Evaluate water quality records to locate upper quartile Ultimately use a subset of total wells Ultimately use a subset of total wells Conceptual Definition

Conceptual Model Evidential layers are spatially associated with the distribution of known occurrences and then generalized into binary patters Evidential layers are spatially associated with the distribution of known occurrences and then generalized into binary patters Individual evidence layers are combined together as a map depicting the best areas to search for contamination Individual evidence layers are combined together as a map depicting the best areas to search for contamination

Use known locations and assess their distribution spatially with respect to each factor causing occurrence Use known locations and assess their distribution spatially with respect to each factor causing occurrence Where are the relationships or breaks between the data and the training points? Where are the relationships or breaks between the data and the training points? Conceptual Model

Input Input Soil Permeability Soil Permeability Overburden Thickness Overburden Thickness Hydraulic Head Difference Hydraulic Head Difference Karst Features Karst Features

Soil permeability Soil permeability Determine spatial association between theme and training points Determine spatial association between theme and training points Analysis reveals that highest contrast occurs at a soil permeability rate of 7.66 in/hr Analysis reveals that highest contrast occurs at a soil permeability rate of 7.66 in/hr

Overburden thickness Overburden thickness Determine spatial association between theme and training points Determine spatial association between theme and training points Analysis reveals that highest contrast occurs at a overburden thickness of 117 feet Analysis reveals that highest contrast occurs at a overburden thickness of 117 feet

Karst Features Karst Features Determine spatial association between theme and training points Determine spatial association between theme and training points Analysis reveals that highest contrast occurs at a distance of 210 m from a karst feature Analysis reveals that highest contrast occurs at a distance of 210 m from a karst feature

Aquifer Vulnerability Maps We now have a map showing where to focus our efforts in similar locations We now have a map showing where to focus our efforts in similar locations Results are based on data collected about existing occurrences Results are based on data collected about existing occurrences Model reveals a map showing favorable areas with greater probablity of finding occurrence Model reveals a map showing favorable areas with greater probablity of finding occurrence Relative Vulnerability Vulnerable More Vulnerable Most Vulnerable

Local versus regional assessment Larger scale study area: Wekiva Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment Larger scale study area: Wekiva Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment Results are normalized across smaller study area, not entire statewide extent of aquifer system Results are normalized across smaller study area, not entire statewide extent of aquifer system Can include refined input data such as LIDAR Can include refined input data such as LIDAR Provides more usable final product for planners, developers, regulators, and local government Provides more usable final product for planners, developers, regulators, and local government Local versus Regional

Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment Benefits Assists local government, planners and developers in guiding growth into areas delineated as lower vulnerability Assists local government, planners and developers in guiding growth into areas delineated as lower vulnerability Enables more focused protection of sensitive areas, e.g., springsheds and ground-water recharge areas Enables more focused protection of sensitive areas, e.g., springsheds and ground-water recharge areas Public tax dollars used more wisely as a result Public tax dollars used more wisely as a result Has be used to help guide wastewater management requirements – septic zones vs. centralized sewer Has be used to help guide wastewater management requirements – septic zones vs. centralized sewer Leon County & Alachua County Leon County & Alachua County Purpose, End Users, and Benefits

Implementing model results Results are not static; model is based on best available data and is snapshot in time Results are not static; model is based on best available data and is snapshot in time New and refined data reveals more accurate or complex statistical patterns allowing higher confidence in results New and refined data reveals more accurate or complex statistical patterns allowing higher confidence in results Lidar: Karst and Overburden Lidar: Karst and Overburden Accuracy is function input data Accuracy is function input data Approach is highly adaptable and useful tool for implementing ongoing protection of ground-water resources Approach is highly adaptable and useful tool for implementing ongoing protection of ground-water resources Implementing Model Results

Alachua and Leon Counties contracted with AGI for development of derivative protection-zone maps based on each of the County Aquifer Vulnerability Models Alachua and Leon Counties contracted with AGI for development of derivative protection-zone maps based on each of the County Aquifer Vulnerability Models Deliver an aquifer protection zone map based on individula results that is directly applicable to land use and environmental regulatory decisions Deliver an aquifer protection zone map based on individula results that is directly applicable to land use and environmental regulatory decisions Generalization of CAVA Model Results

Methodology Generalization of the vulnerability map into specific aquifer protection zones Generalization of the vulnerability map into specific aquifer protection zones Raster Smoothing techniques employed Raster Smoothing techniques employed Help guide implementation Help guide implementation Avoid use of results on parcel to parcel scale Avoid use of results on parcel to parcel scale Account for highly resolved but isolated areas of vulnerability Account for highly resolved but isolated areas of vulnerability Use of ArcGIS Spatial Analyst extension Use of ArcGIS Spatial Analyst extension

Determination of Appropriate Analysis Window Recent projects recommended that model results be applied on a local scale of greater than or equal to approximately 1.0 mi 2 for statewide studies (Florida Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment) Recent projects recommended that model results be applied on a local scale of greater than or equal to approximately 1.0 mi 2 for statewide studies (Florida Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment) Or approximately 0.75 mi 2 for localized studies (Alachua, Wekiva, Leon and Marion County Aquifer Vulnerability Assessments). Or approximately 0.75 mi 2 for localized studies (Alachua, Wekiva, Leon and Marion County Aquifer Vulnerability Assessments). Based on similarities to larger scale projects, AGI determined that model results be used at a recommended scale of 0.75 mi 2, or an approximate 4,500-ft grid cell size. Based on similarities to larger scale projects, AGI determined that model results be used at a recommended scale of 0.75 mi 2, or an approximate 4,500-ft grid cell size.

ACAVA Model Results

Draft test results Focal Mean Filters on a window with a radius of 12 cells Cell size is 345 m. Calculates a statistic on a raster over a specified neighborhood. Focal Mean Finds the mean of the values for each cell location on an input raster within a specified neighborhood and sends it to the corresponding cell location on the output raster.

Note on CCAVA Protection zone map will be a derivative product of the original model CCAVA results Protection zone map will be a derivative product of the original model CCAVA results Not intended as a replacement of the CCAVA results Not intended as a replacement of the CCAVA results As a result, the protection zone map will represent a standalone map product based on CCAVA results and additional supplemental datasets As a result, the protection zone map will represent a standalone map product based on CCAVA results and additional supplemental datasets

1949 Raymond Diehl Rd, Ste. D Tallahassee, FL