Chapter 2 Overview of Total Sample GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November 2012. Available from www.gaincc.org/slideswww.gaincc.org/slides.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 16 Subset of Overview by Level of Care GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available from.
Advertisements

The Main Profiles Of Treatment Planning Needs Among Adolescents Presenting For Substance Abuse Treatment Based On Cluster Analysis Rodney R. Funk, Michael.
1 Intervening in the Recovery Process Michael L. Dennis, Ph.D. Christy K Scott, Ph.D. Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington &Chicago, IL U.S.A. Presentation.
Predictors of Change in HIV Risk Factors for Adolescents Admitted to Substance Abuse Treatment Passetti, L. L., Garner, B. R., Funk, R., Godley, S. H.,
A Phase 4 replication of MET/CBT5 in 36 sites to examine how findings vary by site, client characteristics, and implementation fidelity Michael L. Dennis,
Assertive Adolescent Family Treatment (AAFT) Cross-Site Progress Report Jutta Butler & Randolph D. Muck, SAMHSA, CSAT Michael L. Dennis, Susan H. Godley,
Client Profiles in the Offender Re- entry Program (ORP) and the Need to Address the Twin Issues of Trauma and Crime Michael Dennis, Ph.D. and Vinetha Belur,
The Catalyst Group, LLC Adolescent Residential Treatment Initiative I Mua Mau Ohana Project Preliminary Findings Richard Kim, Ph.D. 03/03/2005 Funded by.
Chapter 19 Methods Appendix GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available from
Trajectories of criminal behavior among adolescent substance users during treatment and thirty-month follow-up Ya-Fen Chan, Ph.D., Rod Funk, B.S., & Michael.
Trauma Issues with Specific Populations: Adolescents & Transition Age Youth OVERVIEW Michael Dennis, Ph.D. and Megan Catlin, M.S. Chestnut Health Systems,
Childhood Violence Exposure and the Behavioral Health/Juvenile Justice Initiative Jeff Kretschmar, Ph.D. Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research.
Kate R. Moritz, M.A. & Michael L. Dennis, Ph.D.
Chapter 4 Overview of Justice Program Treatment Sites GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available.
1 Behavioral Health/Juvenile Justice (BH/JJ) Evaluation Report ( ) Presented by Jeff Kretschmar, Ph.D. Project Director: Institute for the Study.
Strengthening Communities-Youth (SCY) Presented by Dr. David Hussey Institute for the Study and Prevention of Violence at Kent State University.
ADVANCED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC. The Hartford Youth Project Samuel Moy, Ph.D. Robyn Anderson, LPC, LADC.
1 Adolescent Mental Health: Key Data Indicators Gwendolyn J. Adam, Ph.D., L.C.S.W. Assistant Professor - Department of Pediatrics Section of Adolescent.
CYT Family Sessions Impact on CYT Process and Outcome Susan H. Godley, Rodney Funk, Michael L. Dennis, & Mark D. Godley, Chestnut Health Systems.
1 Advances in Identification and Treatment of Substance Abuse Randolph Muck, M.Ed Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health.
Chapter 2 The Problem of Dual Diagnosis. Dual Diagnosis and Comorbidity Dual diagnosis – Describes individuals who meet diagnostic criteria for a mental.
Amethyst, Inc. Amethyst exists to nurture and sustain healthy women and families. We have been providing gender specific and trauma informed alcohol, tobacco.
Always at your service GAIN Related Project Progress Report Michael L. Dennis, Ph.D., Laine Twanow, & Nora Jones, M.S. Chestnut Health Systems, Normal,
Addiction Treatment Works! Through Collaboration and Problem Solving amongst all disciplines.
Substance Abuse Treatment Reduces Costs to Society; Eliminating Substance Abuse Treatment Increases Costs Michael Dennis, Ph.D.* Christy K Scott, Ph.D.**
Cuyahoga County Strengthening Communities – Youth (SCY) Project: Findings & Implications for Juvenile Justice David L. Hussey, Ph.D. Associate Professor.
Bureau of Drug and Alcohol Services (BDAS) /DHHS Presentation to the Gaming Study Commission March 16 th, 2010 Joe Harding – Director –
Using Research/Evaluation Questions to Define Data Collection and Findings: Findings from the FY 2004 KTOS Follow-up Study Robert Walker, Allison Mateyoke-Scrivener,
Chapter 18 Other Special Topics GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available from
ILLINOIS STATEWIDE TREATMENT OUTCOMES PROJECT. Illinois Statewide Treatment Outcomes Project Largest evaluation of treatment outcomes by the State to.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Joe Vesowate Assistant Commissioner.
Creating Quality Coverage to Support Sustainable Recovery Families USA 2014 Health Action Conference Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Care in a.
Briefing Book Slides on SAMHSA/CSAT 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic File: All Grantees GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems.
Louisiana Access to Recovery LA-ATR Understanding Addiction & Supporting Recovery Webinar Pastor Pythian Noah June 25, 2009.
AOD Use and Mental Health Disparities during Pregnancy and Postpartum Victoria H. Coleman, Ph.D. & Michael L. Dennis, Ph.D. Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington,
2009 CSAT Dataset by Study ID Created by Chestnut Health Systems.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.
Chapter 20 Briefing Slides Summary GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available from
Chapter 11 Subset of Overview by Mental Health Disorders GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available.
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF ADDING THE RECLAIMING FUTURES APPROACH TO JUVENILE TREATMENT DRUG COURTS: RECLAIMING FUTURES/JUVENILE DRUG COURT EVALUATION Josephine.
New Jersey Department of Human Services Division of Addiction Services Substance Abuse Treatment Services Provider Performance Report Substance Abuse Treatment.
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: What do the Data Tell Us? Recovery Community Services Program Grantee Meeting December 14, 2007.
1 The Quality Chasm in the Behavioral Health Treatment For America's Youth Michael L. Dennis, Ph.D. Chestnut Health Systems Normal, IL Presentation for.
Reducing adolescent cannabis abuse and co-occurring problems through family-based intervention Howard Liddle, Ed.D., Cynthia Rowe, Ph.D., Gayle Dakof,
Participants were recruited from 6 drug free, psychosocial treatment (PT) and 5 methadone maintenance (MM) programs (N = 628) participating in a NIDA Clinical.
Adolescence and Substance Use by Rick Sampson, American Institutes for Research ( ) An Overview.
Chapter 15 Subset of Overview by Program GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available from
Health Disparities Webinar 2/28/2013 Michael L. Dennis, Chestnut Health Systems. Normal, IL Available from
Introduction Results and Conclusions On demographic variables, analyses revealed that ATR clients were more likely to be Hispanic and employed, whereas.
Chapter 6 Subset of Overview by Gender GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available from
Chapter 13 Subset of Overview by Crime and Violence GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available.
A Phase IV Meta Analytic Study of the Replicability of Motivational Enhancement Therapy/ Cognitive Behavior Therapy for 5 sessions (MET/CBT5) in 36 sites.
Introduction Results Treatment Needs and Treatment Completion as Predictors of Return-to-Prison Following Community Treatment for Substance-Abusing Female.
Texas COSIG Project Gender Differences in Substance Use Severity and Psychopathology in Clients with Co-Occurring Disorders 5 th Annual COSIG Grantee Meeting.
Transformation Accountability (TRAC) Center for Mental Health Services November 2015 Version 6 NOMs Client-level Measures for Programs Providing Direct.
Behavioral Health DATA BOOK A quarterly reference to community mental health and substance abuse services Fiscal Year 2015 Quarter 1 March 10, 2015
Chapter 3 Overview of Adolescent Treatment Sites GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available from.
Chapter 9 Subset of Overview by Risk of Homelessness GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available.
Chapter 17 Subset of Overview by Type of Treatment GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available.
MODELS FOR SUCCESS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR JUVENILE DRUG COURT Reclaiming Futures/Juvenile Drug Court Evaluation Southwest Institute for Research on.
Largest evaluation of treatment outcomes by the State to date 1,890 adult clients recruited from 40 treatment programs across the state Three levels of.
Cleveland Municipal Drug Court: SAMHSA CSAT Adult Treatment Drug Court Grant Dr. Margaret Baughman Madison Wheeler, BS Paul Tuschman, BA Begun.
Collaborative Effort of HIV, Domestic Violence and Homeless Service Organizations to Develop Integrated Services as Strategy for HIV Risk Reduction for.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Impact of Screening and Brief Intervention Grants in Seven States: Substance Use, Criminal Justice,
Kimberly Jeffries Leonard, Ph.D.
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
US Census Data Ortman, Jennifer M., Victoria A. Velkoff, and Howard Hogan. An Aging Nation: The Older Population in the United States, Current Population.
Clinically significant improvements in function
Can be personalized to individual group needs.
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 2 Overview of Total Sample GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available from Created for: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s (SAMHSA) Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) under contract number

2 SAMHSA/CSAT Full GAIN Outcome Data Set Sample: The 2011 SAMHSA/CSAT data set includes data on 29,782 clients from 230 local evaluations, recruited between who were due for at least one follow-up and available in the last quarterly data set of Levels of Care: Outpatient, Intensive Outpatient, Short-term & Moderate/Long-term Residential, Corrections-Based Treatment and Post-Treatment Continuing Care Instrument:Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) (see Versions 3 (CYT & ATM) and 5.1 through Follow-up:89% with one or more follow-ups at 3, 6, 9 & 12 months post intake, and 66% with two or more Funding: SAMHSA/CSAT contracts and and 230 individual grants (see Detailed Acknowledgement)

3 Risk and Protective Factors  The following slides present information on demographics, and risk and protective factors for clients at intake, including:  Demographics  Substance use  Risk behaviors  Victimization  Mental health disorders  Physical health problems  Crime and violence  Sources of stress and strengths  Costs  Summary indices (problem prevalence, quality of life, general satisfaction)  Non-client characteristics (program, level of care, and type of treatment)

4 Age Years 13.4% (n=3,976) Under 15 Years (<15) 13.8% (n=4,105) Years 63.5% (n=18,897) 26+ Years 9.4% (n=2,804) SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,782)

5 Gender Males 73% (n=21,599) Females 27% (n= 8,172) Other 0.03% (n=10) SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,781)

6 Race Multi-racial 13.4% (n=4,003) African American 15.8% (n=4,702) Hispanic 28.7% (n=8,555) White 38.1% (n=11,355) Other 3.9% (n=1,152) SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,767)

7 Demographic Characteristics *Any Hispanic ethnicity separate from race group SAMHSA/ CSAT data dominated by male, minority, age 15 to 17 SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,782)

8 Environment *n = 14,789 SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=28,502)

9 Current Risk of Homelessness At Risk 10.4% (n=3,073) Housed 74.7% (n=22,138) Group or Institution 10.7% (n=3,174) Currently Homeless 4.3% (n=1,261)

10 Substance Problem Recognition * n=13,112 SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,722)

11 Substance Severity by Time Period SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,684)

12 Past 90 Day Primary Substance Cocaine 5.2% (n=1,432) Alcohol 26.4% (n=7,327) Amphetamines 6.8% (n=1,898) SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=27,716) Other Drugs 2.3% (n=644) Opioids 4.9% (n=1,353)

13 Substance Use Problems *Count of 8 items SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,362)

14 Pattern of Weekly Use (13+/90 days) *Not a weekly measure; any in past 90 days SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,615)

15 Substance Use Disorders in Past Year by Major Substances *n=10,897 **Not counted in Any SUD Diagnosis. Abuse is not an option for Tobacco. SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=24,413)

16 Tobacco Diagnosis SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=27,384) Never Used 20% (n=5,354)

17 Recovery Environment - Peers SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,179)

18 Recovery Environment - Home SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,179) *Past 90 days

19 HIV Risk Scale* Past Year at Intake: Needle Use * Mean of 36 items from the next four slides. Intake only. SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=28,905)

20 HIV Risk Scale* Past Year at Intake: Sex * Mean of 36 items. Intake only. SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=28,079) **n=8,246

21 HIV Risk Scale* Past Year at Intake: Victimization * Mean of 36 items. Intake only. SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,378) **n=18,224

22 HIV Risk Scale* Past Year at Intake: Trauma *Mean of 36 items. Available at intake only. SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,422)

23 HIV Risk Change Index* in Past 90 Days at Intake *Count of 7 items listed. Can be used to measure change. SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,114)

24 Number of Sex Partners* SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=28,751) *In the past 90 days

25 Severity of Victimization Scale **Mean of 15 items SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=28,646) *n=18,224

26 Past Year Mental Health Disorders Internalizing Disorders Only 9.3% (n=2,770) Externalizing Disorders Only 20.6% (n=6,128) Both 32.8% (n=9,727) Neither 37.3% (n=11,059) SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,684)

27 Co-Occurring Psychiatric Problems *(n=22,106) ** Count of Conduct Disorder, ADHD/ADD Major Depressive Disorder, Traumatic Stress Disorder, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,588)

28 Homicidal/Suicidal Thoughts *Mean of 5 items SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,551)

29 Para-suicidal Index *Sum of 4 items SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=22,107)

30 Family History of Health Problems SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=28,345)

31 Past 90 Day Health Problems High Problems 8.8% (n=2,604) Low Problems 54.3% (n=16,019) Moderate Problems 36.8% (n=10,854) SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,477)

32 Quarterly Cost of Health Care Utilization  Using the GAIN, we are able estimate the quarterly cost to society of tangible services (e.g., hospital visits, emergency room visits, etc.) in 2011 dollars for the 90 days before intake.  For the 29,782 clients served in 230 sites between , the average Quarterly Cost of Health Care Utilization (HCU) per client: –in the quarter before they entered treatment, was $2,525 and totaled $71,908,959 across clients. –in the year before they entered treatment, was $10,099 per client and totaled $287,635,836 across clients.

33 HCU Cost to Society – 2011 Dollars * Quarterly Health Care Utilization 2011 dollars w/ SA TX based on French, M.T., Popovici, I., & Tapsell, L. (2008). The economic costs of substance abuse treatment: Updated estimates and cost bands for program assessment and reimbursement. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 35, DescriptionUnitCost 2011 dollars Inpatient hospital dayDays $ 2, Emergency room visitVisits $ 6, Outpatient clinic/doctor’s office visitVisits $ Nights spent in hospitalNights $ 2, Times gone to emergency roomTimes $ 6, Times seen MD in office or clinicTimes $ How many days in detoxDays $ Times in ER for AOD useTimes $ Nights in residential for AOD useNights $ Days in Intensive outpatient program for AOD useDays $ Times did you go to regular outpatient programTimes $ 32.50

34 Health Care Utilization Cost SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=28,481)

35 Past Year Crime and Violence High 35.1% (n=10,411) Low 41.2% (n=12,241) Moderate 23.7% (n=7,051) SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,703)

36 Past Year Crime & Justice Involvement *Dealing, manufacturing, prostitution, gambling (does not include simple possession or use) SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,737)

37 Type of Crime * Violent crime includes assault, rape, murder, and arson. ** Other crime includes vandalism, possession of stolen goods, forgery, and theft. SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,377)

38 Cost of Crime in the Past Year  Using the GAIN we are able estimate the cost to society associated with economic losses due to criminal activity (e.g., vandalism, forgery, theft, assault, arson, rape, murder) in 2011 dollars for the year prior to intake.  Of the 29,782 clients served in 230 sites between , the average Cost of crime per client, in the year before they entered treatment, was $276,153 and totaled $756,797,1245 across clients.

39 Cost of Crime – 2011 Dollars* *Cost of Crime 2011 dollars w/ SA TX based on McCollister, K. E., French, M. T., & Fang, H. (2010). The cost of crime to society: New crime-specific estimates for policy and program evaluation. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 108(2)(1-2), DescriptionUnit Cost 2011 dollars Purposely damaged or destroyed propertyTimes$5, Passed bad checks/forged a prescription/took money from employerTimes$5, Taken money/property (not from a store)Times$8, Broken into a house/building to stealTimes$6, Taken a car that didn't belong to youTimes$11, Used a weapon, force, or strong-arm methods to get money or things from a personTimes$44, Hurt someone badly enough they needed bandages or a doctorTimes$112, Made someone have sex with you by forceTimes$252, Been involved in the death or murder of another person (including accidents)Times$9,418, Intentionally set a building, car, or other property on fireTimes$22,126.20

40 Cost of Crime SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=27,405)

41 Intensity of Justice System Involvement SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,617)

42 Recency of System Involvement SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,578)

43 Count of Major Clinical Problems at Intake *Based on count of self reporting criteria to suggest alcohol, cannabis, or other drug disorder, depression, anxiety, trauma, suicide, ADHD, CD, victimization, violence/ illegal activity SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=28,832)

44 GAIN-Initial Profile: Behavior Change Scales at Intake * n =12,440 SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,162)

45 Sources of Stress: Personal SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=14,797)

46 Sources of Stress: Other *Sum of 15 items SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=14,413)

47 Treatment Readiness *Sum of 9 items SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=28,086)

48 Self-Help Activities Scale *Mean of 19 items SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=8,321)

49 Individual Strengths *Sum of 10 items SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=12,996)

50 General Social Support Strengths *Sum of 9 items SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=14,649)

51 Spiritual Social Support Index * Sum of 7 items SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=13,086)

52 Potential Mentors in the Recovery Environment Home School or Work Social Peers *Sum of 12 items Critical gap in connection to recovery community SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=27,385)

53 Quarterly Cost to Society  Using the GAIN we are able estimate the cost to society of tangible services (e.g., health care utilization, days in detention, probation, parole, days of missed school) in 2011 dollars for the 90 days before intake.  Of the 29,782 clients served in 230 sites between , the average Quarterly Cost to Society (QCS) per client: – in the quarter before they entered treatment, was $4,997 and totaled $133,373,852 across clients. –in the year before they entered treatment, was $19,989 per client and a total of $533,495,408 across clients.

54 Quarterly Cost to Society – 2011 Dollars* * Quarterly cost to society 2011 dollars w/ SA TX based on Dennis, M. L., French, M. T., McCollister, K. E., & Scott, C. K. (2011). The economic costs of quarterly monitoring and recovery management checkups for adults with chronic substance use disorders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 41, DescriptionUnitCost 2011 dollars Inpatient hospital dayDays $ 2, Emergency room visitVisits $ 6, Outpatient clinic/doctor’s office visitVisits $ Nights spent in hospitalNights $ 2, Times gone to emergency roomTimes $ 6, Times seen MD in office or clinicTimes $ Days bothered by any health problemDays $ Days bothered by psych problemsDays $ How many days in detoxDays $ Times in ER for AOD useTimes $ Nights in residential for AOD useNights $ Days in Intensive outpatient program for AOD useDays $ Times did you go to regular outpatient programTimes $ Days missed school or training for any reasonDays $ How many times arrestedTimes $ 2, Days on probationDays $ 5.94 Days on paroleDays $ Days in jail/prison/detentionDays $ 84.15

55 Quarterly Cost to Society SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=26,924)

56 Problem Prevalence Index  Summarizes days of problems across domains: substance use, internalizing disorders, externalizing disorders, physical health risk behaviors, criminal involvement, vocational problems, and environmental concerns.  Calculation: the average of the percent of days with problems (of past 90) on each of 23 items across 8 areas. The resulting score is multiplied by 100 to get an index score from 0 to 100.  Interpretation: continuous; where higher values represent more problems across multiple domains.  Triage groups: Low (0-5), Moderate (6-24) or High ( ) based on roughly 50%, 40% and 10% of the clinical population.

57 Quality of Life  Summarizes quality of life represented by fewer reported problems during the past year in school problems, work problems, health problems, sources of stress, risk behavior, internal disorders, external disorders, substance disorders, and crime/violence.  Calculation: the sum of 9 screeners from the GAIN-Q version 3 (reversed to Low=2, Moderate=1, and High=0) divided by the range (18), and multiplied by 100 to get a score from 0 to 100.  Interpretation: continuous; where higher values represent greater quality of life.  Triage groups: Low (0-36), Moderate (37-69) or High ( ) groups.

58 General Satisfaction Index  Summarizes life satisfaction in 6 areas (sexual relationship, living situation, family relationships, school/work, free time, and getting help with problems). This index is optional.  Calculation: sum of these dichotomous items.  Interpretation: continuous; where higher values represent greater satisfaction with life situations.  Triage groups: Low problems (5-6), Moderate problems (3- 4) or High problems (0-2) groups. High satisfaction corresponds to low problems. –However, for the purposes of this presentation, the groups are not reversed, so in the following slides, low satisfaction scores (0-2) are in the low group, and high satisfaction scores (5-6) are in the high group.

59 Cross Validation of Four Summary Indices Problematic Beneficial *GSI groups are usually reversed (low satisfaction scores (0-2) are in the high problem group); here low satisfaction scores are in the low group, and high satisfaction scores are in the high group. SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=22,163)

60 General Satisfaction Index by Problem Prevalence Index Problems are subjectively unpleasant and are associated with lower satisfaction SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=12,218)

61 General Satisfaction Index by Quality of Life Quality of life is subjectively pleasant and is associated with higher satisfaction SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=12,278)

62 General Satisfaction Index by Quarterly Cost to Society Higher costs are subjectively unpleasant and are associated with lower satisfaction SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=11,146)

63 Funder SAMHSA Adolescent Treatment (AT): 67.6% (n=20,123; 161 grants) SAMHSA Criminal Justice (CJ) Adolescent: 15.8% (n=4,720; 32 grants) SAMHSA CJ Adult: 10.7% (n=3,186; 26 grants) Collaboratively Funded 3.3% (n=979; 9 grants) SAMHSA Adult: 2.6% (n=774; 2 grants) SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,782)

64 Grant Program in Chronological Order of first grant cohort , Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) , Adolescent Treatment Models (ATM) , Strengthening Communities – Youth (SCY) , Targeted Capacity Expansion (TCE; TCE/HIV) , Adolescent Residential Treatment (ART) , Effective Adolescent Treatment (EAT) , Young Offender Reentry Program (YORP) , Juvenile Treatment Drug Court (DC) , Adolescent Assertive Family Treatment (AAFT) , Family Drug Court (FDC) , Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention RWJF (OJJDP) , Adult Treatment Drug Court (ATDC) , Brief Interventions and Referrals to Treatment (OJJDP-BIRT) , Offender Re-entry Program (ORP) , Reclaiming Futures-Juvenile Drug Court (RF-JDC) , Juvenile Treatment Drug Court (JTDC)

65 Grant Program TCE: Targeted Capacity Expansion (n=3,017; 15 grants) EAT: Effective Adolescent Treatment (n=6,393; 37 grants) DC: Juvenile Treatment Drug Court (n=1,768; 11 grants) Other Justice Grants: RF/BIRT, FDC, JTDC, RF/JDC, OJJDP (n=1,243; 14 grants) AAFT: Adolescent Assertive Family Treatment (n= 5,497; 75 grants) SCY: Strengthening Communities-Youth (n=2,299; 9 grants) YORP: Young Offender Re-entry Program (n=2,278; 10 grants) CYT: Cannabis Youth Treatment (n=600; 4 grants) ART: Adolescent Residential Treatment (n=1,636; 13 grants) ATM: Adolescent Treatment Models (n=1,455; 10 grants) SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=29,782) ATDC: Adult Treatment Drug Court (n=1,147; 11 grants) ORP: Offender Re- entry Program (n=2,449; 21 grants)

66 Level of Care LTR: Long Term Residential 8.4% (n=2,418) STR: Short Term Residential 1.2% (n=334) OP: Outpatient 70.5% (n=20,263) CC-OP: Continuing Care – Outpatient 7.1% (n=2,030) IOP: Intensive Outpatient 12.9% (n=3,704) SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=28,749)

67 Type of Treatment Local Tx Manual: Specific Manualized Treatment 6.6% (n=1,895) MET/CBT: Motivational Enhancement Therapy/Cognitive- Behavioral Therapy 36.5% (n=10,543) Other: Non-Manualized Treatment 17.8% (n=5,140) Other EBTx: Evidence Based Treatment 10.9% (n=3,158) A-CRA/ACC: Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach/ Assertive Continuing Care 28.2% (n=8,144) SAMHSA 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic Data Set (n=28,880)

68 Outcomes  The following slides present information on the outcomes of substance abuse treatment, including:  Abstinence  Recovery  GAIN change scales over time (SPSm, CWS, HPS, EPS, EmPS, TPSl, IAS, TRI, SES, SATI, MHTI, PHTI, CJSI)  GPRA outcomes (vocationally engaged, housed, no justice system involvement, social consequences, abstinence, and social connectedness) and  NOMS outcomes (treatment initiation, engagement and continuing care; no problems with: health, mental health, family, illegal activity; abstinent, vocationally engaged and housed).  Data on follow up rates, months to last follow up, and number of follow ups per client are provided in the Methods Appendix. Methods Appendix

69 Days of Use in the Past 90 Days by Substance SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to those with 1+ Follow ups Days Used in Past 90 –solid line *There is no pre-ce information available for tobacco Days Used in Past 90 – dashed line

70 Percent Change in 6 Month Abstinence SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to those with 6-Month Follow up (n=20,173) Percent change in 6 month abstinence is calculated as % abstinent at 6 month minus % abstinent at intake Abstinence increased 19% from 43% at intake to 62% at 6-months.

71 Relative Percent Change in 6 Month Abstinence Relative percent change in 6 month abstinence is calculated as: (% abstinent at 6 month minus % abstinent at intake) divided by % abstinent at intake Relative percent of change can be large (i.e., greater than 100%) if baseline abstinence is low. Abstinence increased by almost half (44%) against the intake value. (19% increase/43% at intake). SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to those with 6-Month Follow up (n=20,173)

72 Past Month AOD Abstinence Over Time *Interpolated SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

73 Recovery Over Time* * Recovery defined as no past month use, abuse, or dependence symptoms while living in the community. SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups **Interpolated

74 GPRA Outcomes Over Time *Interpolated SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

75 Change in GPRA Outcomes (Intake to Last Wave*) Vocationally Engaged HousingNo Justice System Involvement No Social Consequences Abstinence Socially Connected *Last wave is the last follow-up SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

76 NOMS Outcome: Number of Treatment Received Outcomes Met* SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups (n=24,637) *Based on a count of initiation within 14 days, evidence based practice, engagement for at least 6 weeks, and any continuing care.

77 NOMS Outcome: Estimated Treatment Episode Cost by Treatment Modality *Used in slides; ** Inter-quartile range of actual costs in 2006 dollars Source: French, M.T., Popovici, I., & Tapsell, L. (2008). The economic costs of substance abuse treatment: Updated estimates and cost bands for program assessment and reimbursement. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 35, Modality SAMSHA Episode Cost (2004)* French’s Estimated Episode Cost (2008)** Adolescent Early Intervention$200-$1,200- Adult Outpatient-$1,132 - $2,099 Adolescent Outpatient$1,000 - $5,000$1,517 - $3,237 Intensive Outpatient/Continuing Care$1,000 - $7,000$1,384 - $5,780 Adult Drug Court-$2,486 - $4,888 Adult Methadone Maintenance-$4,277 - $13,395 Adult Residential$3,000 - $10,000$2,907 - $11,260 Adult Therapeutic Community/Residential$3,000 - $10,000$14,818 - $32,361 Adult Therapeutic Community/In-Prison-$1,249 - $2,112

78 SAMHSA Outcome: Treatment Cost Bands SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups (n=17,847) Below Band 5% (N=872)

79 Selected NOMS Outcomes Over Time SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups *Interpolated **Past month

80 Change in Selected NOMS Outcomes (Intake to Last Wave) Vocationally Engaged* No Health Problems No MH Problems Past Month Abstinent No Illegal Activity Housed No Family Problems *Past month SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

81 NOMS Outcomes: No Problems at Intake * Variable measures the last 30 days. All others measure the past 90 days. SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

82 NOMS Outcomes: Outcome Status at Last Wave *This variable measures the last 30 days. All others measure the past 90 days. **The blue bar represents an increase of 50% or no problem. SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

83 NOMS Outcomes: Count of Positive Outcomes* (Last FU–Intake) SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups (n=25,498) *Based on count of reductions or no problem in the following variables: Substance use frequency, Abuse/Dependence Sx (past 30d), Physical Health (past 90d), Mental Health (past 90d), Nights of Psychiatric Inpatient (past 90d), Illegal Activity (past 90d), Arrests (past 90d), Housed in Community (past 90d), Family/Home Problems (past 90d), Vocational Problems (past 30d), Social Support/Engagement (past 90d), Recovery Environment Risk (past 90d), Quarterly Cost to Society (past 90d), In Work/School (past 90d) at last wave Minus No problems at intake with these variables. 77% have one or more improved areas

84 Past Month Substance Problems Scale Groups Over Time SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

85 Current Withdrawal Scale Groups Over Time SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

86 Health Problems Scale Groups Over Time SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

87 Emotional Problems Scale Groups Over Time SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

88 Employment Problems Scale Groups Over Time SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

89 Employment Problems Scale Groups Over Time – Subset to Those Employed SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

90 Training Problems Scale Groups Over Time SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

91 Training Problems Scale Groups Over Time – Subset to Those in School/Training SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

92 Illegal Activities Scale Groups Over Time SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

93 Treatment Resistance Index Groups Over Time SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

94 Self-Efficacy Scale Groups Over Time SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

95 Substance Abuse Treatment Index Groups Over Time SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

96 Mental Health Treatment Index Groups Over Time SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

97 Physical Health Treatment Index Groups Over Time SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups

98 Criminal Justice System Index Groups Over Time SAMHSA 2011 GAIN SA Data Set subset to 1+ Follow ups