NCA Day October 18, 2006 7:25 – 10:25 am Facilitator: Kyla Gurganus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

EDUCATIONAL PROFICIENCY PLAN
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma Jennifer Felker, Associate Superintendent Division of Learning and School Choice November 7, 2014.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Graduation and Next Generation Assessment Update Coventry High School January 29, 2015.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Fall Conference Michigan Merit Examination Overview – MME 101 Joseph Martineau, Jim Griffiths, and Pat King Educational Assessment & Accountability.
Introduction to the Michigan Merit Examination (MME) and the Secondary Credit Assessment System (SCAS) Michigan Department of Education Assessment & Accountability.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
& NEXT GENERATION ASSESSMENTS Guidance counselors: Mrs. Cherie Davis Mrs. Nancy Vaughn.
Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011.
Michigan Merit Exam – To Be or Not to Be? OEAA 2006 Conference Sessions 44 and 50.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
1 EDUCATIONAL PROFICIENCY PLAN PowerPoint last updated November 2012.
1. The Process Rubrics (40 or 90) should be open soon. 2. The Data Profile and SI Plan are expected to open in December. 3. The complete CNA will.
Using Data to Identify Student Needs for MME Stan Masters Coordinator of Curriculum, Assessment, and School Improvement Lenawee ISD August 26, 2008.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
© 2013 Providence Public School District 1 PPSD Graduation Campaign GRADUATION CAMPAIGN Graduation Info Session Graduation Campaign | February/March 2013.
ASSESSMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY Updates to Student Testing and School Accountability for the school year.
Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.
1 Board Meeting Data Presentation August 25, 2009.
Overview of Michigan’s Secondary Assessments of Science Edward Roeber Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability.
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
Using Assessment Data Helen Thumann Department of Education.
Release of PARCC Student Results. By the end of this presentation, parents will be able to: Identify components of the PARCC English.
Michigan High School Reform Update and Discussion Oakland County Superintendents Association December 7, 2005.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting Bardmoor Elementary.
Understanding Components of High School Success. Recommended Plan Comparison “HS Planning Guide” online Current Juniors and Seniors English 4.0 Math 4.0.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
October 1, Michigan Merit Examination (MME) Data Interpretation Workshop Fall 2007.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Fall 2007 Conference 1 Michigan Merit Examination (MME) MME Reports Assessment and Accountability Conference 2007.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
Ohio’s State Assessments: What do families need to know? November 2015.
EDUCATIONAL PROFICIENCY PLAN (EPP). Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 2 The Educational Proficiency Plan (EPP) is a tool to.
Understanding and Communicating About New Performance Standards on New Performance Standards on Michigan’s Standardized Tests RAISING EXPECTATIONS.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
Accountability Scorecards Okemos Board of Education September 2013.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
February 2016 Our School Report Cards and Accountability Determinations South Lewis Central School District.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Proposed End-of-Course (EOC) Cut Scores for the Spring 2015 Test Administration Presentation to the Nevada State Board of Education March 17, 2016.
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
Paulding County School District Elementary Parent Presentation New Georgia Elementary Parent Informational Meeting All parents and guardians.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
New Ohio law creates options for students to earn a diploma.
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Where Are We Now? ESSA signed into law December 10, 2015
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Release of PARCC Student Results
Special Education Teachers and Highly Qualified Requirements
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Anderson Elementary School
Michigan School Report Card Update
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma
Mississippi Succeeds Madison County Business League & Foundation
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2018 Legislative Session, Act 555 was passed requiring schools.
Presented to the Octorara Area School Board on December 3, 2018
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
What it IS, What it means, What it Offers
College and Career Readiness
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2019 Legislative Session, the Legislature updated a the.
Presentation transcript:

NCA Day October 18, :25 – 10:25 am Facilitator: Kyla Gurganus

Today’s Agenda 1. Staff Introductions 2. Overview of the NCA Process 3. Next Step: School Profile 4. Data and Information 5. Brainstorming Sessions

Staff Introductions Your Name Your Subject/Department/Focus Your Room Number/Location Fascinating fact/dream travel location?

REFLECTION ON LAST NCA CYCLE

Overview of the NCA Process 1. What is NCA? 2. What is its process? 3. What’s new? 4. How will I be involved? 5. Proposed Timeline

What is NCA? North Central Association accredits schools in the north-central part of the US and the Department of Defense’s military installation schools. The NCA standard is for each member school to maximize the proportion of its graduates who are self-directed learners and are prepared to make successful transitions from school to career.

What is the NCA Process? Combines No Child Left Behind, Education YES, and the new Michigan School Improvement Framework requirements with its own quality standards and expectations to streamline paperwork and effort.

NCA-accredited schools are challenged to: meet high standards engage in a continuous improvement process (required by MI law since 1990) have on-site reviews at least once every 5 years

School improvement: should be continuous should NOT be an event (like an NCA day ☺) should NOT just be an act of compliance! is a way to “fight back” against negative press (show we know what’s happening and are trying to do something about it)

NCA Process 1. VISION AND PROFILE 2. PLAN 3. IMPLEMENT 4. RESULTS 5. ACT 6. REPEAT

1. Vision and Profile Make/renew commitment to NCA/school improvement Get started Compile and analyze data (Write a school profile) Select appropriate goals and measures based on the profile

What’s New with NCA No more peer reviews Assessments do not need to be of the same kids or at the same time every year No set time line (but usually 5 years) No affective goals needed No set number of goals Include state, federal, and district goals in NCA goals

How will I be involved?

Ways to be involved: School Improvement Committee/NCA Steering Committee (need leaders) Profile data gathering Profile report writing Goal selection (all staff) Goal committees (need chairpersons) Implementation!

Timeline: : –Focus on preparing for the new HS graduation requirements : –Write School Profile –Choose school improvement goals based on the profile’s data

Timeline: : –Choose assessments –Collect baseline data –Decide on strategies/interventions/PD related to goals –Begin implementing strategies/interventions/PD

Timeline: : –Continue implementing strategies/interventions/PD –Check progress –Administer assessments –Refine strategies/interventions as needed

Timeline: : –Continue implementing strategies/interventions/PD –Check progress –Administer assessments –Refine strategies/interventions as needed –Collect and analyze final data –Write final report

Next Step: School Profile for ourselves, not the shelf! data needed to make wise decisions (not just hunches, anecdotes, or feelings) first profile takes lots of effort; after that, it should be easy to update!

What to Include in a Profile Basic data –what our community is like, who our students are, GPA, MEAP, ACT, attendance, graduation rates Interpretations/implications of the data Courses taught, initiatives, instructional techniques, tutorials, remediation Strengths!! Points of pride!! –from every program, subject, and department Graduate follow-up data

Data and Information New Michigan High School Graduation Requirements New Michigan Merit exam Where are we now? –Current MEAP and ACT scores –Graduation Rates Where do we go from here?

New Michigan High School Graduation Requirements: Start with this year’s 8 th graders (next year’s freshmen) Each required course has lengthy content expectations associated with it –See Michigan Department of Education website for details

Summary of Requirements: 4 credits English language arts 4 credits mathematics (1 in senior year) 3 credits science 3 credits social studies 1 credit physical education/health 1 credit visual/performing/applied arts Online course/experience required

New Michigan Merit Exam (MME): Not yet approved by the US Dept of Ed! –If not approved, MEAP will still be administered Based on the ACT, WorkKeys test, and several other MEAP-like components This fall’s senior re-testing will be the MEAP

New Michigan Merit Exam (MME): ACT part administered on March 13th to all Michigan juniors March 14: WorkKeys and mathematics Mar. 14/15/16: science and social studies ACT and WorkKeys scores may be used for college admissions and job applications One re-test will be paid for by the state Home-schooled students may participate at their local high school

New Michigan Merit Exam (MME): Very controlled conditions –All students must face the same direction –Minimum 3 feet apart –Assigned seating –Uninterrupted testing –Bells, PA turned off –Testing rooms separated from regular school activities

New Michigan Merit Exam (MME): Very controlled conditions –No food or drink in room (students OR proctors) –Testing must be the first activity of the day –Testing must start no later than 9 am –Quiet part of the building –Tests timed; time remaining may NOT be posted

MME Assessment Design: MME English Language Arts score will be based on: –ACT Reading (MC), English (MC), and Writing (constructed response) –WorkKeys Reading for Information test (MC) –Michigan Social Studies constructed response item (rubrics available on-line)

MME Assessment Design: MME Mathematics score will be based on: –ACT Mathematics (MC) –Selected ACT Science items (MC) –WorkKeys Applied Mathematics test (MC) –Michigan supplemental items (about 13 MC)

MME Assessment Design: MME Science score will be based on: –ACT Science (MC) –Michigan supplemental items (53 MC)

MME Assessment Design: MME Social Studies score will be based on: –Michigan supplemental items (57 MC and 2 constructed response)

MEAP SCORES

Last year’s juniors’ MEAP scores: higher in every subject area the first time out (as compared to the class of 2006) Increases over the previous year’s scores: –Reading + 5% –Writing + 7% –ELA + 5% –Mathematics + 4% –Science + 4% –Social Studies + 53%

How the Class of 2007 compares to the state:  Reading – Above the state by 5% (last year below 4%)  Writing – Below the state, but only by 1% (last year below 9%)  ELA – Above the state by 2% (last year below 8%)  Mathematics – Below the state by 5% (last year below 9%)  Science – Even with the state average (last year below 1%)  Social Studies – Below the state, but only by 1% (last year below 7%)

How our MEAP scores affected AYP:  LHS made AYP in English Language Arts –Total 11 th grade cut scores (includes MI-Access students) were above the 52% threshold (by 34%) –All sub-groups met the participation rate and cut scores needed to make AYP in ELA LHS did not make AYP in mathematics –Total 11 th grade cut scores (includes MI-Access students) was above the 44% threshold (by 22%) –All sub-groups met the participation rate and cut scores needed to make AYP in math except students with disabilities They were only 14.3% proficient, and they missed safe harbor by 5%

MEAP Concerns: Less than half of the students are “passing” the math portion Overall ELA scores are falling because of low writing scores Science scores lower than they could be because not all students take earth science

ACT Scores:

Where do we go from here? Break out in groups of 10 Use list of questions to initiate discussion of school improvement Have one person record/summarize responses Reconvene at 10:00 am to report

Brainstorming Questions: 1. What are your reactions/responses to the MEAP and ACT scores? 2. How are we meeting (or not meeting) the needs of our students? How do we know? 3. What changes (if any) need to be made in the courses I/we teach to meet the new graduation requirements? What resources are needed to make those changes? 4. What changes need to be made in the courses I/we teach in order to improve our students’ standardized test scores? What resources are needed to make those changes? 5. What changes need to be made in our overall school in order to have the greatest impact on the current and future success of our students? 6. What should be our #1 focus of improvement in the next two years? Why?