Capitol Corridor: A Performance-Based Management Model FRA Best Practices - State IPR Corridor Management AASHTO – SCORT Annual Meeting, Washington DC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FY 2014 NTD Reporting Federal Register Notices Explanation of Proposed Changes 28 August 2014.
Advertisements

Arizona Caregiver Coalition Advocacy National Alliance for Caregiving Quarterly Coalition Call October 24, 2012.
Silicon Valley Leadership Group – Transportation Policy Committee (March 5, 2014) David B. Kutrosky, Managing Director Capitol Corridor (Sacramento-Oakland/San.
1 Union Pacific Railroad David Wickersham Chief Engineer, Western Region February 24, 2014.
Eastern Indiana Economic Growth Region 6 Strategic Plan August 2010 Approved Version
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL: GETTING ON TRACK Silicon Valley Leadership Group Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
America’s intercity provider
OHIO & LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL CLEVELAND HUB STUDY Ohio Rail Development Commission TMACOG Annual Transportation Summit September 29, 2003.
California Transportation Commission Glendale, California July 25-26, 2007 Business Plan 2008 Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority (CCJPA)
APTA 2013 MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOP CRISIS COMMUNICATIONS Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority Luna Salaver Public Information Officer CCJPA’s.
Washington County Economic Development Council Utah Alliance for Economic Development RICHFIELD MEETING Friday, 13 July 2012.
Capitol Corridor 2012 Vision Plan Short-Range Plan/ Long-Term Vision CCJPA Board of Directors Workshop | February 15, 2012 Photo by Todd Evans.
OCBC Infrastructure Committee April 8, 2014 LOSSAN Rail Corridor Update Jennifer Bergener – Managing Director, LOSSAN JPA.
Port of Oakland. Northern California’s ‘Capitol Corridor’ on Union Pacific Railroad The busiest intercity passenger route in the country outside the NEC.
October  AB 32 (2006)  Target: Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions at 1990 levels by 2020 and maintain reductions  Authorized the Cap and Trade Program.
Service Integration: Service Integration for Our Grandkids Jim Allison Manager of Planning Capitol Corridor.
VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS SYSTEM PLAN 2040
Urban Rapid Transit John Dulin Garrett Page Surbhi Kapoor.
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL: GETTING ON TRACK Silicon Valley Leadership Group Transportation Committee January 9, 2013.
Visit Jacksonville President’s Report Tourist Development Council Meeting August 2014.
Public Transit in Sacramento
Caltrain Modernization Program CA Passenger Rail Summit April 29, 2015.
Caltrain Modernization CMAA September 18, Caltrain Today.
MISSION, GOALS & OBJECTIVES SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SFRTA) MISSION, GOALS & OBJECTIVES.
David Armijo, CEO Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Potential Transit Enhancements With Gas Tax Funding Hillsborough County Transportation Task Force.
Funding the Future of Our Transportation Infrastructure Juva Barber Executive Director.
Customer Service: It’s Not a Department, It’s Our Business APTA Marketing and Communications Conference February 25, 2013 Stella Lin - Department Manager.
1 CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL Silicon Valley Leadership Group February 5, 2014 eBay, San Jose P R E S E N T E D B Y Ben Tripousis Northern California Regional.
PASSENGER RAIL PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT PEER SESSION ______________________ CAPITOL CORRIDOR: A RECIPE FOR SUCCESS 2011 AASHTO SCORT Meeting David B. Kutrosky.
PennDot Presentation Transit Agency Status Wednesday, November 2, 2011
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
A New Regional Vision ASPA Conference April 2010 Steve Heminger, MTC Executive Director.
Transit Alliance 4 Founded in Coalition of 39 groups 4 Local governments 4 Business organizations 4 Community groups.
Beyond the Crossroads National Conference on Transportation Infrastructure and Regulatory Policy May 27, Denver, CO Future Infrastructure Needs,
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Types of stakeholder Internal: internal to the firm Internal: internal to the firm –employees –shareholders /owners Connected: connected by a relationship.
California’s Intercity Passenger Rail Network National Model Highest Ridership of Any State VMT Reduction of 355 M Annually $175 M in Annual Wages $4 B.
Children’s Health System 2009 Strategic Plan. Vision To be nationally recognized as a comprehensive regional and national pediatric healthcare center.
Drive Safe Hampton Roads Thelma Drake, Director September 27, 2013.
CUSTOM CLOTHING “YOU DON’T HAVE TO COME TO US, WE’LL COME TO YOU” PRESENTATION 1: SYSTEMS REQUEST Project Sponsors: Ambarish Regmi Han Le Miriam Barrera.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
1 High-Speed Rail Evaluation October 12, 2007 Planning Committee.
DC Circulator Transit Development Plan TPB Access for All Advisory Committee October 28, 2010.
Reporting to Stakeholders. What are Stakeholders? An individual or group with an interest in an organisation An individual or group with an interest in.
Alameda County Transportation Services – CCBA Panel Reducing Our Carbon Footprint from Transportation Phillip Kobernick, Alameda County General Services.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
By Samuel Bediako & Mo Zhang IFRS for Small and Medium Entities(SME)
New Jersey School Boards Association – Serving Local Boards of Education Since 1914 State Budget Overview Presented by: Michael Vrancik NJSBA Director.
Amtrak Gov’t Affairs October 19, 2007 Amtrak Key Facts Summary November 12, 2007.
Capitol Corridor Sea Level Rise Adaptation Shirley Qian, Planner.
California Intercity Passenger Rail Service Governance: Local Authority American Public Transportation Association December 2, 2015.
Who is APN? 1 IntroductionInsightsAlternativesRecommendationFinancials Vision 2021.
Proprietary & confidential. © Decision Lens 2012 Modeling Best Practices in Transportation Jon Malpass Director, Decision Solutions.
Transit is Smart Growth Matt Ryan Coconino County Supervisor Chair, NAIPTA April 24, 2012 Arizona Transit Association Annual Conference.
Orange County Budget Presentation Linda S. Watson Chief Executive Officer LYNX.
Finance Sub-Committee Report NGEC Annual Meeting Washington, DC February 21, 2014.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
Commuter Rail Studies Summary of MAG High Capacity Transit Study June 2003 Commuter Rail Summary.
Photos by Susie Fitzhugh Bell Times Analysis Task Force (Metro Service) (January 22, 2015date)
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
Indianapolis Public Public Hearing – Proposed 2014 Budget Thursday, August 15, 2013 Transportation Corporation.
Intercity Passenger Rail: Legislative Policy Recommendations Astrid Glynn Chair ASC Intercity Passenger Rail Legislative Team AASHTO Standing Committee.
Presentation to the Joint Committee On Transportation Oversight 1 Jack Basso Chief Operating Officer and Business Development Director American Association.
Partnering with Clients & Paratransit Providers for Brokerage Success.
APTA Sustainability Workshop 2016
Los Angeles – San Diego – San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Update
APTA Sustainability Workshop 2016
NGEC Annual Meeting Washington, DC February 21, 2014
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
D Line Project Overview
Presentation transcript:

Capitol Corridor: A Performance-Based Management Model FRA Best Practices - State IPR Corridor Management AASHTO – SCORT Annual Meeting, Washington DC [2/22/12] David B. Kutrosky, Managing Director Capitol Corridor (Sacramento-Oakland/San Francisco-San Jose)

Capitol Corridor Service Area 170-mile route (~290 track miles) –168 miles-UPRR –2 miles-Caltrain (SF Peninsula) 3 distinct service-area Megaregion –Sacramento / Sierra Foothills –Oakland / S.F. Bay Area –San Jose Extensive connections to local transit and communities Operated by Amtrak under management of Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority (CCJPA) February 22,

CCJPA OBJECTIVES Know your product/service Identify goals for service’s success Efficient and effective management team Incentivize your partners -- service users and providers and financiers Maintain control of service performance Guide expansion via collaborative efforts February 22,

CCJPA Structure Managing Director Planning & Projects EngineeringMechanical Marketing & Communications Call Center & Customer Comments (BART) TransportationAdministration February 22,

Success of Past 13 Years ( ) Elevated core service: 8 daily trains to 32 – Increased frequency under flat State operating budget – 3 rd busiest Amtrak route in nation – Improved relationship with UPRR resulted in the #1 on-time performance in Amtrak system – One of the highest customer satisfaction ratings The performance data speaks for itself… February 22,

( ) Performance Improvements MeasureFY 1998/99FY 2010/11% changeFY 2011/12 YTD Ridership463, million269% improvement +7% Revenue$6.25M$27.2M335% improvement +10% System Operating Ratio 30%48%60% improvement 50% Service Level8 daily trains 32 weekday trains (22 weekend trains) 300% improvement Same On-Time Performance 86%95%Standard = 90% 94% February 22,

Capitol Corridor enters into an annual operating contract –Service/Schedule –Budget and payment provisions –Performance Standards; incentives + penalties Surveys (twice a year) to gauge customer satisfaction Distinct State source of funds (diesel sales tax) –Requires early budget planning process (at least 6 months) –Lock in budget; share risk; focus on improving customer service Review performance: bi-weekly calls; quarterly meetings Make sure front line employees know what’s going on! Amtrak Operating Agreement May 15, February 22,

Capitol Corridor amended out of national Amtrak-UP OTP agreement into a stand-alone 3-party contract –Ensure payment to RR for Capitol Corridor OTP –Eliminated penalties, “look-backs” of national OTP agreement –Each month “hit restart button” Same definition for “on-time” but bar raised to min 92% Payments increased: –by 50% if continued 92%-96%; –by 100% if continued 96+% Benefit of single RR owner who dispatches trains Results: Best OTP in Amtrak; UP earning max incentive Tri-Party On-Time Performance Agreement February 22,

Part of Construction/Maintenance Agreement –Continuously revised as funds are allocated –Funding above Amtrak incremental MoW payments Private-Public Partnership/shared funding 1.Night-time surfacing gang assigned to route 2.Various track upgrades: switches, signal lights, et al 3.Safety Fences: deter trespassing Improved ride quality; no slow orders Results: Retained ridership during down economy; highest customer satisfaction Supplemental Capitalized Maintenance February 22,

Ridership and Gas Prices February 22,

February 22,

February 22,

February 22,

February 22,

February 22,

Buy-in from service providers/operators Support from public/users; gain advocates Secure dedicated funding Get funds obligated quickly; get project “in the ground”; successful phased implementation Tout benefits to policymakers, communities; need for continual investment to meet growth demand viable alternative jobs, economic growth offset rising gas prices reduce GHG emissions THANKS!! February 22, CLOSING