Pam Doak Senior Director.  Provide a brief overview of the Special Education Services 3 Year Strategic Plan and Initiatives.  Provide a historical and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inclusive Services: An Overview
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Updates in IDEA NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement From: All children will have universal access.
Supporting Homeless Students & Families Internship: A School District/University Partnership Alyssa Bogdanowicz, Sarah Forte, and Bill Stover.
Least Restrictive Environment: A World of Options and Opportunities Training provided by the Connecticut State Department of Education in cooperation with:
Iredell-Statesville Schools Alternative School Processes
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Legal and Compliance Issues January 9,  IEP Implementation  Discipline.
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
 Students with Special Education Services transitioning to Price  Specialized Academic Instruction Student Profile  The Heart of Specialized Academic.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Albany Unified School District Strategic Plan Board Study Session June 21, 2011.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
Talbert House Project PASS Goals and Outcomes.
Escambia County School District. Q.1.7 Increase the graduation rate as measured by the Federal Uniform Rate. Year District State % 70.6%
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
Comprehensive Guidance and Counselling South Shore Regional School Board May, 2010.
Bibb County School District Program for Exceptional Children Paired Zone Meeting November 7 and 9, 2011.
 Describes the special education program and services that are provided within a school district and those special education programs and services which.
Collaborative Closing the Gap Action Plans: School Counselors, School Social Workers and School Psychologists Working to Close the Gaps.
SPECIAL EDUCATION POLICY AND PROGRAMS OVERVIEW October, 2006 Ministry of Education.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
The Bullying Prevention and Intervention Plan Presentation to School Committee December 20, 2010.
MNU 7063 Ethical & Legal Issues in Sped Session 1 Tuesday, January 7, 2014 Dr. Judy Martin.
Nevada Counselor / Psychologist Survey Data Prepared for the Legislative Committee on Education July, By Marina McHatton CTE Counseling and Assessments,
Student Support Team (SST) Training A Humanware Strategic Plan Activity Cleveland Metropolitan School District 1.
Getting Oriented to Exceptionality and Special Education There is no single accepted theory of normal development, so relatively few definite statements.
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
RTI Response to Intervention A View of the Ascension Experience.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Placement ARC Chairperson Training 1 Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children.
Instructional Support Team (IST) By Kelli Reisinger Unit 13 Presentation.
ICCSD Learning Supports: Mental Health
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Training Goals ► To define “Educational Benefit” ► To learn a process for reviewing your district’s IEPs.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Board of Education Meeting September 10, Special Education Quality Review - Monitor compliance related to programs and services provided to students.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
An Update of One Aspect of Monitoring, Support and Technical Assistance Available Through the State Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
School Counselors & Assignments \ Elementary Schools Demographic Information.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
Exceptional Children: An Introduction to Special Education,9th Edition ISBN X © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Planning.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding May 7, 2012.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Division of Student Support Services
Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services
Department of Exceptional Student Education
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Leadership Academy Special Education.
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Dropout Prevention & Improving Graduation Rates
Presentation transcript:

Pam Doak Senior Director

 Provide a brief overview of the Special Education Services 3 Year Strategic Plan and Initiatives.  Provide a historical and current information regarding Formal State Complaints filed on the behalf of students with disabilities removed due to disciplinary removals that resulted in a change of placement.

1. Effective Instruction 2. Inclusion/Continuum of Services 3. Professional Development 4. Family and Community Collaboration

 Targets for students with disabilities will focus on increasing:  Increasing Academic Achievement  Increasing Graduation Rate  Developing a comprehensive, accessible, web- based Data Management system

 Targets for students with disabilities:  The percentage of students with disabilities age 3-5 attending a regular early childhood program in the regular program will increase to 35% by June 30,  By June 30, 2015, the amount of time school age students with disabilities served in the general education setting will increase from 63.1% to 66%.  By June 30, 2015 students with disabilities at the elementary level, specifically the ID mild and HFA populations--will be provided an array of services in order to graduate from high school with a diploma and participate within the least restrictive environment.

 Targets for students with disabilities:  By June 30, 2015, 90% of Stakeholders will report general satisfaction with access to Professional Development opportunities offered by Special Education Services (SES).  By June 30, 2015, SES will implement an established framework to coordinate with Academics, Human Resources and Student Support Services departments to deliver cohesive Professional Development across departments to increase the retention rate of Special Education Teacher in WCPSS to 96%.  By June 2015, 100% of SES staff will be skillful leaders who build capacity, advocate, and create support systems for delivering high quality professional development.

 Targets for students with disabilities:  By June 30, 2015, 82% of parents of students with disabilities will indicate satisfaction with parent training opportunities for their student with a disability.  By June 30, 2015, 40% of school-age parents and 62% of preschool-age parents of students with disabilities will report on the CIPP Indicator 8 parent survey that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving service and results for SWDs.  By June 30, 2015, 85% of schools will indicate they have resources available to proactively engage families through collaborative efforts in order to maximize student success.

 Targets for students with disabilities:  The Behavior Specialists/LRE Team will offer FBA/BIP Training exclusively to School Administrators over a three-year period.  The Behavior Specialists/LRE Team will develop a screening process to determine “at-risk” students.  The Behavior Specialists/LRE Team will develop, schedule, offer, and deliver system-wide training to WCPSS employees.  By June 30, 2012 the number of student with disabilities recommended for long-term suspension will decrease by 5%.  By June 30, 2012 the percentage of credits earned/classes passed by SWD that have been recommended for LTS will increase by 5%.  The total amount of seats available in full day alternative learning program options for students with disabilities who are recommended for long-term suspension will increase by 50% in the school year (based on total amount of seats available in full day alternative learning program options in ).

 LRE  Behavioral Health  Manifestation Determination Review/Due Process  Services for Students with Disabilities Long Term Suspended

 Build and support the capacity/expertise of School Administrators, Teaching Staff, Behavior Support Specialists (BST) and SED Regional teachers in the area of behavior support/consultation skills.  Collaborate with all BI Teams for development of processes, professional development and supporting schools.

 Professional Development Activities for School Administrators and Teaching Staff  Functional Behavioral Assessments (FBA)  Behavior Intervention Plans (BIP)/Positive Behavioral Supports  Identifying and Developing Strategies for SWD At-Risk for LTS  Manifestation Determination Review (MDR)  Life Space Crisis Intervention (LSCI)  Crisis Prevention and Intervention (CPI)  Professional Development Activities for Parents (Collaboration w/SES Family and Community Connections Team)  Functional Behavioral Assessments (FBA)  Behavior Intervention Plans (BIP)/Positive Behavioral Supports  Manifestation Determination (MDR)  Identifying and Developing Strategies for SWD At-Risk for LTS  Resources for the Parent Information Center Community Supports to Address Behavioral Needs

 Direct Consultation/Collaboration  BST Staff and Programs  Regional SED I and II Programs  Transition Counselors  General and Special Education Staff Individual Student Needs SWD “At-Risk” for LTS  School Administrative Staff BST Roles and Responsibilities LRE and Placement in Regional SED Programs  Alternative Learning Programs (i.e., Longview) Program Development and Implementation Data Evaluation of Program Effectiveness

 To provide a Behavioral Continuum for SWD that are at-risk of being diagnosed or are diagnosed with a mental illness.  Collaborate with all BI Teams for development of processes, professional development and supporting schools.  Identify resources for the Parent Information Center Community Supports to Address Behavioral and/or Health Needs  Goals include:  Academic Achievement  Increase Time Engaged in Learning  Attendance  Reduction of Behavioral Issues  Increased Parent Involvement

 Collaboration  WCPSS Student Support Services – Counseling and Support Services  WCPSS Intensive Intervention (IIT) Consultation with school staff of students on IIT caseloads Facilitate development and monitoring of goals, FBA, and BIP of students on IIT caseloads  Community Collaborative and Agencies  Wake County Human Services  WCPSS Academics

 To increase the knowledge and capacity of school Administrators and staff and parents in the Manifestation Determination Review (MDR) process and the rights of SWD and their parents upon recommendation for long term suspension (LTS).  Collaborate with all BI Teams for development of processes, professional development and supporting schools.

 Professional Development Activities for School Administrators and Teaching Staff  Long Term Suspension Process for SWD  Pre MDR Process  MDR  Development and Implementation of a Comprehensive Data System  Professional Development Activities for Parents (Collaboration w/SES Family and Community Connections Team)  Long Term Suspension Process for SWD  Pre MDR Process  MDR

 Collaboration  WCPSS Student Support Services – Student Due Process  WCPSS Technology Services – Data Collection, Evaluation, etc.  School Administrative and Teaching Staff – Compliance/Monitoring of BIP, IEP Goals, etc. in Relation to Students’ IEPs  Identified Middle/High Schools for SWD At-Risk for LTS  Discipline and Review Committee (DRC)

 Continue to develop programs for students who have been long term suspended and need school- based programs for implementation of their individual IEPs and instructional services.  Establish procedures for transition to and from the programs providing services for SWD LTS.  Develop information for parents of SWD that explains the discipline policies and services for students that are long term suspended.  Establish data collection and evaluation procedures for implemented programs.

 Infinity Longview (High School)  River Oaks (Middle School)  Garner Evening Program (GEP)  Home/Hospital  SCORE and Home/Hospital

 Full Day Instruction  40 Seats (10 OCS)  60 – 80% Direct Instruction  Highly Qualified General and Special Education Staff  Odysseyware – Supplement Direct Instruction  Program Administrator  Counseling Services  Portfolio Assessment  Data Collection/Program Evaluation

 Full Day Instruction  40 Seats  4 Highly Qualified Teachers, 2 Teacher Assistants  Full Day Direct Instruction  On-Sight Administrator/SES Oversight  Program Components  Academic Recovery/Mastery  Social Recovery  Literacy  Parent Involvement  Portfolio Assessment  Data Collection/Program Evaluation

 Three Hours of Direct Instruction (Monday – Thursday)  20 Seats  Students from Garner Magnet High School, Fuquay- Varina High School, and Southeast Raleigh High School  Individualized Plans for Credit Recovery  Developing Additional Services During the Day (i.e., community)  On-Sight Administrator/SES Oversight  Development of Additional Evening Programs Throughout the District  Data Collection/Program Evaluation

 H/H Selected Based on Individual Needs  Code of Conduct Violation  Medical Need  Expulsion  Hours/Location Based on Individual Student Needs  Services Provided By a Cadre of Trained H/H Teachers Including Both General and Special Education Services  Transportation Provided as Needed  Random Monitoring of H/H Services  Tight Process for 30 Day Reviews  Data Collection/Evaluation

 Selected Based on Individual Needs  Code of Conduct Violation  Expulsion  Paired with Home/Hospital (Special Education Services)  Internet Access Provided  Transportation to and from Orientation

 Targets for students with disabilities:  The promotion rate of students with disabilities from ninth grade to tenth grade will increase by 5% by June 30,  The suspension rate of students with disabilities at ninth grade will decrease by 5% by June 30,  A comprehensive plan to improve middle school interventions and supports for students with disabilities will be developed by December 1, Each area of focus will be evaluated each semester.

 History  December, 2008  May, 2011  July, 2012  Common Theme  Whether the WCPSS developed individualized education programs (IEPs) based upon the unique needs of students with disabilities whose disciplinary removals constitute a change of placement  Whether the individual students named in the complaints and other students experiencing disciplinary removal resulting in a change of placement were denied a free appropriate public education (FAPE) due to procedural violations

A child with a disability who is removed from the child’s current placement due to a disciplinary removal resulting in a change of placement:  IDEA: Continue to receive educational services (irrespective of whether the behavior is determined to be a manifestation of the child’s disability), so as to enable the child to continue to participate in the general education curriculum, although in another setting, and to progress toward meeting the goals set out in the child’s IEP  NCDPI: The traditional analysis of LRE does not apply to students removed from the general population due to violations of the student code of conduct. It is a setting that will enable the student to continue to participate in the general education curriculum, although in another setting, and to progress toward meeting the goals set our in the student’s IEP.

 Provide compensatory services due to:  Denial of FAPE  Lack of implementation of services determined by IEP Teams  Development of alternative learning settings for students removed due to disciplinary actions resulting in a change of placement  Comprehensive data collection system

 WCPSS and Complainants participating in mediation session(s)  Negotiations of settlement agreement  Anticipated completion – on or before October 31, 2012