DPAS II, Component 5 for School Nurses Linda C. Wolfe, RN, MEd Director, School Support Services Facilitator, DPAS II Component 5, School Nurses June 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for.
Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Overview of Computers and Nursing
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
The Process of Scope and Standards Development
Overview of Computers and Nursing Virginia K. Saba Kathleen A. McCormick.
Differentiated Supervision
Evaluating the school librarian using the Danielson Model
The Framework for Teaching Introduction to the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
© 2007 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. 1 School Health Services: Promoting and Protecting Student Health Chapter 2.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
Coordination of Care Vision and Hearing Referral DPAS 2 Component 5 Growth Goals Indicator 3 and 4 Susan Hoffmann MSN, RN, NCSN.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Leanne Lemon, RN, BSN, MSN Candidate Spring 2013.
DPAS II, Component 5 for School Nurses Linda C. Wolfe, RN, MEd Director, School Support Services Facilitator, DPAS II Component 5, School Nurses 11/2012.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
School Year School Nursing report Step Up and Be Counted Initiative National Association of School Nurses National Association of State School.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Delaware’s Teacher Effectiveness Model SEADAE February 23, 2012 Deb Hansen, Delaware Department of Education.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
Perspectives on the Future of Pediatric Nursing Education and Practice Marion E. Broome, Ph.D., R.N. FAAN Distinguished Professor and Dean Indiana University.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
The Certified School Nurse: Untapped Resource
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
Co-Teaching Webinar 3: Evaluation Webinar
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Solano County Office of Education Jay Speck Solano County Superintendent of Schools.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Delaware’s Teacher Effectiveness Model Deb Hansen, Delaware Department of Education October 2012.
Building Coherence: P.S. 162Q Professional Learning Plan October 5, 2015.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Workforce Planning Framework
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

DPAS II, Component 5 for School Nurses Linda C. Wolfe, RN, MEd Director, School Support Services Facilitator, DPAS II Component 5, School Nurses June 2013 NASSNC

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Based on work of Charlotte Danielson ◦ Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching (2 nd Edition) Original work began in components, but 5 th component (student growth measures) not implemented until 2012 Based on professional standards & practice Linda C. Wolfe, RN June 2013

Components 1– 4 for Specialists Component 1 – Planning & Preparation 1a. Designing Coherent Programs or Services 1b. Demonstrating Knowledge of Best Practice and/or Models of Delivery 1c. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students or Clients 1d. Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources 1e. Demonstrating Knowledge of How to Design or use Student Assessments Component 2 – Professional Practice & Delivery of Service 2a. Creating an Environment to Support Student or Client Needs 2b. Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness 2c. Communicating Clearly and Accurately 2d. Delivery of Services to Students or Clients Component 3 – Professional Consultation & Collaboration 3a. Collaborating with Others 3b. Serving as a Consultant to the School Community 3c. Providing Resources and Access 3d. Maintaining Standards of Professional Practice 3e. Using Assessment Data in Planning and Delivery of Services Component 4 – Professional Responsibilities 4a. Communicating with Families /Clients 4b. Recording Data in a Student Record System 4c. Growing and Developing Professionally 4e. Reflecting on Professional Practice Linda C. Wolfe, RN June 2013

Component 5 : Student Growth Measures Component 5 does not expand the role of the school of the school nurse. It does highlight and define what we do. Teams of Delaware school nurses developed DPAS II and all of its components. The work is based on NASN’s Scope & Standards of School Nursing Practice and on current Delaware practice for School Health Services. The Growth Measures are based on current research and understanding of the school nurse’s impact on student health. The Growth Measures document is exactly like the ones for educators and other specialists. The only difference is that “school nurse” is inserted where the word “specialist” or “educator” would be in the other documents. The state offers 17 possible goals and the school nurse chooses 4. The size and number of cohorts of students are agreed upon with the administrator at the beginning of the school year. The state has set minimal percentages of growth. Linda C. Wolfe, RN June 2013

Student Growth Measures (for selected cohort) 1. Absences Due to Illness (FY13: 50%; FY14: 25% ) 2. Visits to the Nurse Office (50%) 3. Vision Screening Referral Completion (close gap by 50%) 4. Hearing Screening Referral Completion (close gap by 50%) 5. Return to Class (50%) Originally there were to be the required items. It was believed that would be applicable to all school nurses. Linda C. Wolfe, RN June 2013

Student Growth Measures (cont.) 6. In-School Injury (50%) 7. Access to Health Resources(10%) 8. Health Behavior: Student (FY13: 5%; FY14: 10% ) 9. Health Education: Student (50%) 10. Infection (FY13: 50%; FY14: 25% ) 11. Delaware Student Asthma Test (50%) 12. IHP Goals (50%) 13. IEP Goals (50%) 14. IHP Activities (50%) 15. IEP Activities (50%) 16. Health Behavior: Staff (5%) 17. Health Education: Staff (50%) Linda C. Wolfe, RN June 2013