Geotechnical Exploration for Reach 2B of the San Joaquin River Restoration Program Nicholas Hightower Division of Engineering, Project Geology 2011 DWR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soil Exploration Part II
Advertisements

2008 Subsurface 3D Modeling: An Application to Waterfront Project Planning and Site Evaluation Andrew S. Thomas Moffatt & Nichol 600 University St, Ste.
Soil Exploration T.E. Civil G.E.- I.
版权所有: CMC 1 Sonda-Jherrukh Coal Mine& Power Plant Project.
Summary of Conceptual Design Site 3 Causeway Landfill Culvert Stabilization Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island (CTO JM38) 19 August 2014.
Boring Logs and Databases Using gINT Software Scott Sochar Engineering Geologist Project Geology / DOE.
© 2011 COLUMBIA Technologies. Use of MiHpt Systems to Improve Project Outcomes Rapid, Real-Time High Resolution Site Characterization © 2013 COLUMBIA Technologies.
Soil & Site Investigation
INTRODUCTION Session 1 – 2
Prepared by: Earth Data N.E., Inc. August 19, 2008.
PILING IMPLICATIONS FOR A NEW INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A CLOSED LANDFILL SITE By Michael Redfern.
Fawad S. Niazi Geosystems Engineering Division Civil & Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology April 27, 2010 Spatial Variability of.
Geotechnical Investigation Step 1 - Gather Existing Information Structure Data Bridge, building, road, wall, etc. Type - stories, loads, materials, etc.
“That’s Not A Levee Boil !” or “How to do more with less” By Glen Pearson, Northern District 2005 Annual Geology and Groundwater Meeting Geology and Groundwater.
Water Resource Division San Joaquin County Water Resource Management Planning Update C. Mel Lytle, Ph.D. Water Resource Coordinator San Joaquin County.
San Joaquin River Restoration Program State of the Rivers Symposium San Joaquin County Ms. Alicia Forsythe May 2, 2011.
Field Borings and Cone Penetration Testing
FIGURE 15-1 Simplified cross section developed from site and subsurface characterization.
Soils Investigation Soil Investigation
SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING FOUNDATION ENGINEERING BY KARTHIVELU.
SOIL EXPLORATION Module 1 -2K6 -March GCEK.
 Soil grains come from weathering of bedrock ◦ Physical weathering – granular soils ◦ Chemical weather – creates clay  Soil is either residual or transport.
Boring Logs and Databases Using gINT Software
SITE WORKS SITE INVESTIGATION AND SOIL INVESTIGATION
Storm Water Strategic Initiative Greg Gearheart, Storm Water CA State Water Board.
CVP FRIANT DIVISION San Joaquin River Settlement FriantDamFriantDam Sacramento San Joaquin Delta Sacramento Merced River.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES CFAC Review Thomas F. Joos, P.E. Civil/Structural Engineer BNL Plant Engineering Division May 8, 2007 NSLS-II Conventional.
Site Investigation and Storage Structure Sizing CNMP Core Curriculum Section 4 – Manure Wastewater Storage and Handling.
Permit Process.
Presented by: 1. A measure of how easily a fluid (e.g., water) can pass through a porous medium (e.g., soils) 2 Loose soil - easy to flow - high permeability.
Wendy Welch ADAPTING THE ARC HYDRO DATA MODEL AND TOOLS TO A HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK KITSAP PENINSULA, KITSAP, MASON AND PIERCE COUNTIES, WASHINGTON.
The Role of Groundwater in Geologic Hazards W. Richard Laton, Ph.D., RG Assistant Professor, Department of Geological Sciences, CSUF.
IMPROVING MILLERTON LAKE FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS TO INCREASE WATER SUPPLY Mr. Antonio M. Buelna, P.E. Mr. Douglas DeFlitch Ms. Katie Lee October 29, 2009.
An Easy Method of Determining Hydraulic Conductivity of Soils using Pore Pressure Response of Piezocone Penetration Test Chung R Song, Ph.D., University.
Dr. Tark Hamilton Camosun College
Northern Sacramento Valley Geologic Cross-Sections & Sand- Provenance Analysis Geology and Groundwater Conference Kelly Staton November 4, 2009.
Northern Sacramento Valley Geologic Cross-Sections & Sand- Provenance Analysis Geology and Groundwater Conference Kelly Staton November 4, 2009.
Peabody Coal Lower Basin Pipeline Engineering Appraisal Study Bureau of Reclamation September 18, 2002.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Marine Resistivity: a Tool for Characterizing Sediment Zones.
1 Update Ocean Desalination Feasibility Studies Karl Seckel Assistant General Manager.
Geotechnical Exploration for Reach 2B of the San Joaquin River Restoration Program Nicholas Hightower Division of Engineering, Project Geology 2011 DWR.
Ground Improvement Dr. Talat Bader
Name : Abdulrahman Al-bedah ID : KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA KING SAUD UNIVERSITY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CE DEEP COMPACTION.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS – II CFAC Review Conventional Facilities Geotechnical Conditions Tom Joos Civil/Structural Engineer BNL Plant Engineering.
Sonoma Valley Groundwater Management Planning. 2 Presentation Overview SCWA/USGS Groundwater Study Stakeholder Assessment Groundwater Management Work.
Modern GROUND IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR HIGHWAYS
Coeur d’Alene Basin TLG Repository PFT meeting December 9, 2003.
SITE INVESTIGATION.
APPLICATION NO LEVEE DISTRICT No. 1 Of SUTTER COUNTY STAR BEND SETBACK LEVEE SUTTER COUNTY April 17, 2009.
Fish Migration Improvement Opportunities in CVFPP Conservation Strategy Planning Areas Department of Water Resources A. Marc Commandatore Senior Environmental.
Introduction Joint Presentation of State Water Contractors and San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority.
SITE INVESTIGATION ARUN MUCHHALA ENGINEERING COLLEGE-DHARI
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Evaluation of the South Central Region Office Well Network for the San Joaquin River Hydrogeologic Region 2015 DWR Geology and Groundwater Conference.
Site Investigation and Field Tests
Bearing Capacity of Duhok city depending on S. P
Geotechnical Engineering II
Geotechnical Investigation
Presented by Jon Traum, P.E.
Water Resource Management Planning Update
UPDATE ON FHWA’S IN-SITU SCOUR TESTING DEVICE (ISTD)
SUB SURFACE INVESTIGATION
OBJECTIVE 1 Irrigation District Infrastructure Studies
CFAC Review NSLS-II Conventional Facilities Update
Board of Supervisors May 9, 2017
Soil & Site Investigation
Water Resource Management Planning Update
Sacramento Environmental Commission January 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Geotechnical Exploration for Reach 2B of the San Joaquin River Restoration Program Nicholas Hightower Division of Engineering, Project Geology 2011 DWR Geology and Groundwater Meeting

Background The San Joaquin River Restoration Program is the result of a Settlement which has two goals: ◦ Restoration Goal: To restore and maintain river flows to help reproduce and sustain populations of salmon and other fish ◦ Water Management Goal: To reduce and avoid adverse water supply impacts on water contractors due to interim and restoration flows. The US Bureau of Reclamation is the lead federal agency, while DWR is the lead state agency for the program. South Central Region Office is the lead for DWR.

SJRRP DESCRIPTION LOCATION ◦ 150 miles of the San Joaquin River from Friant Dam (Millerton Lake) to the confluence with the Merced River ◦ Also includes 13 miles of the Eastside and Mariposa Bypasses COMPONENTS ◦ 350 miles of existing and new levees ◦ 8 control structures ◦ 8 river crossing structures ◦ Seepage monitoring ◦ Borrow areas

Reach 2B Geotechnical Investigation DWR and the Bureau of Reclamation is responsible for gathering geotechnical data to support the alternative channel alignment designs ◦ USBR: Focused efforts on groundwater seepage ◦ DWR: Geologic exploration and analysis to support engineering design of proposed modifications to increase the San Joaquin River channel carrying capacity, along with accompanying structures.

Reach 2B Exploration Reach 2B is about 35 miles west of Fresno

South Central Region Office Secured TEPs and notified landowners with Right-of-Way’s assistance Coordinated and performed Environmental and Cultural Clearances Created and provided essential GIS mapping Marked/Staked hole locations prior to clearances Requested underground utility clearances from USA SCRO Field Staff helped log holes and coordinate the field effort

2010 Geotechnical Exploration Completed in three separate phases: ◦ March ◦ June ◦ November-December 21 Borings range in depth from 50 to 64 feet 72 CPTs range in depth from 60 to 90 feet.

2010 Geotechnical Exploration (Continued) Drilling ◦ 20 borings drilling using mud rotary methods because of heaving sands ◦ 1 boring drilled using hollow-stem auger method ◦ Standard Penetration Tests conducted every five feet with sample bagged ◦ Two thin-walled Shelby tube samples typically collected from each boring for potential shear strength, permeability, compaction, and other geotechnical tests

Cone Penetration Testing ◦ 72 soundings ◦ Continuously measured tip resistance, sleeve friction, and dynamic pore pressure ◦ Pore pressure dissipation tests conducted at selected depths in each sounding to determine depth to groundwater ◦ Used as primary exploration, with lithology confirmed at selected locations with paired drill holes

2010 Geotechnical Exploration

Borings and CPTs were placed at locations where specific design and foundation information was needed

Post-Field Work—Office Time First Step: Review Field Drilling Logs Entered logs into gINT, a borehole database program gINT has multiple functions: ◦ Creates official logs ◦ Stores soils data in database ◦ Allows data export to Microsoft Excel

Field Log  Draft Report Log

Creating Cross-Sections in ArcGIS Export borehole data from gINT into Excel format for ArcGIS, along with CPT logs Draw desired cross-section lines in map view

CrossView

CrossView and ArcGIS

FINDINGS The CPT logs correlated well on the majority of the borings. Soil lab tests are still in the process of being tested. The general soil stratigraphy can be summarized as: ◦ 0-5’ Silty Sand and Silt ◦ 5-20’ Sandy Clay, Clay and Silt ◦ 20-60’ Silty Sand and Poorly Graded Sand

CONCLUSIONS First phase of exploration for Reach 2B resulted in sufficient geotechnical data to begin preliminary design. Additional exploration will be necessary to go forward with more detailed design, and to explore conditions for specific structures and borrow areas. The use of gINT for boring logs makes drill hole data more useable and manageable. The use of ArcGIS and CrossView makes compilation of geologic cross sections efficient and easy for data analysis and presentation.

Thanks!