Erik McCormick Former OSEP Part B Data Manager September 29, 2006 Special Education Data – The Old, the New and the Huh?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Early Childhood Outcomes… Who, What, Where and How
Advertisements

Preschool Special Education A Review of State Performance Indicators and The Child Outreach Network.
Transition from Early Intervention RIDE Winter Leadership Conference February 2007.
Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Revised June 2011.
June 24, 2010 Special Education Strand Morgantown, West Virginia WVEIS Data Conference.
Student Performance Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators 3 – State Assessment Performance, 7 – Early Childhood Outcomes.
Indicator #13:Transition Services for Students Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and.
Delaware Building BLOCKS EARLY CHILDHOOD MONITORING – INSTRUCTION – ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM FOR YOUNG CHILDREN Delaware Special Education Meeting September.
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
DeterminationsDeterminations Now what??. Determination Levels Meets Requirements Needs Assistance Needs Intervention Needs Substantial Intervention.
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
DeterminationsDeterminations Now what??. Determination Levels Meets Requirements Needs Assistance Needs Intervention Needs Substantial Intervention.
Alaskas BE-- S.M.A.R.T. SPP/APR Directors Conference September 28, 2007.
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
Updates in IDEA NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement From: All children will have universal access.
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Transition (Indicators C-8 and B-12)
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
WEB IEP FOLLOW-UP ECO GATHERED FOR BIRTH TO 5 INCLUDING INFANT, TODDLER, PK 1.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Transition Talk Webinar Series: State Performance Plan August 2013 Data Submission Presented by Brenda Bush & Elizabeth Danner Webinar handouts available.
Special Education Data collection and reporting. SPED Data Collected Graduation/Drop Out (ISEE) State Assessment Participation/Performance (Assessment)
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
Presented by the Part C- Kristie Musick, Part C Coordinator Dr. Lesly Wilson, Part C Data Manager Part B- Lori James, Part B Data Manager Part C & B March.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
2014 ALACASE CONFERENCE Preschool Indicators 2014 EI Preschool Conference.
Noel Cole, Coordinator Michigan Department of Education, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services.
SPP Indicators B-7 and B-8: Overview and Results to Date for the Florida Prekindergarten Program for Children with Disabilities PreK Coordinators Meeting.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
Early Childhood Education for ALL Young Children: A Look at the IDEA Six-Year State Performance Plan Susan Crowther IDEA, Part B, Section 619 Coordinator.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
Data Slides for Children & Students with IEPs in 2010 Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
July 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report Indicators 8, 11, 12, 13, and 14 July 2009.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
1 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011.
Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Spring 2012.
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx March 22, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
Evaluation IEP Development, Review and Revision Placement
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education California Department of.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
Annual Desk Audit (ADA) March 31, 2015 Webinar. Agenda  Purpose/Introduction of the ADA  Indicator Reviews  With Five-year trends  Navigating the.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Early Childhood Outcomes Trying to Get The Word Out Maria Synodi, 619 Coordinator Connecticut State Department of Education NECTAC National TA Meeting.
 CIO Training Special Education VR Reports.
Special Education School District Profile Slinger School District Lynda McTrusty.
Appleton Area School District
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
IMS Data Summary Third in a series November 2010
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Presentation transcript:

Erik McCormick Former OSEP Part B Data Manager September 29, 2006 Special Education Data – The Old, the New and the Huh?

The Old (OSEP, Part B) Child Count Fall 2006 OASIS Count Date 10/02/2006 Intensive identification 10/27/2006 Placement (FAPE) Fall 2006 OASIS New codes Exiting Summer 2007 NCLB (OASIS)

The Old (OSEP, cont.) Discipline On-line Suspensions/Expulsions site Personnel 10/01/2006 Staff Accounting Assessments Completed in-house by DEED

The New Clarification Question in Fall OASIS Served by 10/02/2006? AYP Subgroup Size Change Minimum n 40 to 25 OSEP Placement (Environment) Codes Race/Ethnicity Codes Supplemental Data Collection workbook

New OSEP Environment Codes

New Race or Ethnicity Codes

Supplemental Data Collection Special Education State Performance Plan

We are required by OSEP to report data on 20 specific indicators for the SPP. Much of this data is already collected in established data collections. There are, however, a few data elements we do not collect via any other means. Those federally required elements are the reason for this data collection.

SPP Data Elements

We will use a Supplemental Data Collection workbook. We will collect the data required to report on 4 separate indicators within the SPP. Each indicator will have a page of instructions followed by a page for the data.

Early Childhood Outcomes Indicator 7: Percent of preschool children with IEPs who demonstrate improved: A. Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships); B. Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/ communication and early literacy); C. Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs.

Early Childhood Outcomes (cont.) This data must be collected for all IEP preschoolers. Entry data will be collected in the district within two months of program entry. Exit data will be collected in the district prior to the student's 6th birthday.

Early Childhood Outcomes (cont.) You may use any of the following assessment tools to gather the Entry and Exit data: Dial 3 BriganceBattelleAGSor One approved by the Department

Early Childhood Outcomes (cont.) Each student will be screened using an approved assessment. The results will be recorded on the Child Outcomes Summary Form. The data from that form will be reported to EED in the supplemental workbook.

Early Childhood Outcomes (cont.) To complete the Child Outcomes form you will use the predetermined rating scale. Definitions for Level Ratings used for all three measurements are already recorded on the Child Outcomes Summary Form.

Consent for Evaluation Indicator 11: Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days. (State established timeline)

Consent for Evaluation (cont.) The district must report on all children for whom they have received consent to evaluate. All students determined to be eligible will be reported with a valid AKSID number For children under the age of 5 who were tested and determined to be not eligible there may not be an AKSID number

Consent for Evaluation (cont.) The district must provide data on each child for whom they have received consent for evaluation. The district will need to report the following information: Eligibility Status Count of Days required to determine eligibility Reason why determination was not completed within 45 school days What other reasons for delay do you encounter in your district?

Part C students referred to Part B Indicator 12: Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.

Part C students referred to Part B (cont.) The district must report on the following: all students referred by an Infant Learning Program Eligibility Status Reason IEP was not in place by 3rd birthday

Secondary Transition Indicator 13: Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post- secondary goals.

Secondary Transition (cont.) The district must report the following: all IEP students who were 16 or older by the end of the reporting period (June 30, 2007) whether the IEP includes coordinated, measurable, annual goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.

When is this due?? Districts being monitored this year November 15, 2006 All Other Districts Summer OASIS time (July 2007)

More Information? about how to report your data, contact Karen Lipson at or at related to the indicators themselves, please contact Sharon Schumacher at or

More Information? Erik McCormick Alaska Dept. of Education & Early Development