Scott Linner Aimsweb Trainer 651-366-2731 Aimsweb support

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) and AIMSweb®
Advertisements

Progress Monitoring And RtI System
Advanced Progress Monitoring with Aimsweb 2009 Alaska Winter Education Conference Scott Linner
OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE
Fluency Assessment Bryan Karazia.
RtI Case Studies RSS RtI Foundations Training August 2010 Amy Roberts & Erin Banks School Psychologists.
Assessment, Screening and Progress Monitoring made Easy! a tool for every tier Darrell L. Lee, easyCBM Senior Account Manager.
Chapter 9: Fluency Assessment
Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level Dr. Amy Lingo, Dr. Nicole Fenty, and Regina Hirn Project ABRI University of Louisville Project.
PROBLEM STATEMENTS IN PROBLEM-SOLVING, RtI PROCESSES FSSM Summer Institute, June 26, 2007 Charlotte Smith,
Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing
Summer Copyright (c) 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). All rights reserved. All names and data used in this presentation are fictitious.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
Reading Comprehension and Math Computation Screening and Progress Monitoring Assessments for Secondary Students Carrie Urshel, Ph.D., School Psychologist.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing Using CBMs to write RtI goals Using CBMs to write RtI goals.
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
Dana Martineau and Anita Rivers introducing Early Intervention Program.
Aimsweb overview Group-Administered Measures: Training Format
 “Fluency assessment consists of listening to students read aloud and collecting information about their oral reading accuracy, rate, and prosody.” (Page.
Kindergarten Curriculum Night Central Elementary Mrs. Heuring and Miss Nick.
AIMSweb and Goal- Setting December 8, 2010 PRTI. Basic goal setting Measurable goals include: Conditions Timeline, materials, difficulty level In 9 weeks.
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Tina Jensen. What? Fluency Assessment Consists of listening to students read aloud for a given time to collect information.
Webinar 3 Core Instruction (Tier 1). Assessments: – Screening – Evaluating effectiveness of core instruction Research-based/Evidence-based Instructional.
Summer Copyright (c) 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). All rights reserved. All names and data used in this presentation are fictitious.
Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings
E LEMENTARY A SSESSMENT -I NFORMING I NSTRUCTION
Setting Ambitious & Attainable Student Goals OrRTI Spring Training May 3 rd, 2011.
Utilizing AIMSweb to Inform Instruction June 25, 2012.
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
RtI July 29, RtI Is… A General Education Data-Driven Process or System that Provides Instructional Intervention in Reading, Mathematics,
Today’s Learning Objectives: 1.What is Progress Monitoring? 2.Brief review of Universal Screening data, 2.Brief review of Universal Screening data, identifying.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
AN INTEGRATED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR HIGHLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCHOOL YEAR MIKE COULAHAN SARAH LINDWALL COURTNEY JONES PETE REILLEY 11/12/07.
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
Progress Monitoring and the Academic Facilitator Cotrane Penn, Ph.D. Intervention Team Specialist East Zone.
Using the Data From AIMSweb. To view your students’ scores: Click on “My Classes” tab.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
Class Action Research: Treatment for the Nonresponsive Student IL510 Kim Vivanco July 15, 2009
JUNE 2014 K-3 COUNTYWIDE READING DATA. RESULTS COLLECTED.
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
June 2015 K-3 Reading Countywide Data. Results Collected.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
R IDGEFIELD P UBLIC S CHOOL R ESPONSE TO I NTERVENTION P ILOT A PRIL 7, 2016 Janet Seabold, Dawn Mazzola, Charlotte Weeks, & Theresa Serafimov.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
RTI Trends & Issues Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School District Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School.
Essentials for Teachers Getting Started with Benchmark Screening.
Colt Early Childhood Education Center October 8, 2012
DIBELS.
What is AIMSweb? AIMSweb is a benchmark and progress monitoring system based on direct, frequent and continuous student assessment.
Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Overview
Data-Based Leadership
Data Collection Challenge:
CASD K-6 Transition Plan from DIBELS to DIBELS Next
Welcome to Eagleview RTI Reading & Math.
Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Method for Monitoring Student Academic Progress in Basic Skills.
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
East Elementary School
Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training
K-3 Reading Countywide Data
Response to Intervention Overview
Presentation transcript:

Scott Linner Aimsweb Trainer Aimsweb support

2 State Assessment School District Tests of Early Literacy CBM Reading trajectories are established early and become more difficult to change. --Roland Good

R=.706 N=542 Not Proficient Below Proficient Proficient Advanced 3rd Grade State Benchmark in Reading - ORF Benchmark I Goal of 110 WPM 3rd grade reading fluency

Three-Tiered Assessment Model Tier 1: BENCHMARK BENCHMARK Universal Screening for all students STRATEGIC MONITOR Tier 2: STRATEGIC MONITOR Monthly monitoring for students who are mild to moderate risk for failure PROGRESS MONITOR Tier 3: PROGRESS MONITOR Intensive monitoring towards specific goals for students at significant risk for failure 1 2 3

Three-Tiered Assessment Model: Benchmark Tier 1: BENCHMARK Universal Screening for all students Tier 2: STRATEGIC MONITOR Monthly monitoring for students who are at mild to moderate risk for failure Tier 3: PROGRESS MONITOR Intensive monitoring towards specific goals for students at risk for failure

BENCHMARK : Universal Screening Universal Screening Universal Screening Identification of students at-risk for failure Identification of students at-risk for failure Program evaluation across all students Program evaluation across all students 1-4 minutes to complete AIMSweb® assessments 1-4 minutes to complete AIMSweb® assessments Some AIMSweb® assessments are individually administered, while others may be done as a group. Some AIMSweb® assessments are individually administered, while others may be done as a group. 1

Measures Currently Available via AIMSweb®: Early Literacy [K-1 benchmark, Progress Monitor (PM) any age] –Letter Naming Fluency –Letter sound fluency –Phonemic Segmentation Fluency –Nonsense Word Fluency Early Numeracy (K-1 benchmark, PM any age) –Oral Counting –Number identification –Quantity discrimination –Missing number Oral Reading (K-8, PM any age) MAZE (Reading comprehension); (1-8, PM any age) Math Computation (1-6, PM any age) Math Facts (PM any age) Spelling (1-8, PM any age) Written Expression (1-8, PM any age) All students in an academic curriculum arebenchmarked three times per year across any/all of these assessment areas.

AIMSweb as a Program Evaluation Tool: Benchmark 3x/year for Universal ScreeningAll Kids (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.)

Michael Martin: Michael Martin: A student with Benchmark Data that indicates he is performing significantly behind peers at his school.

Fall Benchmark Data for Michael Martin Martin, Michael: Grade 5 (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.)

Discussion : Consider Michaels R-CBM performance in relationship to different AIMSweb® Comparison Groups Michaels School Grade 5: Michaels School Michaels District Grade 5: Michaels District National Aggregate Norms Grade 5: National Aggregate Norms (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.)

3 rd Grade Student Individual Report: 3 rd Grade Student

Things Went Well Data to Know that Things Went Well QUESTIONS: What does report suggest about Heather As progress? SPRING SPRING: Compared to Grade 3 peers at her school, is Heather performing in the: - Well Above Average Range? - Above Average Range? - Average Range? - Below Average Range? - Well-Below Average Range?

Three-Tiered Assessment Model: Strategic Monitor TIER 1 BENCHMARK Universal Screening TIER 2 STRATEGIC MONITOR Monthly monitoring for students who are questionable or of concern TIER 3 PROGRESS MONITOR Intensive monitoring towards specific goals for at-risk students 2

AIMSweb as a Program Evaluation Tool: Schools May Strategic Monitor Monthly for students at Mild to Moderate Risk (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.)

Tier 2: Strategic Monitor Strategic Monitor: Strategic Monitor: (1x/month) Provides option to increase assessment frequency from three times per year to once per month for select students. (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.) Example of Strategic Monitor report containing monthly data collected over a full school year

Strategic Monitoring: October (Jared Reed) (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.)

Intensive monitoring of individualized goals for students at-risk of failure TIER 3: Progress Monitor 3 3

Progress Monitor (Tier 3): Intensive assessment with adjustable frequency that matches need (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.) 3

Benchmark (Tier 1): 3x per year Strategic Monitoring (Tier 2): 1x per month for select students at risk for educational difficulties Progress Monitor (Tier 3): Intensive assessment with adjustable frequency that matches need (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.)