0 GOVERNOR’S P-20 COORDINATING COUNCIL RACE TO THE TOP APPLICATION UPDATE Dr. Deb Duvall January 19, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements

The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP. This presentation is a product of the Maryland State Department of Education 03/03/10 American Recovery and Reinvestment.
2011 Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Annual Update Review Division of Student, Family, and School Support Office of Finance Division of Academic Reform.
Measuring the Common Core Standards Models for engaging postsecondary in student readiness for college and careers.
A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
Sherry A. Key, Director Alabama State Department of Education Career and Technical Education Section Sherry A. Key, Director Alabama State Department of.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers Outline of PARCC Information *Parent/Student Resources, are noted at the end of this.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core Summer Institutes 1.
Analysis and Next Steps. Summary Nevada’s final score of ranks 24 out of the 36 states that applied Among the ten grant recipients,
MSBO 2009 CONFERENCESEPTEMBER SECRETARY OF EDUCATION DISCRETIONARY FUNDS Sally Vaughn Deputy Superintendent, Ph.D. Michigan Department of Education.
Support for the Change, Challenge, and Commitment All Maryland Students College and Career Ready.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
Draft Proposal Summary Massachusetts Race to the Top As of December 14, 2009.
1 Race to the Top: Louisiana’s Blueprint for Education Reform … More Than an Application 1 …BECAUSE OUR CHILDREN CAN’T WAIT.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
Pennsylvania Department of Edward G. Rendell Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak Secretary of Education.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
Race to the Top Grant Application Overview November 3, 2009.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Aimee R. Guidera Director, Data Quality Campaign National Center for Education Accountability April 23, 2007.
CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment San Diego, California – June 23, 2015.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
2009 Closing the Expectation Gap Fourth Annual 50-State Progress Report on the Alignment of High School Policies with the Demands of College and Careers.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Race to the Top Scope of Work Broward County Public Schools.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Debra Tica Sanchez Vice President, Government Relations Association of Public Television Stations (APTS)
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
DAVID GARZA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR C & I FERNANDO CRUZ, DIRECTOR FOR FEDERAL PROGRAMS ELIAS ALONZO III, CTE DIRECTOR SEVERITA SANCHEZ, PH.D, EXECUTIVE.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act K-12 Agenda Webinar Presentation Monday, July 27 th 2009.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
Transformation In Progress Rhode Island’s Phase II Race to the Top August 10, 2010 R e d a c t e d.
0 Governor’s P-20 Coordinating Council Race to the Top Application Update.
Greenville Technical Charter High School Strategic Plan Developed October 2014.
Excellence for All Children State of the Schools Knox County Schools January 19, 2012.
Wisconsin Standards for CTE. Timeline New accountability system begins & AYP ends (ESEA waiver) New proficiency benchmarks for WKCE reading & mathematics.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
College Access Summit REGIONAL STRATEGY SESSION ON ACCESS TO POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION COMMUNITY COLLEGE PARTNERS Race to the Top Update.
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)
Melissa Cropper Teacher and President Georgetown Federation of Teachers Deborah S. Delisle Superintendent of Public Instruction Ohio Department of Education.
Road Map Project & Race to the Top Tukwila School District August
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION State Policies: Orchestrating the Common Core Mathematics Classroom Ilene W. Straus, Vice President California State.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.
Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation– North Carolina Building LEA and Regional Professional Development Capacity First Annual Evaluation.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
How can ARRA Funds Be Wisely Applied? How Researchers Can Help Lou Cicchinelli, Ph.D. Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning Fourth Annual IES.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
Maryland’s Race to the Top Application
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
Current Education Legislation Update
Presentation transcript:

0 GOVERNOR’S P-20 COORDINATING COUNCIL RACE TO THE TOP APPLICATION UPDATE Dr. Deb Duvall January 19, 2009

1 Today's objectives To highlight key points from Arizona’s RTTT Application To identify tasks, roles and responsibilities In its implementation 1 2

Initial work to focus on US DOE grant initiatives and support progress on the four reform areas Standards and Assessments Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Great Teachers Great Leaders Supporting Struggling Schools SLDS project Statewide longitudinal data system Submitted 12/4/09 Race to the Top What's in place Plans for the future Submit on State Financial Stabilization Fund "Data inventory" of reform progress Phase II Submitted 01/11/10

3 RTTT Application: Twelve Elements of America Competes Act, Statewide Student Identifier 2.Student Level Enrollment, Demographic and Program Participation Information 3.Student Level Information about the points at which students exit, transfer in, transfer out, drop out or complete P-16 education programs 4.Capacity to communicate with higher education systems 5.A State Data Quality Audit System Accessing Data Quality, Validity & Reliability 6.Student-Level Test Data 7.Information on Untested Students by Subject 8.Statewide Teacher Identifier with Teacher-Student Match 9.Student Level Transcript Information, including Information On Courses Completed and Grades Earned 10.Student Level College Readiness Test Scores 11.Information Regarding The Extent To Which Students Transition Successfully From Secondary School To Postsecondary Education, Including Whether Students Enroll In Remedial Coursework 12.Other Information Determined Necessary to Address Alignment & Adequate Preparation For Success In Postsecondary Education

4 RTTT Application Vision for Public Education In Arizona By 2020, Arizona’s students will be ranked among the best in the United States, setting an example achieving excellence amid challenging circumstances

5 RTTT Application To accomplish this vision, Arizona established a bold and innovative plan that incorporates grade/content academic interventions creating an end to social promotion while at the same time fostering a “move on when ready” environment for all students.

RTTT Application: Four Education Reforms Develop rigorous college- and career-ready standards and assessments Establish Pre-K through college data systems to track and foster performance and improvement Infrastructure to Facilitate Reform Great Teachers Great Leaders Provide intensive support and interventions to the lowest performing schools Levers to Achieve Reform Efforts

7 Preliminary Scope of Work LEA hereby agrees to participate in implementing the State Plan in each of the areas identified below. Elements of State Reform Plans LEA Participation (Y/N) Comments from LEA (optional) B. Standards and Assessments (B)(3) Supporting the transition to enhanced standards and high-quality assessments C. Data Systems to Support Instruction (C)(3) Using data to improve instruction: (i) Use of local instructional improvement systems (ii) Professional development on use of data (iii) Availability and accessibility of data to researchers D. Great Teachers and Leaders (D)(2) Improving teacher and principal effectiveness based on performance: (i) Measure student growth and link it to both principals’ and individual teachers’ evaluations (ii) Design and implement evaluation systems that incorporate student growth as a significant factor (both at the individual and group level) (iii) Conduct annual evaluations (iv)(a) Use evaluations to inform professional development (iv)(b) Use evaluations to inform compensation, promotion, and retention (iv)(c) Use evaluations to inform tenure and/or full certification (iv)(d) Use evaluations to inform removal (D)(3) Ensuring equitable distribution of effective teachers and principals: (i) High-poverty and/or high-minority schools (ii) Hard-to-staff subjects and specialty areas (D)(5) Providing effective support to teachers and principals: (i) Quality professional development (ii) Measure effectiveness of professional development E. Turning Around the Lowest-Achieving Schools (E)(2) Turning around the lowest-achieving schools

8 RTTT: Standards and Assessments Goal: A systematic linkage of college- and career-ready (CCR) standards to high quality summative assessments and a comprehensive set of supports that leads to an end of social promotion and fosters a “move on when ready” environment for all students. The State will: Adopt Common Core standards Align early education standards to the Common Core and high school graduation to post secondary and workforce expectations Participate in a consortium to develop common summative assessments Provide online tools for formative assessments Round out the K-12 assessment system aligned with college- and career-readiness All LEA’s will: Support implementation of Common Core standards and new assessments

9 RTTT: Standards and Assessments Participation requires: Providing professional development time to help teachers become familiar with the Common Core Enforcing rigorous standards for promotion at 3 rd and 8 th grades beginning in 2011 Providing specific interventions and supports to students leading up to transition grades Contributing as needed to the development of formative and/or interim assessments based on the Common Core Implementing “move on when ready” strategies (e.g. dual enrollment, early college, AP, etc.) Willingness to participate in the pilot testing of K-2 assessments

10 RTTT: Longitudinal Statewide Data Systems Goal: A secure, scalable data warehouse that provides a longitudinal P-20 perspective, value-added applications for classroom and stakeholder use overseen by a shared governance structure representative of the stakeholder groups The State will: Complete a data warehouse incorporating links to higher education, the workforce and pre-school Provide for student alerts, actionable reports and automation of compliance requirement Provide for eLearning Provide data entry and data use training Provide on-line item bank/formative assessment tools Incorporate Arizona’s Growth Model All LEA’s will: Incorporate teacher identifier for all data collection processes

11 RTTT: Longitudinal Statewide Data Systems Participation requires: Building a culture based on objective data analysis and self-reflection Providing professional development to help teachers and principals use data to inform instructional practice Supporting the train-the trainer model on the proposed instructional improvement systems, data dashboard and supporting applications Ensure technology in the classroom

12 RTTT: Great Teachers Great Leaders Goal: High-quality pathways into education, evaluation and other tools that improve teacher and principal effectiveness, a set of initiatives to help our best teachers move to our most challenged schools, and systems that foster self-reflection and continuous improvement The State will: Increase alternative pathways to certification Strengthen accountability of Performance Based Compensation Plans based on student achievement Establish statewide training for mentors Establish the Governor’s Distinguished Educator Corp Expand programs for hard-to-staff subjects (e.g. STEM, special needs) All LEA’s will: Develop teacher and principal evaluations that incorporate student growth

13 RTTT: Great Teachers Great Leaders Participation requires: Making student growth data at least 50% of teacher and principal evaluation criteria Providing professional development on how to administer and interpret new evaluations Providing site-based professional development on how to use data to inform classroom practice Ensuring teacher ratings distribution is in line with overall LEA performance Using new evaluations to inform performance-based compensation, promotion, retention, tenure, removal ineffective teachers/principals Enhancing equitable distribution of highly effective teachers/principals

14 RTTT: Support to Struggling Schools Goal: An innovative system for building capacity and clear criteria for intervening in the persistently lowest-achieving schools, and a systematic linkage of these tools to additional strategies to help disadvantaged schools The State will: Identify persistently lowest-performing schools Provide comprehensive approach to school interventions Institute receivership for persistently failing LEAs Dedicate resources to understand reasons schools struggle Provide intervention strategies specific to rural schools and those serving Native American students All LEA’s will: Accommodate the State’s efforts to turn around struggling schools

15 RTTT: Support to Struggling Schools Participation requires: Partnering with the State and local stakeholders to turn around struggling schools Implementing appropriate strategies to turn around persistently low- performing schools  Provide needs-based professional development  Provide for standards-based, after-school programs  Provide for extended learning time and/or eLearning opportunities Ensuring equitable distribution of highly effective teachers/principals Providing data transparency to stakeholders

16 RTTT: Broad initiatives across reform areas STEM Strategy for the 21st Century College- and career-ready (CCR) alignment Create regional STEM hubs with a central connection Pathways including Early College HS Focus on increasing core content knowledge for teachers and students Research as a classroom/ school management protocol Targeted focus on K-12 engineering education Rural Strategy Governor's Distinguished Educator Corps supplying turnaround specialists Supplement with locally driven initiatives to develop teaching talent Enhance technology in the classroom Broadband/ infrastructure Expand access to quality coursework (e.g., AP) Specific strategies to support Native Americans and English Language Learners Stakeholder involvement Benchmarked programs Gradually shift paradigm from time-based education to mastery of content Particular focus on key transition points in a student's career Invest in comprehensive set of student-level supports Credit recovery Counseling Tutoring Incentives Use technology to target instruction Student-level alerts, Interventions tracking Focus on Transitions

17 Update on Stakeholder Involvement Building strong statewide capacity to implement, scale up, and sustain proposed Plans Strong commitment from participating LEAs to the State's plans and to effective implementation of reform in the four education areas –Participating LEAs sign an MOU to implement all portions of the State's Race to the Top plans (the MOU includes a preliminary scope of work) –The required signature is that of the Superintendent or Charter Holder –Each participating LEA that receives funding under Title I, Part A will receive a share of the 50 percent of a State's grant award that the state must subgrant to LEAs –If a State is awarded a RTTT grant, participating LEAs have up to 90 days to complete final scopes of work, outlining specific goals, activities, timelines, budgets, etc.

18 Working vision for public education in Arizona By 2020, Arizona's students will be ranked in the top 5 in the country and among the best globally Highly effective teaching at the center of all decisions and plans Set ambitious standards and expectations Establish rigorous accountability and support for all players Data to drive decisions at all levels Close the achievement gap without shortchanging stronger schools Leverage innovation and technology to achieve state of the art education Harness the energy and resources of a wide range of stakeholders Scale up what is working for statewide reach

19 For more information: Debra Raeder Karla Phillips