Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rhode Island Model for Educator Evaluation Systems August 2010.
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Open Future Doors through Succession Planning Principal? Curriculum Supervisor? Assistant Superintendent? Special Services Director?
Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.
June 20, Your Presenters  Ken Mattingly – Rockcastle County  Jessica Addison – Todd County/KDE.
CIP Part IV: Culture Strategies to Address School Safety/Classroom Management/Discipline/RTI Framework/Building Supportive Learning Environments.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
World’s Largest Educational Community
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
On-Site School Review All-Staff Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Integrating Evaluation and Curriculum, GLTS. Welcome Presenters: Lauren Jones - Lead Teacher - Carpentry/ Architectural Drafting, ILT member Paul Mears.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Name Staff Developer, Director, Facilitator
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The Quality Review A Reflection.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
FACT OVERVIEW. 22 Inquiry Focus and Number /Year Program Level Decision  CONTEXT FOR TEACHING Class, School, District, and Community Conversation Guides.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Grade 1.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Literacy Partner’s Meeting Wednesday, October 22 nd Moderated Marking: The What, The Why, The How.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Strategic Planning Process & Update. PLC NORMS Responsible Actively Participate Respectful No side bar conversations Reliable Start and end meetings on.
On-Site School Review Leadership Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Title I Schoolwide Planning Comprehensive Needs Assessment Wednesday, October 24, 2012.
IOWA CORE CURRICULUM LEADERSHIP TRAINING Day Two.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
1 Principals’ Student Achievement Meeting April 15, 2009 Leadership for Assessment Literacy From Paper to Practice.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE) Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Session Technical Assistance.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use OCR Grade 6.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Florin High School Professional Learning Communities Rationale Flexibility Effectiveness Sustainability.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
Nevada Department of Education Office of Educational Opportunity Nevada Comprehensive Curriculum Audit Tool for Schools NCCAT-S August
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
What Is the Self-Study Instructional Audit?
Presentation transcript:

Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center

Roadmap for This Session 1) Description of the Self-Study Tool, the connection to the Instructional Audit 2) Characteristics of the Self-StudyTool and small group exploration 3) Simulation of the Self-Study process 4) Next steps and ways to approach the Self-Study Tool in your district/school

What is the Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools? Based on Alaskas Instructional Audit Tool Is implemented under direction of districts and is guided by an EED Technical Assistance Coach Is conducted by an internal team of the entire faculty or a smaller leadership group from within the school Is conducted by an internal team of the entire faculty or a smaller leadership group from within the school

What the SST is… An evidence-based self-study A way to build awareness, buy-in and support for improvement efforts The end product is not a score; instead it is the identification of current strengths and limitations

How the Self-Study Tool (SST) Complements the Instructional Audit SST is based on Alaskas Instructional Audit Tool Incorporates changes made to Instructional Audit Tool based on considerable feedback from audited districts To be implemented by districts and guided by a Technical Assistance Coach

What happens during the Instructional Audit? Audit team develops a snapshot of district/school practices by engaging in: Document review Focus groups & interviews with staff and students Observation of instruction The team combines these data sources to triangulate evidence and assign the rating Meets or Does Not Meet

As a Result of the Instructional Audit: The audit team produces a Report of Findings for the Commissioners review This report complements other data (e.g., SBAs, district conversations) to develop a plan: E.g., stay the course, give recommendations, direct instructional actions, redirect funds for student learning benefit, replace personnel

As a Result of the Self-Study Tool: A school-level team investigates one domain at a time Ratings from 1-4 are determined by the team Strengths and weaknesses are identified and agreed upon A decision is made about how to strengthen the domain

What are Similarities between the IAT and the SST? Evidence-based Provide diagnostic data to help with creation of improvement plans Based on the six domains and 44 key elements within domains (including parent and community involvement key elements)

… And The Differences? IAT conducted by external team IAT conducted over one week IAT uses a dichotomous rating SST conducted by internal team SST may take several weeks or months SST uses a 4- point rubric

Who is involved in the SST? SST may be facilitated by: EED-trained Technical Assistance Coach EED-trained Technical Assistance Coach In consultation with District-level staff In consultation with District-level staff SST is conducted by: Entire site staff or Entire site staff or Smaller group of faculty/staff such as an instructional leadership team Smaller group of faculty/staff such as an instructional leadership team May include parents/community members and older students May include parents/community members and older students

SST Materials Overview & Step-by-Step Introduction to Domain & Guiding Questions Domain Rubric Domain Summary Glossary

What Are the Six Domains? Curriculum Assessment Instruction Supportive learning environment Professional development Leadership

Scavenger Hunt Find a partner Using the SST booklet, conduct the scavenger hunt by answering all the questions on the sheet What did you learn?

Curriculum Curriculum- includes five (5) elements focusing on the coordinated alignment of curriculum to Alaskas State Standards & GLEs. Curriculum- includes five (5) elements focusing on the coordinated alignment of curriculum to Alaskas State Standards & GLEs.

Is aligned, relevant curricula under-valued?

What was the process for aligning curriculum with standards & GLEs at your school? What was the process for aligning curriculum with standards & GLEs at your school? How are new curricula & materials aligned to Standards & GLEs on an ongoing basis? How are new curricula & materials aligned to Standards & GLEs on an ongoing basis? What do we do to make sure new staff understand the Alaska Standards & GLEs, and how the curriculum is aligned to them? What do we do to make sure new staff understand the Alaska Standards & GLEs, and how the curriculum is aligned to them?

Examples of Evidence might include: Local Curriculum Documents/Units of Study Local Curriculum Documents/Units of Study Lesson Plans/Curriculum Maps Lesson Plans/Curriculum Maps Professional Development Records Professional Development Records Curriculum Guides Curriculum Guides Scope & Sequence documents Scope & Sequence documents Professional Resource Materials Professional Resource Materials Curriculum Committee Meeting Records Curriculum Committee Meeting Records

Assessment Assessment--includes six (6)elements related to the use of formative and summative assessment and the ways in which this information is used at schoolwide and classroom levels. Assessment--includes six (6)elements related to the use of formative and summative assessment and the ways in which this information is used at schoolwide and classroom levels.

Instruction Instruction--includes eight (8)elements focusing on strategies and methods teachers use to help students, at varied levels, learn at and above grade level expectations. Instruction--includes eight (8)elements focusing on strategies and methods teachers use to help students, at varied levels, learn at and above grade level expectations.

Supportive Learning Environment Supportive Learning Environment- includes eight (8) elements for review focusing on a safe, supportive, and orderly environment conducive to learning. Supportive Learning Environment- includes eight (8) elements for review focusing on a safe, supportive, and orderly environment conducive to learning.

Learning Environment is critical to a schools success

Professional Development Professional Development-- includes seven (7) elements focused on the ways in which staff is supported in their own growth and development with the intention of improving all students learning. Professional Development-- includes seven (7) elements focused on the ways in which staff is supported in their own growth and development with the intention of improving all students learning.

Leadership Leadership--includes ten (10) elements focusing on the ways in which building-level administrative leadership assists and supports staff in improving student academic achievement. Leadership--includes ten (10) elements focusing on the ways in which building-level administrative leadership assists and supports staff in improving student academic achievement.

In summary, what is the SST? Internal review of strengths and limitations as part of school improvement process Internal review of strengths and limitations as part of school improvement process An evidence-based self-study A way to build staff awareness, buy-in and support for improvement efforts The end product is not a score; instead it is the identification of current strengths and limitations

Digging Deeper into the Domains Review the rubric Discuss the guiding questions Locate the evidence necessary to make ratings for each domain Reach consensus on ratings Determine strengths and areas for improvement

Identify a team Establish group norms & agreements: How to work together (one voice at a time, all opinions respected, use of consensus, etc.) Discuss how to reach consensus Decide how often to meet

Examples of group norms one voice at a time all opinions respected start/end on time using consensus to make decisions no side conversations

1. Review the rubrics for each of the elements in the domain considered. 2. Discuss the guiding questions to create common understanding and acknowledge previous work previously accomplished. 3. Locate and review evidence related to the domains.

4. Review evidence needed to make ratings at each level. Write what the evidence is under the ratings on the rubric. 5. As a group, review all ratings and discuss strengths, weaknesses, and how the school can further develop this domain. 6. Share results of the self-study with other staff & greater school community.

Assist stakeholders in understanding issues associated with the domain Assist stakeholders in understanding issues associated with the domain Celebrate success through identified strengths Celebrate success through identified strengths Share what improvement areas were identified Share what improvement areas were identified Talk about ways to strengthen domain area Talk about ways to strengthen domain area

Q & A Can we do this self-study process on our own? Does the self-study help with creation of improvement plans? Is it best to do all the Domain areas at once?

The measure of success is not whether you have a tough problem to deal with, but whether it is the same problem you had last year. The measure of success is not whether you have a tough problem to deal with, but whether it is the same problem you had last year. John Foster Dulles

Difficulties are just things to overcome, after all. Sir Earnest Shackelton