BACKRIVER TMDL PROJECT Technical Outreach Prepared by MDE/TARSA Prepared for the Baltimore Harbor Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RMP Dioxin Strategy Susan Klosterhaus Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup Item #9.
Advertisements

Contaminants at the Estuary Interface Jon Leatherbarrow 1 Rainer Hoenicke 2 Lester McKee 1 1 San Francisco Estuary Institute 2 California Resources Agency.
C OPPER AND N ICKEL TMDL D EVELOPMENT: L OWER S OUTH B AY.
Mercury and PCBs TMDL Implementation Tom Mumley San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board.
PCBs Total Maximum Daily Loads San Francisco Bay Fred Hetzel SFB-RWQCB May 13, 2003.
Impairment Assessment and Conceptual Model of Legacy Pesticides: DDT, Chlordane, and Dieldrin RMP Annual Meeting May 4, 2004 Jon Leatherbarrow, Chris Werme,
Measuring Water Pollution
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.
TMDL Development West Fork River Watershed July 27 th, 2010 WV DEP WV DEP James Laine James Laine.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
HydroQual Capabilities for Pathways Analysis in Support of Natural Resource Damage Assessment.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Water Quality Monitoring The Role of the Clean Water Act.
Mark Richards Virginia Department of Environmental Quality What’s in Your Water? A Discussion of Threats to Virginia’s Water Quality William & Mary School.
WATERSHED MODELING IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
Watershed Planning: Current Status and Next Steps
Toxics Management Plans Ecology Review Principles.
Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting.
Modeling to Understand Stormwater Management Efforts Portland Harbor Superfund Site Dawn Sanders City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services September.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
San Francisco Estuary Institute Annual Meeting October 7, 2008 Water Quality Science and Management in the Delaware Estuary Thomas J. Fikslin, Ph.D.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
David Maidment & Lynn E. Katz & Imane Mrini Center for Research in Water Resources The University of Texas at Austin Total Maximum Daily Load for Zinc.
Value of Mass Balance Modeling in Formulating a PTS Reduction Strategy for the Great Lakes Joseph V. DePinto Limno-Tech, Inc. Ann Arbor, MI GLRC PBS Strategy.
Technical Track Work Group Report Out August 22, 2012.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part II – SWMM Water Quality Calibration Maryland Department of the Environment.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Deep River-Portage Burns Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting March 13, 2013.
Item 3b Guadalupe River Monitoring WY 2010 Jen Hunt, Ben Greenfield, Sarah Lowe, Lester McKee Sources, Pathway, and Loading Work Group May 6th, 2010.
Presented to: Severn River Association 2008 State of the Severn Anne Arundel County Government Department of Public Works Ron Bowen, P.E. October 21, 2008.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Point Source Loads and Decision Criteria for Toxics Modeling Baltimore Harbor TMDL Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Dynamic PCB Partitioning in Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio Sediments Andrew Lenox Environmental Engineer US Army Corps.
NWQMC San Jose, CA May 8, 2006 Combining Dynamic Assessment with Traditional Monitoring Approaches to Improve Understanding of NPS Pollution Impacts William.
South River Mercury TMDL – June 2005 Jack Eggleston Monitoring Stations Stream Flow Water Sampling Next Steps Plans.
Strategic Planning for Contaminated Sediment Projects: Setting the Course for Proper Project Execution Howard L. Cumberland Geosyntec Consultants October.
Potomac Toxics Monitoring Status and Issues ICPRB March 8, 2004.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting.
ORSANCO’s FY16 Technical Program. WQ Monitoring Programs Bimonthly & Clean Metals Sampling – Metals & traditional 15 mainstem, 14 tribs,
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
Copper Source Loading Estimates (Process Profiles) Physical & Chemical Characterization of Wear Debris (Clemson University) Water Quality Monitoring (ACCWP)
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Cleaning up the Lower Fox River Greg Hill, Wisconsin DNR Winnebago Project University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, May 23, 2008.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
TTWG Report & Technical Topics SRRTTF Meeting Dave Dilks March 16, 2016.
CHRIS ZADAK AND RACHEL OLMANSON, METR0-ST. CROIX WATERSHED UNIT WATERSHED RESTORATION AND PROTECTION STRATEGY.
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Task Force Activities We are working together on a new approach that identifies sources of PCBs and dioxins, directly applies a plan for reduction and.
AQUATOX v. 3.1 Host Institution/URL
Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting to the Chesapeake Executive Council January 22, 2017 Angela Haren Director of Advocacy & Baltimore Harbor Waterkeeper.
Elm Creek Watershed TMDL E. coli TMDL – Review of Preliminary Findings
Niagara River Area of Concern
Elizabeth River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
James River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
River Flow into Chesapeake Bay
Estimation of Loadings for Nonpoint Sources and Stormwater
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Vineyards and Water Quality
Presentation transcript:

BACKRIVER TMDL PROJECT Technical Outreach Prepared by MDE/TARSA Prepared for the Baltimore Harbor Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002

Maryland 303(d) list identification: The impairing substances on the (d) list:  Zn  Toxics (PCB)  Sampling data shows Zn is not a problem in Back River

Data Assessment  Data used include:  Physiographic data: describe the physical conditions of the watershed  Environmental Monitoring Data: identify potential pollutant sources and their contribution, and in-stream water quality monitoring data

Inventory of Data

General Trend for Monitoring to Estimate Loads Timing: Winter – wet and dry (Water and Sediment) Spring – wet and dry (Water and Sediment) Sampling for:  Storm Water Outfall/In-stream (NPDES)  Point Source Outfall/In-stream (DMR)  Stream Water Quality Data (mainstem & tributaries)  Boundaries  Sediment – Sediment Quality Triad (toxics)  Cross Section/Longitudinal

General Trend for Monitoring to Estimate Loads Number of samples  At least 1+1(QA/QC) samples per site, per event Substance list  Water column sample  Total, Dissolved, POC, DOC, TSS  Sediment Concentration  Total, Dissolved, AVS, SEM, foc  Sediment Toxicity/Benthic (toxics)

Modeling PCBs  The model and approach to develop the TMDL is influenced by the sources of impairment and type of impairment (PCB).  We looked outside traditional sources of water quality data as a new way to tackle a TMDL for potential “legacy pollutants”  There are no obvious point or nonpoint sources of the contaminant under the Clean Water Act

Watershed load Estimation Approach  3 methodologies considered: 1. Loads from potential source sites using the universal soil loss equation 2. Estimating loads on a subwatershed basis using flow data and average subwatershed PCB concentration 3. Estimating loads from TSS using SWMM

Toxic Modeling Framework for PCB Framework Under Consideration:  BACKTOX model developed by UVA (on-going project)  Bioaccumulation approach  Biota-Sediment Accumulation Factor

BACKTOX Model  3 different mass balances are represented 1. A water balance 2. A solids balance 3. Contaminants mass balances

BACKTOX Model Cont’d  It includes: 1. Hydrodynamic model – CH3D 2. Sediment transport model 3. Fate and transport model – Toxiwasp 4. Also included are sediment layers to account for sediment –water interactions.

BACKTOX Model Cont’d  Linkages:  Linkage to incorporate the hydrodynamic and sediment transport model results into the fate and transport model  Linking the watershed model to the fate and transport model

Bioaccumulation approach  Fish tissue levels are compared to the sediment criteria using Biota-Sediment Accumulation Factor (BSAF)  Tissue level= Sediment conc. *BSAF*unit conversion  Endpoint is based on risk-based PCB fish tissue consumption advisory

TMDL Status  Watershed Assessment (Source/Data Assessment) – Completed  Nonpoint/point source loads – in progress  Endpoint (BSAF) – in progress  Hydrodynamic/Sediment Transport Modeling – at final stage  Linkage – in progress  Toxic model – in progress