The New Performance Agreement Model June 13, 2012 KBOR Data Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Maryland Higher Education Commission BRAC Higher Education Investment Fund Technical Assistance Meeting June 21, 2010.
Advertisements

WIOA Timeline and Action Plan for States
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
Perkins Postsecondary Reserve Fund Grants WELDING PROGRAM OF STUDY.
COLLEGE SPARK WASHINGTON 2012 Community Grants Program LOI Webinar 9/27/2011 9:30 AM 9/28/2011 2:00 PM.
Performance Based Funding Formula. SSI History SSI Overview University Formula Performance Changes OTC Funding Formula 2.
COLLEGE SPARK WASHINGTON 2012 Community Grants Program Application Webinar 12/22/201110:00 AM 1/4/20122:00 PM.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
System Office Performance Management
WELCOME! We will begin our webinar at the top of the hour As you log on, do not be surprised if you don’t hear anyone else; participants are placed on.
EPortfolio Assessment Pilot. Agenda Purpose of the ePortfolio assessment pilot CSD use of ePortfolio English department use of ePortfolio Future applications.
Proposal Training.  What is Budgeting by Priorities?  How do I participate?  How do I write my proposals? ◦ Narrative Requirements ◦ Mechanics.
Performance Management Training Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget 1.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training
INNOVATION PROJECT PROGRESS
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Recommendations Overview Student Success Task Force.
Learning Outcomes Assessment in WEAVEonline
Student Services Support Program (SSSP) and Student Equity Plans ASCCC Leadership Institute 2015 Cheryl Aschenbach Cynthia Rico James Todd.
STUDENT ASSISTANCE LIAISON ONLINE QUARTERLY REPORTING Guidance On Understanding and Completing the Quarterly Reporting Form.
INNOVATION PROJECT PROGRESS Sept Innovation Management Project Status Project Name: Innovation Management Project Budget : Operational Budget 2010/11.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Charter School 2015 Annual Finance Seminar Grant Management Office of Grants Fiscal September 11, 2015.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
Charter Schools Authorized by the New York State Board of Regents: Performance Oversight – A New Approach New York State Education Department Charter School.
State Board of Education Meeting Race to the Top Update August 1, RTTT3 Overview Allocation of Funds (State and District) State-Level Activities.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
History-Higher Education 2004 Office of Campus Police and Security (OCPS) created excellent practices in the prevention of crime.
Draft TIP for E-rate. What is E-rate? The E-rate provides discounts to assist schools and libraries in the United States to obtain affordable telecommunications.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
October 2004 Strategy Forum Academic Quality Improvement Program The Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools.
AEBG Webinar September 25, Agenda for Today MOE & Consortia allocations update Governance Questions Adult Education Block Grant Reporting Toolkit.
SUS Performance Funding Institute for Academic Leadership Joe Glover October 2015.
1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Columbia Basin College Plenary I: Mission and Mission Fulfillment Rich Cummins Melissa McBurney 1.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Work Related to Senate Bill 2202 (effective January 1, 2001)
1 ND Community Call Gold Community 22 October 2015.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Preliminary Legislative Recommendations to the 85th Texas Legislature October 2015.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board THECB 10/2013.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Enrollment Formula Funding and Outcomes Funding
Outcome Metrics and Industry-Recognized Certification Reporting
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
World’s Best Workforce (WBWF)
Reporting the Course level RWR Assessment data
KCTCS Strategic Plan Update
THREE-YEAR LOCAL STRATEGIC PLANNING
Presented To: College Planning Council
Florida College System Performance Based Funding
Liberal Education & America’s Promise (LEAP) Workshop
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Presented To: College Planning Council
Presented To: College Planning Council
Presented To: College Planning Council
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Budgeting Conversation
Presentation transcript:

The New Performance Agreement Model June 13, 2012 KBOR Data Conference

Performance Agreements  In 1999, the Kansas legislature adopted d  Statute established performance agreements for public higher education institutions

Performance Agreements Statute gave Regents authority to:  review and approve agreements  provide technical assistance to institutions to develop, implement & revise agreements  annually determine the amount of new state funds awarded (if new state funds are allocated by the Legislature)

Foresight 2020  In 2010, the Kansas Board of Regents adopted Foresight 2020  Ten year strategic plan  Plan sets achievement goals that are measurable, reportable, and ensures the state’s higher education system meets Kansans’ expectations

Foresight 2020 Goals  Align Systems and Institutions  Increase Participation  Improve Retention and Graduation Rates  Enhance Student Success  Align with Kansas Workforce Needs  Ensure State University Excellence

Aligning Performance Agreements and Foresight 2020  In February of 2012, the Regents adopted a new model that aligns performance agreements with Foresight 2020

Performance Agreement Model

Misconceptions About New Model  Performance agreement reporting IS NOT Foresight 2020 reporting  Institutions, not Regents, choose indicators and set targets

Model for Community Colleges and Technical Colleges  Four sector-specific indicators  Three institution-specific indicators

Model for Community Colleges & Technical Colleges Sector-Specific Indicators were chosen by the community and technical colleges  1. Increase Distance Education  2. Increase Completion/Transfer  3. Increase Success in Initial College- level Writing Course  4. Increase STEM Completion/Transfer

Model for Community Colleges & Technical Colleges Institution-Specific Indicators  develop three indicators specific to the institution and which support Foresight 2020

Model for Universities  Sector-specific indicators (two required, third is optional)  Five institution-specific indicators (required)

Model for Universities Sector-Specific Indicators were chosen by the universities  1. Increase Student Success/Student Learning  2. Increase Diversity  3. Increase Research/Entrepreneurship/ Commercialization  4. Increase STEM Graduates

Model for Universities Sector-Specific Indicators  Institutions will have two or three sector- specific indicators  Include at least one, and up to two, indicators chosen from Indicators 1, 2 or 3  Indicator 4 is required

Model for Universities Institution-Specific Indicators  Universities required to develop five indicators specific to the institution and which support Foresight 2020  one of the five indicators must address Foresight 2020 Goal 6

Getting Started  Use a team approach to draft agreement  Though one person often writes the agreement, input about the indicators should be broad-based  Create buy-in across campus  Tailor indicators to fit institutional mission and purpose

Performance Agreement Form for Community and Technical Colleges

Two Year Institution Name Here Performance Agreement Contact Person: Phone and Date: 2 Yr Institution Name Here Foresight Goals 3yr History Outcome TargetActualTargetActualTargetActual insert distance education indicator here insert transfer/completion indicator here insert college level writing indicator here insert STEM indicator here insert institutional indicator here insert institutional indicator here insert institutional indicator here **Once form is completed, it must fit on one page***

Using Form  At top of the form, fill out institution name, contact person, contact name and and date  Place cursor inside each gray box and begin typing  Indicators should be objective, quantifiable, and measurable

Using Form  Indicator 1 Increasing distance education  Choose a specific distance education indicator for institution  Indicate which Foresight 2020 goal or goals this indicator supports

Using Form  Fill out the three-year history section – include numerator and denominator if history is expressed as a percent  If there is not a history, put N/A

Using Form  Fill out targets for 2013, 2014 and 2015  Include numerator and denominator if targets are expressed as a percent  Targets should be expressed in a percentage or numerical form  Outcome section is for reporting on performance so will be blank

Using Form  Indicators involving students may be disaggregate by sub-population  Make sure chosen population is not too small  Institutions may disaggregate other indicators as appropriate  Follow the same process for the remaining sector-specific indicators

Using Form  Indicator 2 Increase Completion/Transfer Institution selects population or sub-population to measure Institution decides whether to measure completion, transfer, or both

Using Form  Indicator 3 Increase Success in Initial College-Level Writing Institution selects population or sub-population to measure Institution selects measurement instrument and/or method

Using Form  Indicator 4 Increase STEM Completion/ Transfer Institution determines how to define STEM and what programs to include Institution selects population or sub-population to measure Institution decides whether to measure completion, transfer, or both

Using Form  Indicators 5, 6 and 7  The three institution-specific indicators should support Foresight 2020  Indicators should support institution’s mission in addition to supporting Foresight 2020

Performance Agreement Form for Universities

University Name Here Performance Agreement Contact Person: Phone and Date: University Name Here Foresigh t Goals 3yr History Outcome TargetActualTargetActualTargetActual insert required sector-specific indicator here insert optional sector-specific indicator here if chosen; leave blank otherwise insert required Increasing STEM graduates sector- specific indicator here insert institution-specific indicator here; it must support Foresight 2020 Goal 6 6 insert institution-specific indicator here insert institution-specific indicator here insert institution-specific indicator here insert institution-specific indicator here **Once form is completed it must fit on one page***

Using Form  At top of the form fill out institution name, contact person, contact name and and date  Place cursor inside each gray box and begin typing  Indicators should be objective, quantifiable, and measurable

Using Form  Indicator 1 (required)  Indicator must address the topic of student success/learning, diversity or research/ commercialization/entrepreneurship  Within that framework, institution selects population, sub-population, program, topic or area, (etc.) to measure

Using Form  Indicate which Foresight 2020 goal or goals this indicator supports  Fill out the three-year history section – include numerator and denominator if history is expressed as a percent  If there is not a history, put N/A

Using Form  Fill out targets for 2013, 2014 and 2015  Include numerator and denominator if targets are expressed as a percent  Targets should be expressed in a percentage or numerical form  Outcome section is for reporting on performance so will be blank

Using Form  Indicators involving students may be disaggregate by sub-population  Make sure chosen population is not too small  Institutions may disaggregate other indicators as appropriate  Follow the same process for the remaining indicators

Using Form  Indicator 2 is optional  If selected, indicator must address topic of student success/learning, diversity or research/commercialization/ entrepreneurship  Topic chosen must differ from the topic chosen in Indicator 1

Using Form  If an institution does not choose indicator 2, Board staff will delete this section and renumber the indicators once the draft agreement is submitted

Using Form  Indicator 3 Increase STEM Graduates Institution determines how to define STEM and what programs to include Institution selects population or sub-population to measure Indicator is required

Using Form  Indicator 4 is institution specific, but must address Foresight 2020 Goal 6  Indicators should support institution’s mission in addition to supporting Foresight 2020 Goal 6  Indicator is required

Using Form  Indicators 5, 6 7 and 8 are institution- specific  Indicators are required  They should support Foresight 2020  Indicators should also support institution’s mission

Developing Narrative

Using Narrative Template  Keep audience in mind Regents Trustees (technical & community colleges) Legislators Campus community members  Some may have limited knowledge of higher education

Using Narrative Template  Be clear and concise  Limit to narrative for each indicator to one paragraph  Limit the total narrative to two pages  Explain acronyms and avoid jargon  Use 11 or 12 point font and ½ to 1 inch margins

Using Narrative Template  Include the following elements in the narrative Description of indicator, including the data collected Rationale for selecting indicator How indicator will be accomplished

Tips on Narrative  Keep a notebook detailing how the data was collected, who collected it and what elements were included  This will ensure the same elements are included in the measurement from year to year

Common Questions

 Q. Why are agreements on a three-year cycle?  A. The statute specifies that agreements must be renewed at least every three years

Common Questions  Q. Why are agreements on a calendar year instead of an academic year?  A. Using an academic year would cause a six month delay in an institution’s ability to access new funds

Comparison of Calendar vs. Academic Year Calendar Year  Reports due March 1  BAASC reviews in April and May  Board approval June  Funding distributed in July Academic Year  Reports due September 1  BAASC reviews in October and November  Board approval December  Funding distributed in January

Common Questions  Q. Can we pull data from KSPSD for the agreement?  A. KBOR is implementing a new Business Intelligence tool, which will be demonstrated at the June KBOR data conference. Full implementation is estimated in Spring or Summer of 2013.

Common Questions – 2yr sector only  Q. How do Perkins core indicators of performance relate to performance agreements?  A. Performance on Perkins core indicators affect the awarding of Perkins funding. Institutions are not required to incorporate Perkins core indicators into their performance agreements, but may choose to do so.

Common Questions – 2yr sector only  Q. How do Outcome Metrics relate to performance agreements?  A. The goal of outcome metrics is to determine program eligibility for tiered and nontiered state funding. Institutions are not required to incorporate outcome metrics into their performance agreements, but may choose to do so.

Thank you!