1 Modeling 2 Handouts! Please sign in! in Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Willing to spend the time! Self motivated! Self responsibility! (If you need something Ask For IT!!!!!) Ability to communicate! (Vocabulary) Write,
Advertisements

Inquiry-Based Instruction
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Understanding by Design Stage 3
E-Learning Models Desk Study Chris Fowler. Purpose To explain our current thinking and specification of the E-Learning Models Advisor.
Leading Australian Curriculum: Science Day 1. Australian Curriculum PURPOSE OF 4 DAY MODULES Curriculum leaders develop capacity to lead change and support.
Department of Mathematics and Science
SENIOR SEMINARS Specifics & Example Performances CEPR Center for Educational Policy Research.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Learning Outcomes, Authentic Assessments and Rubrics Erin Hagar
The ABCs of Assessment Improving Student Learning Through New Approaches to Classroom Assessment.
Learning Teaching Enhancing Supporting Sharing ISLN March, 2015.
Understanding the Research Base Presentation to CSSS October 1, 2011.
Leadership for Learning
Digging into the Instructional Design Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez MTL Session, September 20, 2011.
Fostering Algebraic Thinking October 26  December 2  6-hour Assignment after Session 2  January 20 Presented by: Janna Smith
Consistency of Assessment
MARZANO’S HIGH YIELD STRATEGIES
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Exploring mathematical models using technology and its impact on pedagogical mathematics knowledge by Jennifer Suh George Mason University Presentation.
Education of English Conversation
THE PRINCIPLE OF ALIGNMENT EDA 122. ALIGNMENT OUTCOMES PROCESS.
Determining Essential Learnings or Essential Outcomes September 14, 2010.
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
Using formative assessment. Aims of the session This session is intended to help us to consider: the reasons for assessment; the differences between formative.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
Communicating Ocean Sciences to Informal Audiences (COSIA) Session 3 Teaching & Learning.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Central concepts:  Assessment can measure habits of mind or habits of recall.  Tests have their limits.  It is important to know the purpose the test.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
RUBRICS: A REFRESHER COURSE PRINCESS ANNE MIDDLE SCHOOL STAFF WEEK TRAINING, AUGUST 2014.
TEA Science Workshop #3 October 1, 2012 Kim Lott Utah State University.
Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
Big Idea 1: The Practice of Science Description A: Scientific inquiry is a multifaceted activity; the processes of science include the formulation of scientifically.
TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
MY E-PORFOLIO. ¨Evaluation¨… What I know…What I want to know…What I learned… -Process/formative vs product/summative evaluation -Necessary to make changes.
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
Adriana Signorini, CRTE, SATAL Coordinator Greg Dachner, SSHA, SATAL Student Sharai Kirk, SSHA, SATAL Student How do we know our students are learning?
Welcome to AP Biology Mr. Levine Ext. # 2317.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Developing a Learning Progression for Scientific Modeling: Making Scientific Modeling Accessible and Meaningful for Learners Christina V. Schwarz, Brian.
Lesson Planning SIOP.
Science Pacing and Content Earth Space Science Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor 8/9-8/16/101.
CT 854: Assessment and Evaluation in Science & Mathematics
Crysten Caviness Curriculum Management Specialist Birdville ISD.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs Philosophy National 5.
Learning Progressions for Modeling Processes. Supporting students’ understanding of the intellectual and material work of science 1. Organizing what we.
Supporting Students’ Academic Success What is within our locus of control? Kay M. Sagmiller, Ph. D.
Introduction to Earth Science Section 2 Section 2: Science as a Process Preview Key Ideas Behavior of Natural Systems Scientific Methods Scientific Measurements.
Reading Strategies To Improve Comprehension Empowering Gifted Children.
Effective Teaching Strategies Day 2
1 Modeling in MS Science. 2 ANNOUNCEMENTS Q3 Assessments, scantrons due back Apr 13 th end of day (drop off at security if needed) Q4 Assessments: May.
Models and analogies. Where models and analogies are useful in teaching  Objects that are too big, e.g. solar system  Objects that are too small or.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
The Learning Cycle as a Model for Science Teaching Reading Assignment Chapter 5 in Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a Starting Point.
M= Math in STEM College and Career Ready- Conference Summer, 2015.
Goals 1. To understand inquiry 2. To learn about inquiry-based science 3. To compare children’s science and scientists’ science. 4. To compare two methods.
Science and Engineering Practices K–2 Condensed Practices3–5 Condensed Practices6–8 Condensed Practices9–12 Condensed Practices Developing and Using Models.
Evaluating the Alignment and Quality of the Written, Taught, and Tested Curriculum Written Taught Test Curriculum Presented By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell.
What is Inquiry in Science?. Goals 1. To understand nature of science as inquiry 2. To learn about inquiry as a model of teaching 3. To compare inquiry.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
CHAPTER 5 Transfer of Training.
Why Change How We Teach?. 2 The “Modeling Chemistry” Approach to Science Teaching Cheryl Litman.
Conceptual Change Theory
OSEP Leadership Conference July 28, 2015 Margaret Heritage, WestEd
Section 2: Science as a Process
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
Presentation transcript:

1 Modeling 2 Handouts! Please sign in! in Science

2 ANNOUNCEMENTS Q4 Assessments: May be longer (summative) and include questions from Q1-3. Feedback welcome. Continue to check for announcements on PD, summer sessions. CT Science Center free (not paid) workshop on Science Inquiry, last week of July?, Peabody 8 th grade geology workshop, 5 th grade astronomy, etc

3 Q4 pacing: Phychem: elect/energy, end with forum Bio: open, but structure/function, end with some project? Chem: reactions, applications, gas, organic Physics: energy: light/sound

4 Need help with data for TVAL? AP Training: available for lots of teachers DEP Commiss, wants to “ teach in ”, PhyChem, Cross, May 9 or May 16 9am

5 Next year: no openings likely until June, but possible 3 ms gen science, 1 hs biology (eng), 1 hs chemistry/phy chem (HSC), magnet resource BioMed (Hyde).. Talk to me if you have a reason for requesting a transfer. remember, best interests of the school system. MATERIALS/SUPPLIES:Make sure to make a list, use Frey, Fisher, etc and give to admins before the end of the year! May 10 drop off, May 11 Science Fair 9-12 (I do buses), Awards May 12 SRC forms for projects? Bacteria/humans

6 Why Science Follow up discussion: last time Reviewed goals of science education, jobs, how it aligns to courses and offerings in the district/your school. What skills, concepts we choose to emphasize in the science courses

7 Where to go from here Survey of anonymous views… Feedback to principals, guidance, etc.. On course selection and requirements. Changes in course offerings? Changes in focus of course content, skills, grading?

8 TODAY ’ S DISCUSSION How do students learn from models, diagrams, maps? What are some of the issues that research tells us about science learning and models? What are some of the ways we explicitly teach students modeling and how to learn from models?

9 Modeling construction and test of representations that serve as analogues to systems in the real world representations can be of many forms useful in summarizing known features and predicting outcomes

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17 Modeling concepts models as representations of causal or explanatory ideas, there can be multiple models of the same thing, models do not need to be exactly like the thing modeled, models can be revised or changed in light of new data

18 Modeling Modeling: recognize data patterns create models to account for phenomena identify components of model design experiments to test models assess models for data fit and consistency revise models based on additional data (model extension) / effect to cause reasoning use model to make prediction

19

20 Student Issues with models models are not copies; they are deliberate simplifications Error is a component of all models development of specific representational forms and notations role of geometry and visualization

21 Children Model views Level 1: models merely copies of the world Level 2 : models involve both the selection and omission of features, but emphasis remains on the models themselves rather than on the scientists ideas behind the model. Level 3: models were regarded as tools developed for the purpose of testing theories A learning progression for understanding models as generative tools for predicting and explaining

22 4Students construct and use models spontaneously in a range of domains to help their own thinking. Students consider how the world could behave according to various models. Students construct and use models to generate new questions about the behavior or existence of phenomena. 3Students construct and use multiple models to explain and predict more aspects of a group of related phenomena. Students view models as tools that can support their thinking about existing and new phenomena. Students consider alternatives in constructing models based on analyses of the different advantages and weakness for explaining and predicting these alternative models possess. 2Students construct and use a model to illustrate and explain how a phenomenon occurs, consistent with the evidence about the phenomenon. Students view models as a means of communicating their understanding of a phenomenon rather than a tool to support their own thinking. 1Students construct and use models that show literal illustrations of a single phenomenon. Students do not view a model as tool to generate new knowledge, but do see models as a means of showing others what the phenomenon looks like.

23 Data Modeling what professionals do data are constructed to answer questions Data are inherently a form of abstraction data are represented in various ways

24 Scale Models, Diagrams, and Maps make it possible for students to visualize objects or processes depends on the complexity of the relationships

25 Diagrams comprehensibility of diagrams three reasons why diagrams miscommunicate: some do not include explanatory information (illustrative or not explanatory), lack a causal chain, fail to map the explanation to a familiar context.

26 Maps preserve some analog qualities of the space omit or alter features of the landscape easier to represent objects than to represent large-scale space struggle with orientation, perspective

27 Designing Models Task: designing a model that works like a human elbow (Penner et al., 1997). three consecutive 1-hour sessions. Discussed different types of models they had previously seen or made. Considered the characteristics of those models, and how models are used for understanding phenomena. Introduced to the task of de-signing a model that functions like their elbow. Discussed how their own elbows work, Worked in pairs or triads to design and build models that illustrated the functional aspects of the human elbow. Generated an initial model, then each group demonstrated and explained their model to the class followed by discussion of the various models. Modified their models or started over. In interviews conducted after the session, students improved in their ability to judge the functional rather than perceptual qualities of models com pared with non-modeling peers. Also demonstrated an understanding of the process of modeling in general that was similar to that of children 3 to 4 years older.

28

29

30 Teacher’s Role Provides historical examples of very important people changing their views and explanations over time Begins to use students’ external representations of their thinking as a way of evaluating their ideas/ beliefs (in terms of intelligibility, plausibility, and fruitfulness) in order to (a) create, when necessary, dissatisfaction in the minds of the learner to facilitate conceptual exchange or (b) look for ways of promoting conceptual capture in the mind of the learner SOURCE: Smith et al. (2000).

31 Students’ Role Begin to consider the implications and limitations of their personal thinking Begin to look for ways of revising their personal thinking Begin to evaluate their own/others’ thinking in terms of intelligibility, plausibility, and fruitfulness of ideas Continue to articulate criteria for acceptance of ideas (i.e., consistency and generalizability) Continue to employ physical representations of their thinking Begin to employ analogies and metaphors, discuss their explicit use, and differentiate physical models from conceptual models Articulate and defend ideas about what learning should be like

32

33