AGIS 2004 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 1 The European Arrest Warrant Project A short overview of Project JAI/2004/AGIS/043.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Judicial Network The EJN website:
Advertisements

EUROPEAN INITIATIVES IN THE FIELD OF MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION NEW LEGAL MECHANISM FOR CREATING AN AREA OF FREEDOM,
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
European Commission Conference on Stimulating European Judicial training Fátima Adélia Martins Secretary to the European Judicial Network (EJN) in Criminal.
State of play and activities in 2014 March 2014
Purpose MLA and extradition (and other forms of international judicial cooperation) with 3rd countries is part of the external policy of the Union Purpose.
NEW EXISTING TOOLS FOR ENHANCING INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL COOPERATION WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION Towards a new generation of mutual legal assistance mechanisms.
The Area of Liberty, Security and Justice. Objectives Free movement for EU citizens Security and safety in a Europe without borders Figth against international.
Slide 1/15 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
Eurojust The European Union’s Judicial Cooperation Unit.
Judicial reform in Montenegro in the scope of the European Union integration process The road forward and the steps taken Ms. Branka Lakočević Deputy Minister.
THE EU FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRATION Didier Boone BE National Contact Point on Integration to the European Commission Brussels Regional Parliament - June 8th.
1 Substantive criminal law and mutual recognition Hans G. NILSSON, Jur Dr h.c. Head of Division Criminal justice Council of the European Union.
The transition to surrender procedures based on a European Arrest Warrant Wouter van Ballegooij LLM TMC Asser Instituut The Hague.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
Privacy and security: Is Europe going banana? Jean-Marc Van Gyseghem Head of Unit « Liberties in the information society » CRID – University.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE Counsellor, docent, Dr Tuomas Pöysti1 The Constitutionalisation and Evolution of Penal Law and Control Policy in the European.
Delegations III KAM, Bratislava 4th to 8th September 2013.
EU Criminal Law Introduction, Lisbon Treaty. EU criminal legislation EU cannot adopt a general EU criminal code EU cannot adopt a general EU criminal.
6 December 2010 Judicial cooperation in the EU From mutual legal assistance to mutual recognition Adrienne Boerwinkel Senior Legal Adviser Dutch Ministry.
Delegations IV KAM Prague 3rd to 7th September 2014.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
Migration Law Schengen Information System by Konrad Wilk.
UNITS 1 and 2: THE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL AREA IN CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS. THE JUDGE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL AREA Joaquín Delgado.
European arrest warrant and equality of treatment of EU citizens: Croatian example Elizabeta Ivičević Karas University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
M O D U L O IV M O D U L E IV. THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION.
Digitalization of courts in the context of mutual assistance in criminal matters Dr Arkadiusz Lach Department of Criminal Procedure University of Nicolaus.
Welcome to Maastricht University. Faculty of Law Oral v. written evidence in the European Union Prof. André Klip Maastricht University, Ravenna 14 May.
Corporate crime prevention project and Best practices manual Dr. Wybe Th. Douma T.M.C. Asser Institute, The Hague.
European civil procedure law Judicial cooperation in civil matters.
Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA Cooperation between Romania, Ireland and Italy to support the implementation of the Council Framework Decision.
The judge in the European Judicial Area: Civil and Commercial matters. (9 th edition )
November 10, 2010 Washington, D.C.. Criminal Matters Network Secure Component Communication tool with a focus on collaborative and secure work Secure.
Moving Forward With the African Dialogue Cross-Border Principles By Mary Gurure Manager, Legal Services and Compliance COMESA Competition Commission Lilongwe,
SECI Regional Center for Combating Transborder Crime 22. – 23. June 2010 Bucharest, Romania.
EUROJUST EUROJUST Veronika Keller Seconded National Expert for the National Member for Germany (Eurojust)
PRISON HEALTH IN EUROPE: MISSIONS, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS Strasbourg, France 27 th May 2014.
Documentary holdings of the European Union law AL.
Anti-Fraud Strategies
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT PROJECT ECBA-Conference Vienna, 1 st October 2005 Han Jahae Marelle Attinger.
Fight against terrorism. EU institutional/legal framework A bit of history 1957: European Communities are born.
PROJECT INITIATIVES under the FUND FOR BILATERAL RELATIONS OF PROGRAMME BG 14 “JUDICIAL CAPACITY-BUILDING AND COOPERATION” OF THE NORWEGIAN FINANCIAL MECHANISM.
Living in an area of freedom, security and justice European CommissionDirectorate-General Justice and Home affairs.
The Hemispheric Network for Legal Cooperation in Criminal Matters of the OAS/REMJA "CRIMINAL MATTERS NETWORK"
European Arrest Warrant – Actual Challenges
The Court of Justice of the European Union and its case law in the area of civil justice European Commission specific programme “Civil Justice” project.
What is SEEPAG? The Southeast European Prosecutors Advisory Group is a judicial mechanism for international cooperation, having the mission to facilitate.
Reporting of EJN activities November 2014 Rome 43 rd Plenary meeting of the EJN.
CRIMINAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 1 April 2015 THE LISBON TREATY AND CRIMINAL LAW Dr. sc. Zoran Burić Department of Criminal Procedural Law University.
Experience of Slovenia in implementation of European Arrest Warrant
1 European Evidence Warrant Mutual recognition and judicial co- operation in criminal matters in the EU Jarlath Spellman Irish National Member Eurojust.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign, Security and.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign and Security Policy.
MOSCOW, NOVEMBER 2007 JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION PROF DR JAAP W. DE ZWAAN DIRECTOR ‘CLINGENDAEL’ AND PROFESSOR OF EU LAW THE NETHERLANDS.
Lost in Translations – An Examination of the Legal & Practical Problems Associated with the Implementation (or Non-Implementation) of Directive 2010/64/EU.
MOSCOW, NOVEMBER 2007 ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION LAW AND POLICY OF THE EU PROF DR JAAP W. DE ZWAAN DIRECTOR ‘CLINGENDAEL’ AND PROFESSOR OF EU LAW THE NETHERLANDS.
Procedural Safeguards in Criminal Proceedings in the European Union in Practice Estella Baker Professor of European Criminal Law & Justice
CROSS BORDER GATHERING EVIDENCE
JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE EU
Dr. Željko Karas Police College, Zagreb (Croatia)
DIRECTOR ‘CLINGENDAEL’ AND PROFESSOR OF EU LAW
November 10, 2010 Washington, D.C.
Directive 2016/800 on procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings Steven Cras Political Administrator, General Secretariat.
Overview Bitola, November 22-24, 2016.
EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENSHIP
STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF CO-OPERATION
Task force on Crime data availability
Enhancing the Right to be
Presentation transcript:

AGIS 2004 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June The European Arrest Warrant Project A short overview of Project JAI/2004/AGIS/043

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Introduction Recognition of existence of a single law enforcement area Recognition of existence of a single law enforcement area  Area of Freedom, Security and Justice Enhancement of judicial cooperation in criminal matters. Enhancement of judicial cooperation in criminal matters. Replace within Europe with open borders existing extradition procedures by surrender procedures Replace within Europe with open borders existing extradition procedures by surrender procedures Introduce “new approach” of mutual recognition based on mutual trust Introduce “new approach” of mutual recognition based on mutual trust Establish direct contacts between “issuing” and “executing” judicial authorities; end involvement of administration Establish direct contacts between “issuing” and “executing” judicial authorities; end involvement of administration

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Introduction Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States. Part of a general programme to implement mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters Part of a general programme to implement mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters Implementation accelerated following events of 11 September 2001 Implementation accelerated following events of 11 September 2001

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Introduction Explicit objectives of the Framework Decision: Expedition and simplification of extradition procedures Expedition and simplification of extradition procedures (max. 90 days duration) Establishment of direct contacts between judicial authorities Establishment of direct contacts between judicial authorities Introduction of standard form to obtain surrender Introduction of standard form to obtain surrender  The European Arrest Warrant Suppression of double criminality requirement for 32 categories of crimes Suppression of double criminality requirement for 32 categories of crimes

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Introduction Implicit objectives of the Framework Decision: Reduce involvement of national politicians Reduce involvement of national politicians Trust in common level of human rights protection in all Trust in common level of human rights protection in all Member States Abolition of the nationality exception Abolition of the nationality exception

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 The EAW Project “Triggers” for the project: Framework Decision Framework Decision Handbook European Arrest Warrant Handbook European Arrest Warrant Specific problems addressed by the project: Framework Decision is first instrument to apply the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters Framework Decision is first instrument to apply the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters Radical change in judicial cooperation due to mutual recognition Radical change in judicial cooperation due to mutual recognition Status and enforcement of third pillar legislation Status and enforcement of third pillar legislation

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Project partners JUSTICE, London JUSTICE, London Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, Freiburg Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, Freiburg Faculty of Law, University of Lund, Lund Faculty of Law, University of Lund, Lund European Criminal Bar Association (ECBA), London/Maastricht European Criminal Bar Association (ECBA), London/Maastricht Amsterdam Centre for International Law (University of Amsterdam), Amsterdam Amsterdam Centre for International Law (University of Amsterdam), Amsterdam Ministry of Justice of Romania, Bucharest Ministry of Justice of Romania, Bucharest T.M.C. Asser Instituut, The Hague T.M.C. Asser Instituut, The Hague Centre of Information Services for MP ’ s of the National Library of Estonia, Tallinn Centre of Information Services for MP ’ s of the National Library of Estonia, Tallinn

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Project supporters & experts Supporters: Eurojust, The Hague Eurojust, The Hague International Association of Prosecutors, The Hague International Association of Prosecutors, The Hague Association Internationale de Droit Penal, Vienna Association Internationale de Droit Penal, Vienna Centre of Research in Criminal Sciences Fernand Boulan, Aix- en-Provence Centre of Research in Criminal Sciences Fernand Boulan, Aix- en-ProvenceExperts: Active network of experts in 24 out of 25 Member States (exception: Malta) plus: Active network of experts in 24 out of 25 Member States (exception: Malta) plus: Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, Norway and Switzerland. Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, Norway and Switzerland.

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Project objectives (1) Set up network of experts in Member States, provide project with systematic analysis of implementation of Framework Decision on European Arrest Warrant, relevant national case law, and practice Set up network of experts in Member States, provide project with systematic analysis of implementation of Framework Decision on European Arrest Warrant, relevant national case law, and practice Present systematic overview (in English) of relevant national (implementation) legislation and practice in Member States, candidate countries, and Schengen partners Present systematic overview (in English) of relevant national (implementation) legislation and practice in Member States, candidate countries, and Schengen partners Create platform for discussion and exchange of information Create platform for discussion and exchange of information

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Project objectives (2) Increase knowledge regarding Increase knowledge regarding  implementation of the Framework decision on the European Arrest Warrant in the Member States  preparations in candidate countries  relations with Schengen partners (esp. Norway, Iceland) Increase knowledge regarding functioning of surrender procedures based on European Arrest Warrant in the 25 Member States Increase knowledge regarding functioning of surrender procedures based on European Arrest Warrant in the 25 Member States

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Project means Acquisition and publication of relevant legislation, official documents, case law, articles and commentaries Acquisition and publication of relevant legislation, official documents, case law, articles and commentaries Send out standard Questionnaire to correspondents, resulting in country reports Send out standard Questionnaire to correspondents, resulting in country reports Provide standard form for reporting and publishing of case law Provide standard form for reporting and publishing of case law Provide tools for comparative law analysis Provide tools for comparative law analysis

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Project results Website with: Country-reports received from 19 out of 25 Member States Country-reports received from 19 out of 25 Member States National implementation legislation for 25 Member States National implementation legislation for 25 Member States Official documents Official documents Case law from several Member States and the European Court of Justice Case law from several Member States and the European Court of Justice Articles and commentaries Articles and commentaries

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 General observations (1) Surrender procedures based on a European Arrest Warrant are in place in 24 out of 25 Member States Surrender procedures based on a European Arrest Warrant are in place in 24 out of 25 Member States In some Member States constitutional issues have arisen, resulting in necessary changes of the Constitution or annulment of national implementation legislation In some Member States constitutional issues have arisen, resulting in necessary changes of the Constitution or annulment of national implementation legislation In practice executing judicial authorities in certain Member States varify whether box was correctly ticked In practice executing judicial authorities in certain Member States varify whether box was correctly ticked

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 General observations (2) Two main goals of Framework decision on the European Arrest Warrant, that is to Two main goals of Framework decision on the European Arrest Warrant, that is to  Simplify procedures  Expedite procedures prove a success with average duration of procedure reduced from 9 months to 1,5 months Some Member States limit the scope of sensitive list items. For instance, no surrender for ‘murder’ in case of abortion. Some Member States limit the scope of sensitive list items. For instance, no surrender for ‘murder’ in case of abortion.

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 General observations (3) Direct contacts between judicial authorities but administration seems to remain involved in certain Member States at least Direct contacts between judicial authorities but administration seems to remain involved in certain Member States at least The double criminality requirement is abolished in the legislation of most Member States The double criminality requirement is abolished in the legislation of most Member States In practice however, a double criminality check is reintroduced regarding nationals and maintained for sensitive list items In practice however, a double criminality check is reintroduced regarding nationals and maintained for sensitive list items

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 General observations (4) The legislation and practice of certain Member States suggest less than unconditional trust in the warranting of human rights in the requesting Member State The legislation and practice of certain Member States suggest less than unconditional trust in the warranting of human rights in the requesting Member State There now exists an almost complete collection of documents and information, including some otherwise sometimes very difficult to find There now exists an almost complete collection of documents and information, including some otherwise sometimes very difficult to find

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 Tendencies & Expectations Problems remain but in general the EAW procedure is functioning Problems remain but in general the EAW procedure is functioning Second Commission report on the implementation of the Framework Decision expected this month Second Commission report on the implementation of the Framework Decision expected this month The project website will be maintained and updated, also after project ends The project website will be maintained and updated, also after project ends New proposal made under AGIS Builds on existing project, continued collaboration with network of experts New proposal made under AGIS Builds on existing project, continued collaboration with network of experts > new proposal will be “real” research project

AGIS EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June 2006 The European Arrest Warrant - The Reality of a Vision 16 & 17 June 2006