LHD における IRVB を用いた プラズマ輻射計測の現状 (3 次元輻射計測の開発 ) Ryuichi Sano 1, Byron J. Peterson 2, Masaru Teranishi 3, Naofumi Iwama 2, Masahiro Kobayashi 2, Kiyofumi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
微視的核構造反応模型を用いた 9Li 原子核の励起状態の研究
9th TTF Spain September 11, 2002 B. J. Peterson, NIFS, Japan page 1 Radiative Collapse and Density Limit in the Large Helical Device.
6th Japan Korea workshop July 2011, NIFS, Toki-city Japan Edge impurity transport study in stochastic layer of LHD and scrape-off layer of HL-2A.
Soft x-ray tomography on HT-7 tokamak K.Y. Chen, L.Q. Hu, Y.M. Duan HT-7.
DPP 2006 Reduction of Particle and Heat Transport in HSX with Quasisymmetry J.M. Canik, D.T.Anderson, F.S.B. Anderson, K.M. Likin, J.N. Talmadge, K. Zhai.
Design and tomography test of edge multi-energy soft X-ray diagnostics on KSTAR PPPL, Feb. 18, 2014 Juhyeok Jang*, Seung Hun Lee, H. Y. Lee, Joohwan Hong,
COMPUTER MODELING OF LASER SYSTEMS
Structure from motion.
Sub-THz Component of Large Solar Flares Emily Ulanski December 9, 2008 Plasma Physics and Magnetohydrodynamics.
Structure from motion. Multiple-view geometry questions Scene geometry (structure): Given 2D point matches in two or more images, where are the corresponding.
13th IEA/RFP Workshop – Stockholm October 9-11, D characterization of thermal core topology changes in controlled RFX-mod QSH states A. Alfier on.
European Joint PhD Programme, Lisboa, Diagnostics of Fusion Plasmas Tomography Ralph Dux.
Integrated Effects of Disruptions and ELMs on Divertor and Nearby Components Valeryi Sizyuk Ahmed Hassanein School of Nuclear Engineering Center for Materials.
March 26, 2008Janos Marki: ELM-induced divertor heat loads1/11 ELM-induced divertor heat loads on TCV J. Marki, R. A. Pitts and TCV Team 2008 Annual Meeting.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
tomos = slice, graphein = to write
Imaging Diagnostics at the H-1 National Plasma Fusion Research Facility Left: The coherence tomography system Above: Plasma emission reconstructions compared.
Basic principles Geometry and historical development
Measurements with the KSTAR Beam Emission Spectroscopy diagnostic system Máté Lampert Wigner Research Centre for Physics Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
RFX-mod Workshop – Padova, January Experimental QSH confinement and transport Fulvio Auriemma on behalf of RFX-mod team Consorzio RFX, Euratom-ENEA.
THEORETICAL STUDY OF SOUND FIELD RECONSTRUCTION F.M. Fazi P.A. Nelson.
Vacuum Photodiodes for Soft X-Ray ITER Tomography Yu.Gott, M.Stepanenko 10th ITPA Meeting, Moscow, 2006.
Recent Results from the STOR-M Tokamak A.Hirose, M. Dreval, S. Elgriw, O. Mitarai(1), A. Pant, M. Peng(2), D. Rohraff, A.K. Singh(3), D. Trembach, C. Xiao.
- 1 - Radiation process of carbon ions in JT-60U detached divertor plasmas O-26(15+3min.) 29May2008 Spain Japan Atomic Energy Agency T. Nakano,
Kaschuck Yu.A., Krasilnikov A.V., Prosvirin D.V., Tsutskikh A.Yu. SRC RF TRINITI, Troitsk, Russia Status of the divertor neutron flux monitor design and.
ASIPP EAST Overview Of The EAST In Vessel Components Upgraded Presented by Damao Yao.
Model prediction of impurity retention in ergodic layer and comparison with edge carbon emission in LHD (Impurity retention in the ergodic layer of LHD)
Simulation Study on behaviors of a detachment front in a divertor plasma: roles of the cross-field transport Makoto Nakamura Prof. Y. Ogawa, S. Togo, M.
The study of MARFE during long pulse discharges in the HT-7 tokamak W.Gao, X.Gao, M.Asif, Z.W.Wu, B.L.Ling, and J.G.Li Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese.
A Singular Value Decomposition Method For Inverting Line Integrated Electron Density Measurements in Magnetically Confined Plasma Christopher Carey, The.
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP E ~ 0 V/m in Locked Discharges Average potential ~ 580 V  ~ V less than in standard rotating plasmas Drop in potential.
1 B. C. Stratton, S. von Goeler, J. Robinson, and L. E. Zakharov Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey, USA D. Stutman and K. Tritz.
第16回 若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 JAEA
1 C. E. Bush (ORNL), B. C. Stratton, S. von Goeler, J. Robinson, L. E. Zakharov, E. Fredrickson (PPPL) D. Stutman and K. Tritz (JHU) and the NSTX Team.
14 Oct. 2009, S. Masuzaki 1/18 Edge Heat Transport in the Helical Divertor Configuration in LHD S. Masuzaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Murase, T. Morisaki, N. Ohyabu,
Pellet Charge Exchange Measurement in LHD & ITER ITPA Tohoku Univ. Tetsuo Ozaki, P.Goncharov, E.Veschev 1), N.Tamura, K.Sato, D.Kalinina and.
Supported by Imaging the Pedestal Island Structure during the Application of 3D Magnetic Perturbations Office of Science D.J. Battaglia 1*, M.W. Shafer.
Plasma-wall interactions during high density operation in LHD
Doc.: IEEE /0431r0 Submission April 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Polarization Model for 60 GHz Date: Authors:
Characteristics of SVD in ST Plasma Shape Reproduction Method Based on CCS Kazuo NAKAMURA 1, Shinji MATSUFUJI 2, Masashi TOMODA 2, Feng WANG 3, Osamu MITARAI.
Absolute neutron yield measurement using divertor NFM Kaschuck Yu.A., Krasilnikov A.V., Prosvirin D.V., Tsutskikh A.Yu. SRC RF TRINITI, Troitsk, Russia.
Hiroshi Tojo, IAEA TM/ISTW2008, Frascati, Italy, October 2008 Features of High Frequency Mode during Internal Reconnection Events on MAST Graduate School.
47th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 24-28, 2005, Denver, Colorado ECE spectrum of HSX plasma at 0.5 T K.M.Likin, H.J.Lu, D.T.Anderson,
Effect of Energetic-Ion/Bulk-Plasma- driven MHD Instabilities on Energetic Ion Loss in the Large Helical Device Kunihiro OGAWA, Mitsutaka ISOBE, Kazuo.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 13 – November 18, 2011, Salt Lake City, UT Laser Blow-Off Impurity Injection Experiments.
Presented by Yuji NAKAMURA at US-Japan JIFT Workshop “Theory-Based Modeling and Integrated Simulation of Burning Plasmas” and 21COE Workshop “Plasma Theory”
Neutral beam ion loss measurement and modeling for NSTX D. S. Darrow Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory American Physical Society, Division of Plasma.
Motion of the ablation cloud in torus plasmas R.Ishizaki, N.Nakajima and M.Okamoto National Institute for Fusion Science US-Japna Workshop PPPL, Princeton,
52nd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 8 – November 12, 2010, Chicago, IL Development of Laser Blow-Off Impurity Injection Experiments.
Localised Neutron Emission at the edge of high density JET Trace Tritium - ELMy H-mode plasmas A.Murari 6 on the behalf of G. Bonheure 1, S. Popovichev.
Current Drive Experiments with Oscillating Toroidal Flux in HT-7 Superconducting Tokamak J.S.Mao, P. Phillips 1, J.R.Luo, J.Y.Zhao, Q.L.Wu, Z.W.Wu, J.G.Li,
51st Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November 2 - 6, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia ∆I BS = 170 Amps J BS e-root J BS i-root Multiple ambipolar.
54th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics, October 29 – November 2, 2012, Providence, Rhode Island 3-D Plasma Equilibrium Reconstruction.
2014/03/06 那珂核融合研究所 第 17 回若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 SOL-divertor plasma simulations with virtual divertor model Satoshi Togo, Tomonori Takizuka a, Makoto Nakamura.
= 2·10 18 m -3 T e (0) = 0.4 keV ECH and ECE on HSX Stellarator K.M.Likin, A.F.Almagri, D.T.Anderson, F.S.B.Anderson, C.Deng 1, C.W.Domier 2, R.W.Harvey.
Soft X-Ray Tomography in HSX V. Sakaguchi, A.F. Almagri, D.T. Anderson, F.S.B. Anderson, K. Likin & the HSX Team The HSX Plasma Laboratory University of.
Study on Plasma Startup Scenario of Helical DEMO reactor FFHR-d1
Preliminary study for Soft X-ray Spectroscopy in VEST
Investigation of laser energy absorption by ablation plasmas
24th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference – IAEA CN-197
Impurity Transport Research at the HSX Stellarator
Three-Dimensional MHD Analysis of Heliotron Plasma with RMP
Basic principles Geometry and historical development
Application to the VIS/IR Imaging System of ITER
D. S. Darrow Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
Computed Tomography.
Presentation transcript:

LHD における IRVB を用いた プラズマ輻射計測の現状 (3 次元輻射計測の開発 ) Ryuichi Sano 1, Byron J. Peterson 2, Masaru Teranishi 3, Naofumi Iwama 2, Masahiro Kobayashi 2, Kiyofumi Mukai 2, Shwetang N. Pandya 1 1 Graduate University for Advanced Studies, 2 NIFS and 3 Hiroshima Institute of Technology 若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会

Motivation Radiation mainly occurs outside of the LCFS. →1 dimensional assumption can not be applied. →3D or 2D measurement is required. IRVBs(IR imaging Video Bolometer) have many channels ( ch/IRVB). -This advantage will be effective for tomography -In LHD and KSTAR etc. DEMO or ITER →reduction of the heat flux to the divertor is important. Plasma detachment is planned with enhanced radiation for the reduction of heat flux. 3D radiation measurement using with tomography is planned in LHD

Plasma radiation (Far IR ~ soft Xray) Heat radiation (IR) Metal foil Plasma Aperture IR window IR camera Vacuum vessel wall IR imaging video bolometer (IRVB) TemperatureRadiation Image Solve heat diffusion equation Pt, blackened

6.5-L (30x22 ch) (100 fps) 6-T(36x28 ch) (100 fps) 10-O(36x28 ch) (100 fps) 6.5-U(26x20 ch) (50 fps) 10-O 6-T 6.5-U 6.5-L 4 IRVBs are installed in LHD

IRVBs can measure spatial and temporal radiation changes Poloidal

Tomography (Inverse calculation) P rad,j :Absorbed power on each detector h j,k :The geometry matrix as a projection matrix S k :The radiation intensity from the plasma-voxel j :Index of detector channel k :Index of plasma-voxel 3D profile Geometry matrix Measured (IRVB) Measurement Tomography

LHD plasma Mean minor radius:0.6m Major radius: 3.9m Plasma voxels: Horizontal:5 cm 50 divisions (2.5 m < R < 5.0 m) Vertical :5cm 52 divisions (-1.3 m < Z < 1.3 m) Toroidal:1 degree 360 divisions Total number of plasma voxels : 50x52x360 =936,000 Total number of IRVB channels : 3,196ch LHD plasma divided into voxels for 3D tomography IRVB channels << Plasma voxels 7

Non plasma voxels eliminated using EMC3-EIRENE prediction of radiating volume 936,000 → 263,220 Total number of plasma voxel is reduced by mask radiation region Non-radiation region 8

Helical periodicity ・ The plasma repeats itself every 18 degree toroidally. S(R, φ, Z) = S(R, π/5- φ,-Z) Total number of plasma voxels reduced :263,220/20 = 13,161 Assumption of Helical periodicity reduces number of plasma voxels Each plasma voxel should be seen by at least one IRVB channel Number of IRVBs is just 4 →Fields of view of IRVBs can not cover entire torus → Assumption of helical periodicity is employed. Total number of IRVB channels :3,196 ch 9

Reconstruction by ART (Algebraic Reconstruction Techniques) ART: Iterative method with feedback for every sight line. P : IRVB signal H : Projection matrix S : Plasma radiation at voxel H P H PP HTHT S2S2 S1S1 S S2S2 H PP S3S3 Iteration S1S1 HTHT S2S2 Calculation time=(2 hours/ frame)

Test image reconstructed by ART (from simulated profile) Test radiation profile, S (calculated by EMC3-EIRENE) Reconstructed profile, S’ Incident radiation at 6.5-L, P (from EMC3-EIRENE) ART Test hollow profiles is reproduced through reconstruction 11

Reconstruction by SVD (Singular Value Decomposition) SVD U : Left singular vector of H V: Right singular vector of H W: Diagonal matrix of singular value H (13161 x 3196) was successfully decomposed H + : Pseudo-inverse matrix of H (4 minutes / frame) P = H S P = H -1 S IRVBs signal (3196) Plasma radiation (13,161) P : IRVB signal H : Projection matrix S : Plasma radiation at voxel

Test image reconstructed by SVD (from simulated profile) Test radiation profile, S (calculated by EMC3-EIRENE) Reconstructed profile, S’ Incident radiation at 6.5-L, P (from EMC3-EIRENE) SVD Like ART profiles, but negative values are produced. 13

# Reconstructed 3D profile from experiment (SVD method) Reconstructed 3D profile from experiment (ART method) ART results has localized radiation at the edge plasma # ・ Radiation is localized in the edge region. ・ Calculation takes 2 hours. ・ There are no negative values. ・ Radiation from core region may be ghosts.

SVD results has strong radiation in core. ・ Radiation is not localized in a certain region. ・ Calculation takes 4 minutes. ・ Large negative values are produced. Reconstructed 3D profile from experiment (SVD method) #120930

Summary 3D tomography techniques for radiation measurement using 4 IRVBs with ART and SVD are developed in LHD ・ ART method Features of test profile reproduced through reconstruction. But minor ghosts remain in core. ART takes 30 times more calculation time than SVD. ・ SVD method Features of test profile reproduced through reconstruction. But strong ghosts remain in core. Both methods need more improvement Measurement of enhanced radiation for detachment or starting phase of radiation collapse.

Reconstructed (GCV is considered) (A) (C) (B) (A)4e-16 (B)1.9e-13 (C)2.7e e-13  **2

Reconstruction by ART (Algebraic Reconstruction Techniques) H: Projection matrix a: Weight parameter for feedback k: Counts of iterations f: 3D radiation profiles g: IRVB data M: total number of IRVB channels M (3,196) times ART: Iterative method with feedback for every sight line. (N)th IRVB channel Current 3D radiation profile Original (N)th IRVB channel H P : IRVB signal H : Projection matrix S : Plasma radiation at voxel HTHT N=1 ~ M

Characterization of foil thermal properties needed for calibration Conventional method gives only t f Developed method gives t f and ε by iterative convergence Ryuichi SANO et al., Plasma and Fusion Res (2012) Radiation power Foil temperature Solve Heat diffusion equation IRVB measurement Heat diffusion equation Foil parameters (not uniform) Foil thickness: t f Emissivity: ε Thermal diffusivity: κ 21

Reconstructed by SVD (Collapse like) Radiation profile on poloidal cross section (Collapse like) ・ Reconstructed radiation profile has tendency of original profile. ・ More constraints or filter is required. Reconstructed image by SVD (from special profile) Reconstructed by SVD (uniform) Radiation profile on poloidal cross section (uniform) Incident radiation (from EMC-3) Incident radiation (from reconstructed) Incident radiation (from EMC-3) Incident radiation (from reconstructed) 22

Absorbed power at each detector channel P rad,j :Absorbed power on each detector h j,k :The geometry matrix as a projection matrix S k :The radiation intensity from the plasma-voxel j :Index of detector channel K :index of plasma-voxel Geometry matrix (projection matrix) h j,k : The geometry matrix as a projection matrix V i,j,k : Volume of FOV(field of view) sub-voxel Ω i,j,k : solid angle of the detector with respect to the sub FOV sub-volume k : Index of plasma-voxel i : Index of FOV sub-volume j : Index of detector channel IRVB signal and geometry matrix calculation 23

IRVBs can take spatial and temporal radiation changes