Source: McKinsey Report Improvement Journey Poor to FairFair to GoodGood to GreatGreat to Excellent ThemeAchieving the basics of literacy and numeracy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marcela santillán Tenoch Cedillo
Advertisements

LITERACY STRATEGY P Loddon Mallee Region.
Low-Cost Private Schools Knowledge Framework Research methodology template.
Head of Learning: Job description
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Learning and Teaching Using ICT Conferences Summer 2004.
Dylan Grace, President ISSU.  Plan for when and how the new Junior Cycle will be introduced has been outlined  Expectation that new senior cycle and.
Illinois P-20 Council January 27, ISBE MISSION STATEMENT The Illinois State Board of Education will provide leadership, assistance, resources.
Transforming Education in Kentucky EPSB and TEK 1.
How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better and Hackney’s journey Tricia Okoruwa Education Director.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP Wednesday, November 28, DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE TEACHERS AND SCHOOL LEADERS (STEWART)  “High performing countries build their human.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
DOES LEADERSHIP MAKE A DIFFERENCE? 1 The importance of school leadership on the quality of schools and the achievements of pupils:
GREAT TEACHING, INSPIRED LEARNING MARCH 2013 A blueprint for action Great teaching, Inspired Learning.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Lietuvos Respublikos švietimo ir mokslo ministerija Teacher’s In-Service training in Lithuania Renaldas Ciuzas Head officer of the Initial Teacher Training.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
Summer Non-effective School Districts district staff issue a plethora of uncoordinated and often contradictory directives while presiding over resource.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
11 Recruitment of External Mentors for Statutory Induction and the Masters in Educational Practice (MEP) Garem Jackson – Professional Adviser School Standards.
Sandy Adair. During my internship I addressed this competency in a variety of ways. I was able to develop a positive rapport with the staff early on by.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
2014 TCTW State Leaders’ Forum Oklahoma City, Oklahoma January 29, 2014 CTE Teacher Preparation Project SREB.
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Teachers and the Quality Imperative for EFA International Task Force on Teachers for EFA 6-7 July 2010 Amman, Jordan.
Management of teacher education and the issue of quality inclusive education Prepared by Dr. Reda Hegazy Egypt focal point for the "international Task.
Serving: What does the learner demand of us? Process: What processes do we need to master in order to serve our population? Development: What competencies.
LESSONS LEARNED IN PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEADERSHIP for CHSI 2 ND National High School Leadership Summit Archived Information.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
1 CECV Intervention Framework Module 5A Learning & Teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Louisiana Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Student-Based Budgeting Task Force November 3, 2010 Matt Hill.
The Pathway Leadership Team’s Role Kathleen Harris, Director Technical Assistance and Coaching
National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.
THE SPANISH EDUCATION SYSTEM Inspectorate in CASTILLA-LA MANCHA September 2011.
From Data Poor, Information Poor to Data Rich, Information Rich Decision- Making: Design and Implementation of the Rocky View Schools Student Information.
Literacy and Numeracy Partnership Project Curriculum Partnerships LITERACY and NUMERACY PARTNERSHIP PROJECT Gavin Power – Consultant Principal, Literacy.
Presenter: Mazinza Ndala Tel:
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Transformational Leadership Group of Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools Performance of Disadvantaged Youth November 23, 2010 Brenda Steele, Co-Chair.
Improving Literacy and Numeracy Outcomes Geoff N Masters.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Supporting the Primary PE and Sport Premium in London.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
Accreditation External Review
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Post-secondary Success for All: Increasing Awareness, Aspiration, Opportunity and Attainment A Vision for Redesigning Grades 11, 12, 13 and 14 in Minnesota.
Ministry of Education and Sports
School principal as a leader of instructional process
Why some schools succeed ?
An Introduction to the 8 Components of MCL
Building the future Workshop 3 24 November 2017
Presentation transcript:

Source: McKinsey Report Improvement Journey Poor to FairFair to GoodGood to GreatGreat to Excellent ThemeAchieving the basics of literacy and numeracy Getting the foundations in place Shaping the professionalImproving through peers and innovation Intervention cluster Providing motivation and scaffolding for low skill teachers −Scripted teaching materials −Coaching on curriculum −Instructional time on task −School visits by center −Incentives for high performance Getting all schools to a minimum quality level −Outcome targets −Additional support for low performing schools −School Infrastructure Improvement −Provision of textbooks Getting Students in seats −Expand school seats −Fulfill students’ basic needs to raise attendance Data and accountability foundation – Transparency to schools and/or public on school performance – School Inspections and Inspection Institutions Financial and organizational foundation −Optimization of school and teacher volumes −Decentralizing financial and administrative rights −Increasing funding −Funding allocation model −Organizational redesign Pedagogical foundation −School model/streaming −Language of instruction Raising calibre of entering teachers and principals −Recruiting programs −Pre-service training −Certification requirements Raising calibre of existing teachers and principals −In-service training programs −Coaching on practice −Career tracks −Teacher and community forums School-based decision- making −Self-evaluation −Independent and specialized schools Cultivating peer-led learning for teachers and principals −Collaborative practice −Decentralizing pedagogical rights to schools and teachers −Rotation and secondment programs Creating additional support mechanisms for professionals Release professionals from admin burden by providing additional administrative staff System-sponsored experimentation/innovation across schools −Providing additional funding for innovation −Sharing innovation from front-line to all schools

Source: McKinsey Report Poor to Fair ThemeDescriptionExample interventions Providing scaffolding and motivation for low skill teachers and principals Scripted lessons: The system creates instructional objectives, lesson plans, and learning materials for daily lessons to teachers lessons to enable teachers executing lessons rather than devising them Coaching on curriculum: The system creates a field force of coaches to visit schools and work with teachers in-class on effectively delivering the curriculum Incentives for high performance: The system gives rewards (monetary and prestige) to schools and teachers who achieve high improvement in student outcomes against targets School visits by centre: The system’s central leaders/administrators visit schools to observe, meet and motivate staff, and discuss performance Instructional time on task: the systems increases student instructional time Prescriptive teaching materials Technical skill-building External coaches School visits by centre Instructional time on task Getting all schools to minimum quality standard Targets, data, and assessments: The system sets minimum proficiency targets for schools/students, frequent student learning assessments (linked to lesson objectives, every 3-4 weeks), and data processes to monitor progress Infrastructure: The system improves school facilities and resources to a minimum threshold adequate for attendance and learning Textbooks and learning resources: The system provide textbooks and learning resources to every student Supporting low performing schools: The system funds targeted support for low performing schools Outcome targets Assessments Data systems School infrastructure improvement Provision of textbooks Additional funding for low performing schools Getting students in seats Expand seats: The system increases school seats to achieve universal access Fulfill students’ basic needs: The school provides for student basic needs to ensure that more students attend school and that absenteeism declines Meeting basic needs (meals, clothing, transportation, toilets) Increase student seats

Source: McKinsey Report ThemeDescriptionExample interventions Data and accountability foundation Transparency and accountability: The system establishes student assessments and school inspection to create reliable data on performance and to hold schools accountable for improvement Improvement areas: The system uses this data to identify and tackle specific areas (e.g. subjects, grades, gender) with lagging performance Student assessments Transparency to schools and/or public on school performance School inspections and inspections institutes Financial and organizational foundation Organization structure: The system takes steps to make the school network shape and governance manageable and to delineate decision rights accordingly Financial structure: The system establishes an efficient and equitable funding allocation mechanism for schools Optimization of number of schools or teachers Decentralizing financial and administrative rights Increasing funding and changing allocation model Organizational restructuring Pedagogical foundation Learning model: The system selects a learning model consistent with raising student capabilities, and designs the necessary supporting materials for this new model (e.g., standards, curriculum, textbooks) School model (number of years students spend at each education level) Streams/tacks based on student outcomes and academic focus Language of instruction Fair to Good

Source: McKinsey Report ThemeDescriptionExample interventions Raising calibre of entering teachers and principals Recruiting: The system raises the entry bar for new teacher candidates Preparation and induction: the system raises pre-service training quality and certification requirements Recruiting programs Pre-service training Certification requirements Raising calibre of existing teachers and principals Professional development: The system raises professional development requirements and provides more opportunities for self-, peer-, and centre-led learning and development Coaching on practice: Instructional coaches work with teachers to strengthen their skills in areas such as lesson planning, student data analysis, and in-class pedagogy Career pathways: The system creates teacher and leadership specializations through career pathways, raising expectations with each successive pathway rung and increasing pay accordingly In-service training programs School-based coaching Career tracks Teacher community forums School-based decision-making Self-evaluation: The system cultivates ownership in schools for improvement through introducing self-evaluation for schools and making performance data more available Flexibility: The system gives schools the flexibility to pursue specialized programs appropriate to their students, and increasingly decentralizes pedagogical rights Self-evaluation Data systems Independent and specialized schools Good to Great

Source: McKinsey Report ThemeDescriptionExample interventions Raising calibre of entering teachers and principals Learning communities: The system facilitates school-based learning communities to create peer-led support and accountability to each other Flexibility: The system provides effective educators with greater pedagogical autonomy Rotations: The system rotates educators throughout the system in order to spread learning and varied styles of mentorship Collaborative practise amongst educators Decentralizing pedagogical rights to schools and teachers Creating rotation and secondment programs across schools, and between the centre and schools Creating additional support mechanisms for professionals Leverage: The system provides administrative staff in schools so that teachers and principals can focus on pedagogy and leadership rather than administrative tasks Providing additional administration staff System- sponsored innovation across schools Stakeholder innovation: The system sponsors and identifies examples of innovative practises in schools (teaching and learning practice, parent/community involvement practices, etc.) and then develops mechanisms to shares these innovations across all schools Sharing innovation from the front-line Funding for innovation Great to Excellent