The Efficiency of Flexible Solar Panels and Changes in the Earth’s Magnetic Field at Altitude.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Florida Hybrid Rocket Team’s Mile High Club
Advertisements

UF Hybrid Rocket Teams Mile High Club Brought to you by Chris Leonard, Ty Morton, Sam Darr, and Josh Childs.
University of Florida PDR Presentation. Vehicle Design Diameter: 5.86 Length: 135 Static Stability Margin: 1.4 Total Weight: 23.6 lbs.
UF Hybrid Rocket Teams Mile High Club Brought to you by Chris Leonard, Ty Morton, Alex Aueron, Sam Darr, and Josh Childs.
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA T HE M OST I NTERESTING R OCKET IN THE W ORLD.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Launch Lug – helps to guide the rocket upward until it reaches enough velocity for the fins to engage. Parachute – assists in the safe recovery of the.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 19.6 Ib Length: in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in.
Our Mission Statement  Launch a high-power rocket to an altitude of one mile carrying the Operation: Epic Beep payload package. At lift off, the rocket’s.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Critical Design Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Launch Vehicle Propulsion Payload Recovery Vehicle Dimensions Total length of inches 4.0” Airframe (3.9” Inside diameter) Fin span of 3.91” Separates.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Safety ► The safety officer for the entire team is Maia Madrid. ► During launch we will follow NAR safety rules and regulations. ► We will follow standard.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
The Effect of Acceleration on the Crystallization of Sodium Acetate.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
College of Engineering
Rocketry.
Critical Design Review Presentation
Critical Design Review February 2, 2015
November 7, 2014.
November 7, 2014.
LESSON LD02 The Model Rocket
Final Readiness Review
LESSON LD02 The Model Rocket
Plantation High SL team 1
Presentation transcript:

The Efficiency of Flexible Solar Panels and Changes in the Earth’s Magnetic Field at Altitude

Vehicle Summary Total length of inches 4.0” Airframe (3.9” Inside diameter) BlueTube 2.0 Separates into three sections Top Nosecone Payload Flip-Out Rotor Blades Middle Drogue Parachute Altimeters Housing for Rotor Blades Bottom Main Parachute Motor (Plugged) Fins

Payload Summary Studying the efficiency of flexible solar panels, and changes in power output Also investigating changes in the earth’s magnetic field Housed in the Modular Payload System (explained later)

Vehicle Changes Recent delays in funding have delayed parts orders and some parts have gone out of stock –Aerotech K700 motor now Aerotech K828 –Aerospace composite fins now fiberglass covered birch plywood –Ejection canisters will be made and not bought –Piston removed on drogue parachute compartment Design changes from subscale problems –Ejection charge holders have been added –Vertical Wind Turbine has been replaced with flip out rotor blades

Payload Changes The LabPro data logger does not support a data trigger Exchanged for a custom built LabQuest data logger from Vernier at no charge The proper amount of resistance has been researched and verified by manufacturer –77 Ohms of resistance instead of previous 40 Ohms

Motor Selection Aerotech K828 FJ 54/2560 mm casing Change was made because K700 Motor was out of stock from multiple vendors MotorManufacturer Total Impulse (N- sec) Max Thrust (Newtons) Burn Time (s) Average Thrust (Newtons) Thrust to Weight Ratio K828AeroTech ,303.8 N

Estimated Rocket Performance Estimating a coefficient of drag of around 0.60 Estimated dry weight of pounds Rocket Coefficient Of Drag Rocket Weight (without motor) Note: Simulations calculated with 5 mph winds

Motor Thrust Curve

Rocket Flight Stability Margin Center of gravity 73.4 inches from nose Center of pressure 87.5 inches from nose Stability margin of 3.50 calipers Stability of 4.86 calipers after burnout CG Position: 73.4 inches from nose CP Position: 87.5 inches from nose Stability Margin: 3.50

Thrust to Weight Ratio Thrust to weight ratio is 8.64 to 1 High acceleration of approx. 459 m/s 2 (14 g’s) Acceleration (ft/s 2 ) vs. Time (s)

Rail exit velocity 8 ft Rail = 75.0 ft/s 10 ft Rail = 83.3 ft/s 12 ft Rail = 90.8 ft/s Planned to launch using a 10 ft rail Lugs compatible with Standard 1” Black Sky Rails

Parachute Sizes and Descent Rates Drogue parachute: 24 inch diameter TAC-1 Four flat strap nylon suspension lines Deploys at Apogee (backup charge 2 seconds later) Estimated descent rate of 82 ft/s Swivels are attached to each parachute Additional swivel attached to drogue mount

Parachute Sizes and Descent Rates Main parachute: 84 inch diameter TAC-1 Four flat strap nylon suspension lines Deploys at 700 feet (backup charge at 500 feet) Estimated descent rate of 19 – 20 ft/s Drift in 5 mph= 500 feet Drift in 10 mph= 900 feet Drift in 15 mph= 1800 feet Large Margin of Error

Test Plans and Procedures BlueTube airframe was able to withstand 300 pounds of force of compression without signs of failure 350 degrees for 30 minutes = ⅛” increase in circumference Freezer for 30 minutes = No notable change Underwater for 30 minutes = Tube began to wrinkle 2 hours in sun = 1/16 th inch bend across 4 feet

Test Plans and Procedures A 3/16 th inch birch plywood bulkplate withstood 200 pounds of force before test was stopped –Force was applied by stepping on exposed plate –Plate was permanently warped 1/8 th inch across diameter Birch Plate Clamp Force

Test Plans and Procedures All sensors for payload have been verified and function as planned –Sensors must be zeroed before use for best results Accelerometer –Held up for 5 seconds, down for 5, shook, then hit against palm

The magnetic field sensor was rotated clockwise to check functionality Peak readings when pointed to magnetic south (geo graphic north) as expected Does not appear to be affected by other sensors Test Plans and Procedures

Solar panel, current probe, and voltage probes have been tested –Test was done in evening sun –Not optimal power output –Solar panel was 50% covered, then roughly 90% bcovered, then fully covered Test Plans and Procedures

Remaining tests: –Ejection charge deployment test Procedure explained later –Solar panel test in full sun With 77 ohms of resistance, current and voltage probes –Fin strength test Identical to bulkplate test Test Plans and Procedures

Scale Model Flight Test Two half-scale flights have been conducted One ejection charge test before flight Aerotech H Stability margin Two straight flights without any wobble Set up for dual deployment

Scale Model Flight Test First launch reached 2403 feet Second launch reached 2313 feet After launch conditions were put into Rocksim Estimated drag coefficient of 0.45

Scale Model Problems First launch blew a hole in the main airframe (no main parachute) –Cause due to no ejection charge canister support Second launch separated for main parachute, but parachute did not deploy -Cause due to use of Pyrodex/ not enough black powder -Extensive ground testing will be completed with 4F black powder for full-scale

Scale Model Problems First launch carried a vertical wind turbine –Slow, inconsistent spin Second launch carried flip out rotor blades –Fast consistent spin, but shock cord caught under blade and twisted

Scale Model Problems Rotor blade cracked –Higher grade propeller will be used for full scale Shock cord heavily twisted –Shock cords will be better packed use a rubber band to contain cords for organization

Dual Deployment Avionics Test Completed on Monday, December 13 th Altimeters placed in a vacuum chamber Both altimeters showed a drogue and main deployment

Ejection Charge Amount test Status: In planning Calculated 3.1 grams for main, 2.3 for drogue Calculating for 300 pounds of force or 23.9 psi Plenty of force to break three 2.5 mm styrene shear pins 6 total ground tests will be performed

Ejection Charge Amount Test Start test with ejection charges sized below calculated amount Rocket will be mounted horizontally Ballast will be used to simulate actual weights Test must clearly eject and pull out parachutes

Payload Integration Feasibility All sensors and data logger are made by Vernier Software and Technology Data logger is also power source for all sensors LabQuest has been modified by Vernier to fit into the payload airframe To retrieve data the data logger unit must be retrieved

Payload Integration Feasibility All units contained in the Modular Payload System (MPS) Constructed out of birch plywood Two ¼” threaded steel rods for structural integrity Excess wiring will be coiled and stored in bottom section of MPS Slots cut in bulkplates to allow for wiring to pass from one section to another Must be installed facing specific direction to slide over solar panel wiring

Modular Payload System

Removal of the MPS Nosecone must be removed A strap will be connected to the two stainless steel rods the can be used to pull out the MPS When the mid section is exposed the wires from solar panel are disconnected The entire unit is taken to computer for data retrieval via USB cable

Educational Engagement Plan Status “To Apogee and Beyond” Project currently in progress High schools students will learn about the basics of rocketry –Will design and make fins for a partially designed rocket in Rocksim –Working in groups of 2 or 3, they will assemble their rocket Large scale launch day on February 27 th where the 200+ students will launch their rockets Launch site at Local ranch: Tate Farms

Educational Engagement Plan Status Visiting the local middle school’s aeronautics class –Status: Scheduled for first week of February Visiting local elementary school’s science night and will give presentation –Status: In development

Questions?