Times have changed Iowa has slipped from number 1 or 2 in the nation. Worse… when we compare achievement of students with IEPs to those without, Iowa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gifted Education and Response to Intervention Update on Gifted Education Workshop August 2013 Toddie Adams, Marshall County Schools.
Advertisements

Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Improving Educational Outcomes Jackie Dowd Special Assistant to the Governor for Career Innovation Indiana Association of Public School Superintendents.
CATE UPDATE Susan Flanagan, Director Office of Career and Technology Education March 12, 2013.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
Education, Employment and the Economy Lexington Rotary July 19, 2012 Terry Holliday, Ph.D. Kentucky Education Commissioner.
Forsyth County Schools Overview of the Proposed IE 2 Partnership Contract.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
1 Race to the Top: Louisiana’s Blueprint for Education Reform … More Than an Application 1 …BECAUSE OUR CHILDREN CAN’T WAIT.
Every Iowa learner will achieve success in life as a result of... Collaborative Leadership An Update on System-wide Work.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
Iowa Educational Services for the Blind and Visually Impaired (IESBVI)Conference October 8 th and 9 th, 2012 WELCOME!
Measuring Charter Quality Eric Paisner, NAPCS Anna Nicotera, NAPCS Lyria Boast, Public Impact.
Special Education Briefing April 10, 2015 HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HawaiiPublicSchools.org.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Timberlane Regional School District
2009 Closing the Expectation Gap Fourth Annual 50-State Progress Report on the Alignment of High School Policies with the Demands of College and Careers.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
“We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard,
Accountability and Data-Driven Decision Making The Transformed School Counselor Chapter 8 ©2012 Cengage Learning. These materials are designed for classroom.
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
Restructuring Proposal. How can we structure our agency to provide administrative support to our AEA staff and our LEA partners so we can optimize our.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
P-20 in Action – Michigan’s Focus on Career and College Ready Students: Success through Cross- Agency Collaboration 2012 MIS Conference February 16, 2012.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
Chapter 14 Rethinking Special Education. Common-Sense Proposals for Reform 1.Focus on improving general education for all students Improved education.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
U SING D ATA TO ASSESS AND INFORM SCHOOL CHANGE Data for change Presenter: Judith Marty Principal Mater Academy Charter Middle High.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
ESSA Work Group Meeting #1: Setting the Stage June 14,
STAFF/CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK (S/CDN) September 14, 2006 Albany Marriott Hotel Presented by: Jean C. Stevens Interim Deputy Commissioner New York.
Enhancing Education Through Technology ( EETT/Title II D) Competitive Grant Application Technical Assistance Workshop New York State Education Department.
Allegany County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
Cecil County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Wicomico County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Prince George’s County
Washington County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Harford County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Dorchester County March 2013 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Baltimore City March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Queen Anne’s County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Garrett County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Calvert County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Starting Community Conversations
Worcester County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
The Alabama Continuous Improvement Plan ACIP
Talbot County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Phillipsburg Middle School Identification as a School in Need of  Comprehensive Support and Improvement: Starting Community Conversations March.
Frederick County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Presentation transcript:

Times have changed Iowa has slipped from number 1 or 2 in the nation. Worse… when we compare achievement of students with IEPs to those without, Iowa ranks dead last. (Rising to Greatness, Iowa Department of Education, 2011 )

Today, student achievement is our business Measuring our collective efforts is vitally important.

An Expanded Mission Huge socioeconomic, political and educational tidal waves are underway which will impact all levels of government including: –Support for competition and choice in how public services are developed, produced and delivered. –An insistence on more rigorous accountability and transparency. –The greater use of appropriate performance and quality management systems.

An Expanded Mission Iowa’s AEA State System has recently been faced with increasing challenges related to categorical funding. Iowa’s changing demographics have increased demand for AEA services. Stagnant state and federal student performance indicators along with societal pressures for reform demand a more cohesive, focused AEA system.

One Overarching Goal By 2018 every child who graduates from an Iowa pre-k 12 public or non-public, accredited school will be prepared for success in post-secondary studies, a career, and citizenship.

Four Vital Measures 1.Every Iowa child will be proficient in reading by the end of third grade. 2.A numeracy goal will be determined after sufficient progress has been made in reaching the literacy goal identified above.

Four Vital Measures 3.The learning gaps between students with IEPs and those without and for those students in disaggregated sub-groups will be reduced by half by A post-secondary readiness goal will be established by 2014 that most accurately identifies and tracks post-secondary success.

Connection to DE Goals New Report – Overcoming the Achievement Divide – mid-November 2012 Identified problem – significant and increasing achievement gaps for students who face additional challenges Solution – Iowa’s Response to Intervention

System Commitments We will… Provide supports and accountability for implementation of evidence-based, internationally benchmarked, scalable best practices in Iowa schools. Advocate that the current AEA accreditation standards be revised so that they are consistent with the New Compact.

System Commitments We will… Deliver specialized, quality services based on individual student, building, and district needs through a learning contract with each LEA. Re-purpose resources from programs that are not aligned with our overarching goal and vital few measures and/or not delivering consistent student learning results.

System Commitments We will… Build the collective, organizational capacity of AEA personnel to deliver quality services as co-owners of every student’s learning and to decrease variability between AEAs. Maximize our resources. Advocate for efforts and remove policy, structural and statutory barriers that stand in the way of using resources in service to student learning.

System Commitments We will… Constantly and consistently use formative and summative data to inform our progress towards our goal. Meet all statutory requirements at both the state and federal levels. Benchmark our progress against a common dashboard and against standards identified in the research about highly reliable organizations.

Selection Criteria Commitments must… Articulate ways the AEA State System continues its charter responsibility to serve the needs of special education populations. Focus on the requirement that the AEA State System’s services and programs consistently raise student achievement.

Selection Criteria Commitments must… Acknowledge the need for the AEA State System’s to strengthen its collective organizational capacity as well as the capacity of each individual AEA. Help districts and the state provide for ways to find efficiencies in non- instructional services in order to maximize resources for instructional goals.

Selection Criteria Commitments must… Emphasize the goal of holding the AEA State System accountable to co-ownership of student learning goals with its principal stakeholders: LEAs, non-public accredited schools, and the Department of Education. Be administratively, economically, legally, and politically responsible.

Selection Criteria Commitments must… Maintain the ability of the AEA to be responsive to the needs and interests of local districts and accredited non-public schools in their catchment area. Represent the best to which human behavior should aspire.

Accountability Measures During the school year, the AEA system, in collaboration with the DE, will install a performance management system that will define the goals, tactics, timelines, metrics and a tracking mechanism that will provide timely reporting to stakeholders.

Possible Data Sets Healthy Indicators Matrix Iowa Assessments (third grade literacy rates) USDE’s calculation formula for graduate rates Reports detailing the percentage of students requiring post-secondary remediation

A New Compact “The test of the morality of society is what it does for its children.” --Dietrich Bonhoeffer