Academy of Management – Montreal, August 2010 Jacqueline C. Vischer PhD Professeure émérite Faculté de l’aménagement Université de Montréal
1. Size and/or cost issues 2. New tools and technology 3. Organisational restructuring 4. Change organisational culture 5. Take advantage of the New Workspace Opportunity
From: Vischer, J.C Space Meets Status: Designing Workplace Performance Routledge
Fear of the unknown Fear of innovation Fear of losing the familiar Fear of losing ground Fear of conflict
Psychological comfort Functional Comfort Physical Comfort HABITABILITY THRESHOLD
FUNCTIONAL COMFORT Health and Safety Building codes and standards Basic utility – Habitability threshold Workspace supports work Indoor air quality and thermal comfort Lighting and daylighting Spatial layouts and privacy Human and building noise control PHYSICAL COMFORT
Own (occupy) Defend Mark (identify) Possess (control access) Sense of belonging Personalization
Space privacy Work confidentiality Job status Sense of history / longevity Personal control physical controls empowerment / ownership
1. Fear of loss 2. Mistrust of superiors 3. Leaders or champions? 4. Change is too radical 5. No explicit process 6. Costs too much 7. Need for new learning
1. Manage user involvement 2. Take advantage of the New Workspace Opportunity 3. Reduce fear, increase functional comfort 4. Increase workspace effectiveness through environmental empowerment
1. Transformation as imperative 2. Play out the process 3. Embrace conflict 4. Avoid the default 5. Not a zero sum game 6. Empowerment is key 7. Change is positive
Stakeholders need to recognize and work with workspace design as a tool for change by being responsive to the opportunity offered by the new workspace imperative.
Not all stakeholders will want workspace change, or tolerate the same degree of innovation; the process must take its course Note that stakeholders are senior managers, middle managers, employees, facilities staff, design consultants
Conflicts are inevitable, they arise out of fear. Steps need to be taken to manage constructively the energy released by conflict, to the advantage of the change process.
The default position in space-related decision-making is what already exists and what everybody already knows (the tried and true) – except that it is a reversion to ‘no-change’ and not a step forward.
For everything taken away from occupants when their workspace is changed, something must be given back; any loss of that which is familiar is immediate, whereas gains sometimes need time to be felt.
It is important to empower users so that they invest in workspace decisions. The strategic approach to users’ involvement is explicitly designed to fit the project and organisational context.
New workspace implies a new social order, new business processes, even new behaviour and cultural norms. These must be addressed explicitly during the change management process.
COMFORT WELL-MANAGED WORKSPACE CHANGE STRESS From: Vischer, J.C Space Meets Status: Designing Workplace Performance Routledge
Please contact us: Jacqueline C. Vischer Our website: Please contact us: Jacqueline C. Vischer Our website: