ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)1 The CMS Preshower Detector Overview CERN Armenia : Yerevan Physics Institute Belarus : Minsk.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Use of G EANT 4 in CMS AIHENP’99 Crete, April 1999 Véronique Lefébure CERN EP/CMC.
The CMS Detector Paoti Chang National Taiwan University
Silicon Preshower for the CMS: BARC Participation
J-C. BRIENT (LLR) 1  Introduction with pictures  Prototype design and construction  R&D on the design of the full scale calorimeter CALICE - ECAL silicon-tungsten.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
A preliminary analysis of the CALICE test beam data Dhiman Chakraborty, NIU for the CALICE Collaboration LCWS07, Hamburg, Germany May 29 - June 3, 2007.
27 th May 2004Daniel Bowerman1 Dan Bowerman Imperial College 27 th May 2004 Status of the Calice Electromagnetic Calorimeter.
SiD Cal R. Frey1 Some EGS Studies… Compare with Geant4  Questions of range/cutoff parameters EM Resolution understood? Moliere radius – readout gap relation.
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.
Evaluation of G4 Releases in CMS (Sub-detector Studies) Software used Electrons in Tracker Photons in the Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pions in the Calorimeter.
Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.
SPiDeR  SPIDER DECAL SPIDER Digital calorimetry TPAC –Deep Pwell DECAL Future beam tests Wishlist J.J. Velthuis for the.
Roger Rusack – The University of Minnesota 1.
J-C BRIENT Prague Performances studies of the calorimeter/muon det. e + e –  W + W – at  s=800 GeV Simulation SLAC-Gismo Simulation MOKKA-GEANT4.
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER at CMS EVANGELOS XAXIRIS June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques.
Photon-jet reconstruction with the EEMC – Deuxième Partie Pibero Djawotho Indiana University Cyclotron Facility June 18, 2008 STAR.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
Olivier RavatLes Houches/June 3rd Higgs associated production at LHC : Thecase Olivier Ravat, Morgan Lethuillier IPN Lyon Les Houches 2003 : Physics.
Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the CLAS12 Forward Detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) Collaborating institutions: Yerevan Physics Institute (Armenia) James Madison.
ENERGY RECOVERY OF THE CMS ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER DEAD CHANNELS Daskalakis Georgios, Geralis Theodoros, Kesisoglou Stilianos, Manolakos Ioannis, Eleni.
Pion Showers in Highly Granular Calorimeters Jaroslav Cvach on behalf of the CALICE Collaboration Institute of Physics of the ASCR, Na Slovance 2, CZ -
8 July 1999A. Peisert, N. Zamiatin1 Silicon Detectors Status Anna Peisert, Cern Nikolai Zamiatin, JINR Plan Design R&D results Specifications Status of.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation1/ Electron/ physics in CMS Kati Lassila-Perini HIP Activities in the.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Dmitri Ossetski Obninsk State University Department of Applied Mathematics
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
Feasibility Study of Forward Calorimeter in ALICE experiment Sanjib Muhuri Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre Kolkata.
T RACKING E FFICIENCY FOR & CALORIMETER S EED TRACKING FOR THE CLIC S I D Pooja Saxena, Ph.D. Student Center of Detector & Related Software Technology.
Electron Detection in the SiD BeamCal Jack Gill, Gleb Oleinik, Uriel Nauenberg, University of Colorado ALCPG Meeting ‘09 2 October 2009.
1 CMS Calorimetry & Neural Network Abstract We review an application of neural network feed forward algorithm in CMS calorimetry ( NIM A482(2002)p776 ).
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
R.S. Orr 2009 TRIUMF Summer Institute
Software offline tutorial, CERN, Dec 7 th Electrons and photons in ATHENA Frédéric DERUE – LPNHE Paris ATLAS offline software tutorial Detectors.
CaTS and Dual Readout. CaTS – Calorimeter and Tracker Simulation Describe detector in gdml file (xml like) Define.
J-C Brient-DESY meeting -Jan/ The 2 detector options today …. SiD vs TDR [ * ] [ * ] J.Jaros at ALCPG-SLAC04 ECAL ECAL tungsten-silicon both optionsHCAL.
Production Database Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan Preshower Silicon PRR July 5, 2001.
1 1 - To test the performance 2 - To optimise the detector 3 – To use the relevant variable Software and jet energy measurement On the importance to understand.
January 15, 2004CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration Quark Matter 2004, Oakland, CA CMS HI groups: Athens, Auckland,
Polycrystalline CVD Diamonds for the Beam Calorimeter of the ILC C.Grah ILC ECFA 2006 Valencia, 9 th November 2006.
Studies of Electroweak Interactions and Searches for New Physics Using Photonic Events with Missing Energy at the Large Electron-Positron Collider Marat.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
LHC Symposium 2003 Fermilab 01/05/2003 Ph. Schwemling, LPNHE-Paris for the ATLAS collaboration Electromagnetic Calorimetry and Electron/Photon performance.
Procurement Readiness Review : Detector Fabrication, Qualification & Assembly at India M D Ghodgaonkar Electronics Division, BARC, India.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
SPHENIX Mid-rapidity extensions: Additional Tracking system and pre-shower Y. Akiba (RIKEN/RBRC) sPHENIX workfest July 29,
ADC values Number of hits Silicon detectors1196  6.2 × 6.2 cm  4.2 × 6.2 cm  2.2 × 6.2 cm 2 52 sectors/modules896 ladders~100 r/o channels1.835.
Preshower PRR July NCSR DEMOKRITOS Production Center : Institute of Microelectronics (IMEL) Regional Center : Institute of Nuclear Physics (INP)
A Forward Calorimeter (FoCal) as upgrade for the ALICE experiment at CERN S. Muhuri a, M. Reicher b and T. Tsuji c a Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre,
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Performance of the PHENIX NCC Prototype Michael Merkin Skobeltyn Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University.
HCAL Leakage Studies CLIC Physics & Detector Meeting 10. November 2008 Christian Grefe CERN.
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Michele Faucci Giannelli
CMS-Bijing weekly meeting
Presentation transcript:

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)1 The CMS Preshower Detector Overview CERN Armenia : Yerevan Physics Institute Belarus : Minsk University Greece : N.C.S.R. Demokritos U. of Ioannina India : Bhabha Atomic Research Centre U. of Delhi Russia : JINR Dubna Taiwan : National Central University National Taiwan University

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)2 Crystal BarrelCrystal Endcaps Preshower endcaps The CMS Preshower Detector Overview

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)3 Crystal Endcaps : Pseudorapidity < η< Standard SuperCrystals (25 crystals) 14 Special SuperCrystals 3622 Crystals The CMS Preshower Detector The ECAL Endcaps

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)4 The CMS Preshower Detector Fiducial Coverage The fiducial coverage of SE extends from 1.653<η<2.6

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)5 The CMS Preshower Detector Physics Goals    BR(      for m H <150 GeV/c 2  π 0 ‘s from jets fake a photon from Higgs decay π 0  γγ : γγ separation in barrel : ~ cm (possible using crystal information only) γγ separation in endcaps : ~ mm (quite poor using crystal info)

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)6 The CMS Preshower Detector Design Criteria    The Preshower acts as a sampling calorimeter: Lead absorbers : initiate EM showers Silicon sensors : act as energy sampling devices The Absorber : 3X 0 (η = 1.7)  95% conv. prob. The silicon sensors : Fabrication on 4” wafers Large Area : 63 mm x 63 mm Thickness : 320 μm Number of Strips : 32 Strip Capacitance ~ 42pF Occupancy ~ 1%

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)7 The CMS Preshower Detector Detailed Structure

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)8 The CMS Preshower Detector Sensor Overlap 1-D sensor overlapping 2mm wide dead space in one direction tile + ceramic + sensor+PACE micromodule 4288 identical micromodules in the complete SE (both endcaps)

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)9 The CMS Preshower Detector Micromodules 1000 micromodules to be made in Greece by Demokritos & Un. of Ioannina Micro-module Schematic Real

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)10 The CMS Preshower Detector Ladders Ladder Schematic Real

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)11 The CMS Preshower Detector Layout Each end cap : 4.5m 2

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)12 The CMS Preshower Detector Silicon Sensors Design

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)13 The CMS Preshower Detector Silicon Sensors Mask

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)14 The CMS Preshower Detector Silicon Sensors Parameters

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)15 The CMS Preshower Detector Electronics PACE is the compination Of 2 chips: Delta and PACE_AM Delta front-end + Programmable biasing And calibration PACE_AM 160 column, 32 deep FIFO. Programmable biasing, mux 40MHz clock New Design in submicron tecnology (will be delivered for testing in May 2003)

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)16 The CMS Preshower Detector Electronics (Submicron Technology) Delta3.. area = 17mm2, [Delta 2 = 21mm2] PACEAM3.. area = 30mm2, [PACEAM2 = 60mm2]

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)17 The CMS Preshower Detector Silicon sensors measurement setup

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)18 The CMS Preshower Detector Silicon sensors characteristics(1) 34 Sensors manufactured by Demokritos (Institure of Microelectronics- IMEL) while the masks were designed by INP Half of them have been given to University Of Ioannina At this point in Demokritos we have 87 sensors within specifications (17 from IMEL and 70 from ELMA-Russia) C-V I-V Final goal to deliver 1000 sensors to the CMS collaboration

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)19 Depletion voltage for each strip of the 34 sensors (Volts) The CMS Preshower Detector Silicon sensors characteristics(2) Breakdown voltage for each strip of the 34 sensors (Volts)

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)20 The CMS Preshower Detector Silicon sensors characteristics(2) Breakdown voltage for each strip of the 34 sensors Leakage Current at Depletion voltage for each strip of the 34 sensors (Ampers) Leakage Current at 300V for each strip of the 34 sensors (Ampers)

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)21 C.R.I.S.T.A.L. Local Center Software Architecture User Applications Product Managers Local Center Manager Data Duplication Manager Instrument Agents Digital Control Panels Configuration Database Production Database Main Database Objectivity V5.2 Virtual Instruments Labview V5.1 Orbix V3.0.1 CORBA Physical Instruments Central Repository Implemented in Windows 2000 The CMS Preshower Detector Silicon sensors

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)22 The CMS Preshower Detector Expected response for single γ A single 30 GeV p T (η = 1.7) photon on the SE and EE

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)23 The CMS Preshower Detector Expected response for π 0 Two closely spaced photons (~1 cm) from the decay of a 30 GeV p T π 0 (η = 1.7)

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)24 The CMS Preshower Detector Photon (coming from π 0 ) separation in Preshower photon Unfortunately these are not ‘typical’ events PreShower strip = 6 cm x 2 mm 00  =1.7  =2.4

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)25 The CMS Preshower Detector π 0 /γ Preshower cluster energy distribution Indication of separation power: Variation of Width with Et Et=20,  =1.7 Et=50,  =1.7 0/0/ 0/0/ Clearly lose separation power at higher Et (even worst at higher η)

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)26 The CMS Preshower Detector π 0 rejection algorithm particle Layer1 (x)Layer2 (y) Preshower information: Energy (fraction) in 11 strips Extrapolate a straight line from ECAL cluster barycenter to point (0,0,0) Find the intersection of this line with the two Preshower planes The strip closest to the intersection point is defined as the ‘Central Strip’ Central strip definition: around a ‘Central’ strip

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)27 The CMS Preshower Detector Neural Network π 0 rejection algorithm Use Neural Network (Feed-Forward Back-Propagation) 23 input variables: 22 PreShower + 1 ECAL crystals For each strip i in layer 1: E i /  i=1..11 E i For each strip i in layer 2: E i /  i=1..11 E i Crystal information: S 1 /S 25 ‘Central’ strip: extrapolation from crystals

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)28 The CMS Preshower Detector Neural Network output Performance: Look for  %  -efficiency Et=20,  =1.7Et=60,  =2.4 00 00  

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)29 The CMS Preshower Detector π 0 rejection vs E t and η CMSIM : Detector simulation based on GEANT ORCA : Detector Reconstruction

ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)30 The CMS Preshower Detector Conclusions Demokritos is able to manufacture high quality Silicon Sensors to be used in the CMS-Preshower project A part of the sensors will be manufactured in Demokritos and the rest will be bought by ELMA- Russia and Hammamastu Neural Network techniques gave good results in π 0 rejection and will be soon implemented in the official CMS reconstruction Software