Single-slew manoeuvres for spin-stabilized spacecraft 29 th March 2011 James Biggs Glasgow In collaboration with.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNIT 6 (end of mechanics) Universal Gravitation & SHM
Advertisements

Solar Sail Attitude Control using a Combination of a Feedforward and a Feedback Controller D. Romagnoli, T. Oehlschlägel.
Israeli Universal Spacecraft Bus Characteristics and Design Trade-Offs
Benoit Pigneur and Kartik Ariyur School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University June 2013 Inexpensive Sensing For Full State Estimation of Spacecraft.
15th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Copper Mountain, Colorado Low Energy Interplanetary Transfers Using the Halo Orbit Hopping Method with STK/Astrogator.
Saturday, 02 May 2015 Speeding up HMC with better integrators A D Kennedy and M A Clark School of Physics & SUPA, The University of Edinburgh Boston University.
ARO309 - Astronautics and Spacecraft Design Winter 2014 Try Lam CalPoly Pomona Aerospace Engineering.
The Pioneer Anomaly Jonas Williamson University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN.
Robust Object Tracking via Sparsity-based Collaborative Model
07/07/2005 Coupling with PF2012: No existing PF “as is” able to accommodate Karin On going study in France to develop a new generation of PF product line.
Questions from the European colleagues & Answers (only) from the Chinese engineers present for Y.-W. Zhang and S.-G. Yuan Chinese Academy of Space Technology.
Motion planning, control and obstacle avoidance D. Calisi.
Early Research Presentation Optimal and Feasible Attitude Motions for Microspacecraft January 2013 Albert Caubet.
Attitude Determination and Control
SA-1 Body Scheme Learning Through Self-Perception Jürgen Sturm, Christian Plagemann, Wolfram Burgard.
Unit 2 GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT & SPACE SEGMENT
Karla Vega University of California, Berkeley Attitude Determination and Control 6/9/2015.
Attitude Estimation Thomas Bak Institute of Electronic Systems
A De-coupled Sliding Mode Controller and Observer for Satellite Attitude Control Ronald Fenton.
INSTITUTO DE SISTEMAS E ROBÓTICA 1/31 Optimal Trajectory Planning of Formation Flying Spacecraft Dan Dumitriu Formation Estimation Methodologies for Distributed.
Josephine San Dave Olney 18 August, July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC2  Appears to be Feasible  Requirements  Coarse Pointing baselined on NGST  Future.
The flight dynamics standpoint Alejandro Blazquez (CNES)‏ LSWT Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009.
1 The Origin of Gravity ≡ General Relativity without Einstein ≡ München 2009 by Albrecht Giese, Hamburg The Origin of Gravity 1.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
Integrated Orbit and Attitude Control for a Nanosatellite with Power Constraints Bo Naasz Matthew Berry Hye-Young Kim Chris Hall 13th Annual AAS/AIAA Space.
Satellite Communication
Launching, Orbital Effects & Satellite Subsystems
Optimal Low-Thrust Deorbiting of Passively Stabilized LEO Satellites Sergey Trofimov Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, RAS Moscow Institute of.
Constraints-based Motion Planning for an Automatic, Flexible Laser Scanning Robotized Platform Th. Borangiu, A. Dogar, A. Dumitrache University Politehnica.
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
2009 IEEE Aerospace Conference “Spacecraft Jitter Prediction using 6-DOF Disturbance Measurements” Bryce Carpenter Oliver Martin Jason Hinkle Sierra Nevada.
Attitude Determination and Control System
Optimization-Based Full Body Control for the DARPA Robotics Challenge Siyuan Feng Mar
Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS)
System Design Assessment for a Mission to Explore the Pioneer Anomaly Jonathan Fitt School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston,
Robert G. Melton Department of Aerospace Engineering Penn State University 6 th International Workshop and Advanced School, “Spaceflight Dynamics and Control”
Recent determination of Gamma with Cassini M.T. Crosta, F. Mignard CNRS-O.C.A. 5th RRFWG, June, Estec.
Pioneer Anomaly Test – Jonathan Fitt 1 Design Assessment of Lunar, Planetary and Satellite Ranging Applied to Fundamental Physics Jonathan Fitt Friday,
Uniform discretizations: the continuum limit of consistent discretizations Jorge Pullin Horace Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics Louisiana State.
Solar Orbiter Mission (ESA) - The near-Sun phase  approach the Sun as close as 48 solar radii (~0.22 AU). At these distances, the angular speed of a spacecraft.
Guidance, Navigation and Controls Subsystem Winter 1999 Semester Review.
Problem Statement Overview of tasks Requirements for selection test.
FAST LOW THRUST TRAJECTORIES FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
SPHERES Reconfigurable Control Allocation for Autonomous Assembly Swati Mohan, David W. Miller MIT Space Systems Laboratory AIAA Guidance, Navigation,
AAE450 Spring 2009 Brian Erson Attitude Control Systems Trans Lunar Phase Alternative Design Comparison [Brian Erson] [Attitude] 1.
Abstract Particle tracking can serve as a useful tool in engineering analysis, visualization, and is an essential component of many Eulerian-Lagrangian.
LAW OF UNIVERSAL GRAVITATION F G gravitational force (in two directions) G universal gravitation constant 6.67x Nm 2 kg -2 r distance between the.
City College of New York 1 John (Jizhong) Xiao Department of Electrical Engineering City College of New York Mobile Robot Control G3300:
Basic Satellite Communication (3) Components of Communications Satellite Dr. Joseph N. Pelton.
SPIN STABILILIZATION 1. INTRODUCTION Z z x y Y X y Y Z z X x
A fast current response control strategy for flywheel peak power capability under DC bus voltage constraint L. Xu and S. Li Department of Electrical.
March 2004 At A Glance Advanced Mission Design (AMD) researches and develops innovative trajectories and the mathematical methods used for optimal designs.
Characteristics of remote sensing satellites. Satellites generally vary in their architecture Usually remote sensing satellites are having two plateforms.
1 Lu LIU and Jie HUANG Department of Mechanics & Automation Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong 9 December, Systems Workshop on Autonomous.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 ACS Dave Auslander, Dave Pankow, Han Chen, Yao-Ting Mao, UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
© 2012 Anwendungszentrum GmbH Oberpfaffenhofen Idea by: Dr. Eng. Mohamed Zayan | 1.
Space and Solar System Word wall. NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration the federal agency that that deals with aeronautical research and.
Localization by TDOA ©Thomas Haenselmann – Department of Computer Science IV – University of Mannheim Lecture on Sensor Networks Historical Development.
Kepler’s Laws of Planetary Motion
Understanding Complex Systems May 15, 2007 Javier Alcazar, Ph.D.
Smart Nanosatellite Attitude Propagator ssl.engineering.uky.edu/snap
MSU Solar Physics NSF REU Final Presentation
swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Working meeting on Task 2
Mikhail Koptev Yaroslav Mashtakov Mikhail Ovchinnikov Sergey Shestakov
ACS UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory
Measurements of the Moon by CLARREO Pathfinder and ARCSTONE
Nuclear Norm Heuristic for Rank Minimization
Kletskous Magnetic Stabilization
NASA McMurdo Ground Station Typical Workload
Presentation transcript:

Single-slew manoeuvres for spin-stabilized spacecraft 29 th March 2011 James Biggs Glasgow In collaboration with Nadjim Horri at the Surrey Space Centre 6 th International Workshop and Advanced School “Spaceflight Dynamics and Control”

Use an arrow like this to mark current section Introduction  Micro and nano spacecraft seen as viable alternatives to larger spacecraft for certain missions e.g. Enable rapid space access. 29th March James Biggs Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion SSTL-150 UKube 1 – Clydespace and Strathclyde University

Use an arrow like this to mark current section Attitude Modes  Two vital mission phases:- De-tumbling and stabilisation– initial tip-off speeds (worst case scenario for Ukube -5rpm in every axis.) Tumbling motion must be stabilised or mission will fail. B dot control has been demonstrated. Re-pointing and stabilisation – reorient spacecraft to target specific point (e.g. point antenna to ground station, point solar cells towards sun for maximum power.) Accurate re-pointing is yet to be realised.  This presentation proposes a method for re-pointing. 29th March James Biggs Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section Stabilization  Two conventional methods:- Spin stabilization – passive, re-pointing required. o Early satellites – NASA Pioneer 10/11, Galileo Jupiter orbiter Three axis-stabilization – active control. o Thrusters, reaction wheels on conventional spacecraft.  Spin stabilization is attractive for nano-spacecraft Enables temporary GNC switch off. 29th March James Biggs Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section Re-pointing spin stabilized spacecraft  Possibility:- Spin down, perform an eigen-axis rotation, spin up. Computationally easy to plan and track. may not be feasible with small torques of micro/nano spacecraft in a specified time.  Requires better planning/design of reference trajectory. 29th March James Biggs Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March James Biggs Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March James Biggs Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March James Biggs Motion Planning using optimal control Kinematic constraint: Subject to the cost function: Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March Insert Name as Header & Footer Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March James Biggs Sketch of proof – Kinematic constraint Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March James Biggs Sketch of proof – Use a Lie group formulation Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March James Biggs Sketch of proof - Construct the left-invariant Hamiltonian (Jurdjevic, V., Geometric Control Theory, 2002) Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March James Biggs Sketch of proof - Construct the left-invariant Hamiltonian vector fields and solve: Solve the differential equations: Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March James Biggs Sketch of proof. Lax Pair Integration: Solve for a particular initial condition Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March James Biggs PRACTICAL COST FUNCTION 1 Minimise the final pointing direction: Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March James Biggs PRACTICAL COST FUNCTION 2 Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion Minimize J by optimizing available parameters: Minimize torque requirement amongst reduced kinematic motions:

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March James Biggs EXAMPLE Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion SSTL-100

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March James Biggs EXAMPLE Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion SSTL-100

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March Insert Name as Header & Footer Control Torque History (Nm) Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March James Biggs Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section 29 th March James Biggs Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Use an arrow like this to mark current section CONCLUSION 29 th March James Biggs To realise nano-spacecraft as viable platforms for remote sensing precise attitude control is essential. Poses research challenges – low-computational methods for generating low-cost (zero fuel) motions. The presented method reduces the kinematics to a subset of feasible motions that can be defined analytically. Massive reduction in computation – reduced to parameter optimization. Can be extended to minimum time problems, three axis re-pointing i.e. No spinning constraint. Introduction Motion Planning Reduction method Practical cost function Example Conclusion

Thank You for your attention Questions? 23