> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < MEDIN MARINE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT Harmonisation, management and maintenance of marine infrastructure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP5 – Chapter 7. Harmonisation Harmonisation of geometry, data definitions, data models, naming ISSUES: MS deliveries are described in WP 4.1 in an enhanced.
Advertisements

Enhanced Data Description for End Users ScribeKey, LLC Brian Hebert, Solutions Architect
National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Denmark GIS Guidance update.
1 Information Systems Development (ISD) Systems Development Life Cycle Overview of Analysis Phase Overview of Design Phase CP2236: Information Systems.
National Digital Repository ® Preserving the imperfect: reflections from NDAD and elsewhere Kevin Ashley Head of Digital Archives Group ULCC.
Dr Gordon Russell, Napier University Unit Data Dictionary 1 Data Dictionary Unit 5.3.
Chapter 6 Database Design
Data Quality David Loshin Knowledge Integrity Inc.
SeaZone Metadata Maestro Ben Spalding
6 Chapter 6 Database Design Hachim Haddouti. 6 2 Hachim Haddouti and Rob & Coronel, Ch6 In this chapter, you will learn: That successful database design.
Rebecca Boger Earth and Environmental Sciences Brooklyn College.
1 Components of A Successful Data Warehouse Chris Wheaton, Co-Founder, Client Advocate.
LEVERAGING THE ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT Louise Edmonds Senior Manager Information Management ACT Health.
000000_1 Confidential and proprietary information of Ingram Micro Inc. — Do not distribute or duplicate without Ingram Micro's express written permission.
Federated Searching Pre-Conference Workshop - The federated searching cookbook Qin Zhu HP Labs Research Library February 18, 2007.
ETL By Dr. Gabriel.
The BIM Project Execution Planning Procedure
Managing Data Interoperability with FME Tony Kent Applications Engineer IMGS.
Overview of Mini-Edit and other Tools Access DB Oracle DB You Need to Send Entries From Your Std To the Registry You Need to Get Back Updated Entries From.
SeaDataNet Ontology Use Case Roy Lowry British Oceanographic Data Centre Coastal Atlas Interoperability Workshop, Corvallis, July (+ Lessons.
Update on INSPIRE: INSPIRE maintenance and implementation and INSPIRE related EEA activities on biodiversity CDDA/European protected areas technical meeting.
STRENGTHENING the AFRICA ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION NETWORK An AMCEN initiative A framework to support development planning processes and increase access.
FS Enterprise Data Warehouse and Standard Reference Data.
The GPAA RFP to implement Enterprise Data Management 1 GPAA15/2015.
1 Joint Drafting Group on State of the Environment and Eionet Workshop — Overview task 4 and 5 — 13/14 November 2006 EEA Copenhagen.
UBC IT Integrated Reporting Governance Committee June 13 th, 2011.
How does a community maintain a storm
IST 210 Database Design Process IST 210 Todd S. Bacastow January 2005.
Week 4 Lecture Part 3 of 3 Database Design Samuel ConnSamuel Conn, Faculty Suggestions for using the Lecture Slides.
An Online Knowledge Base for Sustainable Military Facilities & Infrastructure Dr. Annie R. Pearce, Branch Head Sustainable Facilities & Infrastructure.
MESH UK Workshop 19 October 2006 Introduction Dr Paul Gilliland Marine Policy Adviser and MESH Partner Lead Natural England.
IODE Ocean Data Portal - technological framework of new IODE system Dr. Sergey Belov, et al. Partnership Centre for the IODE Ocean Data Portal MINCyT,
0 A Workable Solution for Basic Metadata January 9, 2006.
February 17, 1999Open Forum on Metadata Registries 1 Census Corporate Statistical Metadata Registry By Martin V. Appel Daniel W. Gillman Samuel N. Highsmith,
February, CONTEXT  CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS  Creation of the Statistical and Geographical Information System (SNIEG)  INEGI’s Autonomy (July.
C6 Databases. 2 Traditional file environment Data Redundancy and Inconsistency: –Data redundancy: The presence of duplicate data in multiple data files.
MEDIN Work Plan for By March 2011 MEDIN will be 3 years into the original 5 year development plan started in Would normally ask for continued.
Co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme The NATURE-SDIplus Solution for Data Harmonisation.
Intro to GIS & Pictometry Trainers: Randy Jones, GIS Technician, Douglas County Jon Fiskness, GISP GIS Coordinator, City of Superior.
Integrating State and Local Safety Data 1 Roadway Safety Data Program.
How MEDIN supports Marine Planning Dr Mike Osborne, OceanWise Ltd MEDIN Partner Meeting 1 September
7 Strategies for Extracting, Transforming, and Loading.
ISMS Implementation Workshop Adaptive Processes Consulting Pvt. Ltd.
The next generation in cadastral mapping - MUNSYS Presented by Colin Hobson California Cadastral Mapping Association, Conference of.
An introduction to the MEDIN Discovery Metadata Standard.
WISE Working Group D September 2009, Brussels Jon Maidens.
HISP activities are all about moving people from providing services, to also using information to manage services.
Eurostat 1 3.An overview of the SDMX implementation process Edward Cook Eurostat Unit B5: “Central data and metadata services” SDMX Basics course,
EMODNET Preparatory Actions Progress meeting for ur-EMODNET preparatory actions, 24 November 2009 Presentation of Progress Chemical Lot Alessandra Giorgetti.
Core elements of GIS Guidance and practical steps toward harmonisation By Albrecht Wirthmann, GISCO, Eurostat 2 nd.
The Background EBR was born as initiative by some of the public bodies responsible for company registration and legal publicity, to create the telematic.
IST 210 Database Design Process IST 210, Section 1 Todd S. Bacastow January 2004.
An Introduction to the MEDIN Discovery Metadata Standard MEDIN Workshop BGS, Edinburgh, June 2015.
UBC IT Integrated Reporting Working Committee October 26 th, 2011.
Outcomes from EMODnet/MSFD coordination meetings A. Giorgetti, M. Lipizer, M. Vinci EMODnet Chemistry, 3 rd year meeting, June 8-9, 2016 Helsinki, Finland.
ODP V2 Data Provider overview. 22 Scope Data Provider provides access to data and metadata of the local data systems. Data Provider is a wrapper, installed.
Concept of a Danube River Basin GIS
UK Link Programme Update to PNUNC August 13th, 2013
Chapter 6 Database Design
MAES Working Group Meeting Brussels
Validation & conformity testing
Stop Data Wrangling, Start Transforming Data to Intelligence
CDDA & INSPIRE work of EEA - preliminary lessons learnt
Geographical Information System
Metadata The metadata contains
Portfolio, Programme and Project
3. An overview of the SDMX implementation process
Point 6. Eurostat plans for Time Use Survey data processing and dissemination Working Group on Time Use Surveys 10 April 2013.
Technical Outreach Expert
3. An overview of the SDMX implementation process
Presentation transcript:

> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < MEDIN MARINE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT Harmonisation, management and maintenance of marine infrastructure reference information Marisha Rust Ben Spalding SeaZone Solutions Ltd

> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < CONTENTS Project overview Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Technical overview and progress Timescales for completion of Phase 1 Next stages – Phases 2 & 3

> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < OVERVIEW: PHASE 1 Identify all known sources of marine infrastructure Determine the desired common CRS Identify inconsistencies in data Create infrastructure database and mapping Metadata assessment Determine rules governing feature deconfliction Identify base reference attributes Conduct feature deconfliction for pilot site OUTPUT => Phase 1 report and pilot area sample data MEDIN review

> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < OVERVIEW: PHASE 2 Future expected programme of work: New data upload Attribute mappings Metadata creation Deconfliction of data Quality check of outputs Deliver output database of all feature types Phase 2 review of outputs OUTPUT => One definitive marine infrastructure dataset sourced from multiple suppliers, with best available geometry and attributes

> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < OVERVIEW: PHASE 3 Review of project outputs for Phase 2 by nominated MEDIN representatives Agree Responsible Authority / Delegated Responsible Authority Establish long term data management and maintenance strategy method and frequency of update data delivery and formats ratify various requirements of IPR holders in licensing data Develop delivery mechanism of harmonised data to MEDIN and other 3 rd party parties Publicise!

> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < PHASE 1 PROGRESS Identify and assess all known sources of marine infrastructure Common Data Access Ltd (UKDEAL) / UKHO / S-57 Pipelines / surface and subsurface infrastructure / wells Currency / attributes / coverage / scale / geometry / precision Dataset IPR assessment Unknown in some cases Determine the output CRS Geodetic WGS 1984 Identify inconsistencies in data Geometry Attributes

> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < PHASE 1 PROGRESS cont. Metadata assessment Gaps in metadata Formats Standards – MEDIN profile Create infrastructure database, conceptual mapping, tools DB table structure (Oracle) Plug-in tools – upload / dictionary / mapping Conceptual mapping Identify base reference attributes e.g. Installation => Category of Installation Determine rules governing feature deconfliction Best available geometries Best available attributes For each dataset

> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < PHASE 1 PROGRESS cont. Data processing CRS transformation Topologise data (links, nodes and seeds) Add, re-populate and cleanse attributes Import data to database (Oracle) Attribute mappings Using SeaZone developed tools Mapping of all features, attributes and attribute values into central data dictionary

> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < PHASE 1 PROGRESS (pilot site) Deconfliction of features – pilot site Removes all duplicate feature types SeaZone developed plug-in tools Topologised data (links, nodes and seeds) Deconflict Seeds - Keeps only the best available feature Merge Seeds - Merges attributes onto preferred geometry

> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < Deconfliction of features (using Deconflict Seeds tool) BEFORE: Duplicate pipeline features from different sources Deconflict AFTER: Single best available geometry for pipeline feature Land area

> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < Deconfliction of features and attribution harmonisation (using Merge Seeds tool) BEFORE: Duplicate pipeline features from different sources with varying attributes Merge AFTER: Single best available geometry with best available attributes Feature attribute harmonisation

> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < PHASE 1: Following completion of pilot site deconfliction: Quality checking of outputs Geometries Attributes Metadata Deliver output database of GIS feature types ESRI v9.1 PGD format Supporting metadata and statistics

> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < NEXT STAGES Timescales: Deconfliction of pilot area Completion – by mid September 2010 Project report and pilot site data sample Distributed – before end September 2010 Project partners review Phase 1 outputs Mid September – Beginning October 2010 Project Partners review meeting – beginning of Oct 2010 Agreement on costs and timescales for Phase 2 Agree expected programme of work for Phase 2

> BETTER DATA, BETTER SCIENCE, IMPROVED DECISIONS < MEDIN MARINE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT Harmonisation, management and maintenance of Marine Infrastructure data Further information: